Free Essay

Taxable Damages Award

In:

Submitted By emilybrieden
Words 617
Pages 3
Ampersand LLP
Beaumont, TX

TO: Partner
FROM: Staff Accountant
DATE: March 24, 2016
-------------------------------------------------
SUBJECT: Memorandum Privileged and Confidential

Relevant Facts
In 2013, Mr. Hobby suffered serious bodily injury while working at a local refinery in Beaumont. On his 2013 tax return, he deducted medical expenses of $25,000. On his 2014 tax return, he deducted medical expenses of $15,000. In 2015, Hobby won a civil lawsuit connected to his injury in 2013. He was awarded as follows: Punitive damages $150,000.00, reimbursement of medical expense $40,000.00, emotional distress $75,000.00, pain/suffering $200,000.00, interest $7,500.00, and attorney’s fees $25,000.00, totaling $497,500.00.

Specific Issues
Which portion of the award for damages is taxable in 2015?

Support and Analysis
Per IRC §104(a)(2), any damages (excluding punitive) received on account of personal physical injury are excluded from gross income. Therefore, both $75,000 for emotional distress and $200,000 for pain and suffering are a result of the injury and can be excluded from income. Treas. Reg. §61.1-14(a) specifies “for example, punitive damages…are gross income” meaning that the $150,000 of punitive damages from this lawsuit are considered gross income. These are considered income because the punitive award is primarily to punish the wrongdoer, and is not compensatory for the physical injury.

However, IRS publication 4345 (Rev 4-2015) explains that income received for reimbursement of medical expenses that were deducted in previous returns must now be included in gross income for the current year, because the taxpayer has already enjoyed the benefit of medical expenses write-off previously and cannot “double dip”. This is backed up by a court case U.S. v. Schleier [95-1 USTC ¶50,309] where Schleier was allowed deductions in previous years for medical expenses and the court then held his reimbursement for those expenses as taxable in the current year. $40,000 of the settlement goes back into gross income for medical expenses.

Treas. Reg. §61.1 defines gross income as “all income from whatever source derived, unless excluded by law”. Although physical injury damages are protected, IRC §61(a)(1) lists compensation for services or fees as taxable. The settlement included repayment of $25,000 for attorney’s fees, which are taxable. In addition, IRC §61(a)(4) specifically lists out interest income as taxable. The $7,500 in interest gained from the settlement is subject to tax.

IRC §265(a)(1) restricts the deductibility of expenses related to exempt income, but because not all of the settlement was exempt, IRC leaves room for a portion of the legal fees to be deductible according to the amount of the full settlement that is taxable. The percentage is based on the taxable income, divided by the full settlement, and then multiplied by the amount of attorney fees incurred. That total is deductible against the taxable portion of the settlement. 45% of the full settlement (punitive $150,000, medical $40,000, interest $7,500, and attorney fees $25,000) is currently taxable, which allows for that portion of the $25,000 to be deducted. Therefore, $11,250 is deductible for taxable attorney’s fees.

Conclusion
The emotional distress and pain and suffering can be left out of gross income for the 2015 tax return. Punitive damages, reimbursement of medical expenses, attorney’s fees, and interest are all taxable, which increases gross income by $222,500. However, a partial deduction for legal fees of $11,250 can be taken on the taxable percent of the settlement to reduce new gross income to $211,250.

Actions to be taken
Prepare letter, review results with client.
Preparer: Staff Accountant
Reviewer: Partner

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Jghgj

...Are Damages or Punitive Damages Taxable?Posted on August 15, 2011 in Articles The quick answer is damages or awards received for physical injuries or sickness are generally not taxable.  However, punitive damages or awards are generally taxable if they are paid to compensate a taxpayer for non-personal injuries.  Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 104 is the area of law that defines the taxable treatment of compensation for injuries or sickness.  In general if a taxpayer received an award or damages for a personal injury or sickness, then the income can be excluded from taxable income.  If a taxpayer received punitive damages for non-personal injury or a non-sickness then it is typically going to be treated as taxable income.  I say typically, because tax law allows damages received for nonphysical injury or sickness to be reduced for any medical expenses which meet the IRC definition of 213.  Or the attorneys might craft the settlement to be worded as a physical damage. There are many court cases regarding these issues.  One to look at for damages received for non-physical damages is O’Gilvie, Kelly v. U.S. (1996, S Ct) 78 AFTR 2d 96-7454. IRC section 104 states, the gross income doesn’t include: amounts received under workmen’s compensationfor personal injuries or sickness; amount received through accident or healthinsurance for personal injuries or sickness; amounts received as a pension, annuity or similarallowance for personal injuries or sickness resulting...

