Free Essay

Valuation Metrics

In:

Submitted By cima2013
Words 1428
Pages 6
"Which Valuation Metrics Work Best for Stock-Picking Within the Sector?"

FIN630 Section 9044
Professor John Halstead
October 30, 2011

Overview
The article entitled “Which Valuation Metrics Work Best for Stock-Picking Within the Sector?” studies the effectiveness of several market valuation multiples in predicting outperformance of regulated utility stocks relative to the industry as well as the S&P 500 index from 1972 to 2010. The study that was conducted utilizes a database of financial information on publicly traded regulated utility stocks. “The initial source for the universe of firms was from FactSet, and consisted of all publicly traded stocks, that were classified as "Electric Utilities" under the Fact Set industry classification scheme.” FactSet is a company that provides computer-based financial data and analysis for financial professionals on global markets, public and private companies. The study started in 1972 with 80 publicly traded regulated utilities and ends in 2010 with 41 active regulated utilities. “This drop in the number of publicly traded regulated utilities over the last 40 years largely reflects the consolidation wave of the late 1990s and early 2000s, as well as the impact of deregulation during this period.” Black Book (2011).

Methodology
At the end of each month during the period of 1972-2010, we ranked the universe of regulated utility stocks were ranked on the basis of the following eight valuation metrics, and then sorted the stocks into quintiles. We tracked the subsequent total returns of the cheapest quintiles on each metric over one-, three-, five- and 10-year investment horizons relative to regulated utilities as a group and the S&P 500. The eight valuation metrics utilized in the study are: Price-To-Earnings: is a valuation ratio of a company's current share price compared to its per-share earnings.
Price-To-Earnings = Market Value per Share Earnings per Share (EPS)

Price-to-forward-earnings: “is a measure of the price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) using forecasted earnings for the P/E calculation. The earnings used are just an estimate and are not as reliable as current earnings data, there is still benefit in estimated P/E analysis. The forecasted earnings used in the formula can either be for the next 12 months or for the next full-year fiscal period.”
(http://www.investopedia.com)

Price-to-Book Value: A ratio used to compare a stock's market value to its book value. It is calculated by dividing the current closing price of the stock by the latest quarter's book value per share.

Price-to-cash flow from operations (CFO): “A measure of the market's expectations of a firm's future financial health. Because this measure deals with cash flow, the effects of depreciation and other non-cash factors are removed. Similar to the price-earnings ratio, this measures provides an indication of relative value.” Martin,J.,&Titman,S.(2011)

P/E-to-long-term growth rate (PEG): A ratio used to determine a stock's value while taking into account earnings growth.

