...About a week ago after driving my Mini Cooper for a short distance the EML light in the car would come on and the car would hesitate. The car then would loose pressure dropping the speed from normal speed limit to no more than 5 – 10 mph. After parking the car, I noticed that the fan would come on and remain on for an extended period. When I lifted the hood of the car, I noticed that the coolant supply would be low. Replacing the coolant supply did not seem to fix the problem. I attempted to figure out the problem with an experiment. I drove the same speed around the block multiple times. The third or fourth time I noticed a difference. When I drove the car approximately a mile, the temperature gage would increase activating the EML. Then the car would hesitate, loose pressure, and decrease in mph. It seemed to be a direct correlation with an increase in temperature, the EML light coming on, losing pressure, and the decrease in mph. So to make sure there were not any confounding variables, I drove the car slowly to ensure speed was not a factor. Decreasing the speed did not change anything. I was able to make the same observation. I took the car to the auto repair shop. The repair person informed me that there was a leak in the coolant system. The leak caused an increase in the cars temperature. The increase in the cars temperature activated the EML light. The car would loose pressure. When the car lost pressure, the protection mechanism would activate to prevent any real...
Words: 297 - Pages: 2
...Better Investment Cooper Tire vs. Goodyear Tire Analysis from years 2009-2013 September 25, 2014 Alex Anderson Robert Patterson Mason Ruesch Executive Summary Cooper Tire & Rubber Company has been history that goes back 100 years to 1914 (History). The company was started by John F. Schaefer and Claude E. Hart as together they purchased a manufacturing company that focused on tire patches, and tire cement and repair kits. The company slowly expanded and grew becoming publicly a held corporation and eventually became listed on the New York Stock Exchange in 1960 (History). 23 years later, Cooper Tire & Rubber Company joined the ranks of the Fortune 500 companies as one of the largest industrial companies in the United States (History). Today, Cooper Tire & Rubber Company and its family companies is truly global, claiming over 65 manufacturing, sales, distribution, technical and design facilities located around the world (History). Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company was founded in 1898 by Frank A. Seiberling (Goodyear Corporate). Beginning with a mere 13 employees, production began with bicycle and carriage tires, horseshoe pads, and poker chips with wages ranging from 13 to 25 cents an hour. Since then, Goodyear Tire has grown tremendously and in 1926 became the world’s largest rubber company (Goodyear Corporate). Today, both of these companies have been competing to gain advantage in the market share, not only against each other, but other companies within the same...
Words: 3721 - Pages: 15
...take offer cooper offering $260/share for cooper shares Sept 1, 2005 Cooper board of director going to meet and discuss this offer, no action should be taken at this time. Sept 06, 2005 Board of Director of Cooper recommend shareholder should reject the offer Takeover panel review Sept 1, 2005 appeal by Cooper about Lion offer that does not explain the preemptive right. Panel ask Lion to make a join letter to explain the preemptive right Sept 09, 2005 appeal by Lion appealing that Cooper explanation of fair value in the statement of Cooper articles is misleading Sept 21, 2005 Coopers convened an EGM for shareholders by sending notice of meeting and explanatory memorandum to vote out Lion Nathan pre-emptive right from Cooper constitution. Sept 27, 2005 Lion Nathan commenced proceeding in Federal court against cooper, explaining that the explanatory memorandum is misleading October 11, 2005 Injunction was given against Cooper from holding EGM until bidder statement is out to give enough information to shareholder October 10, 2005 Lion Nathan bidder statement comes out. Offering $260 per share of Cooper under several conditions October 19, 2005 Full court of the Supreme Court in Adelaide reject Lion Nathan appeal on Sept 2 decision by Justice Perry. Cooper can hold an EGM to vote out Lion Nathan from its pre-emptive right November 15, 2005 Cooper target statement is out explaining why shareholder has to reject Lion bid. Cooper announce...
Words: 2500 - Pages: 10
...Re: Cooper Industries’ Corporate Strategy (A) Diagnosis: Cooper Industries’ growth depends on its widely diversification. From 1960 to the following 30 years, the company purchased about 60 manufacturing companies that increased the size and scope of Cooper Industries. With its experience and strength in “Cooperization”, it has been able to digest the companies it purchased and welded the company into a highly efficient, profitable, competitive business. But they acquired too much debt due to it diversified its business too quickly. It leads whether or not acquires Champion and Cameron Iron Works became to the biggest problem when the case was written, which would raise the debt-to-capital ratio to 55% to 60%. If they leave the problem unaddressed, they might risk bankruptcy in the future. Analysis: Both of Champion and Cameron Iron Works were in related industries, automotive and petroleum equipment, which were profitable businesses. Cooper Industries was already doing those two businesses. For the opportunities identified in the case have to do with the purchase of Champion and Cameron Iron Works, both of them have a strategic fit with Cooper Industries’ long-term plans. For example, Champion has a poor management, old technology, and failures at diversification. But Cooper Industries is good at this field. Cameron Iron Works had a biggest Compression and Energy Business Segment until 1981. But it was the smallest segment of Cooper Industries. Moreover, Cameron Iron Works...
