In the case involving the death of an infant in the NICU after an antibiotic overdose was prepared by the pharmacy I conclude that this is a case of negligence and therefore the hospital will be held liable. First, a duty to care was established because the patient was under the care of the hospital and the hospital had a duty to help and not further harm the patient. That duty to care was also breached because the infant’s death was due to the incorrect IV antibiotic dose being administered therefore
Words: 308 - Pages: 2
Tort Law Cases/Assignments Trial Procedures Lewis v. Robinson 2001 BCSC 643 British Columbia Supreme Court The plaintiff, Kenneth Lewis, was a delivery person. He knew that the defendants, Will Robinson and Marci Salach, were the new owners and occupants of the property, but Lewis didn't know that the defendants had a dog. Lewis entered the property and was confronted by Salach and her dog. She was holding the dog's leash at the time. Most times, the dog was chained to its doghouse on the
Words: 19246 - Pages: 77
HSA515 February/1/2011 Healthcare Policy Law and ethics Abstract The Snow Storm Lawsuit is a case of Negligence, Duty to act, and wrongful death. This paper will explain the legal, ethical and professional considerations. The Chief Executive Officer of a small non-profit community hospital were on vacation in the Bahamas, the are was hit by a large snow storm, in this case, many of the hospitals health care providers were unable to make it to work, as a result. This paper
Words: 1140 - Pages: 5
mostly with reference to the tort of negligence. This is due to the fact that most of the developments in this sphere have taken place with regard to the tort of negligence. However, once the basic principles are understood, they are easily applicable in the cases of all other torts, as well. Origin of Remoteness in Negligence Direct Consequence (or Directness) – According to traditional approach, before the present law was formulated, once a negligence had been established, a defendant was
Words: 1666 - Pages: 7
In order to prove in court that a tort was done because of negligence, there are several defenses to plead for negligence. Common defenses toward negligence are contributory negligence, comparative negligence, and assumption of risk. To prove in court contributory negligence, the tortfeasor (person who commits a tort) has to show sufficient evidence, in order to prove that the victim contributed to his or her damage
Words: 823 - Pages: 4
Helen Palsgraf was standing on a Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) platform in New York City, waiting for a train to take her and her two daughters. While she was waiting for her train, another train pulled in, and two passengers came running across the platform to catch it. One of the passengers was carrying a package under his arm. The train began leaving the platform, and two LIRR employees (one on the train, one on the ground) attempted to help the passengers get on board while the train was moving
Words: 1626 - Pages: 7
4 Negligence: duty of care Learning objectives At the end of this chapter you should be able to: • have an overview of the history of negligence; • describe the function of duty of care in negligence; • appreciate the way duty of care has been defined and developed; and • apply the principles of duty of care in the areas of omissions and liability of public bodies. 04-Bermin-Chap04.indd 42 2/6/2008 7:39:32 PM 4.1 Introduction Negligence began to be recognised as a tort in its own
Words: 15172 - Pages: 61
Fall 2014 Business Law Midterm This is a take-home-open-book-midterm. This is NOT a group effort. Work alone. DO NOT WORK TOGETHER! Use a scantron. Write your name on the scantron. True or False (Mark A for True B for False): 1. It is a violation of the separation of powers doctrine for State A to adopt a law identical to one adopted by State B. 2. A basic principle of statutory interpretation is that specific provisions in the statute are of greater weight than general provisions. 3. The town of
Words: 1734 - Pages: 7
Apply the tort of negligence to a given fact situation |Level |5 | |Credits |3 | Purpose People credited with this unit standard are able to explain the law of torts, and apply the tort of negligence to a given fact situation
Words: 503 - Pages: 3
so as to avoid allegations of negligence consist of three basic elements. “They are: 1. The likelihood that Davis’ conduct will injure others, taken with 2. The seriousness of the injury, if it happens, 3. Balanced against the cost of the precaution he must take to avoid the risk of negligence. . If the product of the likelihood of the injury exceeds the burden of the precautions, the risk is unreasonable and the failure to take precautions is negligence.” The Louisiana law that set
Words: 811 - Pages: 4