“PEG is a widely used indicator of a stock's potential value. It is favored by many over the price/earnings ratio because it also accounts for growth. Similar to the P/E ratio, a lower PEG means that the stock is more undervalued.” Martin,J.,&Titman,S.(2011).
Dividend Yield: is a financial ratio that shows how much a company pays out in dividends each year relative to its share price. In the absence of any capital gains, the dividend yield is the return on investment for a stock.
Dividend Yield
“Dividend yield is a way to measure how much cash flow you are getting for each dollar invested in an equity position - in other words, how much "bang for your buck" you are getting from dividends.” Martin,J.,&Titman,S.(2011)
Enterprise Value-to-EBITDA: “A financial ratio that measures a company's return on investment. The EBITDA/EV ratio may be preferred over other measures of return because it is normalized for differences between companies. Using EBITDA normalizes for differences in capital structure, taxation and fixed asset accounting. Meanwhile, using enterprise value also normalizes for differences in a company’s capital structure. ” Martin,J.,&Titman,S.(2011)
EV-to-EBIT: “A financial ratio used to measure a company's return on investment. While the EBIT/EV ratio is not very commonly used, it does have certain advantages in comparing companies. First, using EBIT as a measure of profitability eliminates the potential distorting effects of differences in tax rates. Secondly, using EBIT/EV normalizes for the effects of different capital structures.” Martin,J.,&Titman,S.(2011)
Research Findings
The research indicates that out of the eight metrics, Price-to-CFO and Price-to-book seem clearly superior to the other valuation multiples. What came as a surprise is that Dividend Yield was the worst predictor of utility stock performance. “Based on the average one-year total returns during 1972-2010, the cheapest quintile of stocks based on price-to-CFO achieved the greatest outperformance (+6.0% versus the S&P 500 and +4.5% versus the sector), followed closely by the cheapest quintile based on price-to-book (+4.8% versus the S&P 500 and +3.3% versus the sector). Price-to-earnings (+4.5% versus the S&P 500 and +3.0% versus the sector), price-to-forward-earnings (+3.9% versus the S&P 500 and +3.1% versus the sector), and EV-to-EBITDA (+3.6% versus the S&P 500 and +2.8% versus the sector) were the next best metrics, trailed closely by EV-to-EBIT (+3.3% versus the S&P 500 and +2.5% versus the sector), with PEG and dividend yield trailing relatively far behind” Black Book (2011)
The research also showed the Price-to-CFO also had the highest consistency of outperformance, “both relative to the S&P 500 (63% of the time) and also relative to the sector (73% of the time). Other valuation multiples were not as uniformly consistent across both the S&P 500 and the sector. Relative to the S&P 500, price-to-earnings showed the highest consistency after price-to-CFO, with the cheapest quintile of utility stocks ranked on this metric outperforming the S&P 500 61% of the time. Relative to the sector, EV-to-EBITDA showed the highest consistency after price-to-CFO, with the cheapest quintile of utility stocks ranked on this metric outperforming the sector 71% of the time.” Black Book (2011)
The least effective metric in predicting outperformance was Dividend Yield with “(+2.2% versus the S&P 500 and +0.6% versus the sector). To underscore the ineffectiveness of dividend yield, we would point out that alone among the eight valuation metrics we considered, the most expensive quintile of stocks based on dividend yield (i.e., the lowest-yielding stocks) outperformed the cheapest quintile portfolio (the highest-yielding stocks). While the highest-yielding quintile outperformed the S&P 500 by +2.2% and the sector by +0.6%, on average, the lowest-yielding quintile portfolio outperformed the same benchmarks by +3.2% and +1.6% respectively, with similar consistency of outperformance.” Black Book (2011) In conclusion, the analysis of the various market valuation metrics versus subsequent total return finds that portfolios comprising the cheapest quintile of regulated utility stocks based on Price-to-CFO, Price-to-Book, Price-to-Earnings, Price-to-Forward Earnings, EV-to-EBITDA and EV-to-EBIT outperforms both the regulated utilities as a group and the S&P 500. The outperformance of these portfolios is greatest over short holding periods; particularly over a one-year period and is reduced as the holding period is extended to three, five and 10 years.

References
"Which Valuation Metrics Work Best for Stock-Picking Within the Sector?. (2011). Black Book-U.S. Utilities: Strategies to Outperform the Market in a Low-Beta Sector, 45-55. Retrieved from EBSCO host.
Price to Earnings. Investopedia. Retrieved 05:49, October 29, 2011, from http://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/price-earningsratio.asp#axzz1c6b2GeiY
Forward Price to Earnings. Investopedia. Retrieved 05:39, October 29, 2011, from http://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/forwardpe.asp#axzz1c6b2GeiY
Book to Price Value. Investopedia. Retrieved 05:39, October 29, 2011, from http://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/price-to-bookratio.asp#axzz1c6b2GeiY
Martin,J.,&Titman,S.(2011). Valuation: The Art and Science of Corporate Investment Decision (2nd ed).Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Fsdfsd

...a multiples analysis, calculating and defending an estimate of Crocs value. Soln: Comparable companies analysis – Done to determine appropriate valuation multiple for Crocs, Inc. • • Selected peer group based on industry, business and financial characteristics Included explosive growth stocks such as Lulelemon & Under Armour having similar prospects for growth and ROIC as Crocs, Inc. and some mature, stabilized businesses with stable industry growth rates – Nike, Deckers & Timberland. This mix will help us provide valuation from an aggressive sales growth and maturing sales context. Some characteristics used in selection include – o Primary or at least significant portion of business revenue comes from footwear & apparel – analogous to Crocs primary business o Has product appeal to large group of customers o Has distinct product attributes (innovative/creative) and differentiation from competition o Has wide range of distribution channels o CAGR Sales growth, COGS to Sales & Significantly less debt exposure on their balance sheets o Have characteristics of high octane growth and show signs of maturity and stabilizing long-term growth similar to well established footwear brands. • Valuation Multiples The objective was to compare operating metrics and valuation multiples in a peer group to that of Crocs, Inc. for equity valuation. The market multiple model is based on the idea that on average, a company, over time would have roughly the same value as its peers. Assumption:...

