Free Essay

Terrorism

In:

Submitted By dez09
Words 1477
Pages 6
Irvin Lucero
PHL 202
14 Mar. 2007
Government knows too much but acts too slow The American Government has failed us and probably continues doing so. Terrorism has changed the way Americans live their everyday lives from leaving their kids at a day care center to going through a check point at the airport. Others Unknown is a detail account by Stephen Jonesof the events leading up to the horrific bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. In Cover Up, Peter Lance exposes how the American government had evidence and knowledge prior to the attack on 9-11 and failed to act appropriately. Both of these books share various similarities but two that stand out the most are that the government had prior knowledge that wold have prevented both devastating attacks on American soil and how the government leisurely handled both investigations. We would expect that the government to protect us from a foreign invader or a domestic attack but failed both tasks, in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995, and the terrorist attack in New York on September 11, 2001. No one will ever forget the Oklahoma City bombing on the Murrah Federal Building which killed 168 people, including nineteen children under the age of six (Jones 16). It has been portrayed as an attack by Americans, Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols, against other Americans. This attack, which could have been prevented, has strong evidence that McVeigh and Nichols were only two members of a broad conspiracy, one that included other white supremacists and possibly Iraqi agents. Larry Mackey, number-two prosecutor on the government’s team, called Stephen Jones to see if he would join him in denouncing the claim of Carol Howe, an informant for the ATF, that the government had prior knowledge of the bombing over a press conference (Jones 218). To make such an incredible statement like that would have shocked and enraged the American people. All statements that Howe reported were kept in a file where she reported saying that six months before the bombing, a neo-Nazi made a plan to attack the Murrah building (Jones 220). Jones didn’t know that these files existed and was curious to find out more about Howe and her investigation. Jones, realized that the evidence clearly shows that the government knew that an attack was going to happen and did no action to stop it. Likewise, Lance stated that all of the evidence to bin Laden’s ever growing threat to America was contained in the files of the U.S. Justice Department (Lance 24). This shows strong evidence that the government had prior knowledge but seem like they didn’t bother to go on and investigate deeply. The government used several informants to gather information of known terrorist groups, one of these groups was Sheikh’s cell. Nancy Floyd, an informant for the FBI, hired Emad Salem, an ex-Egyptian army officer with intelligence background, to infiltrate the Sheikh’s cell (Lance 28). Salem successfully infiltrated and was sending valuable information to Floyd which she reported to the FBI. When Carson Dunbar, an FBI administrative special agent in charge, took over New York office’s terrorism unit, he wanted to alienate Salem (Lance 29). Salem was a valuable person in gathering information since he had a direct connection with Sheikh and to have him alienated could potentially expose his cover. Salem had evidence that a bombing plot was in the works and it was then the job of the Bureau to perform the necessary surveillance to establish a probable cause for an indictment but Dunbar had another plan of action and that was for Salem to wear a wire and that he would testify in an open court (Lance 29). Salem didn’t agree with the new terms and withdrew, which meant that Sheikh needed a new partner and Ramzi Yousef came into the picture (Lance 30). Salem had said that a bombing was going to happen and with Yousef now working in the plot, the bombing was sure to come. If it wasn’t for Dunbar’s arrogance, one attack could have been prevented and possibly 9-11 would have never occur. It is important to recognize the significance of the evidence that is put forth. All clues that where gathered led to one conclusion, a terrorist attack on American soil. The government had sufficient evidence that