Free Essay

Welfare Rights

In:

Submitted By
Words 2410
Pages 10
Newly arrived residents and social security

This factsheet explains the waiting periods which newly arrived residents may be required to serve before they can receive social security payments.

□ Who is subject to the newly arrived resident’s two year waiting period?
Whether a waiting period applies to you may depend on the date you entered Australia, the date you were granted a permanent visa, and whether you are a New Zealand citizen. If you have not lived in Australia as a permanent resident for a total of 104 weeks, you may be subject to a two year newly arrived resident’s waiting period for the following payments and concession cards:
• Newstart Allowance • Austudy
• Sickness Allowance • Pensioner Education Supplement
• Youth Allowance • Mobility Allowance
• Carer Payment • Commonwealth Seniors Health Card
• Special Benefit • Health Care Card
If you arrived in Australia or were granted permanent residence (whichever is the later) before 4 March 1997, you will not have to serve a two year waiting period.
If you are an Australian citizen or you arrived in Australia before 4 March 1997 (or before 1 February 2000 if you are a New Zealand citizen - see below), and Centrelink decides that you have a newly arrived resident’s waiting period, contact a Welfare Rights Centre/Advocate for advice.

□ Who is exempt from the newly arrived resident's two year waiting period?
The newly arrived resident's waiting period may not apply to you if you:

• hold or previously held a permanent refugee visa or a specified subclass of special humanitarian visa; • are a “family member”* of a holder or former holder of a permanent refugee visa or a specified subclass of special humanitarian visa; • were a “family member”* of a former holder of a permanent refugee visa or a specified subclass of special humanitarian visa at the time the former refugee or humanitarian migrant arrived in Australia; • are an Australian citizen; • are a “family member”* of an Australian citizen or of a permanent resident who has at least two years residence in Australia; • hold a visa subclass 100, 110, 801, 814, 832 or 833; • have become the sole “principal carer” of a child since becoming an Australian resident – for Newstart Allowance or Youth Allowance (unemployed) only; • hold a visa subclass 116 or 836; or you hold a visa subclass 104 or 806 as a ‘carer’ or ‘special need relative’ – for Carer Payment only; • became a handicapped person while in Australia – for Mobility Allowance only; or • hold a specified sub-class of temporary visa – for Special Benefit only (see below).
There are more exemptions from the newly arrived resident’s waiting period for Special Benefit. See “Special Benefit” below.
*A “family member” may include your partner (opposite sex or same sex) or your dependent child. Other people can be deemed to be your “family member”, at Centrelink’s discretion.
Please note: visa subclasses listed throughout this factsheet may change.

□ Who is subject to a qualifying residence period?
Age Pension, Disability Support Pension, Widow Allowance and Parenting Payment do not have a newly arrived resident’s waiting period. Instead, people applying for these payments generally have a qualifying residence period, unless they have a type of visa which gives an exemption (see below).
A qualifying residence period means that in order to be eligible for a particular payment, the person must have lived in Australia as a permanent resident for a specified period of time.
The qualifying residence period for Age Pension is 10 years unless you: • received a Widow B Pension, Widow Allowance, Mature Age Allowance or Partner Allowance immediately before reaching Age Pension age; • were widowed in Australia, and both you and your partner were Australian residents at the time, and you lived in Australia for at least two years immediately prior to the claim; • reached Age Pension age before 20 March 1997 and, immediately before 20 March 1997, received a Widow B Pension, Widow Allowance or Partner Allowance; or • qualify under an International Agreement.
The qualifying residence period for Disability Support Pension is 10 years unless: • your disability only started to significantly affect your capacity to work since you became an Australian resident; • you were born outside Australia and at the time your disability began to significantly affect your capacity to work you were a dependent child of an Australian resident and you become an Australian resident while you are still a dependent child of an Australian resident; or • you qualify under an International Agreement.
The qualifying residence period for Widow Allowance is 10 years unless you: • were widowed, divorced or separated from your partner while both you and your partner were Australian residents; • entered Australia prior to 1 April 1996 and were an Australian Resident continuously during the 26 weeks prior to lodging your claim; • entered Australia on or after 1 April 1996 and lodged your claim before 4 March 1997 and were an Australian Resident continuously during the 26 weeks prior to lodging your claim; • entered Australia on or after 1 April 1996 and lodged your claim on or after 4 March 1997 and have been an Australian Resident for a total of at least 104 weeks; or • entered Australia on or after 1 February 2000 and have been an Australian Resident for a total of least 104 weeks.
The qualifying residence period for Parenting Payment is 2 years unless you: • have become the sole “principal carer” of a child since becoming an Australian resident.