Words: 2072 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Financial Statement Analysis of Your Selected Listed Bangladeshi Company

...Group Work: Financial Statement Analysis of your selected listed Bangladeshi company Guideline for Term Paper Dear All, Please complete the strategy analysis and accounting analysis based on the following guideline by next 2 weeks for the company allocated to your group for term paper, and give me the update. Topic Specific Topics Key Questions Strategy Analysis Industry Analysis (Five forces Model) Rivalry -How do firms in an industry rivalry compete among themselves? -What are the dimensions of the competition? Threat of new entrants -What are the legal entry barriers for a new firm? -What are the economic entry barriers for a new firm? Threat of substitute products -Is there any substitute products of the industry? -If so, What is the level of price difference with substitute product? Bargaining power of buyers -What is level of buyers’ price sensitivity? -What is the buyers’ relative bargaining power? Bargaining power of suppliers -How many numbers of suppliers? -How much critical the product is to buyers? Competitive Strategy Analysis Which competitive strategy the company has taken? Cost leadership or Differentiation Corporate Strategy Analysis -Are there significant imperfections in the product, labor or financial markets in the industry in which the company is operating? - Does the company have special resources such as brand names, proprietary know how, access to scarce distribution channels, and special organization...

Words: 317 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Hanson

...ultimately reduced their business risk. In analyzing the financial risk, the continuous acquisitions have definitely increased the operational risk for the company. Since the case didn’t provide us with the financial statements for Monmouth, we can assume that in order to complete the acquisition they have to issue stocks as they exhausted (or will pretty soon exhaust) their debt capacity. 2. Based on the DCF valuation and using a WACC of 8.25% (the beta assumed to be 1, the average beta of comparable firms and the coupon rate to be 7.96%, the rate for BB rated companies) and a growth rate of 5.5%. The fair price is $40.4 per share for Robertson, lower than the $50 offered by Simmons to sell their stocks but higher than the current market price of $30. As for the peer multiples, and due to the lack of information for the comparable companies we only managed to calculate the EBIAT multiple, the earnings multiple and the book value multiple using the three comparable companies, Actuant Corp, Snap On Inc., and Stanley Works. The result of the multiple valuation showed a fair price of $40.1 per share based on the EBIAT multiple and a value of $29.61 per share based on the earnings multiple. Both prices are below the fair price calculated by the DCF. Only the book value multiple exceeded the DCF fair value with a value of $65.25. The first two multiples failed to capture the future potential and growth of the corporation, where the DCF managed to include it as a factor in the...

Words: 681 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Financial Analysis

...2 Graduate Thesis By Teia R. Merring Copenhagen Business School Strategic and financial analysis and valuation of B&O 0 1 Executive Summary................................................................................2 Introduction............................................................................................6 1.1Motivation.................................................................................................................. 6 1.2Problem Specification................................................................................................ 8 1.3Problem Identification................................................................................................ 8 1.4Problem Handling .................................................................................................... 10 1.5Structure and Methodology...................................................................................... 12 1.5.1Introduction and Presentation........................................................................... 12 1.5.2Strategic Analysis............................................................................................. 12 1.5.3Financial Statement Analysis ........................................................................... 13 1.5.4Prognoses and Budgets..................................................................................... 14 1.5.5Valuation.......................................

Words: 60014 - Pages: 241

Premium Essay

Fair Value

...According to 820-10-35-54-c, it was reasonable to determine that market is not active. Because the adjustments were based on management’s assumption, FFC didn’t used level 1 inputs in the income approach valuation technique (present value technique). In addition, significant adjustment inputs includes credit adjustment (level 3 inputs) and liquidity risk adjustment (level 3 inputs), and implied rate of return (level 2 inputs) under ASC 820-10-35-48/52. According to ASC 820-10-35-37A, when the inputs are categorized within different levels of the hierarchy, the entire instrument should be in the same level of hierarchy as the lowest level inputs that is significant to the entire measurement. So, CDO should be categorized within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Instrument 2 There was no significant decrease in the volume and activity for the MBS, because no significant factors occurred. Therefore, the market should be still active, even the market became increasingly volatile with some declined activity in the Q4 2012. In my opinion, FFC should still use market approach valuation because (1) quoted prices were highest priority inputs in accordance with ASC 820-10-35-37 (2) the theoretical income-approach pricing model needed significant assumption. In the market approach valuation, quoted prices for the similar observed transactions was level 2 inputs. Then, FFC should classify the MBS into level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Instrument 3 According to...

