...Why OJ Simpson Is Guilty Millions of people were watching the slow Bronco chase. He had a gun to his head. He also had 992055.00 in pesos and a disguise. Why would he do that if he was not guilty? He was headed to the airport. If the glove was not found by the racist cop it would have been better.They also should not have had him try on the gloves found at the scene. The gloves were blood soaked and shrunk. They should have bought the same size gloves and then had OJ try them on. They would have had a better chance to win the case. The police also had his DNA on the glove and they found blood at his house. All of these reasons and more are why Oj Simpson is guilty of the murder of Nicole and Ron Goldman. From the biography Made In America....
Words: 506 - Pages: 3
...O.J. Simpson is guilty of killing his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend, Ronald Goldman. There is an enormous amount of evidence that proves that he did. He had a motive, but not a solid alibi. There are lab results dealing with blood, DNA, and fibers that place him at the scene of the murders. If that is not enough to prove him guilty, then there are also the witnesses that can place O.J. Simpson going in and out of the Rockingham estate on the day and around the time of the murders. Others have testified of threatening remarks they heard O.J. Simpson say against Nicole and police reports of violent actions he committed against her. Evidence proves that O.J. Simpson is guilty of killing Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. O. J. Simpson had motive for killing Nicole Brown Simpson. He and his wife were having severe marital problems. There is proof of how bad their relationship was. She had her sister take pictures of her bruised body and lock them in a safe for future evidence if needed. Also, there were recorded 911 phone calls in 1989 and 1993 from Nicole during brutal attacks by O.J. When the police responded to...
Words: 1466 - Pages: 6
...“If the glove doesn't fit then you must acquit” this quote was said by Johnnie Cochran during the trial of Orenthal James Simpson who later pleaded not guilty to two counts of murder. OJ” Simpson is guilty of murdering his ex wife Nicole Brown Simpson and waiter Ronald Lyle Goldman on June 12, 1994. This can be proved by the famous gloves, evidence from the murder scene and the scene itself, and a possible motive that OJ had to murder Nicole and Ronald. Evidence that proves that OJ Simpson is guilty of murdering Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman on June 12th, 1994 are the bloody gloves. According to investigators there was a bloody leather glove at the scene of the murder in Brentwood, California and another bloody leather glove at...
Words: 879 - Pages: 4
...Who was the person that murdered oj simpson's wife. Do you think anyone will ever find out who murdered her? We still don't know who murdered her however people still might think that oj simpson was the one who murdered his own wife. Have you ever heard of a unsolved mystery well oj simpson was in a unsolved mystery. Oj simpson was accused of murdering his own wife but he said he did not. The O. J. Simpson murder case officially titled People of the State of California v. Orenthal James Simpson was a criminal trial held at the Los Angeles County Superior Court in which former National Football League NFL player, broadcaster, and actor Orenthal James O. J. Simpson was tried on two counts of murder for the June 12, 1994, deaths of his ex-wife...
Words: 410 - Pages: 2
...The World Shock Brought On By The OJ Simpson Trials The OJ Simpson trials were held from January 24 to October 3, 1995. These trials were held at the Los Angeles County Superior Court in California. The trials of the People of the State of California v. Orenthal James Simpson were held to try former NFL star and actor O. J. Simpson. He was tried on two counts of murder for the June 12, 1994 deaths of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson and a friend of hers, Ron Goldman. The case was later described as the most publicized criminal trial in American history. The trial and its outcomes were such a major piece of history from the late 90s, with its impact is still being discussed today as there have been numerous accounts of retelling the events....
Words: 1046 - Pages: 5
...OJ Simpson Case Study Psychology 410 November 17, 2000 Gregory E. Haymon OJ Simpson Case Study Forensic DNA is a way to explain a crime, but it has to be gathered and stored properly to be counted pure. The OJ Simpson case, the defense claimed that the murder incident and the Simpson estate were not divided when evidence was collected. The defense stated that the bloodstains were found in the Bronco and on OJ's socks. DNA can be beneficial when determining who the killer was and who was at a scene, but the collection has to be done according to standards. The Simpson case was a displayed wrong and the way forensic DNA works when crimes are solved. The OJ Simpson case demonstrates the most challenging evidence created by the forensics scientists. This evidence may not be enough to convince a jury beyond a realistic doubt that an accused individual is guilty. It is well-defined that with highly trained agents who work on a high profile cases or any other cases, it must be accompanied by well-trained crime scene investigators to collect evidences. Therefore, progress of accreditation programs that train police officers and crime scene technicians in the appropriate approaches to handle the evidence in a crime scene investigation should be on-going. The two main points to consider when examining the case study of OJ Simpson is first to provide an overview of selected case. The second step is to explain the emotional, biological, behavioral components, and...
