Andrew Liu Case Name: U.S West Financial Services Inc,. Plaintiff, v. Robert Cipriano and Nancy Cipriano, Defendants U.S District Court for the Southern District of New York Key Facts: 1. May 1988, defendants executed a promissory note in which they promised to pay to New York City Waterfront Associates, L.P. the sum of $88,643 plus interest. 2. Defendants have made no payments required by the promissory note and are default of their obligations under the Note. 3. Defendants
Words: 415 - Pages: 2
litigation, a New Jersey Superior Court judge ruled that the agreement had been violated by both parties. The judge ordered that the agreement be terminated and denied both companies’ claims for monetary damages. Amazon.com appealed the ruling. In 2009, an appellate court affirmed the lower court ruling but reversed the ruling on damages, which had awarded Toys“R”Us $93 million plus interest. In June 2009, the two companies finally agreed in an out-of-court settlement
Words: 2988 - Pages: 12
London. The seller was ready to ship and expected payment upon presentation of bill of lading. Buyer wanted samples or to inspect goods prior payment. Buyer didn’t want to accept certificate of inspection. Seller refused to ship. CIF transaction. Analysis: under CIF sales contract, the buyer(biddel) has no right to inspect the goods but is obligated to pay upon the presentation of the proper documents. Decision: he has no rights to inspect goods. Basse and Selve v. Bank of Australasia plaintiff
Words: 737 - Pages: 3
domain differ from the concept of government zoning? How does eminent domain differ from police power as it relates to the government assuming control over private property? Discuss at least two court cases that relate to the issue of eminent domain. What are the key issues that were addressed in the court cases that you chose to review? Respond to at least two of your classmates’ postings. PPA 604 Week 2 DQ 2 How is power distributed in the U.S. political system? How does the U.S. political system
Words: 1908 - Pages: 8
Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. 1, 2. After trial, the court found Microsoft had violated Section 2 by unlawfully maintaining its monopoly in the market for Intel-compatible PC operating systems ("OSs") and by unlawfully attempting to monopolize the market for internet browsers, and that it had violated Section 1 by illegally tying its Windows operating system and its Internet Explorer ("IE") browser. The court ordered Microsoft to submit a plan of divestiture that would split the
Words: 1001 - Pages: 5
of this controversial issue may state that the moral aspects are inhumane and that the use should be discontinued from the United States; however, the crimes deemed worthy of capital punishment should not and cannot be overlooked simply because of a certain belief. The implementation of the death penalty should remain in practice to prevent heinous crimes and victimization of the innocent. Sometimes the “chair” truly is the best seat in the house. The supreme court case of Alabama vs John
Words: 1620 - Pages: 7
employment, and that pursuit of the administrative remedy is not a condition precedent to judicial relief.” The trial court granted defendant's motion and entered summary judgment in Defendant’s favor. However, Court of Appeal reversed the judgment. They asserted that, “FEHA does not preempt or preclude other state law claims relating to employment discrimination.” IRAC for Rojo v. Kliger Issue Review in this case was granted to determine the following: * Does FEHA provide the exclusive remedy for
Words: 2000 - Pages: 8
testimony or produce books and records. After the IRS issues a summons to a third party, the taxpayer must be notified within three days of the date on which the summons was served and no later than the twenty-third day before the date fixed in the summons as the day on which the records are to be examined. The IRS authority to issue a John Doe summons which consist of a summons that does not identify the taxpayer whose liability is in the issue.
Words: 970 - Pages: 4
procedures. The Fourth Amendment is the bases for the search and seizure for it states simply this, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable search and seizure… And no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly the place it be searched, and persons or things to be seized.” (Constitution of the United States of America) (Whitebread & slobogin, 2008) When looking back we see that
Words: 1177 - Pages: 5
(1985) 14 6. Romer (1996) 15 7. Nordlinger (1992) and Allegheny Pittsburgh (1989) 16 8. Lee Optical (1955) 17 Class 5: Racial Classifications and Heightened Scrutiny: Strauder, Korematsu, Loving 17 9. Heightened Scrutiny Analysis 17 10. Strauder (1880) 17 11. Korematsu (1944) 18 12. Loving (1967) 19 13. Theories Supporting Strict Scrutiny of Racial Classifications 20 14. Tiers of Scrutiny 20 15. Tiers of Scrutiny Table 21 Class 6: Facially
Words: 52904 - Pages: 212
