1970’s the Ford Motor Company produced a Ford Pinto that they deemed reasonable to sale to their consumers in order to make a maximum profit. However, the car they hurriedly produced lacked some safety features that ended up costing numerous people their lives. Ford knew about these problems but continued with the production anyways; therefore, Ford is responsible for the death of the people who were killed in the accidents in the Ford Pinto because of their faulty parts. In this case, Ford should have
Words: 552 - Pages: 3
Ford Pinto Case Ford Pinto Case If we were involved in the Ford Pinto dilemma we would have used Deontological Ethical reasoning to decide whether or not to disclose the danger that the Pinto posed and/or use that reasoning to determine whether or not to install the part(s) that would make the Ford Pinto safer. Our decision would be to do what is morally right and avoid doing what is morally wrong, regardless of the consequences. True enough Ford was not obligated by government regulation
Words: 1015 - Pages: 5
The Case of the Ford Pinto By James Abstract Product harm crisis can be defined as a sudden break in a product’s life cycle (Siomkos, G.J and Kurzbard. J. 1994). In 1971 the Ford Motor Company created a product harm crisis with the introduction of the Ford Pinto. The Ford Pinto is known to be one of the most dangerous vehicles ever produced in automotive history due to several serious design flaws. This paper will identify the factors that contributed to the product
Words: 979 - Pages: 4
The Ford Pinto Case In the late 1960’s Ford Motor Company wanted to produce a small model car to compete with small Japanese and German imports like Volkswagen, Datsun and Toyota (Danley). In 1969 Ford’s Board approved the plan to produce the Pinto. The CEO, Lee Iacocca, wanted a car that was low weight, under 2,000 pounds, and low cost, under $2,000. Lee “Iaccoca imposed the 2000/2000 rule, i.e., the Pinto could weigh no more than 2000 pounds and cost no more than $2000” (Danley). The engineers
Words: 1100 - Pages: 5
Henry Kissinger’s World Order asks, if today’s leaders can rise above their own definition of world “order”, to achieve peace and global stability. Especially when the “balance of power” is constantly threatened by anarchy and chaos. The reason Kissinger, makes this his core enquiry, is because it addresses a challenge that the human race faces today, one that it might fear the most- a total global chaos. Kissinger uses conflict between different nations as the premise to his argument. He does
Words: 1336 - Pages: 6
whole Watergate case is surely an example of why the press is important to a free society. With due respect for Judge Sirica’s persistence in breaking down those convicted in the break-in, it’s doubtful that the story of the scandal would ever have come out as completely if there had been no Washington Post. Surely there is a place for the carefully contrived rules of the courtroom, but Watergate should be a warning to those who would impose those rules on the press as well. The case clearly shows
Words: 1426 - Pages: 6
Ford Focus: Environmental Analysis Exercise Introduction Henry Ford and 11 other associates established Ford Motor Company in 1903. Manufacture and distribution of their automobiles take place in 200 markets across six continents. The 2010 Ford Annual Report indicated that “throughout 2010 Ford continued market share growth in the car sector with high quality, fuel-efficient offerings bringing bold designs, multiple convenience technologies, comprehensive safety features and engaging driving
Words: 1937 - Pages: 8
Web‐Based training (WBT) – Management Development Programmes (MDPs). Evaluation: The role of Evaluation in Training – Evaluating Reactions and Learning – Evaluating the transfer of training – Evaluating the results of the training Text Book: 1. Donald J. Ford, Bottom‐Line Training, Prentice‐Hall of India Pvt. .Ltd., New Delhi Reference Books: 1. Armstrong Michael, A Handbook of Human Resource Management(11th ed),2009, Kogan Page 2. Lynton Rolf and Pareek Udai,
Words: 349 - Pages: 2
business environment than ever before. To really understand this case, it is necessary to understand the times and societal norms of when it occurred. In short, did Ford design the Pinto's fuel system in an ethical way, and should they have redesigned it later? The reason that this case has gotten so much attention is that Ford did not update the fuel system in 1978, because the cost-benefit analysis favored leaving it unchanged. Ford Motor Company defended their decision to not make the production
Words: 270 - Pages: 2
mountains as well as property on North Carolina’s coast. Unfortunately, Barney has some issues that will need to be addressed both legally and spiritually while attempting to clean his rights in regards to his property. The main legal issues in this case study are eminent domain, adverse possession, joint tenancy, and good-faith purchases of value. Co-Ownership Joint ownership of property occurs when more than one person holds entitlement of a property at the same time.
Words: 1364 - Pages: 6