Words: 1668 - Pages: 7
...In March of 1991, Rodney King was a victim of police brutality. Once the trial was over the officers were found not guilty. After the riot broke out in the city of LA, the Department of Justice had the officers trialed again. Many thought it was unfair for the officers to be charged again, but the officers were then found guilty. A few years after Rodney King, OJ Simpson was on trial for the murder of his wife, Nicole Brown Simpson. During the trial, there were lots of police accusations because he was an African American famous football player, who was loved by many fans but hated by many. Being a wealth African American during this time was a crime, basically, him and his lawyer, Johnnie Cochran, were harassed by the police for the color of their skin. Another victim of police brutality following the OJ Simpson trial was Amadou Diallo in 1999, he came to American in pursuit of his dream. Sadly, his dream came to an end in 1999, when the police had mistaken him reaching for a gun and ended his life. Should an innocent man die for a false statement? “Slaves did not have civil or political rights, so they were not entitled, as others were, to a fair trial or the right to be considered innocent until proven guilty.” (African American Eras: Contemporary Times. p 546) This is evidence that African Americans have had this issue throughout U.S....
Words: 1037 - Pages: 5
...The O.J. Simpson Trial: How The Media Effects High Profile Criminal Cases Noah Norwood Florida State University Abstract This paper goes over the effects the media had on the O.J. Simpson case and how the media interfered. The O.J. Simpson murder case is touted as the most televised criminal trial in history and from the second the murders were discovered there was a media frenzy. On the night of June 12, 1994 the bodies of Nicole Brown and her waiter Ronald Goldman were found outside of Nicole’s condo both stabbed to death. The suspect, former athlete, icon, and actor Orenthal James (O.J.) Simpson was the main suspect of the crime. On June 16th, 1994 the LAPD pressed murder charges against him and placed a warrant for his arrest on which he agreed to turn himself in on June 17th 1994 at 11 A.M.. He would not show up to turn himself in and eventually the infamous White Ford Bronco police chase would ensue. Eventually O.J. would be brought in and face trial in what would subsequently lead to him being found not guilty. Throughout this paper we will go over the historical setting and the phases of the incident from the crime committed to the end of the trial. Along with this the effect the high volume of media coverage and publicity will be covered. Also research on how race and gender affected the outcome of this trial will be displayed. To conclude the O.J. Simpson murder trial was highly effected by the media interference from day 1, which caused a racial stir and a certain...
Words: 2197 - Pages: 9
...is a crime in which one human being kills another human being. Murder is the most damaging of crimes to society. Murder goes against all morals and values in both historical and modern society. Social Scientists argue that legally authorized executions and abortions of unborn children can also be classified as murder. There are a number of cases where murder has gone from being a criminal case to a civil case of wrongful death. Many murder cases where a Jury did not convict a suspect of murder went further to become a wrongful death law suit in which the family sued the Defendant. Such cases have made major headlines such as the case in which OJ Simpson was acquitted of the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. The families of Goldman and Nicole Simpson then sued OJ Simpson in civil court and received a judgment against Simpson for approximately $30 million dollars. This case was appealed and the judgments were affirmed by the Appellate Court in California. Cases of this nature set the stage for these actions and the types of remedies that are available to victim’s families. Should families of victims have the ability to sue a Defendant for the murder of another? Should the murder suspect be sued for wrongful death even if they are not convicted in criminal court? Murder cases in criminal court must have evidence proving that the alleged suspect committed the murder. Civil cases involving wrongful death based on a murder case should have the same standards as the same...
Words: 3583 - Pages: 15
...How much evidence do we need to prove if someone is acquitted or guilty? In many cases like the OJ Simpson case, there is enough evidence that points straight to the perpetrator, but not nearly enough to put him in prison. In law, it is very black and white, DNA has to match with the offender exactly or you have no case. Casey Anthony had a substantial amount of circumstantial evidence, but was able to walk away as a free woman. On July 15, 2008, the police department in Orlando, Florida received a call from a woman named Cindy Anthony, she claimed that her daughter had recently stolen her car, and her two year old granddaughter Caylee Anthony has been missing for quite some time. Later that day...
Words: 1019 - Pages: 5
...|Week Three Paper |Max Pts |Your Pts | |Word Count |1 |1 | |APA |2 |2 | |Gram. Sp. Punct. |1 |1 | | | | | |Defining Terms |1 |1 | |Examples used |2 |2 | |Content |3 |3 | |TOTAL |10 |10 | Jury Nullification Paper Therese Carlon June 3, 2012 Joseph Mariconda The United States Declaration of Independence has been viewed over the first two centuries as one of the definitive government documents that spell out both racial and ethnic equality for all Americans. However, there is a section of this worthy document that refers to one of the foundational premises for our founding freedoms: “That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to...
