The Comeback of Global Warming
(Global Warming vs. the environmental “solutions”)

Who could turn or live back 50 decades ago without technologic advances, mass media invention and the most important pure air? Sometimes I spend time with my grandmother who lives in the interior of the island of Puerto Rico and I enjoy what she tells me her stories about her youth and the environment where she was surrounded. Suddenly she expresses me how she misses living in those times, when she used to go to the rivers to pass the day in the water or in simple a fun water puddle, enjoying the nature.
It’s sad and lamentable what we have to see and hear about the damage of our planet. How Mother Nature is decaying in her environment and shows sense of impotency of doing something for fighting. By the time we are letting ourselves go with the hope with the ambitious government plans, dubious magnates’ idea and investments or should we call it environment sciences?
The truth is that if we find the certain solutions maybe we won’t find them anywhere near of us. Most solutions pretend to have the best intentions to help better the environment and at the same time minimized the global warming. As for example, the fluorescent lamps may help to limit the consume of energy but however it contains mercury substances which can affect negatively the environment, limiting the ways to its maintenance.
Others, try to executes the use of natural gas which is visualize like one excellent solution in various areas for it abundance. Nevertheless it surges huge intimidated (fear) which the gas damages to the portable water which would be fatal for all of us. Its drilling technic involves multiples risks each time that have been worked three zones down the superficies, mostly deep getting more remotes deposits. I consider that this is one of the most significant controversies, consider the