states the vital statistics, called the jurisdictional facts and states the conduct, which forms the grounds for the divorce to be granted. It also covers certain technical matters and asks the court for anything you might want. 2. Motion for judgment- as a matter of law is a request asking the court to enter judgment as a matter of law. 3. Answer- in law, a written pleading filed by a defendant to respond to a complaint in a lawsuit filed and served upon that defendant. 4. Grounds of defense
Words: 818 - Pages: 4
amount of cases that were appealed. We will be counting appealed cases as mistakes that have been committed by the judges. In this report, will we go through and determine which judges in the county are making too many mistakes. 1. The probability of a case in Hamilton County being appealed and reversed in Common Pleas Court .04462 Domestic Relations Court .00403292 Municipal Court .005556867 2. The probability of a case being appealed for each judge Common Pleas Court Judge
Words: 510 - Pages: 3
1 JAUFFUR A.F. v THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2005 PRV 6 Privy Council Appeal No 6 of 2005 Abdul Raouf Jauffur v Appellant Respondent The Commissioner of Income Tax FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MAURITIUS ----------------- JUDGMENT OF THE LORDS OF THE JUDICIAL COMMITTEE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL Delivered the 21st June 2006 ----------------Present at the hearing:- Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead Lord Steyn Lord Hutton Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe Lord Mance ---------------[Delivered
Words: 1626 - Pages: 7
without going to trial. In the case of Rainy vs. Domino’s pizza, LLC traditional litigation was used but using ADR in the case may have been the better way to go. In the state court system this case would begin by the plaintiff, Paul Rainy filing a complaint. Then Domino’s pizza, LLC has to file an answer to the plaintiff’s case, which in this case they deny being vicariously liable for the plaintiffs’ injuries. The discovery process is the next step to state court system. At this point both parties
Words: 727 - Pages: 3
adults so the early juvenile courts created a probation system mainly to provide minors with guidance, supervision, and education. Over time every state had followed Illinois lead and created a juvenile court. In 1967, in the case of In re Gault, the U.S. Supreme court determined that juveniles have the same rights given to adults accused of crimes, also giving them the rights to an attorney, and the right to confront a witnesses against them. Later the Supreme Court also gave the youth rights to
Words: 497 - Pages: 2
A comparison of Between Juvenile and Adult Courts When comparing adult court to juvenile court, there is a surprising abundance of difference. “ Criminal and Juvenile courts sentencing practices work at a cross –angle and sometimes frustrates the system rather than harmonize the social control of chronic and serious juvenile offenders as they proceed between the two systems” ( Juveniles in the adult system, criminal court careers of waived juveniles, 2011). After further examination, I have found
Words: 275 - Pages: 2
Gender Bias in U.S Court System Intro #1 Throughout U.S history women had been known as properties belonging to a man. Women are seen as objects while the men are seen as an individual self. It took many years before the U.S Government amends and adopted new laws in order for women to be label as equals’ of men. One of the biggest movements in U.S history was the Feminist Movement in the 1960’s where groups of women fought to gain equality for women in the life, workplace, home and also to bring
Words: 362 - Pages: 2
recommends that the juvenile courts should be provided with more legal power to hold parents and other community agencies accountable for the care and the behavior of the children and other minors. This model proposes that the “courts should be able to bring parents in as parties in status offense and delinquency cases and compel them to be involved in the rehabilitation of their delinquent or status offending children. In addition, the federally mandated power of the court to monitor the efforts of
Words: 317 - Pages: 2
A German court in 1949 Bamber trials ruled against a woman for illegally depriving her husband of his liberty, after being sent to a work camp following a denounce from her. Such deprivation of liberty was included in the German Code of the nineteenth century which still was into effect. Actually it was an appeal against the decision of the trial court which found that she did not violated a valid law. According to X, the trial court “erred in that it inferred the legality of the informer’s report
Words: 1217 - Pages: 5
appeal? An appeal is a process which assists defendants from wrongful incarceration, (What are Appeal Courts for? 2004). An Appeal if successful allows the higher court to over-turn a lower court’s decision. An appeal is also a defendant’s way of challenging the court’s decision. In the Criminal Justice system, an appeal takes place when an offender “tried in court”, is found guilty, later sentenced or someone who is already convicted and incarcerated may be released from incarceration
Words: 1401 - Pages: 6
