Free Essay

Bankruptcy Fraud

In:

Submitted By rlgibson
Words 2672
Pages 11
Bankruptcy Fraud By Robyn Carter

Forensic Accounting Data Analysis Bill Makkkawi October 13, 2009
Bankruptcy Fraud
What is Bankruptcy? Bankruptcy is a way for individuals or businesses to satisfy debts. There are four types of bankruptcy. There is Chapter 7 which is a complete liquidation for individuals. Chapter 7 bankruptcy liquidates assets that are not exempt and uses the proceeds to pay creditors. In this bankruptcy creditors may be paid in full or a percentage based on the assets that were available. There is Chapter 11 which is for a business. Chapter 11 allows a business to reorganize its operation and finances so that it can pay its creditors. Sometimes in Chapter 11 another entity may take over the original entity in the reorganization. Creditors are told to give the entity time to reorganize and pay the debts. Then, there is Chapter 13 which is reorganization for individuals. Chapter 13 gives individuals a chance to pay creditors over 3 to 5 years through a Bankruptcy Trustee. Most assets can be kept depending on what percentage of the debts will be paid. If the debtor is paying the creditors in full then they would be able to keep all of their assets. This is only available for debtors with verifiable disposable income. The last type is Chapter 12 which is for farmers and fishermen (LII / Legal Information Institute). After completion of whichever chapter used, the creditor gets a “fresh start”.
White Collar Crime Why is this considered white collar crime? Although there are people in blue collar positions that file bankruptcy, they usually don’t have many assets to hide. People in white collar positions, when they get in to a bind and have to file bankruptcy, they tend to do what they need to do so that they don’t lose all of their assets. “The bankruptcy system is designed to give individuals and companies a chance to reorganize their affairs or to equitably distribute the non-exempt assets of the debtor among the creditors if reorganization is not possible” (FBI). Because of the thought of the distribution of their non-exempt assets, those with a lot of assets that are not exempt may tend to commit some type of fraud to keep them. And those debtors are usually in the middle or upper class, white collar workers. The blue collar workers that get caught up in bankruptcy fraud are usually caught up in petition mills, to be discussed later.
Types of Bankruptcy Fraud There are three types of bankruptcy fraud: Concealment of assets, petition mills and multiple filings. Concealment of assets accounts for a large majority of bankruptcy frauds, 70 percent, filed by individuals. This type of bankruptcy fraud is committed by not listing all of the assets on the petition. It can also be committed by transferring assets to relatives. Creditors cannot liquidate assets that they don’t know about. Petition mills are schemes where someone takes advantage of a debtor that is about to be evicted or their house is going to be foreclosed on. Petition mills prey on low income people facing eviction or foreclosure with help for them to keep their homes. When a debtor gets caught up in a petition mill, they are not the ones actually committing the fraud, it is the representatives of the petition mill. Multiple filings happen when a debtor files multiple bankruptcy petitions in different states listing the same assets, although still not listing all of them. They may use fake names or fake social security numbers in different states. This is similar to concealment of assets, because they are still concealing assets from the creditors.
