Premium Essay

Rohr Ethics For Bureaucrats

Submitted By
Words 844
Pages 4
Central Question
Ethics for Bureaucrats was written for current and aspiring career government managers with the aim of examining how to integrate ethics into public administration curricula and training. The author does so by linking several topics such as bureaucracy, law and values with ethics. This book provides ethical questions in the bureaucracy grounded specifically in the discretionary authority bureaucrats have.
Methodology
This book is meant to act as an educational tool for bureaucrats and students aiming to become bureaucrats. It is broken up into three distinct purposes. First, the author begins with providing a history of the rise and fall of the politics-administration dichotomy to set the stage for the rest of the book. Second, he develops an approach for incorporating ethics into public administration and training. Third, he tests his approach with exercises in the form of Supreme Court case studies and questions for discussion.
False Starts
Rohr begins his …show more content…
59). The author attributes “new public administration” with providing a theoretical framework for investigating methods for integrating ethics into public administration education. He also labels Paul Applebee’s Morality and Administration “perhaps the most significant book ever written on this topic by an American author” (p. 60), and applauds his claim that “crude wrong doing” such as that of Watergate should not form the basis for the approach to ethics. It is the “more complicated and elevated” issue of administrative discretion, he argues, that should form the approach. With Applebee’s claim in mind, Rohr reviews several earlier approaches to including ethics in public administration curriculum, and then provides his own idea on how it should be

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Dfs Theory

...KKKKKK Criticism for Max Weber’s Bureaucracy Written by Dr. Wasim Al-Habil College of Commerce The Islamic University of Gaza Beginning with Max Weber, bureaucracies have been regarded as mechanisms that rationalize authority and decision-making in society. Yet subsequent theorists have questioned the rationality of bureaucracies. Which features of modern-day public bureaucracies are rational? Which are not? Buttress your argument with citations from organization and/or public administration theories. Introduction: Max Weber’s work about bureaucracy, translated into English in 1946, was one of the major contributions that has influenced the literature of public administration. However, Van Riper (1997) argues that the work of Weber on bureaucracy has no influence on American PA until the 1950’s. The word bureaucracy is derived from two words; “bureau” and “Kratos.” While the word “bureau” refers to the office the Greek suffix “kratia or kratos” means power or rule. Thus we use the word “bureaucracy” to refer to the power of the office (Hummel, 1998, 307). “Bureaucracy” is rule conducted from a desk or office, i.e. by the preparation and dispatch of written documents and electronic ones. Bureaucracy is borrowed by the field of public administration (PA) from the field of sociology. It was borrowed by PA in much a similar way that practices of business were borrowed from the field of business administration and economics. Weber (1946) presents...

Words: 4936 - Pages: 20

Premium Essay

Criticism for Max Weber’s Bureaucracy

...Criticism for Max Weber’s Bureaucracy Written by Dr. Wasim Al-Habil College of Commerce The Islamic University of Gaza Beginning with Max Weber, bureaucracies have been regarded as mechanisms that rationalize authority and decision-making in society. Yet subsequent theorists have questioned the rationality of bureaucracies. Which features of modern-day public bureaucracies are rational? Which are not? Buttress your argument with citations from organization and/or public administration theories. Introduction: Max Weber’s work about bureaucracy, translated into English in 1946, was one of the major contributions that has influenced the literature of public administration. However, Van Riper (1997) argues that the work of Weber on bureaucracy has no influence on American PA until the 1950’s. The word bureaucracy is derived from two words; “bureau” and “Kratos.” While the word “bureau” refers to the office the Greek suffix “kratia or kratos” means power or rule. Thus we use the word “bureaucracy” to refer to the power of the office (Hummel, 1998, 307). “Bureaucracy” is rule conducted from a desk or office, i.e. by the preparation and dispatch of written documents and electronic ones. Bureaucracy is borrowed by the field of public administration (PA) from the field of sociology. It was borrowed by PA in much a similar way that practices of business were borrowed from the field of business administration and economics. Weber (1946) presents bureaucracy...

Words: 4935 - Pages: 20

Premium Essay

Comparison of Social Control and Social Conflict Theory

...ISSN 1648-2603 ● VIEŠOJI POLITIKA IR ADMINISTRAVIMAS ● 2004. Nr. 13 Accountability and Responsibility in Organizations: the Ethics of Discretion Raymond W. Cox III University of Akron Akron, Ohio, USA The article presents a comprehensive approach to the administrative discretion. The objective of the paper has been to outline a perspective and patterns of behaviour, which are helpful defining "discretion in action". Theoretical discussion on the issue has been extended towards practical implications. Author stresses, that establishing a decision-making architecture, leaders of the organization can create learning and supportive environment, which encourages appropriate and limited use of discretion. Raktažodžiai: atskaitomybė, atsakomybė, diskretiškumas, etika, korupcija, sprendimų priėmimas. Keywords: accountability, responsibility, discretion, ethics, corruption, decision making. Introduction Few aspects of Public Administration engender more controversy than the idea of discretion. For most, the attitude toward the exercise of discretion must be described as ambiguous and even ambivalent. While the necessity of the exercise of discretion is not disputed, there is little agreement on the normative foundation (Bryner, 1987) for that activity. Yet without a normative foundation, there is little basis upon which to judge the exercise of discretion. Recent literature on ethical practices in the governments of Africa has boldly asserted that discretion leads to the breakdown...

Words: 9274 - Pages: 38