Words: 600 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Tax Research Memorandum

...that his recent award for damages to his personal and professional reputation is taxable. Mr. Murray reported to the Environmental Protection Agency that his employer was illegally dumping chemicals into a river. His charges were true, and Mr. Murray’s employer was fined. In retaliation, Mr. Murray’s employer fired him and made deliberate efforts to prevent Murray from obtaining other employment. Mr. Murray sued the employer, claiming that his reputation had been damaged. Mr. Murray won his lawsuit and received an award for damages to his personal and professional reputation and for his mental suffering. He argues that he was awarded damages as recovery of his human capital and a recovery of capital is not income. Therefore the Federal government does not have the power to tax the award. ISSUES: Is the recent award taxable? Income exclusions: damages on account of personal injury or sickness-physical vs. emotional injury. CONCLUSION: Section 104(a) (2) provides that excludes from gross income the amount of any damages (other than punitive damages) received (whether by suit or agreement and whether as lump sums or as periodic payments) on account of personal physical injuries or physical sickness. Emotional distress is not considered a physical injury or physical sickness. However, damages for emotional distress attributable to a physical injury or physical sickness are excluded from income under section 104(a) (2), and also excludes damages no in excess of the...

Words: 441 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Ac553 Chapter 5

...Rights Reserved. Chapter 5 59 Chapter 5 Gross Income—Exclusions SUMMARY OF CHAPTER Having just completed the study of gross income in the preceding chapter and thus gained a comprehension of what income is and when it is taxable, the student should now be ready to proceed to the concepts underlying exclusions from gross income, which are discussed in the present chapter. Since gross income includes income from all sources, to be excluded from gross income the items must be expressly exempted by law. Sections 101–139 list those items. Common Exclusions from Gross Income ¶5001 Gifts and Inheritances A gift, bequest, or inheritance is excluded from gross income. Thus, the donor does not receive a tax deduction for the property transmitted. If property received by gift or inheritance later produces income, the income is taxable. ¶5015 Life Insurance Proceeds Generally, life insurance proceeds received by the benefi ciary are not included in gross income if such amounts are paid by reason of death of the insured. It is immaterial who the benefi ciary is or whether the policy was part of a group life insurance plan or was individually purchased. However, if payment is delayed and the total amount when received includes interest, the interest is taxable. ¶5025 Sale of Residence Sales of principal residences on May 7, 1997, and thereafter are eligible for a $500,000 exclusion from gross income ($250,000 for single individuals). A two-year ownership and occupancy test and...

Words: 5098 - Pages: 21

Free Essay

Adama

...also known as exemplary damages are commonly awarded in product liability or civil suit cases were the defendant is ordered to pay to the plaintiffs a sum of money for their acts of reckless and or willful conduct. The ideas of punitive damages was imposed as a deterrent from reckless,willful conduct. However, the amount of punitive damages awarded have been the topic of my debates leaving some to criticize, that plaintiffs are overly compensated specifically voicing opinions or concerns that a limit should be imposed on punitive damages. Circumstances justifying the recognition of punitive damages based upon the defendant acting intentionally, maliciously, or without regard to the rights of the plaintiff and interests of the claimant. Punitive damages first established in England in 1763. Civil law in the United States recognized punitive damages in 1850. (5) "According to the U.S. Supreme Court, three factors guide a decision to award enhanced damages (punitive damages)": The action of the defendant was willful or deliberate, "whether the infringer had a good faith belief that the patent was invalid", and litigants conduct during the litigation. (4) A jury verdict to impose an amount of punitive damages may be over-turned by the trial judge, if the award is considered to be excessive or inadequate. (6) "A fundamental goal of a punitive damage award is to punish but not bankrupt the wrongdoer." (9) Five States do not recognize or award punitive damages in any civil action and...

