Management Paper on Dynamic Capabilities of Firms Presented to: Dr. Sherif Delawar By Mohamed Antably March 2012 Cairo, Egypt. Abstract: From one hand the dynamic capabilities of firms are the sources and methods of wealth creation and capture by private enterprise firms operating in environments of rapid technological change. Other hand, Human capital ultimate objectives are linking HR practices and knowledge with goals of the firm to achieve and develop
Words: 4356 - Pages: 18
Evaluating Firm Strengths and Weaknesses What Does Internal Analysis Tell Us? Internal analysis provides a comparative look at a firm’s capabilities • what are the firm’s strengths? • what are the firm’s weaknesses? • how do these strengths & weaknesses compare to competitors? Why Does Internal Analysis Matter? Internal analysis helps a firm: • determine if its resources and capabilities are likely sources of competitive advantage • establish strategies that will exploit any sources of competitive
Words: 1556 - Pages: 7
report will give a brief summary of the RBV paradigm, followed, the main base of the report will focus on how firms use their recourses, capabilities and competencies to achieve competitive advantage. Concluding comments will then be made further discussing the concept of RBV.! ! The RBV summary! The Ricardian1 perspective of the heterogeneity and immobility of competitive capability producing and rent earning resources flows through the core of the RBV (Barney, 1991; Kraaijenbrink et al 2010)
Words: 2237 - Pages: 9
NETWORK CAPABILITY – EMERGING AS PART OF AN INDUSTRIAL FIRMS COMPETENCE CONFIGURATION Jukka Vesalainen, University of Vaasa, Department of Management jukka.vesalainen@uva.fi Henri Hakala, University of Vaasa, Department of Management henri.hakala@uva.fi Abstract: The network capability refers to the firm’s ability to build, handle and exploit relationships. These capabilities are interwoven in the complex configuration with other capabilities and competencies of the firm and are, in practice, very
Words: 9794 - Pages: 40
CONTENT 1.Introduction 2 2. IB theories (IDP, ILO) and their invalidation for IB firms from NICs 2 2.1 IDP paradigm: 2 2.2 OLI theory 3 3. Globalization and IDP paradigm 4 4. Samsung’s role in the outpacing of IDP position of Korea 6 4.1 Development of technology capability 7 4.2 Crisis management creation and human resources management 7 4.3 R&D support and technology capabilities 8 4.4 Financial resources transferred within the group 8 5. Conclusions 9 References 11 1.
Words: 2699 - Pages: 11
(Thematic Network) 1st workshop : April 3rd –4th, 2003 (Strasbourg) RESOURCES AND COMPETENCES PERSPECTIVES ON STRATEGY OF THE FIRM: A discussion of the central arguments F. Amesse, A. Avadikyan, P. Cohendet Introduction: In 1994, Wernerfelt received an award for the best paper of the decade in Strategic Management Review (A resource-based view of the firm, 1984). Considering the fortune of the article among practicing managers (Wernerfelt, 1995), he admitted that such a fortune had
Words: 14148 - Pages: 57
differences between firms. Most of the theory base for any such attempts has to be informed by strategic management theory, since the primary question that strategic management seeks to answer is why some firms outperform others over time. This paper synthesizes three major streams of thought in strategic management with the empirical and theoretical literature on strategic marketing to develop an integrative theory-based conceptual framework linking marketing with firms’ business performance
Words: 14979 - Pages: 60
CC-307-017 Dynamic Strategic Alignment This reference note was prepared by Professor Steven White to introduce basic concepts and a framework for discussing strategic management. Copyright © 2009 by CEIBS (China Europe International Business School). No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means – electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise – without the permission of CEIBS The CEIBS Case Centre is sponsored
Words: 4052 - Pages: 17
identified as a key driver of hypercompetition which has transformed the marketplace by higher degree of uncertainty, rapid technological changes and price wars (Harvey, Novicevic, & Kiessling, 2001). Hypercompetition has toughened competition, forcing firms to respond with better ideas at a faster pace and leaving less room for mistakes. In order to achieve
Words: 4500 - Pages: 18
than clear. A conceptual model of unrelated diversification is thus proposed. In drawing on Penrose’s (1959) resource based approach, unrelated diversification is explained by an organization’s ‘three pillars’, which consist of its strength of dynamic capabilities, absorptive capacity, and weak ties. The role of the three pillars is to discover new resource applications or uses in conditions of market failure that are characterized by ‘incomplete’ markets. A novel feature of this model is that an organization
Words: 10977 - Pages: 44
