...Andrew Jackson 0n March 4, 1829 the fate of the United States rested on the shoulders of one of the most racist president Donald Trump. But go back 188 when the U.S. rested on the shoulders of Andrew Jackson. Andrew Jackson may have been a racist president but he did many great things for America. He was a war hero in the War of 1812, founded the Democratic party, and brought the president position into a new era. To begin with Andrew Jackson redefining the president position. He expanded the president power by going to the senate saying what bills needed to be passed. For instance he had public inauguration because he was a man of the people while past presidents were inaugurated in private which this event made him very popular. This earned him the nickname “King Mob.” Andrew Jackson replaced all the past secretaries of the presidents and then replaced them with all his political allies this became known as the spoil system. Jackson fought the Second Bank of America because he thought that the bank was corrupt and that manipulated paper money held to much power over the economy....
Words: 522 - Pages: 3
...Name: University: Course Title: Instructor: Date: Definition of key terms/ people/places/events Andrew Jackson 236- is a former president of the USA who was inaugurated in 1824. He was commonly called “a man of the people” as he advocated reforms to allow more people the right to vote. Anti-masonry 251- this is a movement which emerged in the early 1820s in a bid to resist the Society of Freemasons. Aroostook 255- this is a war between Canadians and Americans which took place at the Aroostook River region in 1838. Bank war 247- this term refers to a war between Andrew Jackson and the Bank of the United States. Jackson wanted to destroy the bank but the bank’s president, Nicholas Biddle was determined to save it. Caroline affair 255- a ship by the name Caroline was ferrying supplies to American rebels across the Niagara River. British authorities however detained the ship and burnt it down. In retaliation, the American authorities arrested a Canadian, Alexander McLeod and charged him with the murder of the American who had died when the ship was burnt down. This is what was referred to as the Caroline Affair. Daniel Webster 242- he was a senator for Massachusetts who challenged Robert Hayne’s call for nullification. Dorr rebellion 237- it was started by Thomas W. Dorr who sought to increase the percentage of voters in Rhode Island. He drafted a constitution which...
Words: 1571 - Pages: 7
...The reasons why Andrew Jackson was a very popular man of his day he was considered a man of the people is Because he was a very noble man he is even on the cover of the 20 dollar bill and he was know for many things like the industrial revolution and much more the various amounts of reasons are endless and he was a very good man to the united states of america. But there was also many bad things he did to america Andrew Jackson resigned from senate just so that he can run for presidency and he really wanted to win. He is also known as the man who led the war and he really is a war hero because of the battle of new orleans. Now there were some reasons that he did wrong like he violated the constitution by over using his power and he started...
Words: 252 - Pages: 2
...main arguments on a textbook that is older than my parents. Making this argument, nonetheless, in an era when textbooks are considered out of date after one semester of classes, let alone 51 years. Mr. Buchanan’s argument continues to fall apart as the article continues. Firstly, stating how this book only mentions one sentence of Harriet Tubman but five chapters of Andrew Jackson,...
Words: 662 - Pages: 3
...Democracy: What’s the Verdict? Jackson was elected into office in 1829 and ever since has been associated with the term Jacksonian Democracy. He helped cause a movement for the Second Party System and that’s why he was associated with the Jacksonian Democracy. With this democracy also came a very bad rap. He has been accused of being a reckless and careless president. He is called this because of all of the havoc he caused across the nation. He’s been charged with degrading the office, causing financial collapse and for cruelty to Indians. He’s guilty on only two of the three charges which are causing financial collapse and cruelty to Indians. He was innocent with degrading the office as he helped put many beneficial things into...
Words: 995 - Pages: 4
...We, the American people, were honored to have electee Andrew Jackson serve as our president for two terms. His valiant decisions in events such as the Bank War, South Carolina’s Nullification Act, and the Indian Removal Act ensured that the majority of Americans opinions would be represented. As a democratic leader elected by the majority of the American people, it is only right that he has responded to and executed the American majority’s beliefs. During Jackson’s first term, the state of South Carolina initialized the Nullification Act. This state act called for South Carolina to nullify any federal institutionalized law to which they found unconstitutional. Despite having ratified the constitution and taken the vow to uphold it, South...