□ Who is exempt from a qualifying residence period?
You may be exempt from a qualifying residence period if you: • hold, or previously held, a permanent refugee visa or a specified subclass of special humanitarian visa; • were a family member* of a person who holds or formerly held a permanent refugee or specified subclass of special humanitarian visa, at the time the family member entered Australia (does not apply to Age Pension, Disability Support Pension or Special Benefit); or • hold a visa subclass 100, 110, 801, 814, 832 or 833 (does not apply to Age Pension or Disability Support Pension).
* You are a “family member” of a person, if you are their partner (opposite sex or same sex) or their dependent child. Other people can be treated as a “family member” in some situations.

□ What if I am exempt?
If you believe you may be exempt from the newly arrived resident's waiting period or qualifying resident's period, you should claim the most appropriate social security payment, and supply evidence of your visa subclass (and if relevant, your former visa subclass). • The visa subclasses giving exemptions are complicated and can change. If in doubt about your visa number, or whether it will exempt you from a waiting period, claim anyway. Centrelink has to accept your claim form. If the Centrelink officer refuses, ask to see a supervisor and contact a Welfare Rights Centre/Advocate.

□ What about Special Benefit?
Special Benefit can only be paid if you are not eligible for any other social security payment, or you cannot be paid another payment because of a newly arrived resident’s or qualifying residence waiting period. You must be in “severe financial hardship” and unable to earn a sufficient livelihood.

□ Who is eligible for Special Benefit?
You may be eligible for Special Benefit if you: • are in severe financial hardship; and • are not able to earn enough money for yourself and your dependents because of age, disability or domestic circumstances, or other reason beyond your control; and • are not eligible for another Social Security payment; and • are an Australian citizen or an Australian resident; or • hold a temporary visa subclass 070, 309, 310, 447*, 451*, 695*, 785*, 786, 787, 820, 826, or a 951.

□ Who is exempt from the newly arrived resident’s waiting period for Special Benefit?
In addition to the exemptions listed above you may be exempt from the two year newly arrived resident’s waiting period for Special Benefit if you: • hold a temporary visa subclass 070, 447*, 451*, 695*, 785*, 786, 787, or a 951; • hold a permanent visa subclass 832, 833 or 852; • hold a permanent spouse or interdependency visa (subclasses 100, 110, 801 and 841) and you are the family member of an Australian citizen or of an Australian permanent resident who has at least two years residence in Australia (see below); or • have a substantial change in circumstances beyond your control.
For Centrelink to decide whether you have had a “substantial change in circumstances” you will need to explain your personal situation to Centrelink. Centrelink applies very strict policy guidelines about Special Benefit. These guidelines are merely a guide for Centrelink to decide whether you can be paid. Whatever your situation, if you do not have adequate means of support, it is important to put in a claim for Special Benefit. *Note: temporary visa subclasses 447, 451, 695 and 785 were abolished on 9 August 2008. However, these visas remain valid until they expire or a new visa is granted. Most holders of these visas will be granted the new permanent refugee visa subclass 851 which has a qualifying residence exemption and an exemption from the newly arrived residents waiting period for all payments. If you are granted an 851 visa, you should contact Centrelink immediately to claim a payment other than Special Benefit.

□ What if Centrelink rejects my claim for Special Benefit?
If Centrelink rejects your claim for Special Benefit, you should appeal. See below for details.

