Premium Essay

Rhetorical Analysis Of Paul Bogard's Argument

Submitted By
Words 275
Pages 2
Paul Bogard builds his argument to persuade the audience that natural darkness should be preserved. He has built his argument throughout his life, but mainly from memories in his childhood. Paul appreciates and values natural darkness, rather than to be quick to reach for a artificial light source. Paul Bogard uses evidence to persuade the audience by using logical appeals and examples throughout his passage. He uses valid and accurate facts that help support his argument. The author also uses reasoning to develop his ideas and to connect claims and evidence, which gives the passage a conceptual flow, but also gives the readers insight of the author's thoughts and beliefs. "Ecological light pollution is like the bulldozer

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Paul Bogard's Argument

...At a time when people are so hitched on technology that they'll rather stay awake and use it instead of sleeping, Paul Bogard tries to get everyone to understand the danger that light is doing not just to one-self, but to the earth itself. He does this by using cautionary diction and congruent syntax. Bogard uses detailed diction that bring pathos into his argument. He uses words like "disappeared", "stars", "rapidly", "darkness", and "irreplaceable" to make the audience first picture themselves in the Minnesota lake looking at the starts with Bogard, then make them feel distressed and concerned about losing such a beautiful view. Its as if he is trying to make the audience feel the sadness he, himself feels about how if the world keeps going this way, the earth will be too polluted to be able to see the sky. He is concerning them, in a way that makes it so personal...

Words: 433 - Pages: 2