Premium Essay

There Is No Hope of Doing Perfect Rearch

In:

Submitted By devonmacs
Words 806
Pages 4
Running Header: There is No Hope of Doing Perfect Research
There is No Hope of Doing Perfect Research
To begin with, perfect research may refer to accurate or precise which leaves it with no room for further development. Imagine a world without research and new minds for progression, the world could still be in the primitive age. According to Metaphysics there is no perfection in this world we live in (Kim, Korman, & Sosa, 2012). May be another world of believes (religion) but not the real one. People have no perfect brains, so one can’t expect them to deliver perfect work.
As we all know, every discovery begins with a single brain which later develops to a certain creation. Each human being has their own understanding and views of certain phenomena. When someone discovers something, it acts as the source of other major discoveries to come. It has to undergo major changes and alteration for its perfection. Research involves experimental analysis either in the laboratory, field or on certain events. During the research experiments, the probability of getting false results is very high due to human, instrumental and other field errors. Let’s say a group of people are doing the same research on a certain topic. Their results will be very different when compared then everyone tries to modify them in different ways. This leads to different discoveries with time. Therefore research is dynamic and a continuous process.
In order to clarify all these, let’s consider the DNA structure discovery. Miescher discovered nuclein in 1869. These gave way for further research to nucleic acid and later the double helix in 1953 by James Watson and Francis Crick (Murray, Rodwell, Lender, Botham, Veil, and Kennelly, 2009). In the initial stages of DNA discovery, no one knew that it had much impact to our lives. The discoveries lead to emergence of other scientists who brought their

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Failure of Rim

...Glass Door Comments BlackBerry Reviews Updated Dec 11, 2013 All Employees Current Employees Only 3.4 796 reviews 57% of employees recommend this company to a friend 796 Employee Reviews Bottom of Form Review Highlights Pros: * "Great environment combined with a perfect work-life balance" in 49 reviews * "Great work environment/culture which makes it a fun place to work" in 45 reviews * "Good benefits; Good company to work for till profits started to slide off" in 36 reviews * "Lots of great people at the company, learned a lot and inspired my career in technology" in 33 reviews * "Good pay, great management, I felt like the work I was doing was important for the company" in 30 reviews Cons: * "No work life balance, limited career advancement, lack of good benefits of tech companies" in 20 reviews * "Senior management (C-Level) does no communicate down to employees well" in 27 reviews * "Poor management decision making processes - not innovative" in 18 reviews * "Upper management doesn't listen to people lower down that actually know what they're talking about" in 15 reviews * "Many bad/useless middle management built up over the years but the layoff did some clean up" in 13 reviews Reviews Dec 8, 2013   “Loved the company and the people.” Software Development Manager (Former Employee) Rolling Meadows, IL I worked at BlackBerry full-time for more than 5 years Pros – BlackBerry was a great...

Words: 90794 - Pages: 364

Premium Essay

Lesson Learnt from  Innovation in Nature Based  Tourism Services 

...INNO NATOUR.  Lesson learnt from  Innovation in Nature Based  Tourism Services  Contact: Faculty of Economics and Public Administration „Stefan cel Mare” University of Suceava Universităţii str., no. 13, Building H 720229 SUCEAVA, ROMANIA Phone: (+40) 230 216147 ext. 294 Erasmus IP web site: www.innonatour.usv.ro Faculty web site: www.seap.usv.ro University web site: www.usv.ro 2012 Subject to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without written permission of the copyright owners. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................................ 5  DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT.............................................................................................................. 8  STUDENTS OF THE 2011­2012 ERASMUS IP ...................................................................................... 9  LECTURERS, TUTORS AND EXPERTS OF THE 2011­2012 ERASMUS IP ................................. 10  RESULTS OF THE ERASMUS IP INNO NATOUR 2011­2012......................................................... 19  FINAL REPORTS OF THE WORKING GROUPS .................................................................................. 20  INDIVIDUAL POST CASE STUDIES OF THE STUDENTS ................................................................. 44  CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS ......................................

Words: 57884 - Pages: 232