□ When does my waiting period start?
The waiting period generally starts from the date you enter Australia, or the date permanent residence is granted, whichever is the later. If you are granted permanent residence after having held a temporary visa class 309, 310, 820 or 826, you will have no waiting period for most payments, and for Special Benefit your waiting period will start from the date you applied for that visa, not from the date you were granted permanent residence.

□ Is Family Tax Benefit affected by a waiting period?
No. Family Tax Benefit is not subject to the two year waiting period and it can be paid to people who hold the classes of temporary visa for which Special Benefit may be payable. It can also be paid to New Zealand citizens living in Australia, whatever their date of arrival (see below for further information about rules affecting New Zealanders).
You should claim Family Tax Benefit as soon as possible on arrival in Australia. Carer Allowance, Double Orphan Pension and Baby Bonus are also not subject to a two year waiting period.

□ What about Assurances of Support?
If an Assurance of Support was signed for you and you are granted a payment covered by the Assurance, the person who signed it will have a debt raised and will owe money to Centrelink. You should contact Centrelink for advice if your assuror cannot provide you with support or refuses to do so.

□ Can I serve the waiting period while I am outside Australia?
Generally, you cannot serve the waiting period while outside Australia. This means that any period you are overseas after the waiting period starts will add on to the waiting period.
If your two year waiting period commenced before 1 February 2000, your two year waiting period for Newstart Allowance and Sickness Allowance will include any period(s) you were overseas.

□ What if my partner cannot get a social security payment?
If you are a member of a couple and only one of you is eligible for a social security payment, it can be paid at the single rate in some circumstances. You should apply to Centrelink for the single rate to be paid under section 24 of the Social Security Act.

□ What if I am a New Zealand citizen or permanent resident?
Most New Zealand passport holders are automatically issued with a Special Category Visa when they enter Australia. This visa previously allowed New Zealand citizens living in Australia to qualify for the full range of social security payments (subject to waiting periods). However, from 26 February 2001 New Zealand citizens’ entitlement to social security changed.

See the factsheet "Social Security payments for New Zealand citizens living in Australia" for further information about the rules affecting New Zealand citizens' eligibility for social security payments.

□ Appeal rights
If you think a Centrelink decision is wrong you have the right to appeal against it. Appealing is easy and free. To appeal simply tell Centrelink that you are not happy with its decision and that you would like to appeal to an Authorised Review Officer (ARO). It is best to lodge an appeal in writing and you should keep a copy of your appeal letter. However, you can lodge an appeal over the telephone.
The ARO is a senior officer in Centrelink who has the power to change the original decision. Many people are successful at this level.
You can appeal to an ARO at any time. However, to receive back pay from the date you were affected by the original decision, you must appeal to an ARO within 13 weeks of receiving written notice of the original decision. If you appeal more than 13 weeks after receiving the notice and you are successful, you will only receive back pay from the date you appealed.
If you think the ARO decision is wrong you can appeal to the Social Security Appeals Tribunal (SSAT). The SSAT is independent of Centrelink.
You have further appeal rights to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal and the Federal Court. Time limits apply.
For more information on appealing see the factsheet “Appeals – how to appeal against a Centrelink decision” and the guide “Appealing to the Social Security Appeals Tribunal".

□ Interpreters
If you think you need an interpreter, or if you feel more confident with an interpreter, you should use one of the three free available interpreter services. • Most Centrelink offices have interpreters available at regular times each week. Your local Centrelink office can tell you about their available languages and times. • You can telephone the Centrelink Multilingual Call Centre on 131 202 and speak to a bilingual Centrelink officer. • You can also call the free Telephone Interpreter Service (TIS) on 131 450 and ask for an interpreter.

