Cosmological Argument: The First Mover I think that the argument contains a major fallacy. Although I agree by the argument’s conclusion that there is a timeless, eternal, God, I would not use it to argue and prove God’s existence because it contains a non sequitur fallacy. I think premise 2 as presented in Aquinas’ second way (Miller and Jensen 224) contradicts the conclusion. All this boils down to really is the claim that the argument is making that: Everything that exists has a cause (first
Words: 348 - Pages: 2
Clarke’s Cosmological Argument In the following paper, I will outline Samuel Clarke’s “Modern Formulation of the Cosmological Argument” and restate some of the points that he makes. Samuel Clarke’s argument for the existence of God states that “There has existed from eternity some one unchangeable and independent being” (37). The argument follows a logical flow and can be better understood when the structure is laid out and the argument reconstructed. Clarke begins his argument with a use
Words: 796 - Pages: 4
Scripture Debate Script I would like to start with the video you showed us about the cosmological argument, this video starts off very reasonably, explaining how something cannot come from nothing, this is currently true and most likely always will be, this I find is one of the only logical aspects of this video. The video then moves on to the next point, did the universe begin, or has it always existed? It then immediately says that Atheists believe the universe has been here forever, this simply
Words: 738 - Pages: 3
Aquina’s cosmological argument states the existence of God, and claims that cosmos or universe exists, the existence of the cosmos has a cause, and that cause is God. Everything begin was cause by something else that happened before; therefore, either there is an infinite casual chain being extending backwards or there is a first cause, something that wasn’t caused by anything but caused something else. There is no infinite casual chain extending backwards, so there must be a first cause that was
Words: 460 - Pages: 2
The Cosmological argument says that the universe began to exist, therefore the universe has a cause. Magic is more believable than even believing that something just appeared with no cause whatsoever. If something begins existing, there has to be a cause. However, there is an argument to this statement. Has the universe always existed or did it simply one day begin? Atheists believe that the universe has always been here and that there’s nothing to it. This theory is shot down a lot due to extensive
Words: 367 - Pages: 2
St Thomas Aquinas version of The Cosmological Argument Aquinas developed the five ways to prove the existence of God. He based his arguments on what could be observed, his observations included that the universe moves and changes. From his observations he reached conclusions about the existence of God. However, Aquinas did actually accept the fact that he may not prove that the cause of the universe is the God of classical theism. He also did not accept infinity because he believed that there had
Words: 519 - Pages: 3
Outline the cosmological argument for the existence of God (21 marks) The cosmological argument aims to prove the existence of God whilst also providing an explanation for the beginning of the universe, with different views coming from various scholars. It is an a posteriori argument, meaning we can draw conclusions from experiences based on what we see around us, although it is not a fact. Despite the separate interpretations, the cosmological argument revolves around a first cause which started
Words: 619 - Pages: 3
The cosmological argument (i) Examine the view that the cosmological argument provides an explanation for the world and is a trustworthy basis for belief in the existence of God. (21) The cosmological argument, also known as the first cause argument, is a classical argument for the existence of God. The word cosmological comes from the Greek for order and it is an inductive argument as the premises are true but the conclusion may not be, and it is also synthetic where the truth is determined
Words: 1053 - Pages: 5
is a compile of ideas related to human nature. It is considered as a guide through out a person’s life addressing issues that maybe basic and pervasive defining the path we choose to take and how we treat others. Philosophies are based on logical arguments and rely on facts. The topic of philosophy can address several different areas such as: the theory of reality metaphysics, the theory of knowledge epistemology, the theory of moral values ethics, politics the theory of legal rights and government
Words: 1677 - Pages: 7
ACCEPT OR REJECT THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENTS AS PROVIDING RATIONALLY CONVINCING ARGUMENTS FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD. PHIL 3431: Introduction to Philosophy of Religion November 20th, 2012 The Cosmological Argument The cosmological argument is considered to be the relationship between the existence of the world or universe and the existence of a being that created this world or universe and maintains its existence. According to many studies, the cosmological argument comes in two forms: the
Words: 2119 - Pages: 9
