Premium Essay

Was The Civil War Good Or Bad

Submitted By
Words 1169
Pages 5
The Civil War. A subject that some people think was caused by lack of Southern states’ rights. But let’s not talk of that. It would probably be preferred to talk about Lincoln. Despite what some people might say, Lincoln was an accomplished president. Lincoln was a successful leader, as demonstrated by his sense of humor, his influence, his intelligence, and his ability to handle depression. Upon reading this, it is hoped that a new light will be seen on Lincoln.
In the world of the eighteen sixties it was rare for someone to have a sense of humor, especially the president. Back then, it must have been hard to smile. But even still, Lincoln managed to smile in most of his pictures, if not all. “You can comb through thousands of photographs …show more content…
Does there even need to be a discussion about this? It is incredibly hard to deny that Lincoln was an influence on this country. Some may argue it as being bad, or some may argue it as being good. “General Pope, seeking a quick and dramatic finish to the affair, pressured Lincoln to sign the orders for all 303 executions. Nor was he alone; outraged newspaper editors and congressmen advocated a speedy hanging as well.”(Soodalter) This example shows how people just wanted the Sioux to die. They didn’t care how many of the convicted were promised safety. In their eyes, all of the 303 Sioux were guilty. But Lincoln met with one of the Sioux’s allies, and decided to go over each of the cases himself. “Given the mood of the country regarding what were seen as unprovoked savage depredations, what drove Lincoln to spare the lives of so many Sioux? The wonder isn’t that Lincoln allowed more than three dozen men to hang; it’s that he took time away from a war that was going badly - and that threatened the entire existence of our nation - to examine one at a time the cases of more than 300 Sioux, and to spare the lives of all but 38 of them.”(Soodalter) Only 38 of the convicted men were hanged. In addition to this act of empathy, or sympathy, Lincoln took time away from the war with the South to go over the cases. A war that was going quite badly for …show more content…
That should be pretty clear. Just take a look at the Gettysburg Address. The speech he wrote was two minutes, while the person who spoke before him took two hours. The gathered crowd didn’t really know how to react when Lincoln sat back down after speaking. And the photographer didn’t even get a chance to take a photo of Lincoln while he was speaking. As if that wasn’t enough, he was also able to escape a plot the secessionists had to kill him before his inauguration. “Pinkerton hoped to foil the plot by getting Lincoln to change his schedule. On February 21, he met with Lincoln in a Chicago hotel room. Lincoln said he could not believe there was a conspiracy to kill him. Hours later, Frederick Seward, son of Senator William Henry Seward, arrived at Lincoln's room and warned him of the plot, which had been discovered independently by detectives working for Colonel Stone and General Scott. They had sent young Seward to Lincoln, who now was convinced. Pinkerton and his associates were able to come up with a plan to get Lincoln safely to and from the inauguration which involved shifting the cars with the president on board to another train.” (cia.gov) True, this example didn’t really prove Lincoln’s intelligence persay, but he recognized that their claims for plots to assassinate him weren't a joke, and he agreed to their plan. This must have also showed Lincoln how far the secession states were willing to go. Looking

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Is the War Is Bring Peace ?

...are a lot of reasons for war. It depends on why the war is being fought, who is fighting the war, and how the war is being fought. These are three big reason's that come to mind when I think about war and peace. Let's look at the first issue of war and that is why the war is being fought. There are many reasons for war. War is normally started by conflicting Idea's. If you look at the two major wars in American history, the Revolutionary and Civil war, you will see that they both were started because of conflicting idea's. Let's first look at the Revolutionary war which brought Independence to America. The reason it was fought was not for this reason only, but one of the major reason's was the colonies didn't want to be taxed without representation, which conflicted with the idea's of the British Empire. Did this war bring peace? Well it depends on which side of the war you were on. If you were on the colonies side then yes the Revolutionary war brought independence and more peace than there was before the war except for the lose of lives, which is always a factor of war. If you were on the British Empire side then no the war did not bring peace. The war was lost along with the 13 colonies and lives were lost. Now lets look at the Civil war. Another war that was fought over conflicting idea's. The North wanted to end slavery which conflicted with the South idea of wanting to keep slavery. After the war was fought slavery was ended. Did this war bring peace? Again it all...