Please note: This factsheet contains general information only. It does not constitute legal advice. If you need legal advice please contact your local Welfare Rights Centre/Advocate.
Welfare Rights Centres are community legal centres, which specialise in social security law, administration and policy. They are independent of Centrelink. All assistance is free.
This factsheet was updated in January 2012. www.welfarerights.org.au -----------------------
[pic]

[pic] factsheet

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Argumentative Essay: Animal Rights Vs. Animal Welfare

...Animal Rights vs. Animal Welfare In the first half of the 20th century, standards for the care of livestock, lab animals, and pets began to improve. Animal ‘rights’ were the rights of animals to shelter, food, and water. There was a pronounced emphasis on improving the quality of life of the animals used by humans, but not on eliminating their use for humans altogether. However, for the last 50 years or so there has been a huge argument over the roles of animals in today’s society, specifically over how we use them for our benefit. There are major differences between the welfare and rights arguments. Animal welfare is fundamentally different from animal rights because it endorses the responsible use of animals in order to fulfill some human...

Words: 297 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Chipotle Views The Differences Between Animal Rights And Animal Welfare

...Animal rights and animal welfare are hot topics in the agriculture community because of the vast differences in animal care and small cases of abuse. There are many definitions of animal rights; however, they conclusively agree that animals should not be exploited for human purposes. These purposes include testing on animals, zoos, and harvesting of animal products. Animal welfare also refers to animals as individuals rather than the property of their owners. Animal welfare differs as it strives to keep the animal “healthy, comfortable, well nourished, safe, able to express innate behavior, and if it is not suffering from unpleasant states such as pain, fear, and distress” (“Animal Welfare: What Is It?”). In a nutshell, animal welfare aims to care and use the animal responsibly....

Words: 407 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

1. It Has Been Claimed That Social Welfare Is Not About Promoting the Recipients’ Wellbeing but About Promoting Their Compliance with Particular Standards of Behaviour. Critically Discuss This Claim with Reference to

...Some have argued that social welfare should be about promoting recipient wellbeing. However, others have argued that in recent times welfare programs are more about controlling the behaviour of welfare recipients. This essay will examine the history of welfare programs to women since the initiation of the post-war welfare state under Labour Prime Minister Chifley to ascertain whether recent development in these programs are more about providing for recipient’s wellbeing or rather about trying to make them comply with certain standards of accepted behaviour. Chifley argued that it was the “duty and responsibility of the community, and particularly those more fortunately placed, to see that our less fortunate fellow citizens are protected from those shafts of fate which leave them helpless and without hope”. He continued the labour movement would fight to ensure a future “free from want, insecurity and misery” (Chifley, quoted in Beilharz, 1994). Chifley was stating that those in need should be the recipients of welfare without them having to comply with any requirements to perform to certain behavioural standards. This approach set the scene for the expansion of the welfare state from the post-war period through its expansion in the Whitlam years until its principles were challenged by the Howard Government in the 1990s. During this time welfare benefits grew and were extended to new groups of people considered in need. The labour party supported the notion of deservedness...

Words: 1713 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Welfare Reform

...The Welfare Reform Act was signed into law by President Bill Clinton on August22; 1996. Other government assisted programs with different guidelines were replaced by The Welfare Reform Act. The eligibility guidelines for The Welfare Reform Act were somewhat stricter than other government assisted programs that made it more difficult for some individuals to qualify. A reduction in welfare fraud has been achieved through The Welfare Reform Act that is due to the responsibility the individual on welfare must exhibit. The individual enrolled in a government program has the responsibility to inform the government or state agency of any household changes such as household size or a reduction or increase in income. These household changes must be reported to the agency as soon as they occur. This requirement increases the amount of responsibility required of the program participant; if these changes are not reported as soon as they are known, the individual may lose his or her benefits. A cap was placed on the length of time an individual may receive benefits on the program as well as the amount of cash assistance he or she is allowed to receive (Ku & Coughlin, 2010). The Welfare Reform Act also places great emphasis on the importance of individuals enrolled in a government or state assistance program involvement in job activities. It is a requirement that the individual actively seek gainful employment or participate in job training. An individual has a right to receive...

