Free Essay

Titration Analysis of Commercial Bleach

In:

Submitted By emilymae1331
Words 976
Pages 4
Titration Analysis of Commercial Bleach
Introduction
In order to determine the percentage of sodium hypochlorite in two different commercial bleaches and compare the relative effectiveness of the two bleaches a titration procedure will be used. Titration is a procedure for determining an unknown concentration of a solute using a reaction with a second solution with a known concentration. Commercial bleaches contain sodium hypochlorite. This is the active ingredient. In experiment 7 we demonstrated the ability to do a titration procedure to determine the sodium hypochlorite percentage in two commercial bleaches. Once we figured the two percentages we compared them to see which was the strongest. To determine the amount of NaClO in each solution we had to perform two successive oxidation reduction reactions. For the experiment to have been successful NaClO(aq)+2NaI(aq)+2HC2H3O2(aq)→I2(aq)+NaCl(aq)+2NaC2H3O2(aq)+H2O(l) needed to become colorless shown as: I2(aq)+2Na2S2O3(aq)→Na2S4O6(aq)+2NaI(aq). Before beginning, we thought the second bleach would be stronger.
Methods and Materials
1. First, we gathered all of the materials, which included: * Buret Clamp * Buret * Ring Stand * Small Funnel * Beaker for collecting waste materials * 125 mL Erlenmeyer flask
2. Then we rinsed the buret with 10 mL of 0.100 M sodium thiosulfate (Na2S2O3), using the small funnel, to clean the buret. The sodium thiosulfate was discarded into the waste beaker.
3. After the cleaning process, we made sure the buret valve was in the closed position. We then filled the buret with 0.100 M Na2S2O3. It is acceptable for the liquid to be over the zero mark at this time.
4. We then placed the waste beaker beneath the buret and opened the valve quickly and watched and listened for an air bubble to leave the tip of the buret. We then quickly turned the valve off. We made sure the liquid was at the zero mark or a few mL below. The experiment is now ready for titration.
5. Next, we placed 50 mL of deionized water in the 125 mL flask and dissolved two grams of sodium iodine (NaI) in the water. Then we added 10 mL of concentrated acetic acid (HC2H3O2) and mixed it thoroughly by swirling.
6. Then 10 mL was poured into one of the bleach samples using a 50 mL beaker. Using a pipet we added 2 mL of the bleach sample into the NaI HC2H3O2 mixture. The mixture turned brown from the diatomic molecular iodine that was created during the reaction.
7. We began titrating the thiosulfate solution into our reaction flask and added 1-2 mL at a time. After adding each addition of the 1-2 mL, we swirled the flask to mix the contents. The brown solution began to lighten, so we added the thiosulfate solution in smaller increments until the solution is a very light brown.
8. Then, we added 2 mL of starch solution and swirled the flask to mix its contents. This turned the solution a dark blue or black color.
9. We resumed titrating the thiosulfate solution one drop at a time swirling the flask until the solution was clear or colorless. This was the end point of our titration process.
10. We prepared another bleach sample by repeating steps 5 and 6
11. After recording the initial volume missing in our data sheets, we titrated the second sample as before in steps 7 through 9. We had to do a third trial because our first two were not within 0.5 mL of each other.
12. We then repeated the sample preparation and titration steps for a second commercial bleach solution.
Results
Sample 1 | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 | Final Buret | 6.10 mL | 13.45 mL | 5.55 mL | Initial Buret | 2.25 mL | 6.10 mL | 0 mL | Volume of thiosulfate | 3.85 mL | 7.35 mL | 5.55 mL | Avg. Volume of Thiosulfate | 5.58 mL | | | % NaClO | .9486% | | |

Sample 2 | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 | Final Buret | 12.50 mL | 19.50 mL | 10 mL | Initial Buret | 0 mL | 12.50 mL | 0 mL | Volume of Thiosulfate | 12.50 mL | 7.00 mL | 10 mL | Avg. Volume of Thiosulfate | 9.83 mL | | | % NaClO | 1.6711% | | |

The percent of NaClO was found by using the formula: 0.170(V)
Discussion
Through titration and redox reactions we were able to discover which bleach was more concentrated. The measured amount of thiosulfate solution used along with its known concentration allowed us to conclude how much iodine reacted. Considering the amount of iodine is directly related to the amount of hypochlorite present in the bleach, the titration with the thiosulfate conclusively told us the quantity of hypochlorite in the bleach. We found the percentage of sodium hypochlorite by using the formula:
% of NaClO= 0.170(v). By using this formula and the data we acquired through the procedure, we discovered that the second bleach’s percentage was higher than the first. This proved our theory that the second bleach would be stronger and harder to dilute.