How Does The Fraud Triangle Fit? The fraud triangle is perceived pressure, opportunity and rationalization. Following the fraud triangle, we look at perceived pressures. One of the biggest perceived pressures in bankruptcy fraud is the thought of losing everything. When someone is used to having a lot of assets but find themselves in a situation that they are unable to pay their creditors and must file bankruptcy, they look for ways that they won’t lose everything they worked so hard for. If something is hidden from the bankruptcy petition it can’t be taken. For a business it is the thought that they may be bought out by another company during reorganization. That is what happened to a company that I worked for. I was a remote coder for Onsite Sourcing which was a company that prepared litigation for court. I did indexing of scanned documents for many different cases. All of a sudden I received information of a filing for Bankruptcy by Onsite. Soon after, I received a document from Bankruptcy Court with information on filing for compensation if I had not been paid for some of my work. Then I got a notice from the HR person that Onsite had been purchased by another litigation company. The opportunity is that the debtor is filing the bankruptcy petition either on his own or through an attorney and they are able to just leave some of the assets off. There is usually quite a bit of time between when a debtor realizes they are going to have to file bankruptcy and when they actually do the filing. When bankruptcy is anticipated, many of the assets are transferred to family members or friends so that they won’t lose them. If it is an involuntary bankruptcy, the debtor still has to file the assets and still has a chance to leave some off. In some cases though, the creditors may know about some of the assets that the debtor may try to hide. At times the creditors may force an involuntary bankruptcy because they fell if they wait too long the debtor will have time to hide assets. The sooner the petition is filed the better chance the creditors will have of getting some if not all of the debts paid. They fraudster rationalizes their actions by the fact that nobody actually gets hurt. Bankruptcy Fraud is considered a victimless fraud because it only involves material things. Many times the debtor doesn’t realize that the bankruptcy fraud they committed with affect many other people with higher prices to cover the loss they creditor had. Also they think that they need the money, or they shouldn’t have to lose everything that they worked so hard for.
Changes in the Bankruptcy Code in 2005 The bankruptcy code changed to help eliminate fraudulent filing in 2005. The changes included income limits for filing Chapter 7 liquidation. There is a means test to determine if the debtor has enough disposable income after allowed expenses and required debt payments to make Chapter 13 payments. There is required counseling prior to filing Chapter 7 or 13 and also just before completion or discharge. Attorneys are now required to personally vouch for the accuracy of what they put in the petition, which may make it difficult to find an attorney to handle bankruptcy. There are also some regulations on refilling which may appear to be abuse of the system. The changes help to prevent that. There are some other changes, but these are the big changes that are trying to stop the fraud.
Changes in Bankruptcy Fraud Bankruptcy fraud was increasing substantially until the changes in the code in 2005. With the increase in bankruptcy filing there was also an increase in bankruptcy fraud. It is estimated that 10% of all filings have some element of fraud (IRS). The table below shows the statistics from the IRS website on bankruptcy fraud cases.
| |FY 2009 |FY 2008 |FY 2007 |
|Investigations Initiated |18 |25 |30 |
|Prosecution Recommendations |18 |10 |20 |
|Indictments/Informations |20 |15 |18 |
| Sentenced |13 |16 |16 |
|Incarceration Rate* |92.3% |93.8% |87.5% |
| Avg. Months to Serve |36 |43 |23 |

