...Case Analysis: PEPSI-COLA UK Peter Kendall, regional vice president for northern Europe of Pepsi-Cola International, had a difficult situation where he was potentially being challenged by Coca-Cola entering the UK with the introduction of their successfully launched product “ diet coke” which was a growing segment in the US and would be in UK as well. Let us consider a SWOT analysis of PEPSI-COLA in UK as of 1982. Strengths: Pepsi-Cola definitely had a head start in the cola market in the U.K. After the worldwide recession, Europe was beginning to recover and UK had led the growth in 1982, with a 6.5% increase from 695 to 740 million cases. The Pepsi challenge, which was widely successful in the US, was also launched in the UK and was resulting in market share increase. Along with the success of the “Pepsi Challenge”, Diet Pepsi gained more market share due to the leverage of the Pepsi name along with their “upbeat” advertising techniques that essentially resonated better with consumers compared to TAB. Weaknesses: Although Pepsi had a head start in the UK, the Coca-Cola brand “Diet Coke” was a huge hit in the United States. It was increasing its hold in the diet beverage segment. Coca-Cola was also known to give huge price discounts to earn exclusive dealerships, which was also a huge threat to Pepsi-Cola. In regards to convenience, Pepsi-Cola had an unfavorable market percentage in vending machines (12% overall) compared to Coca-Cola with shares of 26% and 41%, respectively...
Words: 1097 - Pages: 5
...Financial Statements Analysis Dr. Rimona Palas Caroline LAYANI Id: 94746 Michael WEIMBERG Id: 94852 Nathan BENAMOU Id: 94531 Sebastian KANOVICH Id:799048 I. Executive summary After analyzing the income statement, ratios and strategies of the Coca-Cola Company, we can conclude that Coca-Cola had a continuous revenue growth between the years 2009 and 2011. It is the largest soft drink industry company in the world and therefore stands in a privileged position to face potential crisis. The reason for having our results in the income statement, and thus also in our ratios can be explained by the company’s acquisition and consolidation of CCE’s North American business during the last quarter of 2010. Moreover, another important factor for the decline in equity interest was the sale of the company’s investment in Embonor during the first quarter of 2011. Coca-Cola has been using several strategies. As mentioned above, acquisitions have been an important factor of Coca-Cola over the last 50 years. By acquiring new companies, they were able to eliminate competition, increase their growth and become the market leader of the non-alcoholic beverage industry. Following our calculations, over the past three years, Coca-Cola had an increase in its current liabilities as well as in their “cash to sales”. The debt-to-equity ratio shows that it’s smaller than one, meaning that the company is financed through equity. This low debt-to-equity ratio will usually be preferable...
Words: 13579 - Pages: 55
...CASE STUDY : COLA WARS CONTINUE : COKE AND PEPSI IN 2006 The case study “Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2006” focuses on describing Coke and Pepsi within the CSD industry by providing detailed statements about the companies’ accounts and strategies to increase their market share. ‘ Cola war’ is the term used to describe the campaign of mutually targeted television advertisement & marketing campaigns between Coke & Pepsi. Furthermore, the case also focuses on the Coke vs. Pepsi goods which target similar groups of costumers, and how these companies have had and still have great reputation and continue to take risks due to their high capital. Both Coke & Pepsi have segmented the soft drink industry into two divisions, via – 1.Production of soft drink syrup. 2.Manufacturing & distribution of soft drinks at retail level. Coke & Pepsi have chosen to operate primarily on the production of soft drinks syrup,while leaving independent bottlers with more competitive segment of the industry.The purpose of this report is to gain insight into the possible strategies that can be applied, in order to expand the overall throat share in the future. History revealed that a highly competitive strategy that was utilized in the past by both companies resulted in cannibalization. Because of this, the report is described from the perspective of both Coca-Cola and Pepsi. This report focuses on increasing the overall share and finding new opportunities in the unrevealed...
