Premium Essay

Sfty 350

In:

Submitted By KarlCampbell
Words 2884
Pages 12
Response Plan to Aircraft Emergencies
Karl M. Campbell
Safety 350
Embry Riddle Aeronautical University

Response Plan to Aircraft Emergencies Geilenkirchen (GK) Air Base, Germany, is situated in a unique location at the borders of Germany and the Netherlands. On the West side of the base, right off the end of the runway is a road that represents that border line between the two countries. So besides having a Response Plan for Emergencies between the on-base agencies and off-base agencies you have to have some sort of plan between countries. Currently the plan at Geilenkirchen Air Base describes the responsibilities and functions of the E-3A Component personnel involved in the emergency response in the event of an aircraft emergency at the NATO Air Base (NAB) Geilenkirchen (Van Happen, 2012). The plan is used in exercises and real live responses to accidents/incidents involving aircraft. The plan is coordinated with the municipalities of the surrounding Districts of Heinsberg, Germany and the Districts of Onderbanken, the Netherlands for mutual aid support by the civil emergency services surrounding the base. I will now analyze the Response Plan for Emergencies, E-3A Plan 3.6-8, at Geilenkirchen Air Base, Germany. The first part, Section 1, of E-3A Plan 3.6-8 goes over the Definitions and Terminology for all personnel to understand. It covers the Classifications of Aircraft Emergencies in which emergency services would be required. The classifications include: Aircraft Accident, which has occurred on or in the area of the airfield (On Base) or outside the perimeter of the base (Off Base); Full Emergency, an aircraft that has approached the airfield and is or is suspected to be in trouble of imminent danger of an accident or serious incident; Local Standby, an aircraft that approaches the airfield is known or is suspected to developed some defect,

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Valuejet

...Human Factors involved in the crash of ValuJet Flight 592 A Human Factors Case Study Submitted to the Worldwide Campus In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of Course SFTY 320 Human Factors in Aviation Safety Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University October 2013 Abstract On May 11, 1996, Flight 592 departed from Miami. It had pushed back from gate after a delay of 1 hour and 4 minutes due to mechanical problems. There were 105 passengers on board, mainly from Florida and Georgia, as well as a crew of two pilots and three flight attendants, bringing the total number of people on board to 110. At 2:04 pm, the DC-9 took off from runway 9L and began a normal climb. 10 minutes later the aircraft crashed into the Florida everglades with all hands on board lost. This Case Study will analyze and evaluate all contributing factors, with focus on the human factors, and propose solutions that would have kept the Liveware element from causing the accident. Intro The crash of ValuJet 592 was an accident that gripped the nation. In a decade of low priced airfare, ValuJet was a house hold name for providing economical flights. The loss of flight 592 raised nationwide concerns over the airline industry; from maintenance practices, to management pitfalls among all of the low cost air carriers. 592’s crash also rocked the entire airline industry, and ultimately caused a loss of confidence by the majority of the public in economical airlines. It was a completely avoidable...

Words: 3105 - Pages: 13