Free Essay

The Reagan Doctrine

In:

Submitted By jondoe3077
Words 2293
Pages 10
The Reagan Doctrine: Assisting the Overthrow of Pro-Soviet Regimes.
Jonathan Burton
November 2nd 2011
Strayer University
POL300 Professor Popova-Nowak

In April of 1978 the pro-Soviet People’s Democratic Party of Afghanistan (PDPA) overthrew a corrupted Afghan Republic and would begin a domino effect that would culminate on September 11th 2001 in the New York skyline.
Jimmy Carter had put into effect a doctrine of stating out loud that the Persian Gulf was vital to United States foreign political interest but showed no open displays of force. Behind the scenes the CIA had be involved with the movement to oust the PDPA. This forced the Russian government to send in 5,000 troops. Their aim was to place a Soviet chosen leader into power and after twelve hours of intense fighting, Barbrak Karmal was put in a plane and flown back to Moscow. This would begin a decade long occupation by the Russians and the United States got what it wanted; A Soviet Vietnam.
The United States went to great lengths to supply this war against Communism and the hatred of the Soviets. China, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and others poured in money, weapons, and military advisors to aid the Mujahideen, the new name of the resistance fighters the CIA was backing. This covert operation was run out of the CIA until March of 1985.
February 6th of 1985, President Ronald Reagan laid out his doctrine in the State of the Union Address. “WE must not break faith with those who are risking their lives on every continent from Afghanistan to Nicaragua to defy Soviet-supported aggression and secure rights which have been ours since birth.”(Carpenter, Ted 1986) This was President Reagan at his best, delivering a rallying cry for the people. Little did the American people know at the time, the doctrine had been in full scale use since President Reagan took office.
This doctrine seems like it was never to see the light of day. The Heritage Foundation translated the theory of third world rollback into concrete foreign policy. It had become more accepted to countries to assist in the over throw of leftist regimes even if the dictatorship put into place was no better. The Heritage Foundation laid out rollback: Afghanistan, Angola, Cambodia, Ethiopia, Iran, Laos, Libya, Nicaragua, and Vietnam. When given to CIA director William Casey he presented the Reagan Administration with covert rollbacks in Nicaragua, Afghanistan, Laos, Cambodia, Grenada, Iran, Libya, and Cuba. (Bodenhimer, Thomas 1989) This doctrines goal was to pick apart the Soviet empire piece by piece. It seemed to take on a pay back feel. The United States still was smarting from the Vietnam debacle and the citizens and Congress wanted no part in getting publicly involved with anyone’s fight. Not long after taking office, President Reagan authorized covert military actions against Nicaragua and asked for a repeal of the Clark Amendment which prohibited American intervention in Angola. With all of this going on leaks began of the rollbacks and this forced the covert action to become Ronald Reagan’s doctrine in 1983. Looking at the countries picked for the roll back today most of the actions of this doctrine failed to promote what the United States had hoped for; Friends in foreign policy. Libya just had their revolution, Iran is one of the biggest thrones in United States foreign policy, Laos, Grenada, and Nicaragua have little to no bearing on U.S. policy and Cuba is still Cuba, defiantly resisting American change.
The last one of the group is Afghanistan. This operation was more personal and any of the rest. The United States understood they could lure the Russians into war they could not win and humiliate them in the process by pumping massive amounts of arms to the rebels. In March of 1985 the Reagan Administration issued National Security Decision Directive 166, 29. This was a secret plan to escalate covert action in Afghanistan by supplying the rebels with an array of U.S. technologies, military expertise, satellite data, communication networks, C-4, sniper rifles, mortars, anti-tank missiles and shoulder fired Stinger missiles.(Gasper, Phil 2001) By 1987 there was a endless supply of arms being pumped into Afghanistan. At this point the United States was all in with Afghanistan completely oblivious to the fact that they were helping to create a bigger problem for the future.
During this decade long war Pakistan allowed the CIA to use its intelligence headquarters for base camp. ISI or Inter-Services Intelligence also assists in the funneling of money, arms, and aide to the rebels. They also, with the knowledge of the CIA, began to recruit Muslim extremist from around the world. One of the first volunteers was Osama bin Laden. Bin Laden proved to be most helpful to the CIA since he had connection to the Saudi royal family. By 1984 he was running the Maktab al-Khidamar, an organization that was in charge of getting the weapons, money and fighters into Afghanistan. This shows early on how well bin Laden understood the terrain in which he would effectively hide in until 2011. In 1988 bin Laden created Al Qaeda spread across 26 countries. The United States was aware of this group’s formation and let it be since it felt that it would not bite the hand that feeds it.
In 1989 the Reagan doctrine had won. The Russians had taken enough losses and decided that enough was enough. This would signify the end of the USSR as the world knew it but it would take a little more time for that to be completely realized. The United States felt it had delivered payback for Vietnam and set the collapse of the Soviet Union into motion. The United States knowingly help create the Taliban out of the war. Funded by American, British, and Saudi money and trained by the ISI, the Taliban swept into power in an anarchic Afghanistan. This United States saw nothing wrong with the Taliban coming into power and placing Afghanistan into strict Islamic law. The United States saw a chance for a stable government and then could begin work on oil pipelines that would benefit the oil companies that want a more direct access to the Caspian region which housed large oil and natural gas reserves.
It all seemed too good to be true for the United States. The doctrine had of sponsoring anticommunist guerrillas had made Ronald Reagan a Presidential legend. What they failed to see is that with the USSR no longer the bad guy in the world, all of these groups the United States had trained and armed turned their ire towards the United States for what they deemed as involvement in the Holy Land. These lands became the breeding grounds for terrorist cells bent on striking back at American influences. The strict Shari’ah law that the United States supported was drawing backlash from human rights groups who saw women being degraded and killed. The Taliban and Al Qaeda “anti-Western ideology was a grotesque mirror image of the Carter and Reagan-Bush administration’s anti-Soviet Policy.”(Tripathi, Deepak 2011) September 11th 2001 would see the fruits of the Reagan doctrine come back to haunt the United States. There is little need to explain the events since they are permanently seared into every person memory from the onslaught of coverage. The need to bankrupt the USSR had created a new breed of fighter. One who had never seen peace in Afghanistan and had only seen the United States and the Soviets use their homeland as a battle ground to sort out their hatred for each other. The U.S. and the Soviets left broken countries behind giving them no help in rebuilding in most cases. The United States arrogance in foreign policy cost them dearly. The lost of civilian lives, military lives, economic suffering, and 2 wars with Iraq and Afghanistan than will leave the countries no better than they were before the United States got involved. The United States now has been involved with Afghanistan for almost 40 years now. Did the Reagan doctrine work? Yes it did help overthrown pro-Soviet governments and rollback to USSR Empire, but the cost of that doctrine in human rights was set back hundreds of years as the United States resorted to torture. It pulled the United States into 2 wars that are going to cost the taxpayers trillions of dollars and it has helped to drive the cost of oil up to record numbers, and lead to the single most deadly attack on United States soil.