Words: 750 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Preferential Healthcare

...benefits of the public healthcare system over it’s private counterpart, not only in Canada, but any country attempting to utilize their society to the fullest. I will argue that the welfare-state liberalistic approach is much better because it seeks to pool the resources of the many and regulate/distribute it to the few in dire need, hopefully resulting in a diminishing number of sick and homeless. I begin my essay by highlighting the importance and function of both the welfare state liberalist’s public heath care and the neoconservative private health care. My argument stands on the grounds that public healthcare in Canada is more tenable because it works for the common good of all people, regardless of socioeconomic class while also placing a primary focus on efficiency, instead of profitability. A viable counterargument is that most working people do not find it ‘fair’ to have their hard-earned money taken to support the lazy or poor(welfare), although in reality the vast majority of these ‘lazy’ poor people or those outside of a private healthcare system are not in the position out of free will. As we examine the positives and negatives of both systems it becomes increasingly apparent that as empathetic humans we all have a right to health and to equal opportunity to play our part in society. The welfare-state liberalist view, at its core, is a government that plays a pivotal role in the protection and promotion of the economic and social prosperity of the citizens. Equality...

Words: 2547 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Walfare Reform

...activities of political parties. It is in this respect that the welfare programs also function. They are also like many others, a source of protection and promotion of welfare. But Adam Smith’s invisible hands theory seems to be working here as well. The individualized selfish motives of gaining votes by the politician leads to actions that benefit the general public such as the welfare reforms. This piece has attempted to compare the welfare reforms of the two political parties, Democrats and Republicans. It then highlights similarities and then the differences in the welfare reform beliefs and actions of the two parties. Welfare programs for any society are very important and have the soothing power to satisfy the general public and its inspirations. There are many areas and all are characterized by one common factor i.e. the betterment or the sustenance of the current situation of the people or the particular community to whom the welfare reforms have been initiated. There are reforms for women, against rape, child abuse, domestic violence, poor and its education, entitlements and many others. Each one of the welfare reforms is hotly debated over again and again showing the disagreement of major parties over many issues. Welfare essentially entails itself into the philosophical notion of judgment and the concept of utilitarianism. The greatest happiness principle seems to be working itself up the welfare bills every now and then. One can note how logical statements could...

Words: 571 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Migration Towards Eu: Welfare Magnet

...Academic year 2014-2015 Migration towards Europe and the “welfare magnet”: “Determinants of Turkish Migration to EU-15” Master dissertation Student Kristýna Jedličková Home institution Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze Supervisor prof. Claire Naiditch Submission date September 2015 Acknowledgment I would like to express my sincerest thanks to prof. Claire Naiditch for her guidance, support, patience and valuable recommendations. Declaration of authorship I, Kristýna Jedličková hereby declare that the thesis Migration towards Europe and the “welfare magnet” was written by myself and that all presented results are my own, unless stated otherwise. The literature sources are listed in the Literature Review section. Prague, September 30th, 2015 ........................................................ Signature Key words Migration, welfare magnet, public social spending, inflows of migrants, EU’s migratory policy, European welfare system, Turkish welfare system, Turkey, EU-15, gravity model, fixed effect, random effect, Hausman test, country specific fixed effect, time specific fixed effect. Abstract The purpose of this thesis is to analyse which factors drive migration from Turkey towards Europe and whether the welfare benefits play a major role in the decision making process. The analysis is based on a gravitation model of migration in log-log form. The FE and RE methods were employed as estimation techniques and the Hausman test enabled to distinguish them. The present...

Words: 14837 - Pages: 60

Premium Essay

Welfare Reform Essay

...It seem they explain the thoughts of people who are on welfare and how it is the composed way to live. Although, many liberals do not like the new program but there are not many people welfare. It does not say that they are ok before welfare. The text also state citizens employed and parents are not spending really any time with their young ones and more than half of the parent jobs offer no health insurance. It seems to me that conformists hides the truth containing...

