Search And Seizure In The Public

Page 8 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Premium Essay

    Civil Rights Vs Civil Liberties Research Paper

    Dhiraj Basnet Prof. Sherry Sharifian GOVT-2305-73431 9th Feb 2018 Civil Liberties vs Civil Rights Civil liberties and civil rights’ concepts are frequently used interchangeably but they do represent the various types of guaranteed protections. Civil liberties are the limitations placed on government that provide protection to the people against their actions. 1 For example, the first amendment of the Bill of the rights provides freedom to their citizens to follow whatever religion they like. So,

    Words: 695 - Pages: 3

  • Premium Essay

    Edward Snowden Research Paper

    times even resentment due to America’s belief in securing their personal data from the government. In today’s highly technological society, surveillance and monitoring do not encroach upon privacy, but rather aid in promoting civil liberties and public security. The NSA’s actions do not infringe on the 4th amendment and stand to be legal in the eyes of the constitution and that of the judiciary.

    Words: 959 - Pages: 4

  • Free Essay

    Dna Collection from Arrestees in Canada

    Innocence at Stake: Possibility of DNA Collection from Arrestees in Canada Md Washim Ahmed ABSTRACT Followed by a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, which approved the collection of a defendant’s DNA upon arrests under the Fourth Amendment, the Minister of Justice, Peter MacKay indicated in an interview with the Globe and Mail that he and his Ministry are considering a similar model for Canada. This paper examines the possibility of a similar legislative framework in Canada

    Words: 7373 - Pages: 30

  • Premium Essay

    Unreasonable Search

    Unreasonable Search In the Fourth Amendment, they protected “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.” However, they did not have telephones and had no way to anticipate future technological developments. As a result, they listed only persons, houses, papers, and effects as entitled to Fourth Amendment protection. It does not exactly define what an “unreasonable search” is but it does give an example that leaves

    Words: 526 - Pages: 3

  • Premium Essay

    Kyllo V. Johnson Case Summary

    Danny argued that the technology used to scan his complex violated his Fourth Amendment rights as an unconstitutional search without a warrant. B.) Does the use of a thermal-imaging device to detect relative amounts of heat emanating from a private home constitute an unconstitutional search in violation of the Fourth Amendment? C.) The judges decided in a vote of 5-4 that the search was unconstitutional and against the Forth

    Words: 1587 - Pages: 7

  • Premium Essay

    Homeland Security Investigation

    consent to a search, but are not required to do so. Immigration and customs enforcement conduct homeland security investigations and assist in enforcement and removal operations. In order to conduct a legal search under the Fourth Amendment, the agents must develop particularly probable cause to conduct a lawful search. The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution states, “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not

    Words: 950 - Pages: 4

  • Premium Essay

    Second Set of Amendments

    of the United States the right to feel secure. This right, according to the Administrative Office of the US Courts (2015) (is) the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probably cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. This basically means that it is a direct

    Words: 2463 - Pages: 10

  • Premium Essay

    Texas Vs Johnson Case Summary

    possession of marijuana. Before trial, T.L.O. moved to suppress evidence discovered in the search, but the Court denied her motion. The Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court of New Jersey, Middlesex County found her guilty and sentenced her to probation for one year. The New Jersey Supreme Court stated that the exclusionary rule of the Fourth Amendment applies to searches and seizures conducted by school officials in public

    Words: 1676 - Pages: 7

  • Premium Essay

    4.2 Explain An Anticipatory Warrant

    1) What rights are protected by the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution? • The fourth amendments protect against unreasonable search and seizure of persons, property, or other items without justification. The fourth amendment only protects against persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches. You must have probable cause to obtain a search warrant (p. 37).   2) Explain an anticipatory warrant. • An anticipatory warrant is a warrant bases upon an affidavit (written statement)

    Words: 578 - Pages: 3

  • Premium Essay

    Warren vs Rehnquist Courts

    significant case that the Warren Court decided with regard to civil liberties was Brown v Board of Education of Copeka, Kansas (1954). The court unanimously ruled that there is no place for the doctrine of separate but equal doctrine in the sphere of public education. The Warren Court demonstrated its value for liberalism and activism. The view of the Warren Court was that states are a hindrance in the enhancement of a just nation. In the sphere of criminal procedure and law enforcement, Chief Justice

    Words: 2153 - Pages: 9

Page   1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 50