Words: 775 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Ias 36 Criticism and Amendments

...• IMPAIRMENT OF ASSETS: A GUIDE TO APPLYING IAS 36 IN PRACTICE. • PUBLISHED IN MARCH 2014. Explanation of the basis of key assumptions and the valuation approach used to determine the recoverable amount (IAS 36.132(encouraged), 134(d)(i)-(v), (e)(i)-(v), 135(d)) • Key assumptions usually left out. • If discussed they were not sufficient. • Key assumptions include gross margin, government bond rates, exchange rate for the period, raw material price, inflation, market share, etc. • Comparative information is required Where goodwill or indefinite life intangibles have been allocated to a CGU (or group of CGUs), but no impairment has been recognized, reasonably possible changes in assumptions if such changes would cause the unit’s carrying amount to exceed its recoverable amount (IAS 36.134(f), IAS 36.135(e)) • Sensitivity Analysis is not provided. • If provided, it is not consistent. • If book value increases, investors would expect a clear sensitivity analysis. • sensitivity analysis should incorporate all key assumptions (beyond discount rate and growth rate) . Description of the entity’s CGU when it recognises or reverses an impairment loss for the CGU during the period (IAS 36.130(d)(i)) • Disclosures did not provide description. • If they did, they lacked substance. • Users did not have an idea of the impact of the impairment on the financial activities. Explanation of the events and circumstances that contributed to the impairment loss or reversal (IAS 36.130(a))...

Words: 403 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Integratedanalysis

...INTEGRATED ANALYSIS HOW INVESTORS ARE ADDRESSING ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE FACTORS IN FUNDAMENTAL EQUITY VALUATION FEBRUARY 2013 Co-funded by the PREPARATION OF THIS DOCUMENT In September 2011 the PRI Initiative convened a working group of signatories to investigate how equity investors and analysts are integrating environmental, social and governance (ESG) analysis into their fair value calculations. The members of the ESG Integration Working Group are: Neil Brown Alliance Trust Investments - Working Group Chair Bruce Kahn Deutsche Bank Climate Change Advisors Andre Bertolotti Quotient Investors Masahiro Kato Mitsubishi UFJ Trust and Banking Corporation – observer Paul Bugala Calvert Investments Tony Campos FTSE Group Erica Lasdon Calvert Investments Cécile Churet RobecoSAM Barb MacDonald British Columbia Investment Management Corporation Leanne Clements London Pension Funds Authority Mary Jane McQuillen ClearBridge Investments Jennifer Coulson British Columbia Investment Management Corporation Christie Stephenson NEI Investments Lisa Domagala Solaris Investment Management Ralf Frank DVFA (Society of Investment Professionals in Germany) Dr. Hendrik Garz Sustainalytics (previously employed by West LB) Bryan Thomson British Columbia Investment Management Corporation Mike Tyrrell SRI-Connect Stéphane Voisin Cheuvreux Niamh Whooley Société Générale Robert Hauser Zürcher Kantonalbank (ZKB) Between...

Words: 10003 - Pages: 41

Premium Essay

Acca

...f92007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Pilot Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec June Dec Jun Dec Jun Funding of working capital 3 3 4 2 2 3 Overtrading 2 Cash management 3 1 2 Receivables management 3 4 3 2 1 3 2 2 3 Inventory management (EOQ) 4 3 3 4 2 NPV with inflation and/or tax 4 2 4 3 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 Return on capital employed 4 2 1 Payback period 2 Lease or buy 1 Capital rationing 1 1 Replacement 1 3 1 Internal rate of return 4 2 4 2 1 Risk and uncertainty 2 1 1 1 Sources of finance 2 4 4 2 3 3 3 4 Rights issue 3 2 1 4 3 4 Dividend policy 3 4 3 Theories of gearing 1 1 2 Weighted average cost of capital 1 1 3 1 2 2 4 2 3 4 3 2 Capital asset pricing model 1 3 2 4 1 4 2 Share / business valuation 1 2 1 1 2 4 3 4 4 4 Market efficiency 1 2 2 Forecasting exchange rates 2 4 3 Foreign exchange risk management 2 4 4 3 3 4 3 3 Interest rate risk 2 3 Financial ratios 1 3 2 4 2 4 Please do read the following notes carefully: 1 The purpose of this table is to help you find which questions to practice for specific topics. Do not use this table to try and predict what will be in the next exam - the examiner does deliberately repeat topics! The numbers in the columns are the question number in the exam. Many questions cover more than one area of the syllabus - that is why the same question number sometimes appears more than once, 2 For latest course notes, free audio & video lectures, support and forums please visit...