Words: 1192 - Pages: 5
...STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT FINAL PAPER PEPSICO CASE STUDY ANALYSIS LECTURER: Sisdjiatmo K. Widhaningrat Composed by Chalinee Kunkaweeprad (1206323306) Karisma Maharani Anisakusuma (0906490790) Prasya Aninditya (0906532540) Shafa Tasya Kamila (1006663096) UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA DEPOK 2012 1 STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP “Kami yang bertandatangan di bawah ini menyatakan bahwa makalah/tugas terlampir adalah murni hasil pekerjaan kami sendiri. Tidak ada pekerjaan orang lain yang kami gunakan tanpa menyebutkan sumbernya. Materi ini tidak/belum pernah disajikan/digunakan sebagai bahan untuk makalah/tugas pada mata ajaran lain kecuali kami menyatakan dengan jelas bahwa kami menyatakan dengan jelas menggunakannya. Kami memahami bahwa tugas yang kami kumpulkan ini dapat diperbanyak dan/atau dikomunikasikan untuk tujuan mendeteksi adanya plagiarisme.” Nama : Chalinee Kunkaweeprad Nama : Kharisma Maharani A. NPM 1206323306 NPM 0906490790 : Tanda Tangan : : Tanda Tangan : Nama : Prasya Aninditya Nama : Shafa Tasya Kamila NPM 0906532540 NPM 1006663096 : Tanda Tangan : : Tanda Tangan : 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report provides an analysis and evaluation of the Marketing Strategy of PepsiCo. Methods of analysis include the internal and external analysis of the company. The research draws attention to the competition PepsiCo in the Cola and Snacks industry...
Words: 4714 - Pages: 19
...Case Study #2 Cola Wars Management 5650 Fall 1 October, 17, 2013 Introduction There has been stiff competition between companies that produce similar goods. This competition is alive and well, especially in situations where there is need for a multiple of companies that offer similar goods and services to counter monopoly. However, these wars can take a different turn and bring changes to general operations of some firms (Long & Harding, 1998). Coca Cola and Pepsi are such companies that produce soft beverages, and the wars between these cola firms are far from over. In the recent past, Pepsi has made essential changes in its line of production, and this decision has enabled the beverage firm earn more revenue than Coca Cola. This case study will look at the strategies that both Coca Cola and Pepsi have adopted in their recent operations and the effects of these policies on the two beverage firms’ operations. Pepsi has made use of the application of the Pearce and Robinson Strategic Management Model to outplay Coca Cola in most of its internal strategic operations. This strategic management model has eleven components, and each component plays an important role toward the full implementation of the model as a system (Pearce-Robinson, 2010). Indra Nooyi, the boss at the Pepsi Co. has made several steps to counter Coca Cola’s high quality products. One of her major concern has been to produce less sugary goods at fairly pocket friendly prices. She has applied the eleven...
Words: 2939 - Pages: 12
...STRATEGIC MARKETING Group Presentation Overview of Indian Market- Past • • • • • In the year 1991, the Indian Government adopted Economic Liberalization Policy “Cold Drinks” as popularly known in India were an Urban phenomenon and the favorites (soda based) were Campa Cola, Gold Spot, Limca and Thums Up Pepsi entered in the Indian Market as Pepsi Foods Ltd. and was known as Lehar Pepsi Coke tried to reenter* in 1990 by merging with Godrej but was denied; merged with Britannia Industries India Ltd. July 1993 Parle sold its brands and plants to Coke *Coke was present in India from 1970’s, but was banned in 1977 under FERA Overview of Indian Market- Present • • • • Today the Indian Market for Carbonated Drinks is worth more than Rs.17000 crore The present scenario of the carbonated drinks market is duopoly* situation. Although in every place there are local competitors and there is a huge unorganized flavored water market. As far as the carbonated drinks are concerned there are only two brands (as per the Market Share). – Coke (57.8%) – Pepsi (35.6%) *A duopoly is a competitive situation where there are two competitors, normally of roughly equal size. Coca-Cola BACKGROUND Coca- Cola Milestones • • • • • • • • • 1886: Founded by John Pemberton 1887: Registered as trademark. 1895: Sold in every state & territory in US. 2003: Headquartered in Atlanta with divisions & local operations in over 200 countries...