Words: 641 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Bottom Billion

...allowing them to develop at amazing speed. On the other hand, the bottom billion countries are diverging from this economy, since they are stuck in one of the four traps. The four traps are the conflict trap, the natural resource trap, the trap of being landlocked and the trap of bad governance in a small country. These traps will not allow billion bottom countries to become globalized; however, it can be argued that some of these traps can facilitate the incorporation of a country to world’s economy. Currently, most of the bottom billion people live in African countries. The major problem with these countries is not that they are poor, but that they are not developing. In fact, most of the bottom billion countries are experiencing negative growth and the living standards are lowering each year. These countries are declining on average 0.5 percent per year. Furthermore, the living conditions are horrible and people are dying at a very early age. The life expectancy in these countries is fifty years while in a developing country is sixty-seven years. These lowering standard of living and negative growth are mainly because the country is in one of the four traps. The first trap which is civil war will definitely not allow a bottom billion country to become...

Words: 1689 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Alfred M. Green's Persuasion To Join The Union

...Persuasion To Join The Union At the onset of the Civil War in 1861, the African Americans found themselves in a hard situation. It is hard because the Civil War could be considered both a good and bad time for the African Americans. It could be considered good because the Civil War was technically fought for the African Americans to receive freedom. But, it could be considered bad because at this time African Americans were not allowed to join the Union forces, so they were being discriminated, and there were still slaves in the south. When Alfred M. Green delivered his speech in April of 1861, he looked past the bad and was able to persuade his audience of African Americans to join the Union forces in the Civil War. He was able to persuade his audience by establishing ethos, pathos, and kairos, constructing his speech in a parallel manner, and alluding to famous historic events and people. Before even...

Words: 496 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Bienville Research Paper

...This essay will provide information on why I think Bienivlle put New Orleans in a bad location. Who is Bienville? He is a person who put New Orleans in a bad location if you ask me but is just my options. The reason I say this is because of Hurricane Katrina and some of the wars that happened that was very bad and very bloody. The first topic I will talk about will be Hurricane Katrina.The storm hit New Orleans in 2005.It totally wiped away the whole city by costing the United States billions of dollars to help New Orleans get back up on their feet.The storm lasted for weeks and people didn't have anywhere to live and they had to steal from stores to provide for their family.He should have known that it was a bad idea to put New Orleans right...

Words: 356 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Main Cause Of The American Civil War

...April 21, 1861 to April 9, 1865 were the dates of the American Civil War starting and ending. The setting was in North America between the North and South Economic difference was affected throughout that era which caused feuds between states. Although the Civil War was caused by various of reasons followed by slavery, politics, and economy. These were 3 out of the many reasons on what caused the Civil War. The first main cause of the Civil War was conflict between the North and the South about slavery. Slavery in the 1800’s was harshly treated due to the color of their skin. Slavery helped cause the Civil War because equality didn't seem to exist for the slaves. Which once again makes them have no rights. ”Free laborers were the slaves that...

Words: 361 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Essay On The Causes Of The Civil War

...The American Civil War defined the future of America’s framework, but the various causes of the war also defined the outcome of the battle. From economic differences, to political disagreements, as well as friction from the northern and southern views on slavery put the nation to the brink of war. And growing sectionalism also caused problems within the two sides, until a fever pitch was inevitably hit. With the difference in economy, the growing sectionalism between the north and south, and the political disagreements, war was all but preventable. The economic differences between the north and the south were a major factor in the Civil War’s tension starting to build. Tariffs on imported good gave the north an economic advantage, as their exports were faster to make and more desired. While the south’s exports, mostly cotton, took time because of how...