Words: 936 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

It's Hard Being a Single Dad in America

...It’s hard being a single dad in America An Annotated Bibliography Morin, Amanda. "Fathers Raising Daughters: The Unique Challenges of Single Fatherhood." Education.com | An Education & Child Development Site for Parents | Parenting & Educational Resource. N.p., n.d. Web. 5 May 2013. According to the U.S. Census' most recent information, there are approximately 13 million children living in single-parent households. That in itself isn't all that surprising, but here's something that is: 2.5 million of those children are being raised by single fathers. That's nearly 1 in every 40 households –over half as many as ten years ago –in which custodial fathers are raising children, many of whom are girls. So, what kinds of challenges are single fathers of daughters facing? Some issues are gender neutral. Whether they're rearing boys or girls, custodial fathers tend to have a difficult time making ends meet. Unlike single mothers, single fathers are less likely to have flexible work hours and few are receiving child support. In fact, according to Current Population Reports, a publication of the U.S. Census, a mere 30 percent of custodial dads are awarded child support, as compared to 80 percent of custodial mothers. I will use this information to talk about the facts if my topic. "Best Interests of The Child." About.com Single Parents. N.p., n.d. Web. 05 May 2013. Parents seeking child custody or visitation often hear the phrase "best interests of the child" referred to...

Words: 1481 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Cour

...Court Decisions Checkpoint Axia College Court Decisions Checkpoint The “War on Drugs” is becoming more important to the government, program administrators, policy makers, and the public. Money has become an issue in social welfare programs that is vied for on a daily basis; who will get money to support their causes? In November, 1999, a U.S. District Judge ordered a temporary injunction barring the drug testing of new public assistance applicants in Michigan; citing questionable constitutionality. (Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Weekly, 1999) The use of drugs has long been a concern for citizens when giving money to people who are in need. How often have you heard someone say “Don’t give money to street beggars, they just use it for drugs and alcohol?” The problem of the abuse does not seem to be lessening, but it appears the courts believe that testing before receipt of benefits may not be legal. In this case, I believe that the courts have made the appropriate decision. While the use of drugs and alcohol do contribute to poverty and unemployment, they are also side-effects of a bad situation. While most people feel that those who can work should work, there will always be some that are left without opportunity or ability to provide for themselves and their families. There are several aspects of the drug testing dilemma that must be addressed when reviewing the legality, reality, and constitutionality of such a program. The first issue that must be addressed is equal protection...

Words: 1073 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Guaranteed Income Scheme

...Income Guarantee Schemes Amir Hasanat ECON 3505 - Critique of Capitalism Abstract Canada and the United States grapple with situations that necessitate income guarantee schemes but have not implemented the schemes. Income guarantee schemes are social welfare provisions in which governments offer incomes to the citizens to enable them meet their needs as long as they meet established conditions. The origin of this scheme lies in the understanding that every citizen has a right to wealth and property of the state. It is also based on the reality that not all citizens are capable of earning income or sustaining themselves. Income guarantee schemes are based on social welfare models, which conceptualize that it is the role of the government to cater for the needs of the citizenry. Therefore, income guarantee schemes undermine the ideals of capitalism that call for individual efforts for purposes of meeting needs. Income guarantee schemes have a long history of evolution, implementation, and success. Introduction The United States has a number of anti-poverty programs that guarantee economic support to the vulnerable in society (Economist, 2013, p. 1). Income guarantee schemes can be of great relief to a number of poverty stricken people in the country. In Canada, a four-year experiment with income generation schemes was successful but due to economic period of the time, the schemes were discontinued (Belik, 2011, p. 1). Though they intend to end poverty...

Words: 3623 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Sociology

...director at the Department for Work and Pensions. Concern was expressed that Ingeus had underbid more experienced providers: price was a clinching factor in the official scoring system, whereas bizarrely previous performance was not scored at all. 2: The greatly disappointed voluntary sector will be relegated to sub-contracting. The big companies will hand down their difficult cases, such as addicts, ex-prisoners or the mentally ill – creaming 20%-30% off the top in "management fees" 3: Among the winners is A4E (Action for Employment) – hardly surprising as its founder, Emma Harrison CBE, was named by David Cameron as his workless families tsar. As the Observer revealed, she and her husband have a joint income of some £1.4m from their welfare-to-work empire. 4: The verdict was pretty damning. Not only did contracted companies miss their targets by miles – but the DWP's own Jobcentre Plus outscored them easily. The committee's report is remarkably trenchant: " The performance by the mainly private-sector providers was universally poor … £94m was spent on employment support that did not deliver additional jobs … Private providers have seriously underperformed against their contracts and their success rates are worse than Jobcentre Plus even though private contractors work in easier areas." Despite that, the clamour has begun for jobcentres to be outsourced to private companies. That would put a stop to embarrassing comparisons between the two sectors. There...

