Explain International Court Of Justice Ans: The International Court of Justice (French: Cour internationale de justice; commonly referred to as the World Court or ICJ) is the primary judicial branch of the United Nations. It is based in the Peace Palace in The Hague, Netherlands. Its main functions are to settle legal disputes submitted to it by states and to provide advisory opinions on legal questions submitted to it by duly authorized international branches, agencies, and the UN General Assembly
Words: 4510 - Pages: 19
INTRODUCTION Background Information is power and the spirit of democracy. The right to information is considered as a fundamental human right. Right to Information is also known as the freedom of information or the right to know. In a modern democracy, good governance is essential. Among the chief characteristics of good governance are transparency and accountability, elements that can be best ensured only when information is available abundantly and as speedily as possible. Right to information
Words: 3359 - Pages: 14
The Writ of Habeas Corpus Research Paper and Essay Charlie Potter American Government June 2, 2009 Mr. Potter PART 1 - HABEAS CORPUS RESEARCH PAPER “By this action we should call him King Lincoln I.” - Anti-war Democrats, 1863 INTRODUCTION English in origin, the concept of habeas corpus literally means “that you have the body,” meaning that the court can force the police to produce a prisoner before them
Words: 2544 - Pages: 11
Question 1a(i) Judges are primary on-screen characters in legal as they are the individuals who are set to figure out the opportunity of the legal, the image of equity and they are additionally persons who are set to apply the law in the case before them. By and by, there is an issue of if judges do make law. To put it specially, are judges simply law discoverers or are they truly legislators. It is a reality to the legitimate organization that the essential part of judges is to apply the existing
Words: 3416 - Pages: 14
IMMUNITIES FROM JURISDICTION I. STATE IMMUNITIES Forum State – the state where the court of justice is located. More on the notion of forum: http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/forum A. Rationale for the doctrine of immunity of foreign states from the jurisdiction of the forum State is: - a state must not interfere with the public acts of foreign sovereign states, because sovereigns are equal and equals have no jurisdiction over one another - the judiciary may not
Words: 3268 - Pages: 14
#1: Dr. Levitt’s theory of globalization vs. Douglas and Wind’s idiosyncratic theory Dr. Levitt suggests that the world is becoming a single, homogeneous market. Levitt stipulates that global corporations now operate “as if the entire world were a single entity” Levitt, p.13). In this market, all consumer needs and desires have boiled down to a basic want for products and services of the best quality and reliability, at the lowest price (Levitt, p.14). Technology is the catalyst for the development
Words: 3353 - Pages: 14
a coup can be defined as simply as “a sudden, violent, and illegal seizure of power from a government”(Oxford Dictionary) This paper alleges the illegitimacy throughout the 2014 military coup d’état in Thailand, given its context of a democratic judicial system. The rest of the content examines the illegitimacy through analyzing 3 main points: the true definition of democracy, Military is not the ideal institution to run a country, and a counterargument against the idea where technocratic government
Words: 1225 - Pages: 5
The Non-Obvious Problem: How the Indeterminate Nonobviousness Standard Produces Excessive Patent Grants Gregory Mandel∗ The dominant current perception in patent law is that the core requirement of nonobviousness is applied too leniently, resulting in a proliferation of patents on trivial inventions that actually retard technological innovation in the long run. This Article reveals that the common wisdom is only half correct. The nonobviousness standard is not too low, but both too high and too
Words: 31121 - Pages: 125
potential for liability based on certain tort laws that may be applied. A tort is considered to be a wrongful act that was committed that may result in compensation based on varying levels of proof and damages that are present. Rules, evidence, precedent, and judicial discretion all help to determine which category or tort law will be applicable. The elements and burden of evidence and proof can also vary from state to state, and can focus on different aspects of the damages or injuries caused. Types
Words: 3272 - Pages: 14
For other uses, see Constitution (disambiguation). A constitution is a set of fundamental principles or established precedents according to which a state or other organization is governed.[1] These rules together make up, i.e. constitute, what the entity is. When these principles are written down into a single document or set of legal documents, those documents may be said to embody a written constitution; if they are written down in a single comprehensive document, it is said to embody a codified
Words: 9424 - Pages: 38