*Incarceration includes confinement to federal prison, halfway house, home detention, or some combination thereof.
Data Source: Criminal Investigation Management Information System.
The IRS is involved in the investigations because a great majority of the bankruptcy filings include money owed to the IRS. I know that taxes owed to the IRS and the State is considered unsecured priority debts so they are paid right after any secured priority debts. But I don’t know if they are discharged if there aren’t enough assets to pay all of the taxes.
How has the economy changed the face of bankruptcy? It doesn’t look like the changes are actually preventing fraud bankruptcy fraud. Maybe it has cut down on some of the individual frauds but as I see it, there still continues to be bankruptcy fraud. With the economy the way it is and all the foreclosures many people are looking for ways to save their home. When get to their last straw they may turn to something that appears like a lifesaver but it really isn’t. This case may have appeared to be a lifesaver to some people. In August 2009 a couple in Mississippi pled guilty to mail fraud, bankruptcy fraud and falsifying documents in a bankruptcy case. This case stemmed from the couple having a petition mill. The couple went after people that were in foreclosure and told them they could stop the foreclosure and help them save their home. It would be necessary for them to transfer their home to them and pay them rental payments. Without the debtor’s permission or knowledge the couple then filed bankruptcy. This filing did help save the debtor’s home, temporarily. Because the debtor’s didn’t know anything about it, they didn’t go to the required court hearings so the case was dismissed and the house was foreclosed on. I have started hearing warnings about this type of thing on the radio. The Lt. Governor of Indiana has a radio commercial advising people to be careful and the Lt Governor reminded people if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. This couple will be sentenced in November with the maximum sentence for the man is 10 years in prison and $250.l00 and the wife is looking at a maximum of 3 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.
Punishment For Bankruptcy Fraud in the Past. This couple is lucky they were not in England in the 1700’s because they used capital punishment for bankruptcy fraud. France also had capital punishment for bankruptcy fraud iin 1560. In England bankruptcy fraud was a “person who neglects or omits to discover and deliver his, her or their estates and effects, and in everything act and do as in this act directed.” (Credit Slips). The punishment for fraudulent bankruptcy was to ‘suffer as a felon without benefit of clergy”. The punishment for felons was hanging so that meant a person filing a fraudulent bankruptcy was also hung. There was Perrott that was hung in 1761 for concealing his effects. James Bullock was sentenced to death for failure to discover his assets in 1807 although it was appealed and his sentence was changed. So we are not as harsh with the punishment for bankruptcy fraud now as they were then, but in some cases I wonder if they English and French had a better idea to help deter the bankruptcy fraud.
Bankruptcy Fraud Involving a Business This case took place in Alexandria Louisiana and the perpetrator plead guilty in January of 2009. In this case Bobby Curtis concealed $1,000,000 in contracted business and assets of his company. He was sentenced to 37 months in federal prison and $355,119 in restitution. In this case Curtis filed Chapter 13 for his company Gen-I-Tech and it was converted to a Chapter 11 and was subsequently converted to a Chapter 7 in February 2003. Curtis had received $200,000 in payments prior to his bankruptcy discharge and also won a $1.1 million contract in February 2003. When filing bankruptcy you agree to disclose any income, for I believe it is 6 months, after discharge. In this case the debtor did not disclose these additional funds that could have been used to pay something to the creditors.
How the IRS Has Helped Find and Prosecute Perpetrator’s of Bankruptcy Fraud and What Else They Have Found. In many cases of bankruptcy fraud investigated and convicted by the IRS other crimes have been found. Quite often the one of the additional crimes is tax evasion or some other tax fraud. People don’t remember that income tax evasion is what brought Al Capone down. That alone should tell people that the IRS is not something to mess with. The cases that I found on the IRS website are from 2008. There was Lou Pearlman that was sentenced to 25 years in prison along with other monetary punishments. He pled guilty to “conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States, money laundering, and presenting or using a false claim in a bankruptcy proceeding.” Bankruptcy was low on the charges presented here. Charles Etwell was sentenced to 51 months in prison and a $500,000 fine. He will also have to work with the IRS in the filing of back tax returns. Etwell was convicted of “four counts of tax evasion and one count of make false statements in a bankruptcy petition.” Again bankruptcy was low on this case. Charles Lancaster was sentenced to 46 months in prison and ordered to pay $444, 435 in restitution. Lancaster pleaded guilty to bankruptcy fraud and tax evasion. Karl James was sentenced to 36 months in prison and ordered to pay $1.12 million in restitution to the victims of his bankruptcy fraud and $1.17 million in restitution to the IRS for unpaid taxes. James pleaded guilty to bankruptcy fraud and tax evasion. All of this information came from the IRS website “Examples of Bankruptcy Fraud Investigations FY2008.
Conclusion
There were many more cases investigated, charged and convicted by the IRS. Although bankruptcy fraud may have been the cause for the investigation by the IRS, I don’t think they would have stuck to the investigations like bloodhounds had the fraudsters paid income tax on their ill gotten gains. Bankruptcy fraud seems to be a continuing problem and I really don’t know how it can be eliminated, but, I think, the changes made to the Bankruptcy Code has helped to eliminate some of the fraud. Maybe there needs to be more changes and deeper investigations by the Bankruptcy court, but the expense of that may out weight the results. Someday maybe there will be a reduction in bankruptcy fraud, but in the mean time I guess more people need to be vigilant in helping with tips on fraudulent behavior.