could have potentially saved all those lives that were lost during the attacks. It makes no sense having informants to report valuable information and not have the government to pursue a definite conclusion. The government is supposed to gather information come to a conclusion and take action. James Miller, a receptionist in the Executive Secretariat answered a call from Timothy McVeigh saying that the Murrah Federal building had been bombed but it actually wouldn’t be until thirty minutes later (Jones 4). One would expect that a threat of this magnitude would be reported and investigated but it wasn’t. When a threat is made to a government body, we would expect for the government to investigate and react at a moments notice. But in the case of the Oklahoma City bombing, the TWA 800 and the 9-11 attack, many of the findings that the government found was bewildering due but how they reacted to the evidence was more bewildering. There is strong evidence that McVeigh and Nichols were only two members of a broad conspiracy, one that included other white supremacists and possibly Iraqi agents, but what has always been puzzling has been the government's lack of interest in pursuing other suspects. The government has done this before. A statement by Vincent Cannistraro, former chief of operations and analysis of the CIA’s counterterrorism center, summarized an event saying, “The government just isn’t interested in uncovering a foreign plot. It has its perpetrators, and it doesn’t want anyone or anything complicating its case” (Jones 149). Clearly showing the government’s lack of interest to prosecute every perpetrator to prevent potential future threats. In the months and years that followed, it seemed as if the Justice Department did not want there to be any other suspects. In the trial of McVeigh, the government did not call a single witness who could place McVeigh at the scene of the crime, presumably because each one of those witnesses would also testify that they saw McVeigh with another suspect or the famous John Doe #2. Jones asked several people at the Elliott’s Body Shop Junction City, Kansas, who they all claimed that they saw McVeigh with another person (Jones 49). An unbelievable event happened when Ramzi Yousef came into the U.S. and was searched by the INS and found a suitcase full of bomb manuals, a videotape of suicide car bombers, and a passport with his picture roughly pasted over a Swedish national (Lance 31). He was detain but caused an uproar claiming political asylum that he was given a hearing date and released into the country (Lance 31). How could the government just release someone with material that can potentially be used to cause a terrorist attack in the U.S? On February 26, 1993, a bomb created by Ramzi Yousef went off on the B-2 level beneath the North Tower of the Trade Center and two days later the Feds searched Nidal Ayyad’s computer and found a letter stating that they will attack again and the Trade Center is going to be there target (Lance 33). Thinking that the government let Yousef into the U.S, I would expect for them to improve security and prepare for a possible attack.
It is important to recognize that the government that we think is working for our best interest is actually working for their best interest. It seems that the government was putting &&&&&The pursuit of other suspects would have revealed how badly the government bungled the investigation, or might have showed that the government could have prevented the terrorist attacks. This would have shown weakness within the government structure and the confidence of the American people.
I believe that it is important that the government is inform of every threat that is made towards America and investigated. The government having knowledge and evidence of suspected plots of terror could have prevented the attacks before they escalated.
It wasn’t until the attacks on American soil happen that the government woke up to uncover answers. They didn’t have to work very hard since they had the answers starring at their faces for more than ten years. There are several possible explanations for what is either the government's lack of interest or a cover-up. Expecting that the U.S. Government is the best one in the world, it has let us down many times.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Terrorism