Words: 973 - Pages: 4
...The Panic of 1812 was an economic disaster that occurred when small banks printed too much money causing inflation. Andrew Jackson was the president at the time and had been ruling with more power than any president before him, earning him the nickname “King Andrew.” King Andrew, once elected president, began to push many Americans against the 2nd National Bank. Instead, he wanted them to be deposited into state banks. Secretary of the Treasure Duane refused this, but was simply removed by Jackson and replaced with Roger B. Taney. Eventually, “twenty-three state banks-dubbed ‘pet banks’ by anti-Jacksonians-had been selected as depositories.” The idea was strongly opposed in all of the congress. So much so, that a new political party, called the Whig party. “This name played off the idea that Jackson was acting as if he were ‘King Andrew’ because it was the Whig party in Britain that espoused the limiting of royal power.” The Senate eventually gained control once again and stopped the election of Taney into the secretary of Treasury. Unfortunately, Jackson had already destroyed the American banking system making it unpredictable...
Words: 1075 - Pages: 5
...The atmosphere was optimistically in a way, writers and publishers started to print for the audience (people) different types of genres, women in the society, melodramas and so forth, all these represented the American’s lifestyle and their beliefs ( Divine page 227). Despite this, Andrew Jackson was an American symbol for democracy; however in 1824 he lost the presidential election, four years later his victory was depicted as more democratic mold. In 1824 the election was intense between these individuals ‘John Quincy Adams, William Crawford, Henry Clay, John C. Calhoun, and Andrew Jackson’ from them no one got the majority of voting therefore the House of Representative decided to appoint Adams but his presidential administration had failed, therefore Jacskon took control over the Congress, and in 1828 Jackson and his supporters that worked at the party were very organized. The people accepted him as a democratic leader, and after justifying against Adams, finally he got his presidential triumph. While he was in office his democracy was based on firing those people from the office that he didn’t like or those that didn’t obey him as an important persona (Divine page 229-230). The Jackson administration concerned the Indian’s fate in America; he considered them just not ‘humans’ and he...
Words: 1651 - Pages: 7
...Tears is a phrase known to define the forceful expulsion of the five civilized Native tribes, away from their traditional lands and forced migration to new Indian ground which was west of the Mississippi River. These tribes were the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and the Seminoles. When Andrew Jackson was elected president in the year 1828, the Natives soon became a part of the next racial targeting. President Andrew Jackson encouraged the expulsion; the Congress authorized this removal policy set by the president in 1830. The Indian Removal Act was passed on May 28, 1830; they were involuntarily removed from their homes and forced to move west. The Indian Removal Act was defined as swapping the U.S. western area for the...
Words: 1731 - Pages: 7
...americans with gold. Although the act did all of this, the constitution is the base of our country and, as a sign of respect, Jackson and his inexperienced cabinet could have prevented this horrific event by becoming allies with the Natives. Discrimination was also an important factor in the removal. American were stereotypical and often called the indians uncivilized, savages, and treated them like fugitives. In 1835, Andrew Jackson, former president of the united states, clearly stated in his seventh annual message to congress that “ The country destined for residence for this people shall be forever “secured and guaranteed to them.” (Document D) Jackson believed that it was impossible for the indians to prosper while in contact with the Americans. American believed that this was their land and it is legally theirs even though Native Americans have been in America long before any of the Americans who were against them. Now some people may believe that it was the right thing to do because Indians weren't civilized americans and that since they were on the property of america, they can do anything they dream to do. On the other hand, discrimination was and will always be wrong. It was wrong on moral grounds and constitutional grounds. Therefore, the Americans had no rights to do this and had no right to commit genocide. ALong with the many other reasons of why the removal act was an inhuman action to do, it showed a massive amount of disrespect towards the Indians. In John G. Burnett's...