Words: 551 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Field of Tears

...- genaflevering Are the horrible memories from the Irish Civil War still lingering in the grass on the field? What does the tears of the grandfather symbolize? “Field of Tears” is a short story written by Declan J. Connaughton in which he tells the story about an old man and his granddaughter called Rita. She frequently comes to visit him at the nursing home where he has to stay against her will, simply because he is too old and weak. She knows this and it’s also one of the reasons why she goes to see him that often, to spend time with him before it’s too late which makes every second she has with him precious. Rita wants to take him out for a drive and the grandfather guides her to a field he remembers from when he was stationed during the Civil War. As he sits in the car facing the sea, he starts to recall a memory from the field and suddenly Rita isn’t there anymore but his comrades from the war are. “Field of Tears” is a historical fiction short story that follows a man who took part in the Irish Civil War which followed the Irish War of Independence, where the Irish people fought for the right to be an Irish Republic. England wouldn’t let them have their will but they made a treaty that ended the British rule in most of Ireland. This wasn’t satisfying enough for some of the Irish republicans that didn’t want to take part in the “Provisional Government”, who supported the treaty and this lead to a civil war between these two opposing groups. The story gives us a...

Words: 1125 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Civil War

...The Effects of the Civil War on Americans Sophia Taylor HIS/110 November 3, 2014 Frank Bird The Effects of the Civil War on Americans The Civil War had a major effect on the United States and where we are today. Historian Shelby Foote said, Any understanding of this nation has to be based…on an understanding of the Civil War . . . The Civil War defined us as what we are, and it opened us to being what we became, good and bad things. It is very necessary if you’re going to understand the American character in the 20th century to learn about this enormous catastrophe of the mid-19th century. It was the crossroads of our being. Burns, K. & Burns, R. (Writers). (1990). Episode 1: The cause (1861). In K. Burns (Producer), The Civil War. Arlington, VA: Public Broadcasting Service. What I think Foote meant in this quote was that we are free today because of the Civil War. If it had not been for the north and south fighting we would not be free today. Indivisible Union The north and the south wanted control of the states. The states wanted to relinquish control to the federal government. I think that Foote was saying that with the Civil War we were able to gain control. If it had not been for all the fighting with the north and the south we would not have came to any agreement. So one thing that had a lot to do with the Civil War was slavery. Northerners felt slavery was essentially against what America stood for, Southerners depended on slavery to maintain their...

Words: 899 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Banning Pit Bulls Research Paper

...Pit Bulls are known for being dangerous and in many states the state government is try to pass a law to ban pit bulls.In this argument I stand against the ban I think that there should not be a ban on Pit Bulls or any other dog for that matter .I think this because pit bulls and other dogs are not born as dangerous or vicious. I don’t support the ban on Pit Bulls because the bread of a dog does not make a dog bad it is the owner any dog can be trained to be a good and helpful animal . I think this because during the civil war Pit Bulls were used as hunting dogs . Pit bulls were also used as war dogs during the civil war . During world war II a dog named stubby was the unofficial mascot of the 102nd Infantry division. Once he even saved...

Words: 424 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Essay On Civil War Food

...the Civil War. The food on the Civil War was given for both Union and Confederate soldiers and it was provided by their respective Commissary De- partments, but the daily rations were given to the soldiers uncooked. Generals and other officers had the comfort of a cook, but the majority of the soldiers were collected in groups to prepare their food. The food during the Civil War wasn't high quality and it didn't taste good. according to “Ken. “Civil War Food.” Civil War Academy - American Civil War, 2007, www.marinersmu- seum.org/blogs/civilwar/?p=1472accessed on May 14 2017. Confederate soldiers usually didn’t receive much food at all, their food was typically very simple, especially as the war moved on, the...