References

Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht and Zimbelman (2009). Fraud Examination 3rd Ed. Chapter 16, South-Western, Mason OH.
LII / Legal Information Institute, Bankruptcy: an Overview, retrieved October 13, 2009 from the Worldwide Web: http://topics.law.cornell.edu/wex/bankruptcy.
The Lawyershop, Bankruptcy Fraud, retrieved from the Worldwide Web: http://www.lawyershop.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/white-color-crimes/bankruptcy-fraud/.
U.S. Department of Justice (2009), United States Attorney Southern District of Mississippi, Couple Pleads Guilty to Mail Fraud, Bankruptcy Fraud and Falsifying Documents in Bankruptcy Cases, retrieved October 13, 2009 from the Worldwide Web: http://www.usdoj.gov/ust/r05/pdfs/pr20090821.pdf.
FBI, White-collar Crime, Bankruptcy Fraud: Overview, retrieved October 14, 2009 from the Worldwide Web: http://www.fbi.gov/whitecollarcrime/bankruptcy_fraud/about.htm.
Find Law, The New Bankruptcy Law: Changes to Chapters 7 and 13, retrieved October 14, 2009 from the Worldwide Web: http://bankruptcy.findlaw.com/new-bankruptcy-law/new-bankruptcy-law-basics/big-changes.html.
IRS.gov, Bankruptcy Fraud - Criminal Investigation (CI), retrieved October 14, 2009 from the Worldwide Web: http://www.irs.gov/compliance/enforcement/article/0,,id=117520,00.html.
IRS.gov, Examples of Bankruptcy Fraud Investigations FY2008, retrieved October 14, 2009 from the Worldwide Web: http://www.irs.gov/compliance/enforcement/article/0,,id=174629,00.html.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

When Is It Bankruptcy Fraud?

...When is it bankruptcy fraud? Bankruptcy serves a vital role in the economy. Without bankruptcy, some debtors would never be able to dig their way out of debt. With no ability to discharge debts, they would have to pay their debt by going to prison. At the very least, debtors with no way out could never recover and become contributing members of society. Bankruptcy should be viewed as a tool for those that intend to repay their debts but ultimately can’t. Unfortunately, there are a few that try to cheat the system. This is known as bankruptcy fraud. The bankruptcy process is complex, and there are many regulations in place to make sure it isn’t taken advantage of. While many who commit bankruptcy fraud do it on purpose, there are some who do it in ignorance. Here are a few things to keep in mind in order to avoid bankruptcy fraud. Types of bankruptcy fraud Bankruptcy is intended to be for those that cannot repay their debts on their own. Consequently, there is a limit to how much income a bankruptcy filer can make. There are many different types of income and all of them must be declared in the bankruptcy. Failing to report income, either on purpose or on accident could result in your case being thrown out. In order to prevent bankruptcy from being misused, there is a limit to how often a person may file for bankruptcy. Falsifying information in order to file bankruptcy before the minimum waiting period is another form of bankruptcy fraud. Yet another dishonest...

Words: 450 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Bankruptcy Fraud

...According to the IRS, ten percent of bankruptcy filings are fraud and less than one percent of those are convicted. Bankruptcy can be filed when a company or a land owner is unable to pay overwhelming debts. Sometimes people hide their money and assets, and file bankruptcy just so they won’t have to pay back the debts that they owe even though that person is fully capable of doing so, which is illegal. This is called bankruptcy fraud, which is federal white collar crime which can lead to a maximum of 5 years in jail, and a $250,000 fine. People that you would most commonly see commit this fraud are private citizens, small business owners, corporate CEOs, real estate agents, politicians, and loan officers. There are four very common types of bankruptcy fraud, which are the concealment of assets, filing multiple times, giving false statements, and bust outs. Bankruptcy can be a hard thing to do for someone. Almost anyone filing for bankruptcy is truthful, has good intentions and is hard working. Sometimes, no matter how hard you try, the job market, the loss of your job or the high interest rates can be too much for someone to meet. There are two types of bankruptcy that someone can have, which are straight bankruptcy, and reorganization. When dealing with straight bankruptcy, someone isn’t able to pay their debts, like car loans, credit card debts, or mortgage. This usually involves homeowners, which allows them to start with a clean slate. With reorganization, that person is...