Words: 314 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Valuation of Intellectual Property: Approaches

...Valuation of Intellectual Property: Approaches We have moved into an information age characterized by increasing competition and shorter product life cycles; companies are more dependent on their intellectual properties (IP), as it has being recognized as a Valuable Business Asset. The Value of IP is much different & Valuation is much difficult than the value of any other assets. IP is creation of Human mind but to know the value or to trade that property we have to “value” them. The three main approaches are Market Approach, Income Approach & Cost Approach. Introduction Business enterprise is comprised of Working Capital, Fixed Assets, Intangible Assets and Intellectual Property. The increasing challenges of corporate world everyone wants to earn competitive advantages over others resulting into more dependence on Intellectual Property . Intangible assets Working Business Fixed Capital Enterprise Assets Intellectual Property According to economic theory, the value of an asset is best determined by the market, in the form of a transaction between two unrelated entities dealing at arm’s length. Unfortunately, intangible assets and IP that will eventually support products seldom benefit from open market conditions, either due to novelty or secrecy factors. In consideration of the growing investments required to develop and market products, there is a growing need for assessing the economic value of...

Words: 1278 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Marian-Health

...Case #1. Liston Mechanics Corporation DEADLINE. 4TH CLASS, END OF CLASS SUBMISSION: BY EMAIL AT SAUGUSTE@UTDT.EDU This case gives you an overview of three DCF-based valuation variants (FCFF, FCFE, and APV), relative valuation via comps, and relative valuation via trans. Please use exclusively the data in the case. PART A You must compute the Equity Value of Liston Corp., on a stand-alone basis (i.e., pre-acquisition), for Jim Liston, by doing the following: 1. Use DCF via FCFF discounted at constant target WACC to compute the value of the company and equity. 2. Now check: does the actual D/A ratio (i.e., after your valuation) match the target D/A? If not, find the amount of initial debt that should be used to force a match between actual and target D/A. Using that debt value, recompute Equity. 3. Using the amount of debt you calculated in the previous step as a fixed amount over the planning horizon, perform a valuation via FCFE discounted at constant Ce. What could be wrong with this procedure? 4. Now perform APV with constant debt (again at the fixed level computed in Step 2) and include default risk by discounting tax benefits at the unlevered Ce. 5. Perform APV with constant debt (again at same debt level) but this time, account for default risk by discounting tax benefits at Cd AND by adding a negative term equal to 15% of unlevered EV. 6. Using the original debt amount of Liston (i.e., $ 140 million), compute Equity via comps using EV/Sales...

Words: 347 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Steel Sector

...Intellectual Property Valuatoin Techniques By Daryl Martin and David Drews- IPmetrics LLC Introducation Unlike many of the other assests found on a company’s balance sheet, the intangible assets, such as patents, trademarks and copyrights, are among the most difficult to quantify in terams of their value. It becomes further complicated to ascertain value when contemplating more obscure intangible assets, such as trade dress, trade sectets or software code. While difficult, the value of these assests can be accurately calculated via a number of industry accepted methodologies. The key to a successful analysis is to develop a comprehensive plan of action. The initial point to determine when attempting to value intellectual propery or intangible assests is the rationale for undertaking the analysis in the first place. Why do you need to know the value of the assets? The most obvious situations are those in which a third party has an interest in the asset values. For example, the internal revenue service and othe tax authorities want a detailed understanding about the basis for any value determination used when allocating portions of the purchase price associated with ethe acquisition of other companies. This issue has become even more important with the recent issuance of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard 142, Goodwill and Other intangible Assets, which changed the accounting treatment of certain intangibles acquired through business combinations. Instead of a more-or-less...