Words: 699 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Russian Revolution Dbq

...The Russian Revolution was a significant in russia’s main history because it was the revolution that changed Russia forever. There were many reasons why the revolution sparked but the main three I believe that had the biggest effect on Russia concluded of the lack of food, Tsar’s lack of responsibility and bad decisions , and the prices of food and other materials skyrocketing. Russia for centuries was being ruled by the same family but because of Nicolas II bad performance and significant events that happen this brought an end to the family throne and brought a new way of living for Russia’s people. One of Russia’s main problem for years was the lack of food because of the environment. Since Russia has extremely cold weather and snow it...

Words: 976 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Why the South Lost

...Civil War: Why The South Lost Jason Hillman HIS/110 October 13. 2014 James Halm The south ultimately lost the war because of two things, the will to fight and the emancipation proclamation. The emancipation proclamation basically took a huge chunk of what could have been Lee’s army of African Americans and welcomed them to the free Union army. The slaves were tripping over themselves at the opportunity to escape north and become free. The confederates stayed on the defensive most of the time; rarely did they go into union territory, because most of the times they did it turned out to be a big loss for the confederates. After being beaten down so many times, the confederates lost their will to fight and so started the way the south lost the war. In June of 1863, confederate general Robert E. Lee took his army of northern Virginia into the north for the second time. The union commander George Gordon Meade was in pursuit, they would ultimately bump into each other at Gettysburg. The battle of Gettysburg started by accident, literally troops bumped into each other. General Lee heard that Meade was pursuing him and mead concentrated his army. The union vanguard is already there as well and they bang into each other north and west of town on McPhersons ridge, it’s an intense fight and ultimately the fight will grow until north of town, your had the union 11th corps, fighting against a corps under a man named Richard Uell. In the end you’re going to have 30,000 confederates...

Words: 1436 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Civil War

...Week Eight - CheckPoint Civil War, Table and Response Due Date: Day 5, Assignments Link Points Possible: 20 Points Earned: XX ------------------------------------------------- Part One: Table, Union and Confederate Home Fronts Points Possible: 10 Points Earned: XX Fill in the following table with experiences on the Union home front and experiences on the Confederate home front. Civil War Home Fronts | DifferencesBetween North and South Home Fronts | 1. The Union and the Confederates were very different in the way they conducted business.2. The Union they made industrialization development, infrastructure grew, and urban cities and towns grew.3. The Confederate had large plantations and made their slaves work long and hard on their farms. They grew cotton and tobacco on these plantations.4. The Union was able to pass laws to tax on imported goods so that the Confederates would have to buy from them.5. The confederates wanted stronger state rights and a weaker central government; the Union wanted the government to have more power. | Similarities Between North and South Home Fronts | 1. Both the Union and confederates Struggled, economically, politically, and culturally to agree with one another.2. Union and confederate home fronts faced hardship during the war, from diseases, bad medical care, lack of food, corruption of morality, and rising numbers of deaths.3. Woman of both the union and confederacy found new opportunities to work outside the home.4...

Words: 520 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Arguments Against Jim Crow Policing

...crimes. While police officers are wasting their time accusing innocent people of doing something wrong. It gives criminals more time to commit a crime and get away with it. And that makes me really sick. They are the people that are supposed to help us not hurt us. Over the years the amount of bad and good cops has been roughly the same. I believe that there will always be bad cops as long as...

Words: 628 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Civil Disobedience Bedau Analysis

...When it comes to the pretention of Civil Disobedience and what can be seen as acts of indirect and direct civil disobedience. H.A. Bedau and Henry David Thoreau come to mind because of how they both saw things in different light but at a meaningful level they both thought the same about the government even through they expressed there ideals in completely different ways. Their ideas cross on many different paths as to which even Bedau talks about Thoreau in his essay in regards to being “responsible” for your actions. The main premise of Bedau’s argument in his essay of “civil disobedience and personal responsibility for justice” is to compare the idea of what is civil disobedience and who is responsible for the actions. Bedau spends a great...

Words: 1883 - Pages: 8