Words: 471 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Adelphia Communications’ Bankruptcy

...Adelphia Communications’ Bankruptcy Bankruptcy The case talks about the situation Adelphia went through after the governance problem and fraud they had that led them to bankruptcy. Adelphia being a family owned company; by April 2005 they decided to sell out the remaining assets of the company to the one of the other 3 big cable companies; Time Warner, Comcast and Cablevision; each one of them offered different amount in the bid, nevertheless the company had to analyze how certain each offers were, how probable was any of them to pull out the offers as well as what to do with the money they would get in case the judge let them do the sell. Family Control Adelphia was founded and managed by Rigas family, the case talks about how the company after 1985 decided to go public in order to acquire the capital investment to expand and become one of the biggest cable providers in the country. Nevertheless the Rigas family managed to keep almost full control of the company by keeping special type stocks with decision making power in the board. The company kept being managed by the funding family as well as the family keeping some of the cable assets for themselves in separate private partnerships and continuing to buy properties privately as well as for the company. The case explains how the privately owned assets of the family were managed by already-public Adelphia Corp by some management agreements and with this the expenses of such assets were consolidated with the expenses...

Words: 1878 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Suffrage Denied

...rights to assure the securities’ transferability and rapid judicial resolution of claims for nonpayment.2 To further attenuate risk, investors insisted on foreign laws to govern substantive terms of the securities. By the late 1990s, as various Argentine issuers began defaulting on their obligations, these bondholder rights and protections were tested. It soon became apparent that bondholders were far more vulnerable than originally thought. Highly-publicized reorganization proceedings undertaken by Argentine bond issuers, including In re Central Términal Güemes S.A.3 and In re Supercanal S.A.4, illustrated procedural difficulties encountered by bondholders. Investors found themselves hampered in having their claims admitted by Argentine bankruptcy courts and in being represented as a group by a bondholder trustee or fiscal agent. No case, however, better illustrates the great divide between the expectations of foreign creditors and the outcome of an Argentine insolvency proceeding than In re Sociedad Comercial del Plata S.A.5 Of Counsel, Negri & Tejeiro Abogados (Buenos Aires, Argentina). The author wishes to give special thanks to Dr. Alejandro Breit for his invaluable help and patience in reviewing this article and to Stephanie de Moerloose for her comments and help with the more tedious tasks. This publication has been prepared solely for educational purposes. It provides general information and should not be used or taken as specific legal advice. For further information...

Words: 8733 - Pages: 35

Premium Essay

Bankruptcy

...Bankruptcy Examiner’s Report in Auditor Malpractice Suits A bankruptcy examiner’s report may provide a roadmap to auditors’ negligence, breach of contract, gross negligence, and / or cooperation to cover up fraud committed by the debtor management. A bankruptcy examiner is appointed by the court to investigate the debtor and the debtor’s estate for the purpose to determine if fraud, dishonesty, misconduct, incompetence, and irregularity by the debtor management has occurred before and during the filing of the bankruptcy. The judge call for an examiner based on a request from the trustee, the creditors, major shareholders, and / or his personal judgment. The parties who utilize the finding of the examiner’s report to sue the auditor for malpractice are the trustees, creditors, major shareholders of the debtor, and any other party that may find joining the lawsuit is in the best interest of the society. The examiner’s investigation- first- focuses on many aspects of the debtor’s assets, liabilities, equities, and how the operation is carried out in compliance with rules and regulations. The examiner gathers, verifies, tests, and interprets information from different sources (employees, customers, vendors, lenders, and other professionals who provide service to the entity under investigation). Second, through...

