When a group of people feel undermined or mistreated, tensions may result. Throughout history, the oppressive rule of the minority has spurred the majority to action. In Europe, especially, a country with deeply entrenched monarchical systems, those that chose to break free often paid a heavy price. In the 16th and 17th century, this fight for change was lead by Martin Luther when he pinned his 95 Theses to the wall of a church. What would follow is the formation of sects within Christianity that continue to shape the modern world. While this conflict is known as the “Protestant Reformation,” it quickly became a revolution due to its violent and surprisingly, political and economic nature. Similarly, a century later, The French Revolution sought to overthrow the nation’s head: the king. By analyzing these conflicts through a sociological lens, these social movements can be compared and contrasted. …show more content…
At the time, the Roman Catholic religion was widespread in Europe and the Pope’s power extended beyond spiritual bounds and into political and economic spheres. Thus, the Church held an immense amount of power, much to chagrin of the rulers and kings of Europe. Luther’s Theses were based around changing the Church’s corrupt practises that often focused more on material wealth than spiritual guidance. While he was ignored at first, the Reformation gained momentum and started to spread throughout Europe. It quickly became a violent force tearing through the continent; a fight between evil and good, with each side firm in their belief of spiritual superiority. The Protestants launched their Reformation and the Church responded with a Counter-Reformation by excommunicating Luther and declaring his Theses baseless and