Words: 1847 - Pages: 8
...Coca Cola Wars Case Analysis July 31, 2010 Executive Summary Coca-Cola was invented and marketed in 1886 by a pharmacist named Dr. John Pemberton he named Coca-Cola after the coca leaves and kola nuts he used in order to create the product. Twelve years later in 1898 Caleb Bradham created Pepsi Cola for the beneficial effects it claimed to have on upset stomachs and indigestion. The enmity between the two soda companies are known as the “Cola Wars”. The war began in the 1960’s when Coca-Cola’s supremacy ruled the market as the beverage of choice above Pepsi Cola. Due to the competition between the two rival cola companies actions became extreme and forced both companies to implement strategic methods in order to keep the competitive edge over the other. Coca Cola Wars Case Analysis I. Current Situation: Coca-Cola's and Pepsi Cola’s marketing strategies has been as impossible to tell apart as the products themselves, both companies rely on vibrant colors, catch phrases, attractive people, and famous entertainers to grab consumer’s attention and to entice them into purchasing their products. In 1941 Coca-Cola officially renamed their product to “Coke” as an official trademark with a series of advertisements informing consumers that “Coke” means Coca-Cola (Coca-Cola, 2011). Pepsi was first introduced as " Drink" in 1898 by Caleb Bradham its inventor who created Pepsi at his home, it was later that Bradham changed the name and officially named the beverage Pepsi...
Words: 3366 - Pages: 14
...Managerial Economics Coke vs. Pepsi: An Economic Analysis Rebecca Simmons Managerial Economics Dr Sol Drescher December 4, 2012 Executive Summary In this case study we will do an economic analysis of two major competitors; Coke® and Pepsi®. We will look at the history of these to competitive giants and discuss how they have evolved over the years to become rivals in the 21st Century. In this case study we will also look at the supply and demand of each company’s products. Coke and Pepsi are not only in the beverage business they have branched out into other arenas to continue being the leaders in their market. Both companies do business all over the world; we will also look at how they size up internationally as well as nationally. We will look at production and cost in the short run and long run by analyzing each company economically. Each company has foreta where they will be financially in the 21st Century and in this analysis we will calculate if they have forecasted close to where they are today. Management is a big part of the success of large firms such as Coke and Pepsi so we will look at the management styles of each one. By looking at management will analyze the strategic decision making of each firm and note any issues they have had in the past or present with upper management. Finally strategic decisions in oligopoly markets with regards to profit maximization is vital to the...
Words: 1317 - Pages: 6
...January 25th, h.11.00 January 25 , h.11.20 January 25th, h.11.40 January 25 , h.12.20 January 25th, h.12.40 January 25 , h.13.00 January 25 , h.13.20 th th th th th th th th th th th th th th Name SALICE Valentina MARRONE Emanuela SPAMPINATO Giulia REITANO Boris D’ARRIGO Roberto ARDITA Giuseppe CARIOLA Elena FILIPPELLO Gloria FILOCAMO Andrea ALI’ Andrea RIZZO Emanuele ARENA Annamaria AIELLO Sebastiano SPORTARO Prospero CONTI Maria Cristina LUISI Paola FAILLA Stefania ALAIMO Massimo Maria AYARI Neila CALVAGNA Giorgia CRUCITTI Alessia Case study Cola Wars continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2006 Google Inc. Nucor at Crossroad Caterpillar Tractor Co Komatsu Ltd. Crown Cork and Seal Apple Inc. in 2010 Cola Wars continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2006 Google Inc. Nucor at Crossroad Caterpillar Tractor Co Komatsu Ltd. Crown Cork and Seal Apple Inc. in 2010 Cola Wars continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2006 Google Inc. Nucor at Crossroad Caterpillar Tractor Co Komatsu Ltd. Crown Cork and Seal Apple Inc. in 2010 Seminar guidelines 1. Each student has 20 minutes for presentation. You are required to provide a Powerpoint presentation (please download your Powerpoint file before presentations start) 2. Presentation must be organized as follows: - first, a summary of the case must be given; then - answer to each question (see below) must be provided. The answer must make explicit reference to the relevant parts of the theory and of the data provided by the case study. 1 QUESTIONS: 1. Coca Wars...