II
Afghanistan is now the only war that the United States is currently involved. This was the original war that the United States entered to capture or kill those responsible for the attacks on September 11th 2001. This war quickly become forgotten when the United States government felt the need to invade Iraq under faulty information that the country had weapons of mass destruction. Afghanistan became an afterthought and more of an occupation to rid the country of terrorist cells than a war to revenge the attack on U.S. soil.
The quote is well know and spoken quite a bit in terms of military actions; “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it” (Santayana, George 1905) The United States went head long into Vietnam to crush the Communist government and quickly learned they were fighting an enemy that had a stronger will to be their own country rather than a puppet for a foreign government. The United States even deemed that Afghanistan would be the Soviets Vietnam. As explained earlier in this paper the CIA funneled massive amounts of money and rebel fighters to ensure the Soviets were broken and demoralized when they pulled out in the late 1980’s.
Now the United States is mired in a war they cannot possibly win in Afghanistan. The Afghanistan people are becoming increasingly anti-American and Hamid Karzai has threatened to align Afghanistan with Moscow. (BBC News 2009) Relations become even more strained when drone strikes kill innocent civilians. Most of the infrastructure in Afghanistan has been destroyed over the last 40 years of wars leaving the country beyond the level of a third world country. The United States wants hard answers on the drug trade and corruption before trying to lend money to the government. Joe Biden made a visit to Afghanistan before being elected Vice President; he labeled Afghanistan a “Narco-State” after not receiving the answers he wanted to hear. Many times over government leaders in the United States question the effectiveness of the Afghan government, but yet they refuse to see that they brought Afghanistan to this point. The burning desire of the Reagan Doctrine allowed the Soviets to be defeated, it allowed the Taliban to rise to power, and then the United States ignored this group. Now Afghanistan is Vietnam for the United States all over again.
On the other hand the United States has Pakistan. This is a nuclear country that has provided an open border to the United States in the past, but once the United States stepped foot in Afghanistan relation began to crumble. The success of both Pakistan and Afghanistan are intertwined and the United States is caught in the middle. The killing of Osama bin Laden deeply hurt the relations with Pakistan because it showed that either Pakistan did not know he was hiding in plain sight in their country or just simply did not inform the United States. (Stone, Andrea 2011) More recently the United States attack Pakistani troops with a drone strike after confusion ensued over where rebel forces were attacking from. These two countries need foreign assistance to grow but the United States meddling and bumbling foreign policy is causing more hurt than help.
The Regan Doctrine has now morphed from assisting the over throw of Pro-Soviet regimes to what may in the future be looked at as the Bush Doctrine of assisting the over throw of Islamic governments. This is a dangerous path to follow. Communism is a style of government, Islamic rule is faith based. Trying to change faith based governments is dangerous because it impedes on basic human rights. The United States has been tied to the over throw of Iraq, Afghanistan, Egypt, Syria, and even Pakistan. This idea that everyone needs democracy is a pipe dream since the beliefs of the Islamic religion and democracy does not go hand in hand. The united States can sweep through these countries and try and set up weak democracies but in the end they will collapse and more groups like the Taliban will rise to power and spread a hate for the West.