Words: 771 - Pages: 4
...of imagination, first to recognize the nature of his supremacy. Mao had two careers, one as rebel leader, one as an updated emperor. He had gained the power of the latter but evidently retained the self-image of the former. Because authority in China came form the top down, as was recognized even in the mass line, once the CCP had taken power its leader became sacrosanct, above all the rest of mankind, not only the object of a cult of veneration but also the acknowledge superior of everyone in the organization. Such of the CCP had been put together by Mao that it could be regarded as his creation, and if he wanted to reform it, that was his privilege. Only if we regard him as a monarch in succession to scores of emperors can we imagine why the leadership of the CPP, trained to be loyal, went along with his piecemeal assault on and destruction of them. Mao also seems to have had in mind the idea that student youth could be mobilized to attack the evils in the establishment and purge China revisionism. It would be a form to manipulate mass movement, which his experience told him, was the engine of social change. (387) The Cultural Revolution, like the Hundred Flowers Campaign and the Great Leap Forward, turned out to be something he had not envisioned. Allowing for many variations, the purge rate among party officials was somewhere around 60 percent. It has been estimated that 400,000 people died as a result of maltreatment. (387) How the Cultural Revolution Unfolded ...
Words: 2784 - Pages: 12
...A. One reason why political parties rose in the early Republic was because Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton had opposing views on government. Hamilton wanted a strong central federal government. Hamilton and other leaders created the Federalist party in 1787 and it was backed by the wealthy. The Federalist party believed in a republic where the federal government had most of the power and should protect the interests of the country. Jefferson was at the head of the anti-federalists also known as the Democratic-Republican Party. The Democratic-Republican Party was backed by people such as small farmers, artisans, and planters. They wanted the federal government to have little involvement in their lives and to leave most of the power to the local and state governments (Flanders, 2007). B1. The Whig and Democratic Parties had many different platforms they used. The Whig Party did not want to expand westward and wanted to grow commercially within the current territory of the nation. The Whig party...
Words: 1140 - Pages: 5
...Critical Thinking Essay (Indian Removal Act) As the 19th century began, Americans who had their eyes set on new unclaimed land poured into the south and began heading towards present day Alabama. Since the Indian tribes living there seemed to be the main thing prohibiting the expansion, white settlers petitioned the federal government to remove them from the land. In his 1829 State of the Union address, President Jackson called for the removal of Native Americans from their tribal lands. Andrew Jackson wanted to renew a policy of political and military action for the removal of the Indians from these lands and worked towards creating a law for Indian removal. The Indian Removal Act was put in place to give to the southern states access to the land that Indians had formerly settled on (U.S. Department of State). The Indian Removal Act brought many issues to the table. Such as whether it was constitutional, who had the authority to pass what, and could it be done peacefully. In 1823, a case, Johnson v. M’Intosh, which was fighting for Indian’s rights, was brought before the...
Words: 775 - Pages: 4
...Natives and their Role in the American Frontier As Americans, we do not usually question how we came to this land or why we are able to live here as we do. We believe that the American frontier is this grand historical past of our growth as a nation. However, the country we know today as the United States of America was originally inhabited by natives such as the Native Americans, or Indians as they are commonly known as, and Mexicans who were robbed of their homeland in order for the white man to take over control. As citizens of this country, it is important to know how the natives were treated and portrayed in literature in order to become educated about our country and the people that inhabited this land before us. Being ignorant about a particular culture leads to misguided feelings and judgments that are not normally acceptable. By looking at examples from John Smith’s The Chesapeake Indians, Mary Rowlandson’s A True History of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson, and Frederick Jackson Turner’s The Significance of the Frontier in American History, we will see that natives were portrayed negatively in popular literature and why it is important to understand how they are represented is justified by the colonial expansion of the American frontier. In early literature written by English settlers, Native Americans were portrayed with very negative connotations. The writers often used words such as: brutal, dark, uncivilized, and savage to depict the native...
Words: 1447 - Pages: 6
...Cherokee had sided against them in many wars, and had expressed violent attacks against them. The government wanted to move them off of their Georgia land. This caused the Indian Removal Act to be created. The president, Andrew Jackson at the time, suddenly had the power to negotiate treaties with Native Americans that would move them into Indian Territory. While many...
Words: 1448 - Pages: 6