Words: 809 - Pages: 4
...ANALYSIS OF COCA COLA COMPANY Ltd. Introduction Coca-Cola Company Limited is the world’s largest beverage company as well as the leading producer of soft drinks. The company has spent millions of dollars in the research and development as well as marketing and production in order to create a new unique product to gain the advantages in the so-competitive market. This report is basically focused on how Coca-Cola Company Limited can analyze the market situation and use the best strategies in order to compete with other competitors in the global market. This report will also include the SWOT analysis of the company and the problems the company faced. The strategies used, recommendations and plan implementations will also be examined in this paper. History and Background Coca-Cola Company Ltd. starts from the discovery of Coca-Cola mixture by the Dr. John Pemberton who tried to mix the caramel mixture with carbonated water. In the first few year, he only sold one kind of products, but now is the wold largest producer of non-alcoholic beverages. Coca Cola Company Ltd.. is listed as the most valuable firm in the world. They owned over 300 brands in over 200 countries and serving carbonated soft drink and non-carbonated beverages such as fruit juice, fruit drink, sports drinks, coffees and bottled water. Not only preserving and operating in their existing brand, Coca-Cola Co. also develops new global and local brands to reach, attract and satisfy broader range of consumers...
Words: 2652 - Pages: 11
...the case study, PepsiCo is a producer of carbonated cola drink and was marketing its products in most countries around the world. PepsiCo’s competitor was Coca-Cola. PepsiCo made two acquisitions of Tropicana and Quaker and the view was that there was synergy and economies of scale to be gained. PepsiCo should have had an organisational structure that will enable the achievement of the organisational mission and objectives. The organisation reorganised their structure to a multidivisional structure in a move to exploit the full acquisition potential. A multidivisional structure is most suitable for an organisation that has not got a wide range of products like PepsiCo. The organisation did not experience benefits from the multidivisional structure because PepsiCo had a wide rage of products and different customers. The organisation was structured into divisions and each reporting to the headquarters and there was no synergies and economies of scale gained. PepsiCo revised the organisational structure to a matrix structure. It enabled the organisation to operate in its particular competitive situation at peak effectiveness. At Pepsi they discovered that it was essential to drive the various brands as part of one team. There was less conflict between employees because of the hierarchical setup of the organisation. PepsiCo Beverages became the No 1 liquid refreshment beverage company in measured channels. There was a strategic fit as its strengths in the growing non-carbonated...
Words: 2510 - Pages: 11
...BA 175- Global Marketing Group 8 Alfaro. Alonzo. Barreiro. Corral. March 19, 2015 Cruz. Garcia. Gregorio. Sing Prof. Benjie Sandoval Case 2: Coke and Pepsi Learn to Compete in India I. INTRODUCTION When the world’s two giant soft drink companies Coca-Cola and Pepsi entered the Indian market in the 1990s, they experienced several problems and difficulties. These setbacks led them to realize that what works for one country will not necessarily work for others. In 1988, the Indian government warned the public of the harmful effects of BVO, which was an ingredient used in producing local soft drinks. In 1986, PepsiCo introduced Lehar 7UP and Lehar Pepsi, even though they experienced strict government rules and guidelines, because they wanted to “get an early entry while the market is developing”. In 1990, Coca-Cola attempted to reenter the market. In order to integrate themselves into the Indian market and better compete with the local companies, both Coca-Cola and Pepsi participated in local festivals, released TV campaigns featuring local celebrities and got local athletes to promote their products. Other measures that the two American brands utilized included lowering the price of their products and introducing new product categories. However, just as they were gaining market share, an issue regarding the presence of pesticide residue in their drinks resulted in several partial bans in various Indian states. Their...