...Fighting terrorism is like being a goalkeeper. You can make a hundred brilliant saves but the only shot that people remember is the one that gets past you .” Now I like this statement because I think it describes terrorism short and accurate. In this essay I would like to talk about some different definitions of terrorism. And also give some examples of terrorism. Terrorism is an act performed with the intension of creating fear or sorrow. Terrorism is mostly intercontinental. Terrorism is mostly described as “Tactic and strategy” By the land it happened to or “A crime and a holy duty” By the terrorists themselves. Obviously it depends on who is looking at it, the terrorists themselves probably think of it as a holy act and most of them believe they will go to heaven and get 72 virgins. From the perspective of the terrorized country, however their thoughts will obviously be different. There is really no way to prepare for a terrorist attack, because it can happen at all times. Just like the attack on WTC on 11/09/2001. I do not think anyone was prepared for that. Most terrorist organizations are small, and they are most likely to just do the terror and never warn the victims. The United States Department of Defense defines terrorism as “the calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, ideological .” Within...

Words: 324 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Terrorism

...Given the growing global threats of terrorism, it is significant that an understanding of the history, nature and mechanism-premises under which terror operates is obtained. This is significant as it would shape the perspective of policy makers when addressing issues of this nature. Terrorism, as it is understood is the action of none-state weak actors, individual or groups, who for some reasons feels suppressed, marginalized and, or denied what they may view as the basic human right. All terrorism has political objectives, even though the perpetrators may use religious relics to appeal to a wider existing audience, and invoke a response through violent act to prove or propagate their point. Yoram Schweitzer in "Suicide Terrorism Development &ump; Characteristics," Mark Sedgwick in "Al-Qaeda and the "Nature of Religious Terrorism," and Dr. James Armstrong, all demonstrates that suicide terror attacks are politically motivated even though the perpetrator may use religious symbolism to justifies their acts. Observing areas in the world where terrorism is frequent, especially in the Middle East, it can be argued that groups that engaged in terrorists' activities are those that feel suppressed and taken advantage of by a much greater power. Thus, terrorism, particularly suicide terror is prevalent in areas where systems of gross injustice seem to exist. Therefore, the actual use of terrorism by non-state actors is a tactic aimed at polarizing the population in their favor...

Words: 1774 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Terrorism

...Terrorism is the unlawful use of force or violence by a person or group. The goal is to intimidate or coerce societies or governments in an effort to promote political or ideological beliefs. These attacks can take many forms, and could happen at any time in any place. Terrorists typically exploit weaknesses, and may use technology, hazardous materials, biological agents or other methods to create devastating disruptions to the community. Terrorism thrives on fear. By planning how to respond to a terrorist attack, you can greatly improve your chances of survival. You can also lessen the impact of the attack by reducing the fear in the aftermath. Community Involvement As Chief of River City, my first priority would be to protect the citizens of River City. Attacks can be expected to provide maximum negative effect on the following levels: emotional, food, water, health, financial, infrastructure, leadership and the very function of society. Because it is impossible to know in advance which of these areas will be impacted most heavily in the event of a terrorist event, the best course of action is to make individual preparation in the areas where you are able to do so. For example, a supply of food that is easily stored means you aren't dependent upon stores that may or may not be available at the local supermarket. The same thing is true of a water supply. The citizens would be encouraged to stock up on bottled water. The Supply of bottled water could be crucial in the event...

Words: 1351 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Terrorism

...What is Terrorism? By: James Morris Terrorism Terrorism is political phenomenon by which offenders threaten or use violence on civilians with the intent of exploiting fear. It can be defined as substitute classification of political violence. A quote by Sloan (2006) states “Terrorism is intentional violent acts carried out by nonstate actors against noncombatants with the purpose of effecting a political response.” In our society, the term terrorism is a method or strategy to effect political change in an area. Terrorism can be seen as crime, exploitation of fear, and a form of warfare (Lutz, 2005). Since the 1700’s, history has always kept record of the different types of violence our world has faced. And with terrorism it comes with consequences. (Sloan, 2006). A quote by Moghaddam & Marsella (2004) says “It is usually perpetrated by groups utilizing warfare, due to the fact that they are unable to gain advantage while using conventional methods.” Terrorism as Crime The relationship between the terrorism and crime are both equally considered as wrong doing. Traditionally, within the legal system of the United States, domestic terrorism is treated as a criminal act (Bender & Leone, 1986). It is directed toward civilians for the purpose of inducing fear, dread, and terror. Lutz states (2005) “The focus would be on collection of evidence that would be used in court to prosecute those accused of threats or acts of terrorism.” In a sense, all terrorism can be...

Words: 1340 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Terrorism

...getting involved in fights • Inability to tolerate boredom • Disregard for right and wrong • Poor or abusive relationships • Irresponsible work behavior • Disregard for safety Background of World Anti-Terrorism Day: Terrorist activities have increased multi-fold over the last decade. A global initiative uniting all nations is required to combat terrorism. After the 9/11 terrorist attack on the U.S, terrorism has become the primary cause of concern for nations. History of World Anti-Terrorism Day: The concept of World Anti-Terrorism Day was initiated because thousands of youth are lured into the folds of terrorist camps and organizations each year. May 21 is observed as Anti-terrorism day every year. Purpose of World Anti-Terrorism Day: The Purpose of observing World Anti-Terrorism Day is to: Spread the message of global peace and non-violence. Deter vulnerable youth from following cult practices and being misguided. Commemorate and honor the sacrifices made by thousands of soldiers who battled against terrorism. Pay homage to the victims who lost their lives in terrorist attacks. Device ways and hold awareness programs to protect the future generations from radical influence. Important Features of World Anti-Terrorism Day: Features on...

