...AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT "On February 11-13, 2001, at The Lodge at Snowbird ski resort in the Wasatch mountains of Utah, seventeen people met to talk, ski, relax, and try to find common ground... What emerged was the Agile Software Development Manifesto." (www.agilemanifesto.org) The precursor to Agile project management was the brainchild of Dr. Winston Royce. Introduced in his 1970 treatise, “Managing the Development of Large Software Systems,”1 Dr. Royce presented a 5-point rebuttal of the sequential development Waterfall Model, which had been the status quo for project managment. The waterfall model views a process as a series of steps cascading downwards as shown in the illustration below: Fig. 1: The Waterfall Model Originating in industries concerned with complex physical structures such as skyscrapers, vehicles, and machines, the waterfall model suited these type of projects. The underslying assumption was that late-stage modifications were constrained by the high costs and difficulties inherent in physically modifying a large, complex structure after construction or assembly had begun. The first sequential project management protocol is attributed to Walther Shewhart at Bell Labs, who coined the phrase "Plan-Do-Study-Act"2 in the 1930s. His ideas were advanced in the following decade by the so-called "father of the post-war Japanese industrial renaissance",3 William Edwards Demings, Bell and...
Words: 2613 - Pages: 11
...1) Describe Highsmith's Agile Triangle. How does it differ from the traditional approach to handling project constraints? Do you favor one approach over the other? Explain. In the Traditional Iron Triangle, the constraints are time, money and scope. Time and cost in a project can be difficult to plan in advance. While in Highsmith’s Agile Triangle we focus on value and quality. The general idea behind the agile triangle is that we need to take the focus off of delivering to a set schedule, a fixed budget, and some predetermined set of deliverables and instead focus more on the value the product is delivering (Leading Agile). Traditional development teams are supposed to work within the confines of the ‘Iron triangle'. The three sides of the triangle are Scope, Schedule and Cost. Since Agile places a lot of emphasis on quality, it is often considered a dimension which sits at the middle of the triangle. I would prefer the agile triangle method over the traditional method as Jim Suggested constraints are important project parameters but they are not the goal of the project. Value and Quality are the goals and constraints may need to be adjusted as the project moves forward to increase customer value. According to Jim, Agile teams should focus on the releasable product rather than getting constrained by the iron triangle. The three vertices of the iron triangle collapse into one vertex of the agile triangle called constraints. The other vertices i.e. value and quality define...
Words: 745 - Pages: 3
...Traditional Project Management vs. Agile Development with Software as a Service projects Introduction The purpose of this entry is not to define Agile development methods (there's more than enough of that out there already), but rather to identify the characteristics of a company that is properly implementing and seeing positive results from Agile Project Management. When an SaaS project is initiated, those who are responsible for building the invention are among the most important people to the business during that time. They must be treated with the kind of dignity and respect that demonstrate the impact they have on the success of an SaaS initiative. Traditional Project Management Analyzing the problem-solving characteristics of a company's Executive Officers will tell you a lot. More specifically, what you are looking for is the level by which they do or do not value and honor traditional means of solving problems. The second major characteristic to look for is the existence of a process or strategy that religiously used as an approach for resolving every problem that comes up. Chances are, with this kind of leadership at the very top, you will usually find what - at first glance - appears to be an orderly, hierarchical structure to the way that tasks are delegated. You will usually also notice a disconnect between the lower-level management such as having a clear understanding for design requirements, for example. In other words, a developer might get a different answer...
Words: 1977 - Pages: 8
...Technology (IJCSIT) Vol 5, No 1, February 2013 IMPROVING THE MANAGEMENT OF COST AND SCOPE IN SOFTWARE PROJECTS USING AGILE PRACTICES Mariana de Azevedo Santos1, Paulo Henrique de Souza Bermejo2, Marcelo Silva de Oliveira3, Adriano Olímpio Tonelli2, Enio Júnior Seidel4 1 2 3 Mitah Technologies, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil mariana@bsi.ufla.br Department of Computer Science – Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA) bermejo@dcc.ufla.br, tonelli@dcc.ufla.br marcelo.oliveira@dex.ufla.br 4 Department of Mathematical Sciences – Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA) Universidade Federal do Pampa (UNIPAMPA) ejrseidel@hotmail.com ABSTRACT While organizations want to develop software products with reduced cost and flexible scope, stories about the applicability of agile practices to improve project development and performance in the software industry are scarce and focused on specific methodologies such as Scrum and XP. Given these facts, this paper aims to investigate, through practitioners' perceptions of value, which agile practices are being used to improve two performance criteria for software projects—cost and scope. Using a multivariate statistical technique known as Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), the results suggest that the use of agile practices can be represented in factors which describe different applications in software development process to improve cost and scope. Also, we conclude that some agile practices should be used together in order to get better...
