ED5023-8 | Darylann Whitemarsh | | | Myths about Immigration and Education | Assignment 1 | | |

NONE

-------------------------------------------------
Faculty Use Only
-------------------------------------------------
<Faculty comments here>
-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------
<Faculty Name> <Grade Earned> <Writing Score> <Date Graded>
-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

Immigration has been one of the most argumentative issues.
It offers a predominantly intense example of the sociopolitical context as defined by Merrial-Webster linking a mixture of social and political factors, such as laws, regulations, policies, practices, traditions, and ideologies. Nieto's explanation of diverse education in a sociopolitical framework speaks on the context of populations, and the procedure of education, in relationship to resistance as a stationary procedure Nieto & Bode, (2008).
U.S. history is also immersed in slavery and invasion. Millions of families of Africans, American Indians, Mexicans, Puerto Ricans, and others colonized within and outside U.S. boundary have undergone political and economic oppression and, in schools, criticism of their native cultures and languages. But the history of racism and exploitation experienced by so many of our people, including their children, is rarely explained. Instead, conventional courses and teaching have been based on the myth of a painless and smooth assimilation of immigrants Nieto el al. (2008).
According to Richard Rothstein during the colonization period from 1880 to 1915, few Americans thrived in school, minimum of all colonists; colonists of all upbringing did poorly. Instead, it was the grandchildren of European immigrants who performed well in school, but the belief that first-generation colonists made it at least in terms of academics, is decisively recognized in the public consciousness. Additionally, schools have conventionally distinguished their responsibility as that of an integrating agent, segregation, denial, and disappointment that have repeatedly complemented immigration have unassumingly been left at the school entrance Nieto el al. (2008). The educational accomplishment of immigrant students in U.S. schools has varied, manipulated by a variety of influences including the level and inferiority of appropriate education in their home country, household socioeconomic status and educational accomplishment, natural linguistic literacy, superiority of U.S. schools, and general commitment. In general, immigrant scholars do not fare as we as their second-generation U.S. –born peers; even though a small fraction exceeded them. As compared to immigrant scholars from poor and Latino backgrounds be likely to experience the lowest levels of success in school and the highest failure. Much of this can be credited to poor quality schools and programs, underprepared teachers, and the existing bias they face in schools and society Irizarry, J. G., & Kleyn, T. (2011). Individual differences in social and economic factors are linked with changes in educational outcomes. According to the immigrant “selectivity” perspective, academic differences among immigrant individuals likely replicate national modifications in the kinds of people who privileged into migrating from another country to the United States.
Supposed success of the children of Asian and African immigrants in the United State is partly credited to the fact that these immigrants incline to be more educated than Asians and Africans who do not migrate Crosnoe,el al. (2011).
Asian immigrants’ children, for example, gains not only from the selection their educated parents made to migrate to the United States, but also from the preparedness of school staffs to make greater investments in children from immigrant groups that have been educationally successful. By dissimilarity, Latin American immigrants’ children are hindered not only by the greater socioeconomic disadvantages that portray the Latin American immigration but also by related biased that disregard them in schools Crosnoe, el al. (2011).
Why is multicultural education important for all children? Inorder to answer this question we must look at the prevalent sensitivity or misunderstanding that multicultural education is only for students of color, for inner-city students, or underprivileged students. This presumably grew from the origins of multicultural education: the Civil Rights and Equal Education Movements of the 1960s. Through that period, the main objective of multicultural education was to address the needs of students who generally had been ignored or museducated by the schools, particularly students of color. Those who first encouraged multicultural education decisively thought that consideration needed to be given to developing curriculum and materials that reflected these students’ pasts, principles, and knowledge Nieto el al. (2008).
According to Nieto & Bode, (2008) currently, a broader conceptualization of multicultural education has increased recognition. It is that all students are miseducated to the extent that they receive only a partial and biased education . Granting it is true that the prime casualties of biased education are those who are unnoticed in the curriculum, everyone misses out when education is biased. Multicultural education is important to all children because multicultural education is a plan that builds on the cultural background of students and their families to participate in learning. It embraces the past and present experience of their cultures as well as the principal culture of the country. It helps in the development of their own self-esteem as well as connecting their knowledge and backgrounds to the subject being taught. Diverse education is not just for new colonists and learners of color as numerous individuals think. It is also meaningful that middle-class European American students know about the histories, struggles and contributions of other groups. In multicultural education the beliefs of all students are repected and appreciated and drawn upon by teachers to plan lessons Gollnick, D. M., Chimm. P.C. (2009).
A good deal of indication points to an immigrant benefit in multiple signs of educational program, meaning that many minority from immigrant families surpass their classmates in school. This apparent benefit is often described to as the immigrant paradox, in that it occurs regardless of higher-than- average rates of societal and pecuniary disadvantges in this people as a whole Crosnoe, R., & Turley, R. (2011).