Words: 2861 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Terrorism

...If you ask anyone in America what do you think of Pakistanis? Without any hesitation they would say "Pakistanis are terrorists". This is the stereotype which has developed over the recent years and it would be wrong to say that such a stereotype is wrongly associated with the country. The biggest problem facing Pakistan is terrorism which has spoiled the country's reputation in the entire world and it would require excessive amounts of effort on behalf of the country to improve its image in the global arena. Terrorism in Pakistan is majorly associated with religious extremism and its incidence has increased since the events of 9/11. Taliban was behind the attacks of 9/11 and its roots extended to Pakistan. Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan is another terrorist group which has been associated with terrorist attacks in the country and is directly linked to Osama bin Laden's Terrorist organization. Taliban's fight was not initially against Pakistan but after 9/11 when former President Pervez Musharraf agreed to form an ally with the U.S against "War on Terror" there was great rage in the Taliban outfit who decided then to launch terrorist attacks in the country in retaliation. Although Pakistan is part of the US alliance they are often accused by US for being a terrorist country which has challenged Pakistan's sovereignty. This has also resulted in internal conflicts in the country with many people raising their voices against the government and demanding Pakistan to leave the US alliance...

Words: 532 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Terrorism

...in "The Devils," a novel portraying the multifarious political climate of 19th century Russia. This often-overlooked period, which presaged the Communist Revolution, saw Russia experiencing unprecedented levels of terrorism by an assortment of groups such as anarchists, nihilists, populists and socialists. The discussion of this tumultuous and critical period is among the most engaging passages in "The History of Terrorism: From Antiquity to Al Qaeda," edited by Gérard Chaliand and Arnaud Blin. The book, which includes essays by the editors as well as other scholars, provides a useful and levelheaded survey of a subject that is regularly understood and often manipulated. The very term "terrorism" is complex and takes on widely varying meanings depending on one's viewpoint. Accordingly, the book begins with a rigorous chapter by political scientist Ariel Merari that provides both a typology of terrorist acts and thoughtful insights on what distinguishes terrorism from other forms of violence. Although many definitions of terrorism exist, Merari discerns three common elements in these definitions: "(1) the use of violence; (2) political objectives; and (3) the intention of sowing fear in a target population." These common elements recur in the book's survey of terrorism, which begins with the ancient Jewish sect known as the Zealots, who rebelled against the Roman Empire, and an extremist Muslim group called the Assassins, who terrorized European crusaders. Chaliand and Blin make...

Words: 844 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Terrorism

...James Janosz Political Science 495 Terrorism December 14th, 2009 The Changing Look of Terrorism The purpose of this paper is to study and look at how terrorism has changed from pre 9/11, to post 9/11, to the current and future times. The United States is currently fighting the war on terror. But who is the enemy to the war? Can terrorism actually be considered an enemy? The answers to these questions are difficult to answer and defend, depending on the circumstances. But the key constant to the question is, there is no internationally agreed definition of terrorism. Common definitions of terrorism refer only to those violent acts which are intended to create fear/terror, are perpetrated for an ideological/political goal, and deliberately target or disregard the safety of civilian targets. The first section of this paper will deal with both views of the changing face of terrorism from pre 9/11, to post 9/11, and to the present day. The next section of this paper will discuss the variables of why terrorism has changed. In conclusion this paper will summarize the study of the changing face in terrorism. Throughout this paper there will be historical facts, evidence, theories, and analysis to support my argument how terrorism has changed over time. The language of terrorism that we, as Americans read it as, on September 11, 2001, two American airplanes flew into the World Trade Center and another into the Pentagon, while yet another suspiciously crashed in a deserted Pennsylvania...