Words: 647 - Pages: 3
...Economic Data In the 1970’s, Sears was a major economic player in the tool industry. They were originally called Sears and Roebuck until the early 1970’s, but since then the Roebuck part of their name has been dropped. During the early 1970’s was when Sears began to develop more business in a retail setting, as they began expanding heavily into suburban shopping malls and doing less business through their mail-order catalog, which, historically, was what had made them a well known company. The major brand that Sears holds that could have competed with Cooper/Nicholson is the Craftsman brand, which was registered by Sears in 1927 and was recently names one of America’s most trusted brands. From 1970-73, the US economy grew by an average of about 3.8% per year, and an average of 2.7% per year from 1974 onward. The 1970’s saw the rise in a term called “Stagflation”, meaning that the economy was growing slower than expected (stagnant), and inflation was happening to prices. It is believed that the inflation was the caused by the Vietnam War and President Lyndon Johnsons “Great Society” Programs. Those programs were a series of increases in government spending aimed at improving education, medical care, and transportation, all while helping to eliminate problems in urban centers. Unemployment was high back in the 1970’s, due to the large number of women who were attempting to enter the workforce, combined with the fact that there were very few jobs available. Additionally, major...
Words: 2327 - Pages: 10
...Cooper Industries’ Corporate Strategy I. Situation of the company Cooper Industries was the manufacturing company have the three group of business. The three group business are Electrical & Electronic, commercial & industrial, and compression & drilling. All this group had created growth in term of revenue by doing acquisition. Initially, Cooper was the recognized leader in pipeline compression equipment. However, the company had developed production expertise and had built a reputation for customer service in the natural gas industry as well as extracted gas from underground wells. Electrical and Electronic. The E & E segment was Cooper’s largest in 1988, generating one-half of corporate sales and 57% of operating profits. Cooper had entered this segment with the 1981 purchase of Crouse-hinds. By 1988, E&E had four sub-segments, each representing quite diverse business, but all focused on the mature North American market that accounted for over 90 percent of segment sales. Commercial and industrial. In the commercial and industrial segmen Cooper participated in the non-powered handtool and window treatment business, and in the automotive aftermarket. In the Tool group, consolidation of acquisitions was completed and new manufacturing of acquisitions was completed and new manufacturing facilities constructed by 1988, and the company held the preeminent market position in most of its tool lines. Compression, drilling and energy equipment Compression and drilling...
Words: 1247 - Pages: 5
...COOPER INDUSTRIES, INC Nicholson File Early in 1972 Nicholson File had to stave off a take over attempt by H.K. Porter Company Inc. which controlled 30.5% of the company's stock. Porter made a cash tender offer to stockholders. However, Porter did not get enough stock to take over Nicholson. In trying to fight the takeover Nicholson File made several merge overtures to other companies like VLN Corp. A few years back, it had rejected an offer from Cooper Industries. Cooper Industries interest in Nicholson Cooper was interested in Nicholson because of its competitive strength in the hand tools industry. Nicholson had a 50% share for files and wraps with a very strong brand name and high quality line. It also had a 9% share of the 200 million hand saws and saw blades market with excellent brand & quality. It had a very effective and large distribution system across US, Canada and overseas. Cooper industries believed that Nicholson can achieve 6% annual sales growth as also bring down the cost of goods sold from 69% to 65% and selling and administrative expenses from 22% to 19% , thereby increasing its profitability. Cooper would be able to use Nicholson’s distribution system to cross sell Cooper’s hand tool lines in the industrial and consumer markets. Cooper anticipated that the Nicholson acquisition would lessen its earnings volatility and currently Nicholson is in the merger market to stave off the raid by H K Porter Company. 1/5 Valuation of Nicholson File (without...
