Nietzsche v. Bowden In this paper I will analyze the ethical theories of Nietzsche and Bowden and apply them to the recent case involving Volkswagen and its use of “defeat” devices to cheat diesel emissions tests. In order to effectively analyze whether or not the actions of Volkswagen were ethical, I will first discuss Nietzsche’s view of morality, followed by Bowden’s application of care ethics. In Beyond Good and Evil Friedrich Nietzsche presents his critique of morality, as well as the concept
Words: 1263 - Pages: 6
Beauvoir further distinguishes her conception of an ethics of ambiguity from Hegel's understanding of the progression of human relations by contrasting her articulation of a "conversion" to a "stoic" ethics, perhaps more explicitly to the Stoic stage of Hegel's dialectic. Beauvoir calls the practice of stoic indifference in reaction to life's disappointments a condemnation of "that whole part of ourselves which we had engaged in the effort" to accomplish something. In such a reluctance to make oneself
Words: 488 - Pages: 2
Writing Assignment #2 Immanuel Kant thought of a structural way of how people should morally behave, the Categorical Imperative. Kant believed that moral rules are absolute and needed to be followed by and for everyone to maintain order. There are two formulations to this, hypothetical imperatives and categorical imperatives. Hypothetical imperatives are things we should do in order to achieve our desires. If a person wanted to go to college, it is in their best interest to take the SAT.
Words: 1096 - Pages: 5
Human society has been wanting answers to some of our most viable questions who created us who are we what is our purpose what is the universe and how was it started who rules the skies who rules the oceans many stories and tales have been created to assist in answering and is anyway possible to the most fundamental questions we called those myths. Deriving from the Greek word Mythos, myth in its most basic form of definition is an "ancient narrative that attempts to answer our fundamental human
Words: 443 - Pages: 2
Knowledge according to Plato, is justified true belief. For a person to know something he/she has to believe it, has to be able to justify it and it has to be true. ("Plato | TOKTalk.net," n.d.) However, this definition does not cover all types of knowledge for example, we know how to eat. This knowledge is not based on any kind of belief or justification. To answer this question, we must first understand the two main terms, personal knowledge and shared knowledge. Personal knowledge can be knowledge
Words: 1552 - Pages: 7
The key term in the prescribed title is “neutral question”. What is a “neutral” question? How can someone conclude on whether the question is neutral or not? A question is a powerful tool. It can lead to insight, inspiration, discovery and progress. It can determine where to go next. From the dictionary point of view, a “neutral” question is an unbiased question, one where the questioner has no preconceived ideas or predictions, has no vested interest in the answer, will accept whatever the answer
Words: 1552 - Pages: 7
Law and moral standards are intimately related as both regulate the conduct of the individual in a society. The laws that are generated are usually based on moral principles of the society which may be derived from their cultural beliefs, their religions and customs. Moral standards are the code of conduct of individual on what they considered of ethical things to do and whatnot, usually it is influence by their religions and their own customs belief. Phil Harris defined moral standards as a set
Words: 996 - Pages: 4
An Ethical Dilemma Every person has unique moral imperatives that force him or her to act in particular ways. A dilemma emerges when there is a conflict between individual opinions where one has to make choices. It may either be within a person or between two or more individuals. Ethical dilemmas are common in daily life experiences and workplaces, and they are accompanied by challenges of analyzing the problem critically and making effective decisions that do not harm others. At one point
Words: 1962 - Pages: 8
If it came down to it, would it make sense for one to steal something for their survival? What if it was only for the betterment of oneself? How about if one did not care or even fully realize what they were doing? Would all of these still be considered thievery? Questions like these have the power to shroud opinions about what is defined as right and wrong. These certain questions are able to challenge people on their take of the difference between stealing for survival and stealing for greed.
Words: 1890 - Pages: 8
That encompasses the spirit of entrepreneurship. The word “entrepreneur‟ is derived from the French verb “enterprendre‟ which means “to undertake”. The use of the term dates back to 1723 when Richard Cantillon coined it. Cantillon defined the term as a person who pays a certain price for a product and resells it at an uncertain price: "making decisions about obtaining and using the resources while consequently admitting the risk of enterprise.” Now the term has evolved and has taken several meanings
Words: 947 - Pages: 4
