Free Essay

Should Cannabis Be Legalised?

In:

Submitted By Stormieross
Words 1354
Pages 6
Should Cannabis be legalised? There has been a lot of debate on whether cannabis should be legalised, there are many people who think it should be but there are also a lot of people who reckon it’s a unacceptable idea. Both sides of the argument are strong as they can support their decision, with facts; therefore the government has a very hard choice to make. I think that cannabis should be legalised because it seems to have a lot of good causes, and even though it would appear to have an unpleasant side to it, my opinion would be it has more good causes than bad. Nowadays most young people experiment with some type of drug, despite the fact they are illegal. The most popular would come across as being Cannabis. Some people see this as being extremely unhealthy and that is why they don’t want it to be legal, but Cannabis doesn’t have any direct harm to the user and it would seem to be the least harmful illegal drug you could use. Cannabis is also now classified as B opposed to C. This wouldn’t have had any effect on the public as the same amounts of people buy it illegally. The reasons I think it should be legalised are; Smoking is legal and the mortality rate and the amount of illnesses smoking causes are a lot higher. Smoking can be a lot more harmful to the body as it can cause Cancer and many sorts of diseases such as, Bronchitis and Emphysema. Cannabis is yet to cause fatal illnesses such as smoking does. The government refuse to make smoking illegal as it brings them a lot of tax, so why not put tax on cannabis? Even though I wouldn’t classify cannabis as healthy but smoking anything can’t be good for your body. Cigarettes have a lot of chemicals in them such as Ammonia, which is found in dry cleaning fluids, they also contain nicotine, which is the addictive part; cannabis doesn’t contain this hence not causing the user to be addicted. One of the main reasons people think cannabis should be legal is, Cannabis can help medically as it can prevent chronicle pain and reduce cancer cells from spreading throughout the body. It acts as an anaesthetic towards pain. There is a lot of question that cannabis is the answer to Alzheimer disease. Scientists are researching about what diseases it can prevent such as Cancer. It can numb the pain, therefore causing them to feel a lot better. Chronicle pain is a big issue and if cannabis can prevent it then that would be the end to a lot of suffering, but if it isn’t legalised this won’t be possible. The government and some of the public suggest to use a legal drug to stop pain but a lot of them don’t work and some can just be a waste of money. It has been proven that cannabis reduces pain in many people with chronicle pain. Alcohol causes a lot of issues around the world as it causes people to be disruptive and it can be very easily bought. When people drink too much they can sometimes have no control on over the way the act or behave therefore can be very abrasive. Alcohol causes more damage to the general public than cannabis currently would do, so the question is how much do you think the government spends on policy? – Cannabis doesn’t cause the user to become loud and disruptive, it does the complete opposite therefore the government wouldn’t have to spend so much money on damage which would have been caused by the many people, who have been out on a Friday night and have been violent and damaged property. There is a lot of binge drinking therefore maybe if it were legal there wouldn’t be so many people on streets late at night and could almost cut down on crime.
There are places around the world in which have already legalised cannabis, such as Amsterdam. The crime rate in Amsterdam is a lot lower than us and this could well be due to cannabis being legal. The Dutch believe that they will not be able to stop cannabis being used therefore they haven’t made it illegal. Cannabis is an herbal drug, and for that reason there should be legal as it causes the users body no harm. Legal Cannabis would promote responsible use and safe supply and would stop many people’s futures being needlessly destroyed. When the user goes to buy cannabis they can never be sure that it is completely safe as they could of mixed with any other substance. They have to buy it illegally thus they have to take a risk. If it was legal the government could make sure that it is pure and then there would be less risk and cannabis would be increasingly better. There are seven million people in the UK in which smoke cannabis and if it were to be legalised, those people wouldn’t have to worry about the risk of the unclean drug. Lots of that seven million people use it because they have a medical issue and cannabis can ease the pain, so it can be extremely helpful to those who suffer from chronicle pain. As people have to buy and sell cannabis illegally, people convicted of drug offences have their future prospects ruined. When they are caught they would have to pay a penalty or could even go to jail hence if their future life would be completely damaged and would be a lot harder or them to regain their normal lifestyle. They may only have been selling for a good cause, such as to the ill. If the government decided to legalise it, that wouldn’t necessarily mean, ‘glamorise’ it. They could definitely still discourage cannabis if it were legal. They could only issue it to certain people if they wished, such as hospitals for the ill – as it stops pain. Countries, which have experimented with decriminalization, have not yet encountered massive use of the drug. Young people may only use it because it is illegal and it makes them feel as though they are ‘breaking the rules’ and they may feel as though they are being rebellious. If it was legal they may have no reason to then try the drug and there would be less use of it. Prohibition is also extremely expensive to enforce and the money could go to a better cause such as, spent on education and medical treatment. The government wastes a lot of money on prohibiting cannabis. They have a choice and they could choose not to do this. There are many people who believe it’s not up to the government as they can be the ones to choose what to put in their own bodies.