Words: 1592 - Pages: 7
...For the exclusive use of C. SULLIVAN Harvard Business School 9-391-095 Rev. April 18, 1995 Cooper Industries’ Corporate Strategy (A) The business of Cooper is value-added manufacturing. – Cooper Industries’ management philosophy Manufacturing may not be glamorous, but we know a lot about it. – Robert Cizik, Chairman, President and CEO Cooper Industries, a company more than 150 years old, spent most of its history as a small but reputable maker of engines and compressors to propel natural gas through pipelines. In the 1960s, the firm’s leaders decided to expand the company to lessen its dependence on the capital expenditures of the cyclical natural gas business. During the next 30 years, the company acquired more than 60 manufacturing companies that dramatically increased the size and scope of Cooper Industries (Exhibits 1 and 2). Through a process that both insiders and outsiders called “Cooperization,” the company welded a group of “independent, over-the-hill companies into a highly efficient, profitable, competitive business.”1 By 1988, the diversified industrial products company derived $4.3 billion in annual revenues from manufacturing 2 million items. Cooper’s products ranged from 10¢ fuses to $3 million turbine compressor sets marketed under an array of brand names, the most famous of which was Crescent wrenches. “We decided a long time ago,” said Robert Cizik, chairman, president, and CEO, “that if we could do an outstanding job at the unglamorous part by making necessary...
Words: 12792 - Pages: 52
...Rubber (GT) *Official Logo copied from (Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company official website, 2013) Corporate Name The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company Exchange Traded In National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations (NASDAQ) Ticker Symbol GT Description The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company has a long journey of success of more than a century. Frank A. Seiberling, the founder bought first plant of the company, when the bicycle boom was spreading out around the world. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company was initially incorporated with a capital stock of $ 100,000, on August 29, 1928. (Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company official website, 2013) "More people ride on Goodyear tires than on any other kind" was adopted, as the slogan of the company in 1916 and 10 years later in 1926, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company became the largest rubber company in the world. (Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company official website, 2013) Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company took a long 53 years to reach the milestone of billion-dollar-year. At present, sales of Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company has a figure in $20 billion. (Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company official website, 2013) *Official Logo copied from (Cooper Tire & Rubber Company official website, 2013) Corporate Name Cooper Tire & Rubber Co Exchange Traded In New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Ticker Symbol CTB Description The history of Cooper Tire Company actually dates back to 1914, when two brother-in-laws John F. Schaefer...
Words: 2218 - Pages: 9
...Cooper Industry Case Analysis Cooper Industry is an engines and compressors maker with a history more than 150 years. It had been a small company but with good reputation until 1960. In 1960, Cooper expanded its business by acquiring other manufacturing company. It had a famous process call “cooperization” which brought up with many highly efficient, profitable, and competitive businesses. In 1989, Cooper was considering more acquisitions. It first won the bidding with a $21-a-share tender offer and purchased the Champion. It also considered a $700 million bid for Cameron Iron Works. The strategic issue in this case would be whether or not Cooper should complete the purchasing even with a high financial risk and profound operational and organizational ramification. Fist let’s use Porter’s Five Forces to analyze Cooper Industry. Bargaining power of new entrants Level: Medium Cooper tried to fulfill their goals of growth and diversification through acquisitions, and they did success. The diversification allowed Cooper to do the business in many different industries. For example, Cooper began the diversification in 1967 when it acquired the Lufkin Rule Company- a hand tool business. After that, it acquired two more hand tool business companies in 1968 and 1970. Although there were competitors in all the industries that Cooper diversified into, the operation strategy makes Cooper have a stable market shares in different industries. Bargaining power of substitutes. Level:...
Words: 628 - Pages: 3
...Sample Answer For Cooper Industries Case Study Cooper Industries Inc. is the manufacturer and leading producer of engines and big compressors for oil and gas extraction industry. The firm had been heavily dependent on oil and gas sector for its sales and major earning; fluctuations due to cyclic nature of industry concerned its management. Although long-term sales and earnings growth for Cooper had been above average, its stock was less attractive to investors due to higher risk and earnings volatility. Cooper’s earlier acquisitions resulted in diversity of markets but did not result in reduction of earnings volatility.To reduce the risk, management initiated an acquisition strategy to diversify its product portfolio. An acquisition criteria was established that called for acquisition of leading companies of their respective market segments. Cooper acquired three different companies under its acquisition strategy but failed to tempt management of Nicholson File Company for a merger three years ago. However now with Nicholson in play, there was an opportunity for Cooper to acquire a controlling interest in the company. In May 1972, Robert Cizik, executive vice president of Cooper needed some answers before proceeding with appropriate course of action for this opportunity. QUESTIONS 1. Should Mr. Cizik of Cooper Industries try to gain control of Nicholson File Company in May 1972? 2. What is the maximum price that Cooper can afford to pay for Nicholson and still keep the acquisition...