The immigrant parabox, nevertheless, is more noticeable between the children of Asian and African immigrants than other groups in secondary school, and it is greater for boys than for girls. Additionally, evidence for the paradox is far more reliable in secondary school than in elementary school. In actual fact, school readiness seems to be one area of possible risk for children from immigrant families, specifically those of Mexican origin Crosnoe et al. (2011). In agreement the principle of Immigrant Parabox research had showed that immigrant youth are often academically successful compared with children with U.S.-born parents. In NewYork, for instance,children of immigrants generally outperform their peers with nativeborn parents on achievement tests. This indicated that evidence of an immigrant parabox in education the parabox being that immigrant youth enjoy academic advantages in the relative absence of the socioeconomic advantages, such as high parental education and income, that is usually associated with school success. Data suggests that when youths are linked to adults and families are related to each other, youth may be less oriented to potentially negative peer influences. This could also explan why first-generation of European immigrants has done so well in the academic area. Community and institional organizations could also be a channel for communicating the high educational anticipation of immigrants to children Crosnoe et al. (2011).
The beliefs underlting educational structures characterize how the sociopolitical context is functioning at the school level. School’s and the larger society’s hypotheses about people belief system that helps create and maintain structures that replicate those guidelines.
Agreeing with Nieto, S. & Bode, P. (2008) we take in the principles and ideas in our culture and we implement them whether we enthusiastically consider them or not.
Educational structures can limited the human potential of many immigrants such as racism, social differences, socialclass, language, sexual orientation, and gender. Imagining that those issues doesn’t exist , or that it doesn’t effect us, is to deny the truth. A suitable example would be funding for low-income unban school district as compared to funding for suburb school district: In their yearly report on funding of public schools, the Education Trust Research on education funding conceded that system is primarily biased Nieto, et al. (2008).
Article on The Cruel Divide, stated that not only has California unsuccessfully effectively fund its schools, the state has also failed to rightfully distribute accessible education funding. Even though four decades of improvements designed at making California’s school economics system more reasonable, the fact remains: A poor school district is likely to get less funding than one serving fewer low-income students. Significant differences within funding among districts lead to sizeable changes in finance between the state’s highest and lowest poverty districts Barondess, H., Schroeder, L., & Hahnel, C. (2012).
In general revenue-limit gap among the maximum and lowest poverty districts is $874. The range is highest amid high school regions, where it amounts to $1,344. Although attempts to level per-student financial support through the revenue-limit formula, some higher poverty regions collect far fewer funds than more wealthy regions Barondess, et al. (2012). At a nationwide level, California’s K-12 expenditure has caused fewer teachers, counselors, and librarians to be hired. In per-students expenditure, California is placed near the bottom, with 42 states spending more per student than the Golden State. 1 Although teachers, civic groups, and our governmental leaders have called for improved education expenditure, it will take more than just extra dollars to repair education economics system Barondess, et al. (2012).
A better procedure would more rightfully allocate dollars to districts and schools by this means offering districts with large focus of high-need students the extra dollars they need to accelerate student accomplishment and close success gaps Barondess, et al. (2012). Even though years of attempts to restructuring the system of education economics, boundaries continue between school regions with the highest and lowest poverty levels. In fact, this report disclosed that the maximum deficiency school regions those with the major absorptions of low-income students obtain $620 less per student from native and public sources than the most wealthiest districts. Meant for mid-sized school district of 6,000 students, that amounts to more than $3.7 million per year Barondess, et al. (2012).
To validate that all students have access to a high-quality education, our chosen leaders must modified our structure of education finance to make it coherent, translucent, and unbiased. In particular, we call on state leaders to distribute dollars based on the diverse needs of students and ensure that those dollars are benefiting students and communities. By reforming our education finance system, leaders could better support schools in their efforts to close gap and prepare all students for college and career Barondess, et al. (2012).
School-Level Policies and Practices within the school funding has been being a state and district for issue years. The sociopolitical framework influence procedures and performs in many schools one example that exemplified this would be how schools enforce an English-only policy. Enthusiastically or not sending students a communication about the position and significance of dialects other than English. In some of these schools, students are prohibited to express their natural linguistic not only in classroom, but halls, cafeteria, and playground. While the method may have been well intentioned and formed out of a genuine determination to help students learn English, the effect is disapproval of students’ individualities, intended or not Nieto, et al. (2008).
Another example is the curriculum: “If the content of school knowledge excludes the history, art, culture, and ways of knowing of entire groups of people, these groups themselves are dismissed as having little significance in creating history, art, culture” (Nieto, et al. 2008 p.9 ).
The sociopolitical framework also undergirds other school policies and practices, including teaching, capability grouping, assessment, parent outreach, corrective polices.
To improve the educational short- changing of dissimilar student population, the course and instruction must be changed in separate classrooms: Schools’ policies and practices and the common principles that support them must also be challenged and reformed.