Words: 1260 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Do Bankruptcy Laws Unjustly Favor Lenders?

...Do Bankruptcy Laws unjustly favor Lenders? Intro Bankruptcy is a legally declared inability or impairment of ability of an individual or organizations to pay their creditors. Bankruptcy law provides for the development of a plan that allows a debtor to resolve his debts through the division of his assets among his creditors. Although the goal of the modern bankruptcy is to allow the debtor to have a “fresh start,” and to be granted relief of some liability, there haven’t been any regulators to protect consumers or debtors since the first Bankruptcy Law that the Congress passed in 1797 which lead to imprisonment of thousands of debtors. And it wasn’t till 1841 that the debtor could voluntarily go into bankruptcy and so avail himself of this privilege of discharge. The Federal Bankruptcy Act of 1898 had 3 principal objects in view: 1. To prevent preferences and ensure equality in payment as between the creditors of insolvent debtors; 2. To punish and discourage commercial fraud; and 3. To discharge honest debtors from their debts when overwhelmed by financial misfortune through no fault of their own. The act gave creditors collectively full power over the administration of insolvent estates and placed upon them the responsibility for enforcement of the act. New Legislation The new Legislation enacted by Congress called the Bankruptcy Abuse and Consumer Protection Act was intended to make it more difficult for debtors to file a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy under which most...

Words: 1064 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Ifm Ch.25

...Chapter 25 Bankruptcy, Reorganization, and Liquidation ANSWERS TO BEGINNING-OF-CHAPTER QUESTIONS 25-1 Bankruptcies occur in firms of all sizes. Small firms, with fewer creditors, are often able to work out informal settlements and thus avoid the time and expense of formal bankruptcy. Ross Corporation, described in Question 3, is probably too large, and it has too many creditors, to work out an informal settlement. If Ross attempted to resolve its problems informally, the attempt would probably fail, and then it would have to resort to the federal bankruptcy court. Note that if there had been fewer creditors, and particularly if most of the debt were owed to a few banks, then the chances of an informal resolution would be better. But with many holders of the publicly traded bonds, 15 banks, and 250 unsecured creditors, there would probably be too many holdouts to reach an informal resolution. 25-2 The judge in a federal bankruptcy proceeding can abrogate all contracts, including labor contracts. If a contract requires payments greater than the company’s cash flows can support, then the judge can order that payments be scaled back to a level the company can afford. Labor contracts were abrogated for a number of firms that were hit with asbestos suits, notably Johns Manville, and currently several airlines are in bankruptcy proceedings under which labor contracts will likely be changed. 25-3 a. As noted above, is probably too large, and it has too many creditors...

Words: 6034 - Pages: 25

Free Essay

Ethics

...Institut für Controlling und Consulting, Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Austria Johannes Kepler Universität Linz Institut für Controlling und Consulting Altenberger Straße 69 4040 Linz Austria Stefan.mayr@jku.at Keywords: Corporate responsibility, corporate restructuring, enterprise crisis, bankruptcy 1238 Abstract Discourse regarding ethics and corporate responsibility arose in the last years linked with an increasing number of accounting fraud scandals. The recent financial crisis has had a lasting negative influence on corporate profits. Companies have had to satisfy the interests of several stakeholders, such as its employees, banks, customers and the community, and at the same time successfully manage the consequences of the crisis. An empirical qualitative study which was conducted in Austria in 2008 is presented in this paper aimed at investigating business ethics and crisis management. The stakeholder theory will be used as a reference framework. This paper concludes with lessons that can be learned and political recommendations and policies put forth to grant failed businesses a second chance. 1. Introduction In the past few years, an increasing number of fraud cases and accounting scandals is linked to fierce discourse with respect to ethics and corporate accountability. Business ethics has likewise become a current research subject in science (Homan/Lütge, 2005; VHB, 2008). Discussions concerning corporate responsibility can be examined from different...