Words: 1717 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Settlmet Payment Deductiility

...among different parties through attorneys. When agreements are reached, “settlement payments” occur. Hence, people consider settlement payments as prices that one party pay to the others for their wrongful behaviors or violation of laws. For tax purposes, are settlement payments deductible? According to Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 162(a), any ordinary and necessary business or trading expenses are deductible during the current taxable year. That is to say if any settlement payments meet criterions of deduction under 162(a), but not in the exception of Section 162, should be deductible. In real court cases, IRS uses the exceptions of Section 162 to disallow settlement payments. Nowadays, more court cases and arguments appear to show that even though some settlement payments are in the exceptions of 162 (a), they can also be deducted. The relief of settle payments deductibility causes disagreements among tax professionals. Some believes settlement payments may be composed of deductible compensatory damages from non-deductible punitive damages; however, others worries that allowing deductibility may leads an indirect lesser penalty, because juries are unaware of tax benefits from deductions. This essay will mainly discuss the deductibility of settlement payments by explaining of original laws and regulation languages, citing tax professionals’ perspectives and illustrating actual court cases. According to IRC Section 162(a), “all the ordinary and necessary expenses” from...

Words: 2916 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Taxation Paper

...Federal Income Taxation I Facts: Murray reported his employer to the Environmental Protection Agency. He claimed that his employer was illegally dumping chemicals into the river. The court filed in favor of Murray and his employer was fined. This cost Murray his employment and his employer made deliberate efforts to prevent Murray from obtaining other employment. Murray sued his employer saying that his reputation had been damaged. Murray won the lawsuit and received an award for “damages to his personal and professional reputation and for his mental suffering.” Murray wants to find out if this award is taxable and argues that he was awarded damages as a recovery of his human capital and a recovery of capital I not income. Therefore, the Federal government does not have the power to tax the award. Issue: Whether Murray was compensated for his reputation and his mental suffering is he required to pay taxes for such compensation? If so what amount and how should it be reported on his income tax. Analysis: Code Sec 61(a) state “Except as otherwise provided in this subtitle, gross income means all income from whatever source derived, including (but not limited to) the following items: (1) Compensation for services, including fees, commissions, fringe benefits, and similar items; (2) Gross income derived from business; (3) Gains derived from dealings in property; (4) Interest; (5) Rents; (6) Royalties; (7) Dividends; (8) Alimony and separate maintenance payments; ...

Words: 613 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Case for Tax Research

...Date: July 12, 2012 From: Kathryn Baker To: Teddy Chow (“Taxpayer’s) Tax File Regarding: Federal Income Tax Consequences of damages awarded to the Taxpayer after Taxpayer was injured in an auto accident. I. Relevant Facts: The taxpayer filed a lawsuit to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in a 2000 auto accident. In 2004, a jury awarded the taxpayer $1,620,000. In addition, delay damages in the amount of $1,080,000 were then added to that award, resulting in a total judgment of $2,700,000. The defendants appealed the award, and while the appeal was pending, the parties reached a settlement, which provided for payment to Teddy of $2,550,000. In 2009, after attorney’s fees of $850,000 were subtracted, Teddy received $1,700,000. II. Issue: 1. How are the damages treated for tax purposes? 2. Is the attorney’s fee deductible? III. Relevant Authorities: A. Compensation for Injury or Sickness Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) Sec. 104(a) provides the general rule that- Except in the case of amounts attributable to (and not in excess of) deductions allowed under section 213 (relating to medical, etc., expenses) for any prior taxable year, gross income does not include that--- IRC Sec. 104 (a)(2) the amount of any damages (other than punitive damages) received (whether by suit or agreement and whether as lump sums or as periodic payments) on account of personal physical injuries or physical...

Words: 681 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Acc331 Cheat Sheet

... without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration. Statute of Limitations- federal 3 years regular, 6 years-omit>25% of gross income, none-fraud. State may be different, Michigan regular is 4. FICA(federal insurance contributions act)-social security tax -social security 6.2% 2010 4.2% 2011. Base amount is 106,800 -medicare 1.45% FUTA(federal unemployment tax act) 6.2% on first $7,000 of wages Chapter 3 Basic Tax Structure -Economic income (+)only place where u add stuff when determining GI -Gross Income -Adjusted Gross Income (-) -Taxable Income (-) -Tax (-) -Tax Due (-) Tax Formula for Individuals Income Less:exclusions GI Less:deductions for AGI Adjusted Gross Income Less: the greater of Total itemized deductions Or standard deduction Less: personal and dependency exemptions Taxable income Tax on taxable income Less:tax credits Tax due (or refund) *economic income---- exclusions *gross income—deductions for AGI AGI -itemized deductions or standard deduction *itemized deductions are related to production or collection of income and management of property held for the production of income. *Standard deduction: 2010 2011 single 5700 5800 married,filing j 11400 11600 surviving spouse 11400 11600 head of house 8400 8500 married,filing sep 5700 5800 *amount of each additional standard deduction 2010 2011 single 1400 1450 married filing j 1100 1150 surviving...