’My body is my own and if I choose to experiment with it, it is me who pays the price and not the state.’’ – said one girl who spoke to a news reporter. It is fundamental to our society that we consider adults to be intelligent enough to make their own decisions. – If we don’t give them this option it would be as though the government is controlling the public. Adults should be able to make their own decisions and if they make the wrong choice that is up to them and government shouldn’t have to interfere with the choice they have made for themselves. Cannabis has no victim, it is considered as a consensual crime, no one else is affected it the user chooses to take cannabis in private, as it does them no harm. Cannabis causes the user to be calm and peaceful and not to be abrasive. Therefore as the user takes cannabis there is no effect on anyone else around them. Cannabis causes no health risks so far known and an overdose is hardly impossible. There are a lot of positive points to legalizing Cannabis as it can help a lot of people and it has hardly any heath risks. It medically helps people by preventing the pain of multiple sclerosis.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Should Cannabis Be Legalised in the Uk?

...“Cannabis should be legalised.” To a large extent I agree with this statement; cannabis should be legalised. I do feel, that legalizing cannabis would help resolve many of our country’s problems and difficulties, for example street-crime or burglary indirectly related to drugs. However I also feel that it could cause other types of problems if people don’t understand the effects of it. To many people, they see cannabis as a dangerous and damaging drug, however the effects of cannabis are sometimes not as bad as alcohol or other legal drugs. Keeping drugs illegal will only carry on the on-going drug related cycle: people get caught with possession of drugs, their third time getting caught they get a sentence, go to prison, come out, and it happens all over again. To keep one person in jail for one year, for drug abuse, is forty thousand pounds. When cannabis users come out of prison, they often have nothing to go back to, many find themselves back in their old life almost immediately with the same contacts they had before; the drug dealers. Even if they wanted to quit, quitting is not an easy process itself. Refraining from cannabis won’t result in physical withdrawal symptoms, unlike the nicotine in tobacco. However some long-term users do report psychological problems when it comes to being weed-free. This can range from difficulties in coping with social situations to sleep problems and heightened anxiety. Rastafarians don’t have a specific way of living or religious...

Words: 1141 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Why Cannabis Should Be Legalised

...10. Prohibition has failed to control the use and domestic production of marijuana. The government has tried to use criminal penalties to prevent marijuana use for over 75 years and yet: marijuana is now used by over 25 million people annually, cannabis is currently the largest cash crop in the United States, and marijuana is grown all over the planet. Claims that marijuana prohibition is a successful policy are ludicrous and unsupported by the facts, and the idea that marijuana will soon be eliminated from America and the rest of the world is a ridiculous fantasy. 9. Arrests for marijuana possession disproportionately affect blacks and Hispanics and reinforce the perception that law enforcement is biased and prejudiced against minorities. African-Americans account for approximately 13% of the population of the United States and about 13.5% of annual marijuana users, however, blacks also account for 26% of all marijuana arrests. Recent studies have demonstrated that blacks and Hispanics account for the majority of marijuana possession arrests in New York City, primarily for smoking marijuana in public view. Law enforcement has failed to demonstrate that marijuana laws can be enforced fairly without regard to race; far too often minorities are arrested for marijuana use while white/non-Hispanic Americans face a much lower risk of arrest. 8. A regulated, legal market in marijuana would reduce marijuana sales and use among teenagers, as well as reduce their exposure to other...

Words: 1167 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Should Marijuana Be Legalised ?

...legalisation of cannabis sativa, more commonly known as marihuana, has been one of the most controversial issues ever to occur. Supporters claim that marihuana is less harmful than drugs currently legal such as tobacco or alcohol and it can be beneficial for society and economy. However, what seems to be more convincing is opponents’ conviction that legalising it would have a substantial number of negative effects. The most commonly mentioned consist of: excessive consumption, increased rate in car accidents and the phenomena of progressing from soft to hard drugs. First of all, cannabis legalisation could cause a rise in a number of people consuming it. Though the number of marijuana users might not quickly climb to the current figures for alcohol and tobacco users, if marijuana were legalised, the increase in users would be both large and rapid with subsequent increases in addiction. Legalization would decrease price and increase availability. Availability is a leading factor associated with increased drug use. As opposed to the complicated and lengthy process of finding a black market dealer of the drugs, one could under legalisation, get marijuana in a shop or at the gas station. Not only cwould it allow easier access for current users, it would also attract new smokers who had not smoked marijuana because of the effort required in getting access to it. Apart from increased consumption, drug-impaired driving would also increase if marijuana is legalised. Marijuana is already...