Words: 1648 - Pages: 7
...CJA 344 Week 3 ury Nullification Paper Assignment: Jury Nullification Paper CJA/ 344 Week 4 November 25, 2012 Mr. Jones CJA 344 Week 3 Assignment Jury Nullification Paper Ongoing debate exists on the issue of whether indeed ethnicity influences proceedings in the court room or not. Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor said in a 2001 speech that a judge's gender and ethnicity does, and should, influence his or her decision-making on the bench. Sotomayor made the comments on October 26, 2001, at a University of California-Berkeley symposium marking the 40th anniversary of the first Latino named to the federal district court. She states something very relevant to this which was, "I wonder whether by ignoring our differences as women or men of color we do a disservice both to the law and society," she said at the event, sponsored by the law school. "I further accept that our experiences as women and people of color affect our decisions. The aspiration to impartiality is just that — it's an aspiration because it denies the fact that we are by our experiences making different choices than others." "Our gender and national origins may and will make a difference in our judging. This is not to say that all African Americans, all Latinos or all women share the same views and life experiences. This too would be a silly position. But it is to say that in our society, factors such as race, gender and social class...
Words: 1149 - Pages: 5
...* * * * * * * * * Representation Of Race In Media * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Much of our perceptions of the world are based on narratives and the images that we see in film, television, radio, music, and other media. These are some of the outlets that construct how individuals see their social identities, as well as learn and understand about what it is to be black, white, Native American, Asian, South American, etc. (Dow, Wood, 2006, p. 297). You will get a better understanding of this once you understand the concept of ideologies. Ideologies are what create our perception of the world around us, whether it is political, social, economic, etc. Ideologies are not the product of individual intention or conscious, rather we create our intentions within ideology (Marris, Thornham, 2000, p. 267). These ideologies exist before we are even born; they form the social constructions and conditions that we are born into. But, ideologies are just a practice, and it is produced and reproduced in apparatus of ideological production. The media is a great example of an apparatus of ideological production (Marris, Thornham, 2000, p. 273). It produces social meanings and distributes them throughout society. However, as long as ideologies continue so will social struggles such as racism, which we will discuss in this essay. Media elites represent different races through media based on...
Words: 1829 - Pages: 8
...| Death Penalty: | What’s the problem? | | Michael Stender (14354787) | 11/27/2012 | What is the good of killing our inmates if the violence around us continues to grow more and more out of hand? This paper examines a single perspective of societies position on a difficult but necessary evil. | Death Penalty: Why do so many citizens oppose the death penalty? In today’s society the rate of crime, specifically those that involve crimes which can be tried as a capital punishment cases, continue to increase; domestic killings, predatory crimes against children and innocent victim crimes have all continued to rise; Meanwhile the public’s belief and support in our justice systems ultimate punishment continue to fall. The death penalty although looked at as cruel or inhumane by some, can be viewed as a necessary evil. Society as a whole must feel that our system of laws is protecting us. Locking up non-violent and common criminals and attempting to rehabilitate in order to join society is a continuing effort and with some success. However, most studies have found that an increasing number of prisoners today are repeat offenders with sentences for more violent crimes. A study recently done found that 56% of violent felons are repeat offenders and 61% of all felons are repeat offenders. The study also found that most are being punished outside the walls of prison due to their criminal past. After the inmate is released he’s sent back out to society...
Words: 1701 - Pages: 7
...Bias in Our Court System….is it fair or unfair justice??? America was built on the premise of everyone having equal rights. After years of British tyranny our forefathers felt they wanted a system where they will not be improperly punished without facts. In fact the framers of the Constitution felt they needed a system where everyone gets a fair shot. In America everyone who is accused of a crime is supposed to have a fair trial and is assumed innocent until proven guilty. Sadly, however, some would argue America’s criminal justice system has become more twisted and unfair than ever and that the rule of law has basically been vanquished in America’s criminal justice system. Outcomes of cases are generally decided now by the prosecutors and more plea bargaining is the norm over trial by jury. Yet so many people in our society today feels that people in the system gets equal opportunities. Although some people end up with different sentences and punishments people say that the American court system is a fair system. America has slowly turned into a system where justice and fairness is overruled by money and power. In the media today many people are committing crimes and walking away with a slap on the wrist. Many social media and news shows the bias in court systems through their broadcasts of issues. The American justice system is biased in their convictions and sentencing through racial disproportion, social structure, and economic standing. Our criminal justice...
Words: 2231 - Pages: 9
