Directions Read the “Harnischfeger Corp” case study and answer the following questions. Submit your completed assignment no later than the last day of Week 2. 1. Describe clearly the accounting changes Harnischfeger made in 1984 as stated in Note 2 of its financial statements. After reviewing the accounting policies of other corporations in similar industries, Harnischfeger decided to adjust their depreciation method. Instead of continuing to use the accelerated method for depreciating their US
Words: 1184 - Pages: 5
1. Describe clearly the accounting changes Harnischfeger made in 1984 as stated in Note 2 of its financial statements. The following summarize the accounting changes made and noted by Harnischfeger: a. Included equipment purchased and resold from Kobe LTD in net sales (full sales amount) as opposed to disclosing only margin. Since the purchase of equipment from Kobe Steel, Ltd. was for the purpose of resale (vs. use or lease), this change more accurately reflects net sales. b. Financial
Words: 843 - Pages: 4
4. In considering the rules based approach of GAAP and the principles based approach of IFRS we looked at GAAP first. GAAP provides application clarity, low risk, and for companies in the same industry there is easy comparability. These Rules, however, must be accounted for using these rules even if the information is misleading, uneasy to compare across industries and the risk increases when rules are not followed. IFRS allows us to consider best out of multiple ways to account for transactions
Words: 763 - Pages: 4
EXERCISE 8-5: (a) Inventory December 31, 2014 (unadjusted) $234,890 Transaction 2 13,420 Transaction 3 12,800 Transaction 4
Words: 1746 - Pages: 7
take into account any items that were lost, stolen or damaged throughout the accounting period. Another method is the first-in, first-out method, also know was FIFO. This method is very simple they assume the oldest units in the inventory are always the first sold. Then the last-in, first-out method is just the reverse also known as LIFO. This means the newest items that are in inventory are the first ones sold. These methods are not very exact. Lastly you have the average cost method which is
Words: 442 - Pages: 2
between FIFO, LIFO and CWAC FIFO, which is stand for “first-in-first-out”, is an inventory costing method which assumes that the first stock bought are the first ones to be sold, and the stock bought later are sold out later. Recently-placed goods that are unsold remain in the inventory at the end of the year. With this inventory valuation approach, the company accounts for the value of inventory received first when sales are made. One of the more common reasons a company chooses FIFO is because
Words: 297 - Pages: 2
4-2 Price to earnings ratio Market value per share/Net value per share During a period of rising prices, we would expect a LIFO firm to report lower net income than a FIFO firm, other things equal. Also, for a rapidly growing firm, we would expect it to report lower net income than if it used straight-line. Thus, even though their reported net incomes are the same, a dollar of current net income suggests higher expected future payoffs for firm A than firm B. Since investors value higher future
Words: 591 - Pages: 3
Helping mining and mineral companies make the grade Improving your throughput and material grade Mining is simple, right? It is all about getting more product out of the ground, processing, and transportation. Whether you’re producing gold, diamonds, platinum, coal, iron ore, aluminium, or copper – the more you dig and process, the more you sell. But how much control and monitoring do you have over your work in process? How visible is your material as it flows through stockpiles
Words: 925 - Pages: 4
The controversy about the initiative to wipe out the LIFO inventory technique seems that is not a piece of cake. Actually is so controversial that is putting companies, which are using LIFO in real problems. Some of the reason that companies had been using LIFO is because the benefits of paying less tax and also for book purposes. What I think about the three options of eliminate LIFO either for financial accounting or tax purposes, or not allowing it for financial accounting purposes but allowing
Words: 512 - Pages: 3
accordingly. Revenue Recognition, extraordinary items, receivables, inventory, long-lived assets, and debt and equity would all have to be altered when switching between the two. For example, LIFO inventory valuation is not permitted under IFRS. Because of this, a company would have to recalculate under the FIFO method as well as adjust COGS and tax expenses. 2. Which method best reflects the economic reality? For investors, IFRS may present more approachable and comprehensive financial statements
Words: 279 - Pages: 2