Words: 753 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Drug Testing Welfare Recipients: Scandal or Solution

...Drug Testing Welfare Recipients: Scandal or Solution Welfare programs as we know today were created in the 1930’s during the great depression to aid unemployed and under employed people in supporting their families. (“The”) It was not intended to be a government funded crutch for substance abusers. Often tax payers complain about tax monies being spent to support the habits of drug users who receive welfare. The fix to this problem is simple, drug testing. Drug test everyone on welfare and when the welfare recipient tests positive, take away the benefit. Problem solved. But is it? The consideration of testing welfare recipients for drug use has been debated since welfare reform in 1996. Subsequently, “at least eight states have passed legislation regarding drug testing or screening for public assistance applicants or recipients (Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Utah)”. (United, par. 2) Legislators in twenty other states have also proposed drug testing for people who receive welfare. (Prah) However, drug testing welfare recipients is an ineffective use of tax monies because drug abuse is not common in welfare recipients, it is expensive and unproductive, and it is a violation of personal rights. It is easy to believe that most people who receive welfare have some sort of drug abuse problem; nevertheless this could not be further from the truth. The reality is, of the 310 million people living in the United States in 2011, only 1.95 million...

Words: 1301 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

The Return of Reagan

...The return of Reagan's 'welfare queen' New laws to make welfare claimants pay for drug tests cruelly exploit the resentments of struggling middle-class Americans Florida Governor Rick Scott is poised to fulfill a "top priority" campaign pledge and sign legislation requiring the state's approximately 58,000 welfare recipients to pay for their own random drug tests. The fiscal hawk and governor was once the head of Columbia/HCA, which perpetrated the biggest Medicare fraud in US history, and he opposed the creation of a database to track heavy prescription narcotics like Oxycontin because it would be an "invasion of privacy". This in Florida, our nation's undisputed capital of illegal prescription drugs, where dope is slung out of strip mall "pill mills". But I digress – and it's only the second paragraph. "If you go apply for a job today, you are generally going to be drug-tested," Governor Scott told Central Florida News 13 in October 2010. "The people that are working are paying the taxes for people on welfare. Shouldn't the welfare people be held to the same standard?" Thirty states took up bills to mandate drug testing for "the welfare people" during the 2011 legislative session, which is now in most states drawing to a merciful close: legislators were otherwise busy restricting abortion, worker and immigrant rights, while liberalising the right to bear arms on college campuses and destroy the environment; Florida and Texas have passed legislation making it harder for...

Words: 1241 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Social Welfare

...Social Welfare Past & Present robert white HN300: Human Services and Social Policy Social Welfare Past & Present robert white HN300: Human Services and Social Policy 2014 2014 Social welfare began in England with the English Poor Laws. Poor Laws were a body of laws that provided relief for the poor, developed in 16th-century and maintained, with various changes, until after World War II. The Elizabethan Poor Laws, were administered through parish overseers, who provided relief for the aged, sick, and infant poor, as well as work for the able-bodied in workhouses. However, the modern welfare state was started by Otto von Bismarck, the first Chancellor of Germany, created the modern welfare state by building on a tradition of welfare programs in Prussia and Saxony that began as early as in the 1840s. Bismarck introduced old age pensions, accident insurance and medical care that formed the basis of the modern European welfare state.  The United Kingdom, as a modern welfare state, started to emerge with the Liberal welfare reforms of 1906–1914 under Liberal Prime Minister Herbert Asquith. The passing of the Old-Age Pensions Act in 1908, the introduction of free school meals in 1909, the 1909 Labour Exchanges Act, the Development Act 1909, which heralded greater Government intervention in economic development, and the enacting of the National Insurance Act 1911 setting up a national insurance contribution for unemployment and health benefits from work. The...

Words: 1891 - Pages: 8