References
Bodenhimer, Thomas Gould, Robert. The Reagan Doctrine: Third World Rollback 1989 South End Press accessed from www.thirdworldtraveler.com on November 2nd 2011
Carpenter Galen, Ted U.S. Aid to Anti-Communist Rebels: The Reagan Doctrine and its Pitfalls 1986 Cato Institute Policy Analysis No. 74 accessed through www.cato.org on November 2nd 2011
Cohn, Marjorie Explaining Why They Hate Us 2011 www.consortiumnews.com accessed November 4th 2011
Gasper, Phil Afghanistan, the CIA, bin Laden, and the Taliban International Socialist Review, November-December 2001 accessed from www.thirdworldtraveler.com on November 5th 2011
Roskin, Michael Berry, Nicholas IR: The New World of International Relations copyright 2010 by Pearson Education, Inc
Stone, Andrea Bin Laden Killing threatens Already Tenuous Relationship between U.S. and Pakistan May 5th 2011 accessed from www.huffingtonpost.com December 1st 2011
BBC News Nosedive in Afghan-U.S. relations February 2009 accessed from www.news.bbc.co.uk on December 2nd 2011
Santayana, George Reason for Common Sense, volume 1 of The Life of Reason 1905

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Reagan Doctrine

...The Reagan Doctrine Ronald Reagan is best known for his speech at the Brandenburg Gate near the Berlin Wall where he stated “Mister Gorbachev, Tear down this wall!” That was his challenge to the Soviet leader. Like presidents before him present Reagan had established a doctrine to eradicate the Soviet influence on the world. Ronald Reagan was not the first to propose a doctrine to fight the Soviet nation. In fact, he was just following in the footsteps of his predecessors. The Reagan doctrine was similar to of Truman, Eisenhower, Nixon and Carter in that they all wanted containment of the Soviet Union, but were as they used a more defensive method Reagan deployed a more Offensive style to dealing communist-controlled countries. Reagan laid out his interpretation of his doctrine at his State of the Union Address on February 6, 1985. "We must not break faith with those who are risking their lives on every continent from Afghanistan to Nicaragua to defy Soviet-supported aggression and secure rights which have been ours from birth . . . Support for freedom fighters is self-defense." He went on to explain how he thought that Truman’s version of containment, originally designed to halt Stalin in Europe was now obsolete. President Reagan’s doctrine facilitated the use of US involvement in places like Angola where the Union for the Total Independence of Angola (UNITA) fought against the Soviet and Cuban backed Angolan government. US involvement was also present in Afghanistan...