Conclusion 1. After titrating both NaClO solutions, we successfully proved our hypothesis. 2. We found everything we hoped to find. Redox reactions helped with this. 3. The relevance of this is to determine which bleach would be more efficient. 4. The first solutions concentration was .95% 5. The second solution had a concentration of 1.67% 6. Because of the higher concentration, sample 2 took more mL to dillute.

References 1. Department of Physical Sciences, OCCC. Laboratory for Survey of General, Organic, and Biochemistry. Hayden-McNeil. Plymouth, MI. 2011. 2. Timberlake, Karen C. Chemistry, 11 ed. Prentice Hall. Glenview, IL. 2012.
References
3. Department of Physical Sciences, OCCC. Laboratory for Survey of General, Organic, and Biochemistry. Hayden-McNeil. Plymouth, MI. 2011. 4. Timberlake, Karen C. Chemistry, 11 ed. Prentice Hall. Glenview, IL. 2012.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Experiment 8 the Analysis of Household Bleach

...Experiment 8: Redox: Analysis of the Oxidizing Capacity of Bleach PURPOSE In this experiment, you will show how redox reactions can be used to quantitatively determine the amount of oxidizing agent in liquid hypochlorite household bleach. There are two oxidation-reduction reactions for determining the oxidizing capacity of bleach. Initially an excess of iodide ions are added to a bleach solution. The iodide ions are oxidized to iodine after the solution has been acidified. Starch is added to the resulting iodine solution as an indicator. The solution is then titrated with sodium thiosulfate until the color of the solution changes indicating the endpoint of the reaction. Data collected from the titrations will be used to calculate the mass of the sodium hypochlorite in an unknown solution of bleach. Given the original mass of the unknown solution and the calculated mass of the sodium hypochlorite in the unknown solution, the percent by mass of the sodium hypochlorite can be determined. The oxidizing capacity of the unknown bleach is effectively the percent by mass of the sodium hypochlorite in the unknown bleach sample. OJECTIVES 1) Titration of a sample of bleach with thiosulfate. 2) Determining the end point of the titration with starch indicator. 3) To determine oxidizing capacity of bleach by determining the percentage by mass of the bleach that is sodium hypochlorite. 4) Balance and summarize the two redox reactions to determine the overall chemical reaction that...

Words: 3658 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Form 6 Chemistry Experiment

...sodium carbonate accurately using the method of “weighing by difference”. Transfer the weighed carbonate to a beaker and add about 100 cm3 of distilled water to dissolve it completely. After dissolving, transfer the solution to a 250.00 cm3 volumetric flask. Rinse the beaker thoroughly and transfer all the washes into the volumetric flask. Remember not to overshoot the graduation mark of the flask. Make up the solution to the mark on the neck by adding water. Pipette 25.00 cm3 of sodium carbonate solution to a clean conical flask. Add 2 drops of methyl orange indicator to the carbonate solution. Titrate the carbonate solution with the given dilute hydrochloric acid until the colour of solution just changes from yellow to orange. Repeat the titration two times. Calculation : Results : Questions : Calculate the molarity of the sodium carbonate solution prepared and the molarity of the hydrochloric acid. 1 2. What is the meaning of “weighing by difference”? Suggest one method other than using acid-base indicator to...