Words: 5533 - Pages: 23

Free Essay

Australian Bankruptcy Law History

...Australian Bankruptcy Law Contents Executive Summary 2 History of Australian Bankruptcy Law 3 The Beginning 3 The English Root 3 The Adaption and the Bankruptcy Act of 1966 5 The Debate 6 The Reform 6 For the Change 6 Against the Change 6 Conclusions & Recommendations 7 Citations & References 8 Executive Summary The purpose of this report is to examine the history, and the development of the Australian Bankruptcy Law. Through reviewing historical information, the origins of the current Bankruptcy Law are explored. Furthermore, the development of Corporate Insolvency Laws in Australia from 1901 through to 2001 Corporations Act is studied. The last part of this report reviews the ongoing debate on the need to relax the Corporate Insolvency & Bankruptcy Laws, in order to encourage entrepreneurship. This is followed by a final conclusion on the topic of the Australian Bankruptcy Law, and recommendations on where it could head for the better. History of Australian Bankruptcy Law The Beginning Before examining the development of any laws in Australia, one must review and accept the irony that, Australia began as a nation of convicts. In the late 18th century, the British empire were being burdened by the increasing number of criminals, convicted of variety of crimes from petty theft, fraud, to even murder. Due to the limited landmass, King George III empowered Captain Arthur Phillip, commander of the First fleet, to sail out to Australia...

Words: 2400 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Fin 370 Learning Team Week 4

...Learning Team B Summary/Reflection University of Phoenix Finance For Business FIN/370 XXX XXXXX Learning Team B Summary/Reflection Introduction In week four we covered various topics such as Capital structure, market capitalization, the effects of financing strategies on capital cost, and discussed differences of leasing vs. buying and how the there are requirements that financial companies are incompliance. We were also asked to calculate favorable and unfavorable financial leverage and interest. XXXX In week four of FIN/370, I learned many things related to financing and capital budgeting structure. We talked SOX and the requirements that the SEC sets forth for organizations to ensure financial compliance. This was a topic that I had quite a bit if firsthand knowledge with because when out SOX was first introduced our organization took it seriously and each employee of the company from the top down was responsible to attend the training and would be held accountable for their actions at every level of the organization. We also had good discuss about lease versus purchase and which option is better for individuals. It was interesting to see the different outlooks and opinions that other people had relating to whether they preferred leasing or purchasing. We had our week four calculation problems again which I struggled with several of them this week but not quite as many as the week before.  I have watched the videos and utilized other sources to answer the financial...

Words: 874 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Payday Arguments Against Bankruptcy

...Would you ever consider signing a lease with a “no bankruptcy clause?” Does it help for me to tell you that doing so will not put you in danger should you reach the point where you need to file? I do have to say that any lessor who includes this in their lease is somewhat “questionable”. Payday loan lenders, hard moneylenders, and other small business lenders will frequently include such a clause, but it has no actual legal implications. Dishonest debt collectors quite often try to collect through harassment a debt that has actually been discharged through bankruptcy. Criminal organizations buy bad debts including some that have been discharged through a bankruptcy. Almost all debts qualify to be discharged through bankruptcy. If there were...

Words: 380 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Student

...Filed 5/30/12 Viadro v. Titus CA1/5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE |JULIANNE VIADRO AS LIQUIDATING TRUSTEE FOR HUMBOLDT CREAMERY, LLC, | | |Plaintiff and Respondent, | | |v. |A132331 | |RALPH A. TITUS et al., | | |Defendants and Respondents, |(Humboldt County | | |Super. Ct. No. DR091101) | |LINDA NICHOLSON et al., | | |Movants...