Words: 937 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Doctrine of Reagan

...Doctrine of Reagan Mrs. J. Y. Baker Prof. Thomas Payne Jr. – POL 300 February 4, 2012 Doctrine of Reagan With the threat of The Cold War, U.S. Presidents beginning with Truman had to create doctrines to find remedies for the problem of communism and its expansion. The doctrine of Ronald W. Reagan was especially noteworthy because it initiated a revolutionized foreign policy after World War II. The Cold War brought trepidation of nuclear bombing that sent panic through the U.S. government. This is why previously the U.S. chose not to challenge the Soviet Union head-on. Officials felt American’s weren’t ready to send their loved ones to fight another war on foreign soil after Vietnam listed so many casualties. However with the risk of communism spreading further and possibly encompassing the globe, the U.S. just couldn’t take a backseat and keep quiet. In 1983, Reagan dubbed the Soviet Union an “evil empire” using a speech written by Dolan for the opposite purpose. As Diggins put it “Reagan dubbed the Soviet Union ‘the focus of evil’ of the entire world” (2007, pg. 29). Following the footsteps of his predecessor, President Carter, Reagan developed a way to fight the war on communism and make the people happy by preventing our military from suffering anymore casualties. President Carter got the ball rolling when the Soviet Union tried to invade Afghanistan in 1979. That’s when the U.S. supplied secret military aid to mujahideen fighters to assist in driving out the...

Words: 784 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Reagan Doctrine

...analysts argue that the Reagan Doctrine as an innovation. According to Lagon: “The scope of the Reagan Doctrine was both broader and narrower than the predominant Cold War political doctrine of the United States, containment” (1994). The Reagan Doctrine played a role in Central America as well. For example, Anastasio Somoza of Nicaragua was overthrown by the revolutionary front in 1979. In addition, the Doctrine also affected Cambodia and Angola. In all the regions affected by the Reagan Doctrine, the U.S. officials always supported the insurgents and used them as proxies for the United States. The assistance of the insurgencies, especially in Afghanistan, destabilized the pro-Soviet regimes in the process of consolidating totalitarian control over their countries. The first key element of the Reagan Doctrine was the balance of power. During the Cold War Era the US and the Soviets often clashed over Capitalism’s influence in the world against the spread of Communism. Soviet hegemony over east Europe had made it clear to the United States that its greatest threat was the Soviet Union and primary enemy was communism. Beyond the Central and Eastern European countries each superpower had allies in remote areas of the globe. Most of these peripheral nations favored the Communist idea of governance. Lagon states: “the relative balance in these Third World client states favored the Soviets in the latter of the 1970’s and 80’s” (1994). Therefore, Doctrines that began with Trumann...

Words: 500 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

The Reagan Doctrine

...The Reagan Doctrine The Reagan Doctrine popularized during the two-term presidency of Ronald Wilson Reagan was one which he hinted to in his 1985 State of the Union Address. He affirmed to the American public and the world that “We must not break faith with those who are risking their lives--on every continent from Afghanistan to Nicaragua--to defy Soviet aggression and secure rights which have been ours from birth. Support for freedom fighters is self-defense.” (Reagan, 1985, Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents 21, no. 6). This theme was expanded upon afterwards by then Secretary of State George Shultz, and picked up by journalists, most notably Charles Krauthammer who was first to give the Reagan Doctrine its name in his column in the April 1, 1985 issue of Time magazine. The Reagan Doctrine contended that the United States had a duty to oppose the spread of communist dictatorships and to support the freedom fighters that were part of insurgencies defying Soviet aggression. Its policies were rooted in the 1950s anti-communist doctrines long supported by Americans; however it differed in that “containment” was no longer its only goal. Under the Reagan doctrinal policy it was now permissible to support freedom fighters seeking to throw off governments in counties suffering under communist domination. The rhetorical outpouring of the Reagan Doctrine was much more universal than its actual enactment of policy. This was attributed largely to the impact on U.S. interests...

Words: 1068 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Reagan Doctrine

...“Documents” Reagan Doctrine 1981 – 1989 By: Naomi Reid Professor Muhammad Sohna Pol 300 Sunday, July 29, 2012 “The "Reagan Doctrine" was used to characterize the Reagan administration's (1981-1988) policy of supporting anti-Communist insurgents wherever they might be. In his 1985 State of the Union address, President Ronald Reagan called upon Congress and the American people to stand up to the Soviet Union, what he had previously called the "Evil Empire": "We must stand by all our democratic allies. And we must not break faith with those who are risking their lives--on every continent, from Afghanistan to Nicaragua--to defy Soviet-supported aggression and secure rights which have been ours from birth." (Reagan Doctrine) To the naked eye the Reagan Doctrine appears to corresponds with the United States’ 40-year mission for containment of the Soviet Union. The doctrine however is very different. As carried out by Presidents Truman, Eisenhower, Nixon and Carter, containment is a defensive theory referring to efforts to limit the further spread of Soviet power. During the initial years of the Cold War, the United States’ official policy towards communism was containment. With the creation of the Reagan Doctrine the focus shifted from keeping communism from spreading to eliminating existing communist governments. In addition to the rollback of these communist governments, the United States also wanted to encourage capitalism and democracy in those places. The Reagan Doctrine...

