traders. A hairdresser trimming someone's hair Sole traders do not have a separate legal existence from the business. In the eyes of the law, the business and the owner are the same. As a result, the owner is personally liable for the firm's debts and may have to pay for losses made by the business out of their own pocket. This is called unlimited liability. Advantages * It is easy to set up as no formal legal paperwork is required. * Generally, only a small amount of capital needs to be
Words: 1044 - Pages: 5
GOOD SAMARITAN LAW GUIDELINES 1. The Bystander is allowed to leave immediately after safely taking the injured person to the hospital without getting questioned only after giving the address. 2. The Bystander should be compensated or rewarded for his act to encourage others to come forward to help the road accident victims 3. The Bystanders shall not be liable for any civil or criminal liability 4. The Bystander shall not be compelled to reveal their personal details while informing
Words: 291 - Pages: 2
debentures for further substantial sum secured by charge over all company’s assets. Issue: Whether Sue can enforce her charge [security interest] against Bling Bling Pty Ltd ? Relevant case: Under corporate law, there is a rule of separate legal entity explained in the case of Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd. Once a company is incorporated, there will be a distinction between private and company’s debts and assets, a company can contract with its members and a company can be liable in tort
Words: 1530 - Pages: 7
There are two ways you can choose and insurance company either by enrolling the help of an Independent insurance agent or by scouting for the right company yourself. An Independent Agent is a small business owner who represents a number of insurance companies, different from agents employed by large insurance companies that employ agents to sell their products. They are the middlemen of insurance. Why use an independent Insurance Agent? One would wonder why in this digital age one would look for
Words: 774 - Pages: 4
This correspondence shall confirm my appearance at the Van Nuys Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board for a Mandatory Settlement Conference in the above-referenced case. The MSC was scheduled because applicant’s attorney’s office filed a Declaration of Readiness to Proceed and Penalty Petition concerning an outstanding 5710 invoice dispute. However, since that time, that issue has been resolved. I appeared at the Mandatory Settlement Conference because we also have an outstanding venue issue.
Words: 866 - Pages: 4
Daniel Cisneros, Kali Greene, Gunnar Hestar, Malachi King, Daniel Little Opening Statement Introduction: Good morning Your Honor. Our names are: (as follows) and it is our pleasure to be representing the defendant, Ms. Brittany Spares, in this case. The defendant was accused of Driving While Intoxicated and leaving the scene of the crime, two very serious crimes. At the end of this case, we will be seeking a verdict of not guilty. Theme: Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, this is a common case of
Words: 520 - Pages: 3
Facts On the 22nd of February, 1980, the Supreme Court of Illinois filed their opinion in the case number 50745. In this case, Robert E. Woodill et al. – the appellants – had sued Parke Davis & CO. et al. – the appellees – citing a drug that the company had produced as responsible for injuries sustained by Eric Woodill during delivery. For that matter, the plaintiffs were acting on behalf of Eric – a minor – in which case they were seeking restitution for the injuries. In reference to that, the
Words: 1086 - Pages: 5
Name Institution Course Unit Lecturer Date Case name: Doe v. United States 487 U.S 201(1988) Facts of the case: Petitioner John Doe was a target of the federal grand jury investigations into possible cases of suspected fraudulent manipulation of oil cargoes and, as a result, receipt of unreported income (Justia ). Pursuant to a subpoena that directed him to produce all records of transaction received in some backs in Bermuda and the Cayman islands, doe appeared before a grand jury. In his appearance
Words: 880 - Pages: 4
nterprise Cleverness Providers, Inc. v. Carole Hudson Facts Carole Hudson was a workforce of Enterprise Cleverness Providers (BIS). Throughout August of 1983, Milliseconds. Hudson been given an employment present via Operations Technologies, Inc. (MTI), a contending agency. With regards to onethird of MTI's staff had been former staff of BIS. Enterprise Cleverness Providers (BIS) looked for an injunction to stop Milliseconds. Hudson via working for MTI. Milliseconds. Hudson considered that will
Words: 476 - Pages: 2
Written Brief Statement of Facts Plaintif, Dr. Smriti Nalwa, injured her wrist at an amusement park, during a bumper car ride. She sued the amusement park owner, Cedar Fair, L.P, for negligence in not operating the bumper car in order to prevent her injury [1]. On the 5th of July, 2005, plaintiff took her children to Great America amusement park, operated and owned by the defendant. The park’s bumper car ride, Rue le Dodge, consisted of small vehicles that were powered by electricity and moved
Words: 1377 - Pages: 6