Reference

Barondess, H., Schroeder, L., & Hahnel, C. (2012). The Cruel Divide: How California’s Education Finance System Shortchange its Poorest School District, The Education Trust—West 1-8. Reteived August 25, 2012 from: www.edtrust.org/west/press-room/press-release/new-education-
Chambers, T. (2009). The "Receivement Gap": School Tracking Policies and the Fallacy of the "Achievement Gap". Journal Of Negro Education, 78(4), 417-431.
Crosnoe, R., & Turley, R. (2011). K-12 Educational Outcomes of Immigrant Youth. Future Of Children, 21(1), 129-152.
Goldblatt, P. (2004). School is Still the Place: Stories of Immigration and Education. Multicultural Review, 13(1), 49-54.
Gollnick, D. M., Chimm. P.C. (2009). Multicultural education in a pluralistic society,
New Jersey Upper Saddle: Pearson Education, Inc.,
Gonzales, R. G. (2010). On the Wrong Side of the Tracks: Understanding the Effects of School Structure and Social Capital in the Educational Pursuits of Undocumented Immigrant Students. Peabody Journal Of Education (0161956X), 85(4), 469-485.
Hall, C. (2012). The Effects of Reducing Tracking in Upper Secondary School. retived
Irizarry, J. G., & Kleyn, T. (2011). Immigration and Education in the 'Supposed Land of Opportunity': Youth Perspectives on Living and Learning in the United States. New Educator, 7(1), 5-26. doi:10.1080/1547688X.2011.551731
Kleyn, T., & Irizarry, J. G. (2011). Guest Editorial Introduction: Special Issue on Immigration and Education. New Educator, 7(1), 2-4. doi:10.1080/1547688X.2011.551730
Kowalczyk, J. (2010). "The Immigration Problem" and European Education Reforms. European Education, 42(4), 5-24. doi:10.2753/EUE1056-4934420401
Nieto, S. & Bode, P. (2008). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education, Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.,
Simms, K. (2012). A Hierarchical Examination of the Immigrant Achievement Gap: The Additional Explanatory Power of Nationality and Educational Selectivity Over Traditional Explorations of Race and Socioeconomic Status. Journal Of Advanced Academics, 23(1), 72-98. doi:10.1177/1932202X11430270