Words: 2469 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Question

...Determine if the following fringe benefits are taxable under salaries tax (a) A $100 cash coupon given by an employer to an employee as a birthday gift. (b) Tips given to a waiter in a restaurant. (c) An ex-gratia payment by the employer in the form of a gold coin in recognition of a job well done. The coin had a face value of $1,000 but a market value of $2,000 at the date of payment. (d) A gas bill settled directly by the employer for quarters occupied by an employee who had entered into the contract with the gas company. (e) Payment in lieu of notice made by the employer for early termination of employment of an unsatisfactory employee. Answers (a) As the cash coupon is a personal gift and not a reward for services, it is not assessable to salaries tax. (b) Payment from someone other than the employer is assessable if the payment is income from the employment. Hence, the tips given to the waiter are clearly assessable. In any event, the assessability of receipts from a third party is covered by the inclusion in section 9(1)(a) of the words ‘….whether derived from the employer or others…’. (c) So far as the payment was a reward for services, the fact that it was not stipulated in the employment contract would not affect its assessability. Furthermore, as the gold coin had a cash equivalent of $2,000, it is this figure that should be assessed. (d) In this case, as it was the employee who had entered into the contract with the gas company, he had the liability to...

Words: 382 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Random

...552. CHAPTER 5—GROSS INCOME: EXCLUSIONS Question MC #1 The taxpayer’s marginal tax bracket is 25%. Which would the taxpayer prefer? a. $1.00 taxable income rather than $1.00 tax-exempt income. *b. $.80 tax-exempt income rather than $1.00 taxable income. c. $1.25 taxable income rather than $1.00 tax-exempt income. d. $1.30 taxable income rather than $1.00 tax-exempt income. e. None of the above. 553. CHAPTER 5—GROSS INCOME: EXCLUSIONS Question MC #2 Cash received by an individual: a. Is not included in gross income if it was not earned. b. Is not taxable unless the payor is legally obligated to make the payment. c. Must always be included in gross income. *d. May be included in gross income although the payor is not legally obligated to make the payment. e. None of the above. 554. CHAPTER 5—GROSS INCOME: EXCLUSIONS Question MC #3 Sharon’s automobile slid into a ditch. A stranger pulled her out. Sharon offered to pay $25, but the stranger refused. Sharon slipped the $25 in the stranger’s truck when he was not looking. a. The $25 is a nontaxable gift received by the stranger because Sharon was not legally required to pay him. b. The $25 is a nontaxable gift because the stranger did not ask to receive it. *c. The $25 is taxable compensation for services rendered. d. The $25 is a nontaxable service award. e. None of the above. 555. CHAPTER 5—GROSS INCOME: EXCLUSIONS Question MC #4 Carin, a widow, elected to receive the proceeds of a $150,000 life insurance policy...

Words: 7955 - Pages: 32

Premium Essay

Tax Outline

...I. Orientation  • Regulation vs. Statutory Provision * Regs - have the force of law and are passed by executive agencies * Regs - must be based on a statutory provision and serve as interpretation of the statute. * Inconsistency B/W reg and statute Æ reg. wins * Rules: administrative announcements of IRS Æ merely serve to state the IRS position on something but do not have the force of law...

Words: 4824 - Pages: 20

Premium Essay

Vak Learning Style

...1. (TCO E) Interest, dividends, and annuities income are classified as _____. (Points : 5) active income passive income portfolio income None of the above 2. (TCO D) Tom Tanner traded in a printing press with an adjusted basis of $20,000 for a smaller press valued at $12,000. In addition to the smaller press, Tom received $3,000 in cash and was relieved of the existing liability of $5,000 on the old press. What is Tom's recognized gain? (Points : 5) $0 $3,000 $4,800 $5,000 3. (TCO H) Bob and Susan file a joint return for the 2010 tax year. Their adjusted gross income is $80,000. They had a net investment income of $9,000. In 2010, they had the following interest expenses. Personal credit card interest: $5,000 Home mortgage interest: $10,000 Investment interest (on loans used to buy stocks): $10,000 What is the interest deduction for Bob and Susan for the 2010 tax year? (Points : 5) $19,000 $8,000 $16,000 $25,000 4. (TCO B) Bob and Cindy Smith paid the following medical expenses during the year (all in excess of reimbursement). Hospital and doctor bills: $800 Medicine and drugs: $700 Hospitalization insurance premiums: $6,000 Medicine and drugs (for dependent mother, age 71): $1,000 Assuming that the Smiths' adjusted gross income was $60,000, how much of a medical expense deduction may Bob and Cindy claim on their joint return? (Points...