Words: 2939 - Pages: 12
...MARKETING COKE AND PEPSI IN IT CITY. OBJECTIVE 1. Finding the satisfaction of retailers towards the movement of Coke and Pepsi in terms of value addition and promotional strategies of Coke and Pepsi. 2. Products and quantities offered and the satisfaction different class of customers. Problem Statement Based on the promotional strategies, improvement of distribution efficiency and suggestions for the improvement in terms of the value addition towards the retailers by Coke and Pepsi distributors. Literature Review 1. Lemley, Mark & McKenna, Mark The article discusses market definition in terms of intellectual property (IP) and antitrust law in the U.S. as of August 2012. The carbonated soft drink products developed by the competitors Coca-Cola Co. and PepsiCo Inc. are used to address several IP and antitrust law issues, including fair use under copyright law and mark similarity under trademark law. A consideration of supply substitution under antitrust market definition is also mentioned. 2. Nair, Anil & Selover, David D (2012) The study of competitive dynamics has become a vibrant area of research within strategic management. We contribute to this research stream by examining the nature of competitive interaction between Coke and Pepsi. We found that while Coke''s and Pepsi''s strategies display interdependent relationships, the volatility of the interaction among strategies do not always attenuate over time, and Coke''s strategies are driven by Pepsi in some cases...
Words: 975 - Pages: 4
...Industry Analysis: Soft Drinks Meghan Deichert, Meghan Ellenbecker, Emily Klehr, Leslie Pesarchick, & Kelly Ziegler Strategic Management in a Global Context February 22, 2006 Industry Analysis: Soft Drinks Barbara Murray (2006c) explained the soft drink industry by stating, “For years the story in the nonalcoholic sector centered on the power struggle between…Coke and Pepsi. But as the pop fight has topped out, the industry's giants have begun relying on new product flavors…and looking to noncarbonated beverages for growth.” In order to fully understand the soft drink industry, the following should be considered: the dominant economic factors, five competitive sources, industry trends, and the industry’s key factors. Based on the analyses of the industry, specific recommendations for competitors can then be created. Dominant Economic Factors Market size, growth rate and overall profitability are three economic indicators that can be used to evaluate the soft drink industry. The market size of this industry has been changing. Soft drink consumption has a market share of 46.8% within the non-alcoholic drink industry, illustrated in Table 1. Datamonitor (2005) also found that the total market value of soft drinks reached $307.2 billion in 2004 with a market value forecast of $367.1 billion in 2009. Further, the 2004 soft drink volume was 325,367.2 million liters (see Table 2). Clearly, the soft drink industry is lucrative with a potential for high profits, but there are several...
Words: 5374 - Pages: 22
...Industry Analysis: Soft Drinks Meghan Deichert, Meghan Ellenbecker, Emily Klehr, Leslie Pesarchick, & Kelly Ziegler Strategic Management in a Global Context February 22, 2006 Industry Analysis: Soft Drinks Barbara Murray (2006c) explained the soft drink industry by stating, “For years the story in the nonalcoholic sector centered on the power struggle between…Coke and Pepsi. But as the pop fight has topped out, the industry's giants have begun relying on new product flavors…and looking to noncarbonated beverages for growth.” In order to fully understand the soft drink industry, the following should be considered: the dominant economic factors, five competitive sources, industry trends, and the industry’s key factors. Based on the analyses of the industry, specific recommendations for competitors can then be created. Dominant Economic Factors Market size, growth rate and overall profitability are three economic indicators that can be used to evaluate the soft drink industry. The market size of this industry has been changing. Soft drink consumption has a market share of 46.8% within the non-alcoholic drink industry, illustrated in Table 1. Datamonitor (2005) also found that the total market value of soft drinks reached $307.2 billion in 2004 with a market value forecast of $367.1 billion in 2009. Further, the 2004 soft drink volume was 325,367.2 million liters (see Table 2). Clearly, the soft drink industry is lucrative with a potential for high profits, but there are several...
Words: 5353 - Pages: 22