Words: 5164 - Pages: 21

Free Essay

Ethics

...The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 45 (2005) 48–64 Contagion effects of the world’s largest bankruptcy: the case of WorldCom Aigbe Akhigbea,∗ , Anna D. Martinb , Ann Marie Whytec a Department of Finance, College of Business Administration, University of Akron, Akron, OH 44325, USA b Department of Finance, Charles F. Dolan School of Business, Fairfield University, USA c Department of Finance, School of Business, University of Central Florida, USA Received 16 June 2003; received in revised form 23 December 2003; accepted 27 July 2004 Available online 26 November 2004 Abstract On July 19, 2002 WorldCom sought protection from its creditors when it filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, earning the distinction as the largest bankruptcy filing in U.S. history. The events surrounding this history-making occurrence provide an important opportunity to examine the repercussions for WorldCom’s stakeholders. We especially focus on the valuation effects of the WorldCom failure on exposed financial institutions for their important monitoring roles as institutional investors and creditors. Despite the heightened uncertainty facing investors during this period, we find that the market is remarkably efficient in distinguishing among the various types of stakeholders. In particular, institutional investors and creditors are largely unaffected by the events, which is expected based on the benefit of diversification. In contrast, large and key competitors are adversely affected by the events...

Words: 8815 - Pages: 36

Free Essay

In Re Romano (2006) 353 B.R. 738; 2006 Bankr

...President and other fifty-percent shareholder of Allstate. c) While engaged as a consultant, Farley became aware of the Romanos' practice of writing checks for personal expenses out of the company account. d) Allstate was in financial difficulty and failed to pay substantial debt to its unsecured creditors, while at the same time the Romanos withdrew large sums of money from Allstate. e) Romano filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition in the District of Massachusetts. f) Farley filed an Amended Complaint against Romano and his wife and individually and on behalf of Allstate, seeks to except a debt he asserted was owed by the Romanos from discharge. g) Farley also argued that the Romanos' withdrawal of substantial sums from Allstate's checking account for personal expenses amounts to embezzlement under 11 U.S.C. ß 523(a)(4). * Issue: The issue was, whether or not any debt owed by the Romanos to Farley or to Allstate was non-dischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. ß 523(a)(2) and ß 523(a)(4). Rule: Section 523(a)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code provides that a debtor may not discharge debt for embezzlement or larceny. Also Section 11 U.S.C.S. ß 523(a)(2) sates that a debt shall be excepted from discharge, when it is the result of debtor’s false statement, made with knowledge of its falsify, with the intent to deceive the creditor, and where the creditor justifiably relies on the representation to its detriment. Analysis : The Court held that: a) No express...

Words: 604 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Disqualified Director: Malaysia's Law vs Uk's Law

...Contents Abstract 2 Introduction 3 Body 4 Definition of directors 4 Definition of disqualified directors 4 Circumstances for disqualification of directors 5 i. Undischarged bankruptcy (section 125) 5 ii. Convicted of crimes (section 130) 5 ii. Disqualification in insolvent companies (section 130A) 6 Comparison of penalty or punishment of disqualified director under Malaysia’s Law and United Kingdom’s (UK) Law 6 Example of cases involve directors disqualification in UK and Malaysia 7 Case 1 7 Case 2 8 Conclusion 10 Abstract Director is one of the important people in the conducting of a company. Without them, the company cannot be operated and all matters concerning the company cannot be carried out. At present, when a company fall or declared bankruptcy, the director become a disqualified director and cannot be a director in other companies as they may cause a similar incident recurring. According to this matter, the punishment of the disqualified director in Malaysia is fixed to 5 years which in major or minor case and must pay a fine RM100, 000.00 or both. They can’t be a director of other company just because they fail to exercise their duties and caused they commit a major or minor cases in a long time period. This paper aim to examine whether the punishment of disqualified director can be implementing or change in Malaysia compare to other country. Introduction In Malaysia, the situation which the person who tend to be a disqualified...

Words: 2904 - Pages: 12