Words: 3283 - Pages: 14
...Agile Methodology Brian Crites System Analysis and Design July 16, 2012 Summer Term B 2012 Professor David A. Ostrowski Agile Methodology is an approach to project management that for the most part is used with software development. Agile Methodology is a very important part of software development. Throughout this paper I intend to discuss what the movement toward agility means for the future of systems analysis and design (Hoffer, George, & Valacich, 2011). In the year of 2001 many proponents met in Utah and came to discuss and agree on underlying principles (Hoffer, George, & Valacich, 2011). Through this discussion they came up with the “The Agile Manifesto” (Hoffer, George, & Valacich, 2011). There is very important information listed in the Agile Manifesto as you can see from the information I have provided, according to my textbook, below. “The Manifesto for Agile Software Development Seventeen anarchists agree: We are uncovering better ways of developing software by doing it and helping others do it. Through this work we have come to value: • Individuals and interactions over processes and tools. • Working software over comprehensive documentation. • Customer collaboration over contract negotiation. • Responding to change over following a plan. That is, while we value the items on the right, we value the items on the left more. We follow the following principles: • Our highest priority is to satisfy the customer through early and...
Words: 958 - Pages: 4
...whether the student has completed prescribed courses 5. Approval from the respective course coordinators 6. Final billing made on the student to make payment of his fees. In this entire process one has to understand what the needs of the student are and then we need to bill him as per the requirements of the course which he is bound to enroll. There should not be blind system of billing everybody without any purpose. Hence in this case the validation of subjects and needs has to be clarified at all instances. Appendix B 1. When should you use an Agile method, and when should you use an engineering-based method for developing a system? Support your answer Agile methods are adaptive in nature. Their nature is to welcome and adapt changes. And also the agile processes focus on people rather than process so in a case where a system to be developed is about to change rapidly and also depended upon the persons; the agile methods must be a good approach. Also the documentation part is too less in this case. Engineering processes are predictive in nature and they do not support changes and also they are process focused. So when there is a system that will remain stable for a long period of time engineering approach is good...
Words: 506 - Pages: 3
...Replacing PeopleSoft Using the Agile Methodology Development January 8th, 2015 IT Project Manager Group F’s College of Technology Mid-West, USA 12345 College President Group F’s College of Technology Mid-West, USA 12345 Dear College President: Per the goals of the IT department our project: Replacing PeopleSoft using the agile methodology, is designed to replace the current software at our college. By doing this we will create a more time and cost efficient software program at our college that will be used throughout all our campuses. The new software will be maintained and updated internally which in turn will result in a reduction of expenses. We are hoping to start and complete this process within a year. Throughout the year our internal staff will gain the knowledge necessary to maintain and update the new software. They will also use the agile methodology to ensure that this process is done successfully. We also understand that this will cause complications at times with our means of communication between stakeholders and employees. Liaisons will be in place to communicate updates and other information to our stakeholders and employees in the case of complications. We are requesting your approval to start this project by the end of January 2015 once you have reviewed this project report. You will see in our report that requests for finances will be minimal as we own all of the hardware. We plan on using most of the existing hardware, if not all of it...
Words: 2733 - Pages: 11
...Study on Agile software development methodologies A B M Moniruzzaman abm.mzkhan@gmail.com Dr Syed Akhter Hossain aktarhossain@daffodilvarsity.edu.bd Abstract Today‘s business environment is very much dynamic, and organisations are constantly changing their software requirements to adjust with new environment. They also demand for fast delivery of software products as well as for accepting changing requirements. In this aspect, traditional plan-driven developments fail to meet up these requirements. Though traditional software development methodologies, such as life cycle-based structured and object oriented approaches, continue to dominate the systems development few decades and much research has done in traditional methodologies, Agile software development brings its own set of novel challenges that must be addressed to satisfy the customer through early and continuous delivery of the valuable software. It‘s a set of software development methods based on iterative and incremental development process, where requirements and development evolve through collaboration between self-organizing, cross-functional teams that allows rapid delivery of high quality software to meet customer needs and also accommodate changes in the requirements. In this paper, we significantly indentify and describe the major factors, that Agile development approach improves software development process to meet the rapid changing business environments. We also provide a brief comparison of agile development...
Words: 7127 - Pages: 29
...serena.com An IntroductIon to AgIle SoftwAre development June 2007 tAble of contentS Executive summary............................................................................................................................................................ 3 Agile vs. waterfall: practical differences in methodology .............................................................. 4 Two agile software development methodologies ................................................................................. 6 Xp ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 The XP development process ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 XP rules and concepts ......................................................................................................................................................................7 Scrum ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Scrum management........................................................................................................................................................................ 8 Scrum...
Words: 2845 - Pages: 12
...Agile development process implies short development iterations, and more spontaneous communications between involved teams, while Waterfall development process consists in linear tasks succession, and uses formal documentations between teams. Agile is thus more adapted to innovation development processes, since it allows to iterate and to adapt fast. When Pearson used a Waterfall approach, it was struggling to reach customer adoption, and was spending a lot of money and time in upgrading Successmaker, as stated by Adams-Woodford: “We have spent 30 million on the new SuccessMaker development and even six to eight months after launching the first version, it has not been well adopted by the market” (p3). By adopting an Agile approach, Pearson realized the following benefits: Fitted-to-market product development. Waterfall process implied that development team was making all decisions, not product management. However, product management teams are the ones in contact with customers, and analyzing the market and its trends. As a result, the products developed were pushed to the market, and the feedback from customers were coming too late in the process. On the contrary, when adopting Agile process, the product management team is the one handling the product and its evolution. This way, the product is fitted to the customers, since product management teams know the market and its expectancies in depth, and can accordingly push features that are creating most value for the customers...
