Free Essay

Battle of Verdun

In:

Submitted By arrowsmithg
Words 1859
Pages 8
The Battle of Verdun
21 February – 18 December 1916
The Build-up/Plan
The German siege of Verdun and its ring of forts, which comprised the longest battle of the First World War, has its roots in a letter sent by the German Chief of Staff, Erich von Falkenhayn, to the Kaiser, Wilhelm II, on Christmas Day 1915.
In his letter to Kaiser, Falkenhayn said he wanted to “bleed France White” by launching a massive German attack on a narrow stretch of land that had historic sentiment for the French – Verdun.
In his letter to Wilhelm, Falkenhayn argued that the key to winning the war lay not on the Eastern Front, against Russia, but on the Western Front. He also believed that the French simply couldn’t allow these forts to fall as the national humiliation would have been too much. By fighting to the last man, Falkenhayn believed that the French would lose so many men that the battle would change the course of the war.

Kaiser acted upon Falkenhayn's recommendations. In doing so he agreed to switch focus from the Eastern Front to the Western Front. This strategy was not without its critics; in particular Paul von Hindenburg argued that the opportunity was lost to capture the bulk of the Russian army. Ultimately the failure of Falkenhayn's recommendations cost him his position.
Falkenhayn’s plan had credibility. The forts were very much part of the French moral and they would fight ferociously to keep the Germans out of the area. However, Falkenhayn’s plan also had one major weakness – it assumed that the French would be an easy opponent and that it would be the French who would take massive casualties – and not the Germans. In fact, all the forts around the area had been weakened as the French High Command had moved ammunition out of the forts to other areas on the Western Front. Also the trenches dug for defence had not been completed. Senior officers at the fort complex around Verdun complained to their Commander-in-Chief Joffre about the state of the defences in the area. He rejected their complaints.
Falkenhayn's choice of Verdun as the focus of the German offensive was shrewd. Although relegated by France to the status of a minor fortress during the early stages of the war, France having lost faith in the value of fortress defences, Verdun maintained a great psychological hold in the minds of the French people. On a practical level the woods immediately behind Verdun would have proved far easier to defend than the Verdun forts.
The last fortress town to fall to the Prussians in the Franco-Prussian war of 1870-71, Verdun's fortifications had been significantly boosted in the 1880s to withstand further attacks. In addition its status as an important fortress since Roman times guaranteed recognition of the name ‘Verdun' to most Frenchmen. In short, it was of greater value symbolically than strategically. Falkenhayn counted upon this.
Another part of his plan was to subject Verdun to intense bombardment, this meant drawing in and diverting French troops from all over the Western Front to the eight mile wide front around Verdun.
The task of besieging Verdun fell to the German Fifth Army under Crown Prince Wilhelm. He planned to assault the town from both sides of the surrounding Meuse River, a plan vetoed by Falkenhayn, who, feared heavy losses, ordered the attack to be restricted to the east bank of the river.
Originally scheduled to start on 12 February the offensive was postponed to 21 February on account of poor weather.
In the mean time between the planned and actual start date French Commander-in-Chief Joffre received intelligence of the imminent attack, quickly deploying reinforcements to the French Second Army. Meanwhile the fortress commander, Lieutenant Colonel Emile Driant, also a politician and published author, vainly attempted to improve Verdun's trench systems in time.
Driant prepared for the attack by posting two battalions, led by himself, at the tip of the Verdun, on the east bank of the Meuse River. He faced formidable opposition: one million German troops against 200,000 defenders.
The Battle/Attack
140,000 German troops started the attack, with Crown Prince Wilhelm in charge. They were supported by 1,200 artillery guns that targeted 2,500,00 shells at the Verdun region, that’s 1,00,000 shells an hour. They had nearby railway facilities. This was good because 1,300 ammunition trains were needed to supply these guns. The Germans also had complete air supremacy with 168 planes located in the area – the largest concentration of planes in history up to that point. To start with the French only had 30,000 troops to oppose the Germans. On the day the battle started February 21st, 1000 German artillery guns fired on a six mile line along the French front. Wilhelm’s intention was to kill the French defenders before the infantry (soldiers on foot) even started their advance to the fortress.
By the close of the day the German forces had succeeded only in capturing the French front line trenches, much less than planned, although Driant himself had been killed during the battle, and his two battalions demolished.