Words: 506 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Tlwhite39

...The Cold War and U.S. Diplomacy The Reagan Doctrine In the political history of the United States, the Presidential Doctrines hold an important position. Presidential Doctrine can be defined as a set of principles or practices applied by a President to a particular situation, region, or government, and a President may formulate a doctrine alone or with the help of advisers within the entire administration (Jones, 2013). According to the Monroe Doctrine to the Reagan Doctrine, in the realm of the U.S. politics and foreign affairs, presidential doctrines have played a pivotal role, and if studied from the perspective of the Cold War, the importance of the Reagan Doctrine can be ascertained. The presidential doctrine of Reagan which is popularly known as the Reagan Doctrine played a significant role in decreasing the global influence of the Soviet Union. In the course of the Cold War but it also played a crucial role in shaping the long term foreign policies of the United States in a tumultuous manner primarily because of its role in supporting the anti-Sandinista rebels (called “Contras”) and for eventually instigating the U.S. – Iran conflict, and it is due to such a roles that even today the Reagan Doctrine is considered strategically an important political approach. The Soviet regime provided a chance for Reagan to formulate a doctrine which will be able to strengthen the motivation of these rebels and eventually bring an end to the Soviet ...

Words: 1504 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

The Cold War and U.S. Diplomacy

...The Cold War and U.S. Diplomacy Strayer University Summer 2014 The purpose of the Reagan Doctrine was to “sponsor anticommunist guerrillas who are trying to overthrow pro-Soviet regimes” (Roskin, 2010, p.58). It was implemented in the mid-1980’s; specifically mentioned in a discrete manner in President Reagan’s 1985 State of the Union Address and lasted less than a decade, until the end of the Cold War in 1991. One of the major challenges that President Reagan faced throughout his time in office was Communism and the Cold War. Although these issues had been a problem through several presidencies, they began to escalate in the early years of Reagan’s administration. Reagan believed that President Carter provided minimal leadership to reverse communism. In 1985 President Reagan introduced the principles of the doctrine through support of anti-communist revolutions. During his State of the Union Address in 1985 he compared, “anticommunist forces with American colonists who had fought the revolutionary war, describing those latter-day patriots as ‘freedom fighters’ for democracy” (“The Reagan Doctrine”, 2014, par. 2). The doctrine was created to decrease the Soviet influence in Africa, Asia and Latin America as part of the Reagan administration’s Cold War strategy (Reagan Doctrine, 2014). It has been argued that the Reagan doctrine contributed to the fall of communism itself. One of the diplomatic efforts that occurred during Reagan’s time in office was the support...

Words: 1193 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Strayer Pol 1

...Ronald Reagan was the 40th United States president that served from 1981-1989. In his 1985 State of the Union address, President Ronald Reagan called upon Congress and the American people to stand up to the Soviet Union, what he had previously called the “Evil Empire”. From this State of the Union came the well-known Reagan Doctrine of 1985. This doctrine defined American interests around the globe and its determination of preventing communism from expanding. “The Reagan Doctrine proclaims overt and unashamed American support for anti-Communist revolution. It is intended to establish a new, firmer--a doctrinal--foundation for such support by declaring equally worthy all armed resistance to communism, whether foreign or indigenously imposed.” (Krauthammer, 1985). A situation that required the United States diplomatic efforts during President Reagan’s time in office was the rapidly growing expansion of the Soviet Union in East Asia, Indies and the Middle East. Another situation was the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan which had begun in 1979. Previously, the Carter administration had little hesitation in coming to the aid of Afghanistan after the invasion. At the time, the United States had the understanding that the Soviet Union would eventually become Middle East and would be able to gain control of the oil fields. Two events increased U.S.-Soviet tensions: the suppression of the Solidarity labor movement in Poland in December 1981, and the destruction of an off-course civilian...