Words: 851 - Pages: 4
...Primavera Gets Agile School CIS/525 Instructor November 22, 2014 Primavera Gets Agile There is always a best practice and critical success factors an organization can adopt to turn the organization’s entire development organization around in the most amazing way. Prior to adopting agile project management, Primavera development organization experienced problems. Agile techniques should be considered when solving such problems while implementing strategies in adopting agile methodologies. There will be challenges and obstacles that Primavera will face when transitioning to agile project management, but with hard work, these obstacles can be tackled. From since 2004, Agile has continued to have an impact on Primavera project management and its economic growth. Problems prior to Agile Some may look at a company like Primavera and think that they had all the necessary software to operate flawlessly, but that was never the case. While scuffling like everyone else, Primavera once maintained the tradition waterfall development approach with a team working tirelessly to dispense high-quality services to a growing and diverse market, as swiftly as possible. In an attempt to complete projects on time, team members had to follow a typical cycle that demanded late hours and weekends. Project managers basically used what was called a command-and-control philosophy. In other words, only managers made decisions without consulting or getting input from their team. This cause the relationship...
Words: 1728 - Pages: 7
...2012 Waterfall vs. Agile Methodology Mike McCormick MPCS, Inc. Revised Edition 8/9/2012 Waterfall vs. Agile Methodology Contents Waterfall vs. Agile Model Comparison .........................................................................................3 Conceptual Difference.................................................................................................................3 Efficiency ....................................................................................................................................4 Suitability ....................................................................................................................................4 Waterfall Model Diagram .............................................................................................................5 Explanation of the Waterfall Model ..............................................................................................5 Phase I: Requirements................................................................................................................6 Phase II: Analysis .......................................................................................................................6 Phase III: Design.........................................................................................................................6 Phase IV: Coding ....................................................................................................
Words: 3023 - Pages: 13
...fit the new cultures of the software development companies. Most software companies nowadays aim to produce valuable software in short time period with minimal costs and within unstable, changing environments. Agile Methodologies were thus introduced to meet the new requirements of the software development companies. This paper presents how the Alpha Bay Corporation handled software development process and the type of software development methodology used by them and the recommendations for improvements which includes agile approaches including Extreme Programming, Agile Modeling and SCRUM, describes the differences between them and recommends when to use them. Company Profile Alpha Bay Corporation is building a world-class system called AIRSTM. Their software gives retailers the integrated, real-time data access they need to see where their inventory is, when they need it, across all channels of their business. This allows retailers to increase their revenues by raising the average order value, reducing out-of-stock situations and dramatically increasing customer loyalty. Alpha Bay’s AIRSTM suite, which includes applications such as Point-of-Service, Web Store, Catalog Order Management, Store Operations, Customer Management, Item Management, Business Intelligence, Reporting, and more. Alpha Bay also develops and deploys state-of-the-art database technologies to manage real-time retail information and deliver unsurpassed levels of data reliability and...
Words: 1411 - Pages: 6
...Project Management and Project Success Project management is the facilitation of the planning, scheduling and controlling of all activities that need to be done in the project in order to achieve project objectives. Project management is a very important term in large and small businesses because all businesses are eager to implement new activities, such as the development of a new project and service. In addition project success requires proper planning and help from a management team. A project can be successful if it exceeds customer requirements, the business aims are understood and it meets the objectives. The aim of this essay is to critically analyserelevant academic literature for factors contributing to the successful delivery of computing projects. This essay begins by providing a brief overview of Waterfall and Agile then moves on to critically analyse them. Following that the importance Risk Management will be discussed.Finallyan additional project management will be discoursed and essay then concluding the main point of the findings. There are many different types project management approaches, but the most common project management approached which are being used in around many years are Agile and Waterfall. Agile project management has been around for more than 25 years. This approach was first defined as Agile Manifesto by Martin Fowler and Jim Highsmith. Manifesto has been a controlling valuein entire Agile Project Management models (Robert K. Wysocki, 2009)...
Words: 1337 - Pages: 6
...Recommendations for Leadership Development 21 Lead with Humility (Level 5 Leadership) 21 Engage in Interactive Leadership 22 Practice Authentic Leadership 22 References 23 Organization Overview The focus of this section is to provide a description of the Software Engineering and Development (SEAD) organization at MCG, the leadership practices of the company’s CEO, and the link between the CEO’s leadership practices and the SEAD organizational culture. This department and leader were chosen for two reasons. First, the SEAD organization underwent many changes over the past 3 years due primarily to the CEO’s leadership decisions, including a complete reorganization to align to Agile methodologies, and an acquisition to Hearst. Second, political forces governing healthcare and innovations in IT management due to cloud computing, in the same timeframe, had tremendous impact to the healthcare industry as a whole, the MCG company specifically,...
Words: 5552 - Pages: 23