Words: 594 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Drug Decriminalization

...I believe that every human has that right to decision want to do with their bodys. I believe that every drug should be decriminalized because the decision of taking drug should be up to the person and not the government. A person should not be punished for doing something that they chose to do to themselves. Even if it hurts their body. I know many people that srmoke cannabis on a daily and they are very productive people. Sometimes they blend into regular people so good that you surprised when they tell you that they do drugs. Even when cannabis got legalised in some states, there is still a federal ban on it which causes people that have been arrested and detained for cannabis will still be prosecuted for it even though it is legal in their...

Words: 369 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Marijuana Research

...The legal status of cannabis during 1619-1915, coupled with a ban on alcohol during 1920-1933, has provoked questioning of the rationality of the current US federal legislation on both drugs, as marijuana is currently illicit whilst alcohol is not. Research has suggested that marijuana could be equally if not more beneficial than alcohol to the economy, with fewer negative externalities. This discussion has been sparked anew after the states of Colorado and Washington infringed federal legislation by instating the open legality of marijuana. The topic, in current debate, must be viewed objectively to reach a valuable conclusion, since much of the argument is highly opinionated and biased owing to the stigma attached to such substances. Marijuana is currently a Schedule I substance under federal law whereas alcohol is federally regulated through the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) alongside stringent state and county laws. Existing federal law makes alcohol legal to those over the age of 21, with high taxation placed on consumption. Hence, the substance is highly regulated, although not currently prohibited. We intend to examine the economic effects that alcohol has on the economy and compare these findings with the hypothetical benefits of legalised marijuana. Analytically considering the reasoning behind its current illegal status, we will compare the negative externalities of cannabis against those of alcohol to determine whether there is logic behind...

Words: 5121 - Pages: 21

Premium Essay

With Considered Reference to Scholarly Literature on the Subject, Assess the Advantages and Disadvantages of Cannabis Legalisation in Australia.

...disadvantages of Cannabis Legalisation in Australia. Dennis, M.L. & W White (1999) ‘The Marijuana Legalization Debate: is There a Middle Ground’. In JA Inciardi (ed), The Drug Legalization Debate.  Sage Publications. Ferguson, D.M.. & L.J. Horwood (2000) ‘Does Cannabis Use Encourage Other Forms of Illicit Drug Use?’, Addiction, 95(4): 505-520. Gerber, R.J. (2004) ‘History of Demonizing Drugs’.  In Legalizing Marijuana: Drug Policy Reform and Prohibition Politics, Westport, CT: Praeger, pp. 1-16. Hall, W. (1997) ‘The Recent Australian Debate About the Prohibition on Cannabis Use’, Addiction, 92(9): 1109-1115. Hall, W. (1998) ‘Cannabis Use and Psychosis’, Drug and Alcohol Review, 17: 433-444. Hall, W. & R.L. Pacula (2003) ‘Policy Alternatives’.  In Cannabis Use and Dependence: Public Health and Public Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 183-226. Himmelstein, J.L. (1983) ‘From Killer Weed to Drop Out Drug’, Contemporary Crises, 7(1): 13-38. Sarre, R. (1990) ‘A Review of the Cannabis Expiation Notice Scheme in South Australia: Research Note’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 299-303. MacCoun R.J. and P. Reuter Drug War 'Heresies: Learning from Other Vices, Times, & Places', Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. McGeorge, J. & C.K. Aitken (1997) ‘Effects of Cannabis Decriminalization in the Australian Capital Territory on University Students’ Patterns of Use, Journal of Drug Issues, 27(4): 785-794.  Cannabis has had a long...

