ANSWERING A LEGAL PROBLEM: THE ‘FIVE STEP’ PLAN WHAT YOU NEED: • KEY FACTS • RELEVANT ISSUES • KEY LEGAL PRINCIPLES • APPLICATION OF THE LAW TO THE FACTS • TENTATIVE CONCLUSION WHAT TO DO: 1) Identify KEY FACTS of the problem Unlike judges, when you answer a problem or case study you do not need to summarise the facts of a problem. What you should do is identify the key facts. 2) Identify RELEVANT ISSUE of the problem From the key facts, you should then be able
Words: 707 - Pages: 3
Business Law- In this unit you, Click Link Below To Buy: http://hwcampus.com/shop/business-law-in-this-unit-you/ In this unit you, you will select a case law pertaining to the topic of business entities. Each case law analysis allows you to express yourself as clearly and fully as possible in dissecting a court decision. The purpose of the assignment is two-fold: 1. To give you the opportunity to read a real court decision. 2. To challenge you to think about how you would have
Words: 420 - Pages: 2
(stare decisis) from the common law implementation in UK courts. This goes back to King’s Henri II (the King’s Bench) whereby past decisions were dispensed throughout the kingdom. The reasons and main advantages of the same are to ensure consistency/uniformity and predictability, thus creating confidence in the legal system. The stare decisis (stand by what is decided) enacts the requirement on the courts to follow/abide by the previous rationes decidendi of previous cases. Mainly, the lower courts
Words: 1253 - Pages: 6
predictability in law. Stare decisis is a doctrine or policy of following rules or principles laid down in previous judicial decisions. By giving significant weight to previous decisions, a consistent set of case law is developed from which the public can draw conclusions about how a court will decide a current or future case. - Would not a better way simply be for the judge to apply whatever law is applicable based on the facts of the current case? If the judge based on the facts of the current case, it has
Words: 554 - Pages: 3
Analysis of a Flag Burning Case In 1984, Gregory Lee Johnson burned an American flag at a Regan campaign protest. He was subsequently arrested, convicted, and sentenced to prison in the Dallas County Criminal Court. Johnson appealed, lost in the Texas Court of Appeals, Fifth District, but eventually his conviction was overturned by the highest court in the state, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals; upon a final appeal, made by the state, the case made its way to the United States Supreme Court
Words: 652 - Pages: 3
NATIONAL UNIVERSITY «ODESSA LAW ACADEMY» Department of International Law and International Relations TERM PAPER In Legal Philosophy on topic: «Judicial Precedent» By the 1st year student of the 1st group Of the Faculty of International Legal Relations Supervisor: Prof. National scale ___________ Number of points ______ Assessment ECTS _______ Commission members: ___________ _______________________ ___________ _______________________ ___________ _______________________
Words: 6308 - Pages: 26
Case of HOODA v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION [2012] FMCA 1018 A review of Mr. Hooda’s case was sought pursuant to Judiciary Act, concluded with a declaration that the application was not rendered invalid, a writ of certiorari to quash the decision that the application was invalid, and a writ of mandamus issue to the respondent to determine the application according to law. We are today to discuss the justification of Smith FM and the implication of the case in terms of valid visa application, which
Words: 1062 - Pages: 5
July, 13 2013 (Week 3 Assignment Introduction to Law) MOD6_ 1. What are the two basic functions of trial courts. The trial court's basic function is to resolve disputes by determining the facts and applying legal principles to decide who is right. The appellate court's task is to determine whether the law was applied correctly in the trial court. 2. What is the difference between a dissenting and a concurring opinion? So Majority opinion is called the
Words: 354 - Pages: 2
Certainty in the law is a concept for which the Administration of Justice strives. Judicial precedent promotes certainty in case law while Statutory Interpretation promotes certainty in legislation. Discuss these statements with reference to the principles and rules of Judicial Precedent and Statutory Interpretation. Illustrate your answer by reference to cases. Individuals have different perceptions, and businesses operate in a market-based system, where production is fuelled by profit
Words: 2644 - Pages: 11
opinion because of the reasoning and/or the principles of law on which the decision is based. A concurring opinion agrees with the decision of the court but offers further comment (http://www.lectlaw.com). In law, a majority opinion is a judicial opinion agreed to by more than half of the members of a court. A majority opinion sets forth the decision of the court and an explanation of the rationale behind the court's decision. Not all cases have a majority opinion. At times, the justices voting
Words: 1270 - Pages: 6