Words: 1191 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The Cold War and U.S. Diplomacy

...Diplomacy SHAMIKA WARD EMMANUEL OBUAH POL 300: Contemp Intl Problems May 31, 2013 The Cold War and U.S. Diplomacy The Reagan Doctrine was the foreign policy in the United States, enacted by President Ronald Reagan. The doctrine was design to eradicate the communist governments in Africa, Asia, and Latin America that were authorized and corroborated by the Soviet Union. This assignment will review by what method the United States delivered open and private backing to guerrilla and resistance movements during the Regan years. Additionally, explain the political doctrine detailed events that occurred in Afghanistan when the Soviet Union invaded. As a final point, this assignment will define the benefits and drawbacks established on the Regan Doctrine. Summarize the Situation of U.S. Diplomatic of the Regan Doctrine During the course of the initial years of the Cold War, Presidents Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, and Jimmy Carter all endorsed dogmas against communism in order to enclose it. Ronald Regan prohibited their détente policy in 1979, when the Soviet Union attacked Afghanistan. This alone demonstrated that policies that only contain communism were unproductive. Regan criticized in the compromise policy when it emanated to any communist government. As an alternative, Reagan proposed the Rollback policy. The creation of the Reagan Doctrine moved from containment and dispersal to eradicating all current communist governments. Likewise, the United States wanted to rise...

Words: 1299 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Us Foreign Policy

... PAGE: 1 Outline: A) Introduction: U.S. Foreign Policy and Nicaragua. B) General Discussion: 1) Nicaraguan history, 2) The Sandinistas, 3) The Brezhnev Doctrine, 4) The Reagan Doctrine, 5) The Contras and the CIA, 6) Other Political Strategies, 7) Political Ramifications Internationally, 8) Political Ramifications Domestically. C) Conclusion. Foreword: Many times throughout its history, the United States government has been embroiled in disputes over its foreign policy. These conflicts arise sometimes domestically, sometimes internationally and sometimes in both areas. One of the most significant foreign policy problems the U.S. government has ever had, involved its dealings with Nicaragua during the 1980’s. By dissecting the sequence of events which lead upon to the U.S. government using the CIA to train the Contra rebels and the foreign doctrine issued which propagated this unprecedented action on the part of the Reagan Administration, I shall provide evidence to support the conclusion: that despite the out come and any international “blowback”, this was the only course of action available to the U.S. government in order to stop the spread of socialism in the Western Hemisphere. DATED:...

Words: 3453 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

The Cold Ar and Us Deplomacy

...between these countries was sometimes followed by high tensions, which would have emanated into a war but did not (Gottfried & Reim, 2003). The following essay will look at what the U.S. did during that time, as well as summarize the situation that required U.S. diplomatic efforts during the president’s time in office. In addition, the essay will describe the effect of these diplomatic efforts for the U.S. and other countries as well as assess, in conclusion, the advantages and disadvantages of the particular doctrine that was followed. What the President Did During That Time During the cold war, the president was Ronald Reagan. He, together with members of his administration, came up with a strategy designed to oppose the influence that the Soviet Union had in the world. It came to be referred to as the Reagan Doctrine. This also came to be the showpiece of the United States foreign policy in the early 80s until the Cold war ended in 1991 (Gaddis, 2011). Under this Doctrine, the U.S. government provided what is widely known as “overt and covert aid” to resistant movements as well as anti-communist guerillas in an effort to ensure that the support the Soviet Union received from Latin America, Asia, and Africa was reduced. This...

Words: 2401 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Current Events and U.S. Diplomacy

...Diplomacy Contemporary International Problems POL 300 March 4, 2012 The Reagan Doctrine was no different. Presupposing a world of evil and good, it operated on the theory that evil, was in the form of the USSR, and was getting the upper hand. To Reagan and his advisers, examples of Soviet treachery, including support for Marxist movements around the globe, were numerous; moreover, Soviet adventurism, from the Horn of Africa in the 1970s to Central America in the 1980s, showed no signs of lessening. Reagan was intent on stopping that trend—a trend, he believed, that President Carter had done little to reverse. Therefore, he adopted the vocabulary of the early Cold War, advocating policies equally aggressive and bold in range (Foreign Affairs). Reagan presented his vision at his State of the Union Address on February 6, 1985. "We must not break faith," he declared, "with those who are risking their lives—on every continent from Afghanistan to Nicaragua—to defy Soviet-supported aggression and secure rights which have been ours from birth." The president went on to compare anticommunist forces with American colonists who had fought the revolutionary war, relating those early patriots as "freedom fighters" for democracy. Providing aid to those groups was not only ethically just but geopolitically sensible. "Support for freedom fighters," Reagan declared, "is self-defense." It would be months before those declarations would take form as a permanent...