Words: 4938 - Pages: 20

Premium Essay

Mw Petroleum

...Valuation is the estimation of an asset’s value, whether real or financial, based on variables perceived to be related to future investment returns, on comparison with similar assets, or, when relevant, on estimates of immediate liquidation proceeds (Pinto, Henry, Robinson, Stowe; 2010). Correct valuation of real assets can present challenges to financial analysts. Different models can be used to arrive at the closest estimate of value and yet certain issues will always arise. This case attempts to tackle two approaches in real asset valuation: Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis and the issues surrounding such, as well as the Black-Scholes Model for Real Options. Questions to be addressed in the study are: 1. Evaluate Amoco’s and Apache’s corporate objectives and strategies. Is it reasonable to expect that the MW properties are more valuable to Apache than to Amoco? What sources of value most plausibly account for the difference between buyer and seller? 2. Structure and execute a DCF valuation of all the MW reserves. How much are the reserves worth? Is your estimate more likely to be biased high or low? What are the sources of bias? 3. How would you structure an analysis of MW as a portfolio of assets in place and options? Specifically, which parts of the business should be regarded as assets in place and which as options? What kinds of options are present? Should this approach yield a higher or lower value that the DCF approach? 4. Execute the analysis you structured in...

Words: 996 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Accounting Case

...After reading the case, we need to figure out three questions, which are a. FFC’s determination of whether the respective markets for the instruments were active or inactive and whether there was a significant decease in the volume and level of activity for the instruments. b. The valuation technique used by FFC c. The classification in the fair value hierarchy for each input into the fair value measurement and how these classifications affects classification in the fair value hierarchy of the entire instrument. We will answer these questions by each instrument separately: First, Collateralized Debt Obligation (CDO) Before September30th, 2010, FFC was in an active market, and it determined the fair value of the CDO by using a market-based valuation technique that relies on inputs such as quotes prices for similar CDO securities and requires only insignificant adjustments. After that, there was a significant decrease in the volume and level of activities and the CDO’s market was not active. Besides, significant adjustments are required to determine fair value as of the measurement date given the lack of recent and relevant transactions. The valuation techniques FFC used for CDO is income approach, because this way could maximize the use of relevant observable input and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. There are two factors FFC mainly considered in the fair value measurement. Frist, FFC considered the implied rate of return on September 30, 2010, which...

Words: 470 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Fin/Gm571 Week 2 Text Problems

...rate of return for Bill: n = 4 r = ? PV = -$195,000 PMT = 0 FV = $168,000 r = ? PV = r = -3.66% A11. (Calculating the PV and FV of an annuity) Assume an ordinary annuity of $500 at the end of each of the next three years. a. What is the present value discounted at 10%? b. What is the future value at the end of year 3 if cash flows can be invested at 10%? a. to get present value: n = 3 r = ? PV = ? r = 10% PMT = $500.00 FV = 0 PV = PV = $1,243.43 b. to get future value: n = 3 r = ? PV = 0 r = 10% PMT = $500.00 FV = ? FV= FV = $1,655 Chapter 5 A1. (Bond valuation) A $1,000 face value bond has a remaining maturity of 10 years and a required return of 9%. The bond’s coupon rate is 7.4%. What is the fair value of this bond? Calculating PV factor i= required return = 9% = 0.09 n= 10 years Coupon Rate to get value Annuity Cash Flow of $1000 to get present value Cash flow= $1000 * 7.4/100 = $74 Cash flow=...

Words: 524 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Csv Forcasting and Risks

...INTRODUCTION To value the business we need to forecast some or all of the following depending upon which model of valuation we intend to use: dividends, future free cash flows, earnings per share, EVA which itself requires NOPAT and the Balance Sheet. Note that even if we are interested in cash flows we will usually forecast these using the indirect method rather than the direct method because the basic building blocks of profitability, growth, investment and financing are more readily framed in terms of accrual based accounting and moreover corporate tax is profit based – ultimately we are interested in the prospects for profitability. We should use at least two methods of valuation to value a company and in any one method look to undertake some sensitivity analysis or scenario analysis. The forecasting should be comprehensive and be conditional upon the corporate and business strategy, the accounting analysis and the financial analysis. Importantly, the forecasts should impound the evidence on key financial variables such as sales growth, EPS over time and ROE over time.EVIDENCE ON SALES GROWTH AND EARNINGS We begin with some evidence which is useful in the context of a forecast. But do remember this is what occurs on average. If the forecast is largely at variance from the evidence then this will need explaining within the context of the business strategy or the accounting. In addition if strategy or accounting changes we need to assess the consequences for the forecast...

Words: 302 - Pages: 2