Words: 856 - Pages: 4
...would have on Cooper Inc. Cooper wants to acquire Nicholson while allowing them to retain control and management independence of the company. However for Cooper to be able to realize the benefits of such a deal they would need to increase the efficiency of the business through refining their product offering through cutting certain product lines and reducing employees who’s tasks have become redundant due to the merger as well as combining the two companies’ distribution networks. This will likely result in the retention of the Nicholson family’s shares since Cooper will probably not allow complete management independence. To take control of Nicholson, Cooper needs to obtain 265,000 more shares but if the Nicholson management does not accept Cooper’s terms then the 247,000 shares that are held by speculators and uncommitted shareholders will not be sufficient. This leaves them with the option of striking an agreement with H.K. Porter. Since Porter now has 177,000 shares that will be converted to VLN preferred shares if Nicholson accepts their offer, it would be beneficial for them to come to an agreement with Cooper since their preferred shares are a more attractive option. Porter’s position may leave room for negotiation, Cooper may be able to bring down their asking price of a tax free $50 per share. Besides the current issue of Cooper being able to acquire Nicholson, they may have to consider some other problems they may encounter post merger. Assuming the Cooper manages to...
Words: 620 - Pages: 3
...Corporation recently made an acquisition of Cooper Industries. Eaton Corporation was founded in 1911 by Joseph Eaton. Eaton Corporation specializes in diversified power management. Its primary business focus is on the Electrical Sector; however, it does have four other segments in Truck, Aerospace, Hydraulics, and Automobile and has businesses both domestic and international. Eaton has over 72,000 employees worldwide and sells products to more than 150 countries. According to its 2011 annual report, Eaton Corporation reported $16 billion in sales with a profit of $1.3 billion. Cooper Industries was founded in 1833 and like Eaton Corporation; it is a diversified manufacturer of electrical components and tools. “Cooper has seven operating divisions with leading positions and world-class products and brands including Bussmann electrical and electronic fuses; Crouse-Hinds and CEAG explosion-proof electrical equipment; Halo and Metalux lighting fixtures; and Kyle and McGraw-Edison power systems products.” (Eaton to Acquire, 2012). Between the two companies, there is a lot of room to improve their products and meet customer needs. After the acquisition; the new company will continue to make electrical products their primary focus. According to its 2011 annual report, Cooper Industries reported $5.6 billion in revenues and $827.6 million in profits. The acquisition of Cooper Industries by Eaton Corporation is considered to be a win-win move for both companies that are both leaders in the electrical...
Words: 1961 - Pages: 8
...Cooper Industries Inc. Based on the given information in the case study regarding the acquisition of Nicholson File Company by Cooper Industries, there is no question that Cooper should try to gain control of Nicholson. This decision is based on an analysis of the bargaining positions of each group of Nicholson stockholders which have disparate goals and needs that need to be met. In addition, an appropriate payment method and specific dollar value based on a competitor's offer and Cooper financial data was decided. The remainder of this paper will provide the analysis and rationale for this determination. Should Cooper Industries Acquire Nicholson File Company? Cooper Industries has been expanding through diversification since 1996. Cooper's requirements to acquire a company has three major components. The target company must be: 1. In an industry in which Cooper could become a major player 2. In an industry that is fairly stable, with a broad market for the products and a product line of small ticket' items; and 3. A leader in its market segment. When looking at the criteria that Cizik's company (Cooper Industries), set forth relative to acquisitions, the acquisition of Nicholson meets all three objectives plus has significant potential short and long-term potential. Cooper management feels that by eliminating redundancy and streamlining Nicholson's operations this potential can be realized. Currently, Nicholson's financial history boasts a 2% increase in profit...
Words: 270 - Pages: 2
...Cooper Case 1. What is Cooper’s corporate strategy? How does it create value? What are its key resources? Response: What is Cooper’s corporate strategy? Cooper Industries is a broad company that uses the M&A strategy of diversification by acquiring companies that posses their own strong assets and exhibit stable earnings. As stated by the Corporate Role the company’s acquisitions had guidelines of companies that served a broad customer base, had stable earning and proven manufacturing operations using well-known technologies and had brand name product from market leaders. Moreover, Cooper’s corporate strategy is diversification through acquisitions and mergers. This diversification is in both related and non-related businesses to lessen its dependence on the capital expenditures of the natural gas industry. Cooper’s started acquiring low-technology manufacturing companies. The companies were premium-quality products with strong brands names mainly still own by the original family owners that have seen better days. Once Cooper’s acquired the companies they would update the processes and equipment and consolidate the plants. In a few cases, moved entire manufacturing plants to new plants in the southern part of the country to break away from practices of 20 years ago. They called this the “Cooperization” process which is one where they create lean independent business. The “Cooperization,” process included plans for divisional managers to seek out complementary acquisitions...
Words: 869 - Pages: 4