Words: 3080 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

The Reagan Era

...On Friday October 16, 1981, President Ronald Reagan wrote in his personal diary, “Central America is really the world’s next hotspot. Nicaragua is an armed camp supplied by Cuba and threatening a communist takeover of all of Central America.” (The Reagan Diaries, 2007) For the next eight years as Commander-in-Chief, this mindset would shape his perspective on the small Third World country about the size of North Carolina. The Administration’s policies, actions, and attitudes toward Nicaragua and other perceived hostile nations became known as “Reagan Doctrine.” The defeat of the Nicaraguan Revolution became the “cornerstone of the Reagan Central American policy and the test case of Reagan Doctrine.” (U.S. Intervention in the Nicaraguan Elections and American Foreign Policy in the Post-Cold War Era, 1992) Reagan Doctrine was not a label coined by President Reagan or his administration. It was a term used later by his critics to define his foreign policy strategy for countries around the world. The Reagan Doctrine was a strategy to aid anti-communist, or more specifically, anti-Soviet insurgencies in the Third World during Reagan’s two terms as president from 1981-1989. The primary goal was to overthrow Marxist regimes and/or prevent Marxist regimes from becoming established. Reagan wasted no time getting started in the implementation of his foreign policy. The Administration’s first comprehensive “U.S. National Security Strategy,” which was a document approved by the President...

Words: 2622 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Reagan Analysis

...Reagan Analysis George W Ivery III HIS 145 June 16, 2014 Shaun Sullivan Reagan Analysis President Ronald Reagan the 40th President of the United States had certain qualities that made people think of him in several different lights. One of the ways people saw him is overrated and taking credit for what he did not do when he resided at the White House as president. On the other hand some said he is much underrated due to him not getting proper credit for some of the things he did and changed while he was in office. He had quite a few items that are in the history of this country, which include the Principles of the New Right, the Iran Contra Affair, and credit for ending the Cold War between the United States (U. S.) and the Soviet Union (USSR). These are just a few items that will be taken into consideration to see if he was or was not the person that is liked or disliked by the people of the U. S. The election of President Reagan in 1980 saw the emergence of what was considered the “conservative cause known as the “New Right” movement, partly in response to counter-cultural protests of the 1960’s-evangelical Christian groups, social issues” (The resurgence of conservatism 1980-2000, 2014). The Reagan Doctrine; “A strategy orchestrated and implemented by the United States under the Reagan Administration to oppose the global influence of the Soviet Union during the final years of the Cold War” (The resurgence of conservatism 1980-2000, 2014). It is also known as...

Words: 1418 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

The Cold War and the U.S. Diplomacy

...The Cold War and U.S. Diplomacy POL 300 January 31, 2012 The key problem for his presidency clearly would be the Vietnam War. It had driven his predecessor from office, and if it were not resolved in a way that could be turned to political advantage, it would drive him from office as well. Two months after Nixon assumed the presidency, American combat deaths exceeded thirty-six hundred, and there seemed no end in sight. Nixon was in a dilemma, for during the campaign he had said that he had a "secret plan" to end the war but could not divulge it because it might upset the Paris peace negotiations. If his plan involved escalation, Democrats could charge that he was abandoning attempts to reach a peaceful solution and could point to mounting American casualties and prisoners of war. If he negotiated a solution that led to the fall of the government in Saigon, Democrats could charge he had abandoned an ally. Nixon had to find a way to cut American commitments while preserving the non-Communist government in South Vietnam—at least for a "decent interval" so that the overthrow of the regime could not be blamed on the United States (Morgan 2002). Nixon, his national security adviser Henry Kissinger, and Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird settled on an approach with several elements. First, the Laird policy for "Vietnamization" was adopted. Responsibility for fighting would be turned over to the Vietnamese, in order to reduce American casualties. Gradually...

Words: 1576 - Pages: 7