Words: 2135 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Assessing Success of Drug Policy

...predominant in Western society since the 19th century, with cannabis introduced to the United States in 1839, while opium was introduced to Europe and the United States through trade with China. These drugs were initially used for pharmaceutical benefits, but over time various legislatures introduced laws to administer, regulate and prohibit the use of various drugs. The declaration of ‘war on drugs’ took place in the United States of America (USA) in 1971. The historical response to the ‘war on drugs’ has been prohibition: the complete banning of drug use. This approach, which involves strict enforcement of illegal drug laws, has proven costly and ineffective (RCAP & RANZCP, 2004). This essay will focus on Australia’s current drug debate regarding the legalisation of certain prohibited illicit drugs. Whilst examining the Australian position, this essay will use international examples to illustrate how the current strategy fails and survey workable solutions. Firstly, this work examines the historical position of the ‘war on drugs’. It will outline the history of drug use in Australia and the nation’s current drug policy. This essay will then discuss the criminal, social, health and policy issues surrounding the debate regarding the legalization versus prohibition. Having addressed these points this essay concludes the prohibition of certain illicit drugs has failed comprehensively and legalising, controlling and regulating drugs should be the new Australian drug policy. ...

Words: 2641 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Case Stud

...Introduction- Issue, Past campaigns, what campaign I’m doing, provide info on whats going to be in the report the structure, and how ill be providing a creative solution. s Illicit drug use is a major problem in Australian culture as a recent study in 2012 by the United Nations has concluded that Australia has the highest rate of recreational drug users in the world (Toohey,2012). An Illicit drug can be defined as “the non-medical use of a variety of drugs which include: amphetamine- type stimulants, cannabis, cocaine, heroin and other opioids, and MDMA (ecstasy) (Hall W, Ross J, Lynskey M, Law M, Degenhardt L.,2000). Australian Governments on all levels including non-governments have been trying to fight this illicit drug problem for many years with different approaches to the epidemic. This case study will be analysing the illicit drug problem in Australia, trends and closely scrutinizing the effectiveness of the Australian Governments National Drug Campaign 2010-15 (NDC) in reaching its target audience. This case study will then be further comparing other Anti-illicit drug Campaigns worldwide and in the past to the NDC and finally providing a creative solution which may help the NDC, which may help this Social Marketing campaign effectively communicate to its target audience. The National Drug Strategy 2010-2015 is a social marketing campaign which is aimed at improving the health, economic and social outcomes for Australians by preventing the uptake of harmful drug...

Words: 1002 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Anth106 Notes

...Anthropology Lecture 1 introduction Common Misconceptions with Drugs . The effect of a drug is caused solely by its pharmacological properties and effects. . Some drugs are instantly addictive . The gateway/ stepping stone theory - the use of 1 drug leads to the use of other more dangerous drugs What are drugs ? Krivanek's definition : Drugs are substances that are introduced into the body knowingly but not as food. Therefore illicit drugs, legal recreational drugs and legal but regulated pharmaceutical drugs that aren't recreational at all. - Whether if a drug is considered bad and is prohibited depends on the culture of the society in a particular period. What is culture ? The definition of culture = Through Roger keesing and Andrew Strathern's definition it is a system of shared ideas, rules and meanings that underlie and are expressed in the ways that human live. - This includes : law, beliefs, political economy, media and popular culture - this perceives ideas about what is normal and abnormal to society. " Culture is always changing and contested, not unified" Enthography as a method for studying drug use It is a process of observing, recoding and describing other peoples way of life through intimate participation the community being studied". - Participation observation, involving yourself in the life of the community , taking up the life of the other person, observing their actions, asking questions and learning what questions...

Words: 21869 - Pages: 88

Free Essay

Translating Reference

...Sydney Institute of Interpreting & Translating Address: Suite 206, 4 Goulburn Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia Tel : 61 2 9283 5759 Fax: 61 2 9264 2380 E-mail: info@siit.nsw.edu.au Passage 1: Scenario: An international conference on issues relating to elderly people needs this passage translated into Chinese for session papers. Medicine and law and the euthanasia debate 医学、法律与安乐死争议 Medicine and law are the main social institutions at the heart of the euthanasia debate. Where euthanasia is legalised, doctors have the problematic gate-keeping role as the arbiters of terminal illness, deciding how terminal it is, administering pain relief and treatment and ultimately, depending on the legislation adopted, prescribing or delivering terminal medication. Medicine shares this gate-keeping role with the law, which serves a regulating and restraining function, providing safeguards for both doctors and individuals. The many safeguards required in most versions of euthanasia legislation, covering issues such as the meaning of terminal illness and suffering, the patient's decision-making capacity, the interpretation of intention and coercion, the availability of alternative relief, the responsibilities of medical professionals and provision for scrutiny of doctors' decisions, underline the complexity of the issue. A strong view put forward by antieuthanasia advocates is that the very soul of medicine is placed on trial by euthanasia and that doing harm to medicine...

Words: 15962 - Pages: 64