Wilhelm withdrew his forward infantry in preparation for a further artillery bombardment. This allowed the French defenders to position themselves such that they were able to position the advancing German troops from across the river.
Verdun remained in French hands, although the defensive situation was dire. A message was sent to French headquarters on 23 February reporting that Driant had been lost, as had all company commanders, and that the battalion had been reduced from 600 to around 180 men.
The following day, 24 February, German troops succeeded in over-running the French second line of trenches, forcing the defenders to within 8 kilometres of Verdun itself. Nevertheless, two outer forts, Vaux and Douaumont, continued to hold out.
A French division sent in piecemeal that same day was dispersed under heavy German artillery fire; Flame throwers were used in large numbers for the first time to help the German advance the eight miles they needed to if they were to capture Verdun.
By February 25th, the Germans had captured 10,000 French prisoners. To the German's astonishment, the huge fort at Douaumont, considered to be the most powerful fort in the world, was manned by just 56 elderly part-time gunners who gave the German attackers no resistance. On this next day Douaumont fell. The effect on French morale of the loss of Douaumont was marked, on both the remaining defenders and the reinforcements freshly arrived. Popular French sentiment within the country demanded its recapture: withdrawal from Verdun was therefore politically impossible.
The French Commander-in-Chief, Joffre, remained in deep focus. He issued a statement noting that any commander who gave ground to the advancing Germans would be court-martialled. Joffre put General Henri-Philippe Petain in charge of the defence at Verdun.
Petain understood that the defence of Verdun would result in many French casualties. He was determined to inflict the maximum damage to the German invaders in the course of these losses. Hence he effectively re-organised French use of artillery, personally taking commanding of this aspect of the defence.
He also took action to ensure that an effective supply route to Verdun was maintained. This was a difficult situation because the only road to Verdun was from the outside. In fact, it was barely a road by definition. It was only twenty feet wide and vehicles could barely pass one another. Yet along this road, 25,000 tons of supplies were moved into Verdun and 90,000 soldiers. 6,000 vehicles were used in this task and it is said that 66% of the French army was to pass up this road at some time during the battle to save Verdun. The road was given the nickname "Sacred Way" by the French. But despite the new military input, the French suffered badly.

On 6 March the Germans began a fresh offensive after receiving fresh artillery supplies, at first making great progress until French counter-attacks pushed back the advancing German infantry.
For the remainder of the month Wilhelm launched repeated attacks against the French reinforcements constantly pouring into the fortress. Of the 330 infantry regiment of the French army, 259 eventually fought at Verdun.
Falkenhayn reluctantly committed another corps of men to an attack up the left bank of the Meuse River towards a small ridge named Le Morte-homme (the 'Dead Man'), a battle that raged continuously without conclusion.
Meanwhile the casualties were mounting rapidly on both sides. The French were certainly losing huge numbers of men, as were their German opposition. By the time the battle ended almost one million casualties had occurred in roughly equal numbers on either side.
April 9 saw the third major German offensive launched. Both sides suffered casualties, by the end of April; the Germans had lost 120,000 men and the French 133,000 men.

As the battle moved through the spring of 1916, Pétain asked Joffre for more and more men but Joffre refused. He wanted the men for the planned attack on the Somme. Pétain was replaced by General Nivelle - a soldier who believed that the most successful strategy was to be on the offensive at all times.
By the summer, France had achieved some form of air supremacy over the Germans but this counted for nothing as the battle on the ground was one of simple attrition as the casualties mounted on both sides.

