360-Degree Feedback Scenario Name Institution

360-Degree Feedback Scenario 360-degree feedback also known as multi-rater feedback is a performance evaluation test where employees get anonymous feedback from their co-workers. Employees can recognize their strengths and weaknesses though this method of assessment. The paper will look at the mistakes that people make in formulating a 360-degree feedback and appropriate use of the 360-degree performance evaluation test. Scenario 1 For a 360-degree feedback to be effective and efficient as a performance appraisal test, managers should be able to invest time in the development process of the assessment, analysis of data collected (Campion, Campion, & Campion, 2015). In this scenario, the manager makes a mistake of substituting the survey with a 360-degree feedback test. There is no time investment in the assessment. At that first point where the manager rejected the test, that is the ideal time that they were to formulate a better 360-degree performance evaluation test. The results of the tests were invalid because the manager made mistakes that one is not supposed to make the use of Multi-rater performance test.
According to Wilson, 2014, committing an error in the process of formulating a 360-degree feedback can lead to inadequate or unclear results. Such mistakes include substituting another method with a 360-degree feedback, case in point, the manager substituted the survey questionnaire for using a 360-degree performance test instead. Another mistake that the manager made is he used a limited amount of time in the assessment of the results. The test should be comprehensive and should take the time to yield proper results. Also, for efficient 360-degree to work efficiently, stakeholders must be involved and enough resources allocated to fund the test. In the above scenario, the manager openly