Words: 8885 - Pages: 36

Free Essay

Analytical Chem

...Chemistry Modern Analytical Chemistry David Harvey DePauw University Boston Burr Ridge, IL Dubuque, IA Madison, WI New York San Francisco St. Louis Bangkok Bogotá Caracas Lisbon London Madrid Mexico City Milan New Delhi Seoul Singapore Sydney Taipei Toronto McGraw-Hill Higher Education A Division of The McGraw-Hill Companies MODERN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY Copyright © 2000 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Except as permitted under the United States Copyright Act of 1976, no part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a data base or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher. This book is printed on acid-free paper. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 KGP/KGP 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 ISBN 0–07–237547–7 Vice president and editorial director: Kevin T. Kane Publisher: James M. Smith Sponsoring editor: Kent A. Peterson Editorial assistant: Jennifer L. Bensink Developmental editor: Shirley R. Oberbroeckling Senior marketing manager: Martin J. Lange Senior project manager: Jayne Klein Production supervisor: Laura Fuller Coordinator of freelance design: Michelle D. Whitaker Senior photo research coordinator: Lori Hancock Senior supplement coordinator: Audrey A. Reiter Compositor: Shepherd, Inc. Typeface: 10/12 Minion Printer: Quebecor Printing Book Group/Kingsport Freelance cover/interior designer: Elise Lansdon Cover image: © George Diebold/The...

Words: 88362 - Pages: 354

Free Essay

Global Warming

...Physical Chemistry Understanding our Chemical World Physical Chemistry Understanding our Chemical World Paul Monk Manchester Metropolitan University, UK Copyright  2004 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ, England Telephone (+44) 1243 779777 Email (for orders and customer service enquiries): cs-books@wiley.co.uk Visit our Home Page on www.wileyeurope.com or www.wiley.com All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except under the terms of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 or under the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4LP, UK, without the permission in writing of the Publisher. Requests to the Publisher should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ, England, or emailed to permreq@wiley.co.uk, or faxed to (+44) 1243 770620. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold on the understanding that the Publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. If professional advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought. Other Wiley...

Words: 233668 - Pages: 935

Free Essay

Test2

...62118 0/nm 1/n1 2/nm 3/nm 4/nm 5/nm 6/nm 7/nm 8/nm 9/nm 1990s 0th/pt 1st/p 1th/tc 2nd/p 2th/tc 3rd/p 3th/tc 4th/pt 5th/pt 6th/pt 7th/pt 8th/pt 9th/pt 0s/pt a A AA AAA Aachen/M aardvark/SM Aaren/M Aarhus/M Aarika/M Aaron/M AB aback abacus/SM abaft Abagael/M Abagail/M abalone/SM abandoner/M abandon/LGDRS abandonment/SM abase/LGDSR abasement/S abaser/M abashed/UY abashment/MS abash/SDLG abate/DSRLG abated/U abatement/MS abater/M abattoir/SM Abba/M Abbe/M abbé/S abbess/SM Abbey/M abbey/MS Abbie/M Abbi/M Abbot/M abbot/MS Abbott/M abbr abbrev abbreviated/UA abbreviates/A abbreviate/XDSNG abbreviating/A abbreviation/M Abbye/M Abby/M ABC/M Abdel/M abdicate/NGDSX abdication/M abdomen/SM abdominal/YS abduct/DGS abduction/SM abductor/SM Abdul/M ab/DY abeam Abelard/M Abel/M Abelson/M Abe/M Aberdeen/M Abernathy/M aberrant/YS aberrational aberration/SM abet/S abetted abetting abettor/SM Abeu/M abeyance/MS abeyant Abey/M abhorred abhorrence/MS abhorrent/Y abhorrer/M abhorring abhor/S abidance/MS abide/JGSR abider/M abiding/Y Abidjan/M Abie/M Abigael/M Abigail/M Abigale/M Abilene/M ability/IMES abjection/MS abjectness/SM abject/SGPDY abjuration/SM abjuratory abjurer/M abjure/ZGSRD ablate/VGNSDX ablation/M ablative/SY ablaze abler/E ables/E ablest able/U abloom ablution/MS Ab/M ABM/S abnegate/NGSDX abnegation/M Abner/M abnormality/SM abnormal/SY aboard ...

Words: 113589 - Pages: 455