German gains continued in June, but slowly. On 1st June they attacked the heights along the Me River and finally took Fort Vaux on 7th June. The fort had h the start of the battle in February. On June 23rd they almost reached Belleville heights; within 2.5 miles of Verdun itself – but this attack faltered as the German army had given all that it had and could give no more. Pétain was preparing to evacuate the east bank of the Meuse when the Allies' offensive on the Somme River was launched on 1 July, partly to relieve the French. The Germans could no longer afford to commit new troops to Verdun and, at a cost of some 400,000 French casualties and a similar number of Germans, the attack was called off.
By the end of October 1916 a new French commander of the Verdun forts Charles Mangin (Third Army's General) took the offensive and managed to retake Douaumont on 24 October, followed by Fort Vaux on 2 November. But unfortunately the surrounding land, around the forts was now wasteland.
The battle at Verdun continued to December - ironically after the Somme conflict was considered to have ended. In this month the French captured 11,000 prisoners and with them 115 heavy guns.
The Results and Casualties
French casualties during the battle were estimated at 550,000 with German losses set at 434,000, half of the total being fatalities. The only real effect of the battle was the irrevocable wounding of both armies. No tactical or strategic advantage had been gained by either side.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Battle Of Verdun Research Paper

...The Battle of Verdun was against Germany and France. German Chief of Staff, Falkenhayn came up with the reason for the Battle of Verdun. Crown Prince Wilhelm was assigned the task of surrounding Verdun. Petain was appointed to defended Verdun. He knew there would many French casualties but he knew it could not be avoid. Petain was determined to do maximum damage on Germany’s army in the course of the deaths. Britain go involved to great a diversion to drain German on manpower. Russia helped on the Eastern Front which meant German had to withdraw troops from Verdun to help in the Eastern Front. A new French commander was appointed named General Charles Mangin who started to retake ground that Germany took. When- Wilhelm tried to kill most of the defenders...

Words: 567 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Battle Of Verdun Research Paper

...The Battle of Verdun has been labeled the lengthiest and greatest world in history. The battle was fought on a the Western Front in the city of Verdun during WWI from February 21 to December 18 of 1916 between the German and French armies. In February 1916, the French military strength was half of the assailant. The Battle of Verdun commenced on the morning of February 21, 1916, with an artillery bombardment by Germany that lasted 10 hours, firing around one million shells by 1,400 cannons packed along the eight-mile front. Under the command of Crown Prince Wilhelm, the German heavy guns led to the destruction of French trench systems, which forced French soldiers to fight in small groups with no tactical links. The attack drew French troops...

Words: 300 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Trench Warfare: The Battle Of Verdun

...The main idea is Trench Warfare. The author is trying to teach us about what techniques were used. The intended audience is high school students. He empahsizes how they were made. The author assumes that the sudience knows what trench warfare is. There are no omissions or bias. The main idea is The Battle of Verdun. The author is trying to teach us what happened during the Battle of Verdun. The author is writing for people interested in learning more about the battle. The author emphasizes the casualties that happened. The author assumes that the audience knows why the battle occured. There are no omissions. There is no bias. The main idea of this source is the Treaty of Versailles. The author is trying to teach the audience about what the...

Words: 253 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Carl Sandburg – Grass

...Waterloo are is that it has to be some sort of battle site since he mentions the pile the bodies. Austerlitz is a battle site that Napoleon Bonaparte was involved in which he basically defeated the Russian and Austrian troops, which historians might say it was one of Napoleon’s greatest victories of his time. Ironically, Waterloo was Napoleon’s last battle as commander of the French which was defeated by Duke of Wellington of England and Gebhard von Blucher of Prussia. In all those places that Carl named, many people lost their life which was an important point Carl is trying to get across. He then mentions Gettysburg, Ypres and Verdun which are also major battle sites that happened in history. Gettysburg was a civil war here in the United States in which it has become a major historic site, as you might know Civil wars cause many casualties and I am guessing that the count of dead bodies is well over the 500,000 mark. Ypres and Verdun are two historic sites in World War where thousands and thousands troops died. Ypres is not a big facility in which the two enemies are trying to take over and the one who takes control might determine who could win the war. With that basically said, Delgado 2 both sides send as many troops as possible which equals a huge casualty count. An estimated 1,000,000 soldiers where dead from both sides from what I remember. Verdun is not far in casualties; Verdun is considered one of the greatest battles ever. If a war site earns a name like...