Words: 2369 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Tax 483

...regulations after being taught. 2. In tax, everything is income—Then you exclude some thing to get an adjusted income—Then you take deductions to figure out taxable income. II. Identification of Income Subject to Taxation: A. Gross Income: The Scope of Section 61: 1. We need a definition of income because of due process concerns—We need a law that everybody recognizes. 2. WHAT IS INCOME? a. §61 defines gross income as “all income from whatever source derived.” 1) §61 lists 15 specific items that are considered income. b. Cesarini v. United States: The Cesarinis found $4,467 in cash in a used piano purchased by them. 1) The court held that the found money is taxable as ordinary income in the year in which the taxpayer attains uncontested possession of it. 2) INCOME: Treasure Trove: It is considered income in the year that it is reduced to undisputed possession. c. Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.: Glenshaw Glass Co. recovered compensatory and punitive damages as a result of a fraud and anti-trust suit. It did not report the punitive damages as income and the IRS assessed a deficiency. Punitive damages are intended to deter the defendant and others from engaging in conduct similar to that which formed the basis of the lawsuit. Compensatory...

Words: 22861 - Pages: 92

Premium Essay

Tax Law: a Broader Perspective

...Tax Law: A Broader Perspective Accounting for Income Taxes Taxes and the Law: A Broader Perspective Taxes are everywhere and exist as a vital part of national structure, both legally and financially. Taxation influences everything from wages to inheritance. Given this, one is compelled to inquire as to how this balance works and what constitutes its existence. That is where understanding the effects of tax law and how they are accounted for have great import. As with any other facet of life, rules accompany the application and processing of taxes, and how they are required to be paid. This sounds rather rigid, but there are many benefits to taxation as well as the normal mandatory sacrifices. This means that taxes can change to ease financial hardship just as they can be altered to increase individual expenditure. For instance, FS-2006-2 - Publication 4492 has created tax breaks for Katrina, Rita, and Wilma victims. Those who have been affected may now exclude from income certain cancellations of debt and extends, from two years to five years, the replacement period for converted properties. At this point a logical question to ask is who governs taxation, and how are benefits and penalties decided? Modern taxation extends all the way back to Section I of both Articles 8 and 9 in the constitution, and has been heavily influenced by America's sixteenth amendment to the constitution. Amendment sixteen gave Congress the power to tax any entity regardless of census or enumeration...

Words: 838 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Financial 6 Passmaster Questions

...Becker CPA Review, PassMaster Questions Lecture: Financial 6 CPA PassMaster Questions–Financial 6 Export Date: 10/30/08 1 © 2009 DeVry/Becker Educational Development Corp. All rights reserved. Becker CPA Review, PassMaster Questions Lecture: Financial 6 Pension Plans CPA-00679 Type1 M/C A-D Corr Ans: D PM#1 F 6-01 1. CPA-00679 FARE R02 #8 a. b. c. d. Page 19 Which of the following disclosures is not required of companies with a defined-benefit pension plan? A description of the plan. The amount of pension expense by component. The weighted average discount rate. The estimates of future contributions. CPA-00679 Explanation Choice "d" is correct. Although pension accounting has extensive disclosures, projections of future contributions into a pension plan are not required. "a", "b", and "c" are required disclosures. CPA-00681 Type1 M/C A-D Corr Ans: C PM#2 F 6-01 2. CPA-00681 FARE R99 #13 Page 9 Jan Corp. amended its defined benefit pension plan, granting a total credit of $100,000 to four employees for services rendered prior to the plan's adoption. The employees, A, B, C, and D, are expected to retire from the company as follows: "A" will retire after three years. "B" and "C" will retire after five years. "D" will retire after seven years. What is the amount of prior service cost amortization in the first year? a. b. c. d. $0 $5,000 $20,000 $25,000 CPA-00681 Explanation Choice "c" is correct. Amortization of unrecognized prior...

Words: 30153 - Pages: 121