Words: 3370 - Pages: 14

Free Essay

Terrorism

...Why has it been so difficult to define the concept of "terrorism?" 1 Why has it been so difficult to define the concept of "terrorism?" 2 Arriving at a consensual definition of terrorism has been particularly difficult. Although it is not a new phenomenon, finding a universally accepted definition that fits every terrorist event has not been achieved with any measure of success.1(Spindlove & Simonsen, 2010) Terrorism is an ideological and political concept.2 (Mahan & Griset, 2007) Some concepts and definitions are either too specific or too vague. The difficulty in assigning a truly comprehensive definition to terrorism lies in the fact that, not only is it challenging to be specific when motives, targets and methods differ so broadly from case-to-case, but the complexity of untangling the overlaps within each of these categories makes the task virtually impossible. In assessing the different perceptions, concepts and definitions of terrorism, it appears that the most disparity lies within the description of terrorist motivations. It is vital to be comprehensive in the categorization of motivations because the methods and targets selected by terrorists are often reflected by their purpose. This paper will examine contrasting perceptions regarding an event some call terrorism. Its nearly three years after the Nov. 5, 2009, shooting rampage in Fort Hood, Texas, an event some call "terrorism". Major Nidal Hasan, American-born an Muslim, currently faces the death penalty if convicted...

Words: 502 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Terrorism

...How has terrorism been redefined since 9/11? There is neither an academic nor an international legal consensus regarding the proper definition of the word "terrorism" however overtime some thinkers have tried to distinguish between ‘old’ and ‘new’ terrorism. This is the basis for the re-think over the term ‘terrorism’. Terrorism has changed significantly since the 1960’s. The rise of religious fundamentalism, the end of the Cold War, the new global banking network and the telecommunications revolution has all changed the motives and techniques of terrorism. Until the 1980’s, terrorism was not seen, as a significant threat to national security, but it was the large nation states such as Russia and china that were seen as the major players in international politics. During the 1990’s, there were signs of development within the terrorists actions and methodology due to the fact that not only were targets becoming more substantial and more noticeable, there techniques were becoming more and more radical. However, it was not until September 11th 2001 that the world finally realized the new threat that terrorists posed. The threat that is posed is not from nation states, but individuals within that state who feel their interests have been ignored. An example that this is true for is not only for Islamic fundamentalists but also for Timothy McVeigh, who was responsible for a truck bomb that killed 168 people in Oklahoma City in 1995. This was an act of terrorism in that he inflicted...

Words: 1080 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Terrorism

...cultural expectations because they don't have access to culturally accepted methods achieving those objectives, so they switch to acts of terrorism. Any group that employs terrorist activities has very problematic and compelling motives to participate in those activities. Psychological motivation for violence originates from terrorists' personal disappointment with life and achievements. This particular motivation is discovered to develop into a "believe system" from the terrorist. The individual fails to think about the measures taken to achieve the wrong agenda and may be inclined to project antisocial behaviors onto others, producing a polarized "us versus them" mindset. A significant problem in discussing terrorism is implementing a commonly recognized definition. Terrorism can be defined as the unlawful utilization of fear or force to accomplish particular political, financial, or cultural objectives. Since it is so laborious to define, institutions such as the United Nations have experienced great a difficult time creating procedures in opposition of terrorism. Religious doctrines are essentially unique because of ethnic and cultural identities it encompasses principles profoundly held. A threat to an individual's religion places not only the present in danger, but likewise, a person's cultural past along with the future. Terrorism in the name of religion is often violent as a result of individuals who are religiously passionate about their acts with moral conviction...