Words: 497 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Significan Events of World War 1

...WW1 Significant events Many battles were fought in World War 1 and many lessons were learnt. Whether it is the advancements of technology or the new war tactics. Three of these kind of events stand out: the Gallipoli campaign in 1915, which is important as its failure influenced many countries who participated in the battles. The battle of Verdun which was the longest battle in WW1. And finally the US entering the war which, although happened towards the end of the war, influenced the battles and the decision making around the war. After the examination of these events, the most influential event of WW1 will be established and further proved to be the significant turning point in WW1. The first turning point in World War 1 is the British Campaign at Gallipoli in 1915. This campaign was important because it improved the morale of the British public, it allowed grain to more easily flow to Russia, and it kept Russia in the war, which was needed in order for the Allies to win. On November 25th 1914, Winston Churchill suggested his plan for a new war front in the Dardanelles to the British government’s War Council. On January 15th 1915, the War Council gave its agreement and British troops in Egypt were put on alert. The Central Powers were fighting primarily on two fronts – the Western and Eastern Fronts. Creating another front would force the Germans to split their army still further as they would need to support the badly rated Turkish army. When the Germans went to assist...

Words: 1817 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Explain Germany's Response To Russia

...French border. Germany then invades Belgium to attack France. Britain declares war on Germany: Britain protests the violation of Belgium's neutrality, and is guaranteed by a treaty. The German Chancellor says that the treaty is just a scrap of paper, and the United Kingdom declares war on Germany. Battle of Tannenberg: The Battle of Tannenberg was a right between Russia and Germany in the year 1914, and resulted in the suicide of Russian commanding General, Alexander Samsonov, and a German victory....

Words: 517 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Source E And F Source Analysis

...Sources E and F would be significantly useful for a historian studying attempts to break the stalemate on the Western front, as they can provide different mediums, visual shots and a quote by someone with a notable authoritarian role in World War 1, and different perspectives. Source E, a photo depicting the road into Verdun and the French army, has a lack of knowledge when it comes to perspective, as the photographer was unknown, however it may have been from a French perspective, meaning that it would not be very useful for a historian studying the attempt to break the stalemate on the western front in this sense, as it is difficult to differentiate the view or perspective of the photo and understand the context behind it. Source E has a high sense of reliability, despite having a low level of perspective and context, due to the lack of author. This can be seen in the time that it was taken, 1916, as it was in the middle of the attempt to break the stalemate on the western front, making it relevant. It is also reliable as whoever the photographer was, they were of a close proximity to the event, as they were there to take the photo, which would be linked to a position of high authority, however it also creates a sense of bias, as it could have been created as propaganda and appealed to an intended audience of Germany, or the allied forces, lowering the level of reliability....

Words: 520 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Battle of the Somme

...Keegan- History Short term Significance of the Battle of the Somme The Battle of the Somme was a war planned late in 1915 as a joint French-British attack. The French Commander in Chief, Joffre, conceived the idea as a battle of attrition, the aim being to drain the German forces of reserves, although territorial gain was a secondary aim. However, the German attack Verdun made the Somme offensive even more pressing because the French army was under severe pressure there. The battle of the Somme was fought from the 1st July 1916 until later in same year where on November the 16th it was brought to an end. The massive amount of casualties in this time, as well how the war was fought Is what has made the battle so historic. For example, It’s best known for the mass amounts of soldiers who died and more specifically how they died In such a short space of time and why. The style of warfare was different and more brutal than ever before, for example better technology and large scale operations which seen over 1.7 million shells were fired at the German’s alone and made the war a huge test for the countries involved who relied heavily on individual decisions, as well as man power. The first day of the Somme (1s July 1916) proved to be massively significant due to the sheer numbers of soldiers lost. Up to 60 000 British soldiers became casualties thanks to enemy fire (one third of the British military) British hopes were high going in to battle for the first time. Indeed, the poster campaign...

Words: 1703 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Long Term Causes of Wwi

...World Civilization II Long Term Causes of the First World War        The First World War was a major battle, a great war that the world had never seen before. It was a time in which lives were lost, economies devastated and politics turned upside down; but what were the causes? There wasn’t just one simple immediate cause of the war, but several long term causes. The roots of the war included mutual defence allies and imperialism, and it was these factors that led to a destructive and fierce war.        Long before the war began; countries within the continent of Europe had decided to protect themselves and therefore, signed mutual defence agreements (Kelly). These agreements not only meant that they were protected, but also that they would have to protect their allies if they were attacked. Many of these alliance agreements had been made and signed between 1879 and 1914. For example in 1879, Germany and Austria-Hungary had signed a Dual Alliance to protect them from Russia and in 1881; Austria-Hungary became an ally of Serbia, so that they could protect Serbia from Russia trying to gain control (historyonthenet.com). Other alliances included France and Russia; Britain, France and Belgium, and finally Japan and Britain. In this case it was inevitable that there would be a world war and it all began with Austria-Hungary announcing a war on Serbia. Of course Russia jumped to protect them, which led to the Germans starting a war with Russia and then France and because Germany...