Words: 254 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Terrorism

...cultural expectations because they don't have access to culturally accepted methods achieving those objectives, so they switch to acts of terrorism. Any group that employs terrorist activities has very problematic and compelling motives to participate in those activities. Psychological motivation for violence originates from terrorists' personal disappointment with life and achievements. This particular motivation is discovered to develop into a "believe system" from the terrorist. The individual fails to think about the measures taken to achieve the wrong agenda and may be inclined to project antisocial behaviors onto others, producing a polarized "us versus them" mindset. A significant problem in discussing terrorism is implementing a commonly recognized definition. Terrorism can be defined as the unlawful utilization of fear or force to accomplish particular political, financial, or cultural objectives. Since it is so laborious to define, institutions such as the United Nations have experienced great a difficult time creating procedures in opposition of terrorism. Religious doctrines are essentially unique because of ethnic and cultural identities it encompasses principles profoundly held. A threat to an individual's religion places not only the present in danger, but likewise, a person's cultural past along with the future. Terrorism in the name of religion is often violent as a result of individuals who are religiously passionate about their acts with moral conviction...

Words: 254 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Terrorism

...cultural expectations because they don't have access to culturally accepted methods achieving those objectives, so they switch to acts of terrorism. Any group that employs terrorist activities has very problematic and compelling motives to participate in those activities. Psychological motivation for violence originates from terrorists' personal disappointment with life and achievements. This particular motivation is discovered to develop into a "believe system" from the terrorist. The individual fails to think about the measures taken to achieve the wrong agenda and may be inclined to project antisocial behaviors onto others, producing a polarized "us versus them" mindset. A significant problem in discussing terrorism is implementing a commonly recognized definition. Terrorism can be defined as the unlawful utilization of fear or force to accomplish particular political, financial, or cultural objectives. Since it is so laborious to define, institutions such as the United Nations have experienced great a difficult time creating procedures in opposition of terrorism. Religious doctrines are essentially unique because of ethnic and cultural identities it encompasses principles profoundly held. A threat to an individual's religion places not only the present in danger, but likewise, a person's cultural past along with the future. Terrorism in the name of religion is often violent as a result of individuals who are religiously passionate about their acts with moral conviction...

Words: 254 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Terrorism

...Terrorism and Homeland Security: The Impacts on Preventative Measures Abstract This paper explores four different topics on homeland security and anti-terrorism policies. The creation of the Department of Homeland Security or (HDS). What policies had to be implemented and what did the creation of a new agency affected or benefit. The impact that international terrorism has caused the United States of America and how this policies and changes help build a stronger defense against them. The implementation of local enforcement agencies and the community in the fight to deter terrorist attacks. The Federal Emergency Management Agency or (FEMA) and how organizational bureaucracy hindered cooperation and communication among local and federal agencies. This paper will address what measures have been and can be taken in the future to improve inter-agency cooperation and communication. Table of Content Terrorism and Homeland Security: The Impacts on Preventative Measures Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………2 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………..4 Terrorism and the creation of the DHS………................................................................................4 USA PATRIOT ACT……………………………………………………………………………...5 Appropriate roles of agencies and community………………………………………………….5-6 Preventative plans…………………………………………………………………………………6 Community Emergency Response………………………………………………………………...6 FEMA……………………………………………………………………………………………..7 National Response Plan…………………………………………………………………………...

Words: 2744 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Terrorism

...Week 5 Case Analysis SEC/460 December 4, 2011 Terrorism either international or domestic is an act to gain attention for a cause and to get a point across at the expense of innocent people. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (2011) proclaims that “Throughout its more than 100-year history, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has protected the American people from threats to our way of life. As some of our greatest threats—gangsters, public corruption, hate crimes, cyber attacks, white-collar fraud, and terrorism—have evolved, the FBI has changed to meet them head-on” (FBI, 2011, p. 1). Terrorism of the past has occurred in third world countries and not until recently have the terrorist come home to roost right here in America. Terrorism has become an international and domestic problem that has taken the lives of innocent people, destroyed property, and assets and an alarming rate. The media is a tool the terrorist use to publicize, their intentions, motivations, and philosophy whether it be religious, political, or ideological. This assignment requires the assessment and case analysis of a domestic or international terrorist event. The event for the purposes of this paper is a bomb explosion outside the courthouse in the city of New Delhi, India. The Associated Press (2011) reported the event as “A bomb apparently hidden in a briefcase exploded Wednesday as people lined up outside a top court in New Delhi, killing 10 people and wounding scores more in the...

Words: 1161 - Pages: 5