Words: 1281 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Battle Of Somme Analysis

...history books, The Battle of Somme is considered a turning point that eventually brought about the end of The Great War, the First World War. It came at a staggeringly high cost to both sides. In terms of casualties, it was the single bloodiest battle during the war, lasting over a period of 4 months. Overconfidence in the precursor artillery bombardment to lighten the German defenses before the main offensive, and poor execution of fires, ratcheted up the number of casualties the British would sustain before the Somme Offensive came to a conclusion several months later. This paper examines the pre battle preparations, the battle itself, and the aftermath of the battle, with a particular focus on the artillery’s role and effectiveness...

Words: 1572 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

His335

...When most people are asked what they think of when they visualize a battlefield on the Western Front during World War 1, they’ll usually talk to you of the static trench-warfare, or the several-year long stalemate, which resulted in millions of casualties for mere miles of ground. What few actually know, though, is that at least initially, the Western Front was a mobile war. It wasn’t until late October and mid-November of 1914, that the German and Allied armies developed their notorious defensive trench systems, for which the war would immortalize. The reasons for the development of trench-warfare were due both to the massive casualties sustained in frontal assaults, and the relative inability to counter such modern inventions as the machine-gun and improved rifled artillery. To have a better understanding of how and why the Western front devolved into the trench-dwelling war of attrition that it’s become famous for, we must first explore the tactics used in the years previous, and in the first few months of the First World War. The leading military leaders of the Allied and Central powers in the years prior to 1914, and even years afterward, were heavily influenced by the tactical genius of the early 19th century General, Napoleon. They believed that if war were to come to Europe again, though it would be a costly affair, it would be won through flanking maneuvers and supported and screened by horse-cavalry, as had been the case in the Napoleonic Wars and the later Franco-Prussian...

Words: 1704 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Why Was The Somme Important In History

...During July 1st and November 18th in 1916, one of the bloodiest battles in history was carried out along the Somme Valley in France concerning the British, French and the Germans. This particular battle compromised the main Allied attack on the Western Front and is famously known as the Battle of Somme. The Battle of Somme or the Somme Offensive is a significant battle in history as it was one of the largest battles ever fought in World War 1. As a result, the British troops lost one third of their soldiers on the first day which currently still holds a single-day record. In 1915, the battle was planned to be a joint French-British attack against the German Empire to weaken the German forces simultaneously on the Eastern and Western Fronts....

Words: 365 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

World War One

...Introduction The First World War went down in history as one of the worst wars ever to be fought, owing to the magnitude of destruction and loss of life it left in its wake. The war started in 1914 ending in 1919, and has been described variously as the Great War, the War of Nations and the War to End All Wars. (Dwight E, 1966) It was fought by many nations around the world, with Europeans being the main players, and is very significant for the way it shaped the continents years after it ended. Many explanations for the possible causes of the war have been given, some of which have been accepted while others have been disputed. The war was fought in a series of battles fought at different locations at different times and involved over 65million men. This paper discusses the genesis, chronology of events during the war, the main players, the casualties and the implication of the war on modern history. The Genesis, Main Players, Events, Casualties and Implications First of all, it is thought that competition among the major European powers was an ingredient in fuelling the war. This was so especially between Britain and Germany, who were competing to have the most powerful navy in the world. All parties were building up large armies and navies, and from this there emerged a professional and powerful class of military officers. At one point, Germany had a well trained, large army that could match the entire army of Great Britain. This led to emergence of tension in Europe, which...

Words: 1721 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Paper

...Stephen Kosaka Professor Jacob Jones HIST 157, Term 2 3 December 2006 WWI: The Battle of Meuse-Argonne World War 1 had begun in 1914, in response to an assassination of the Archduke Francis Ferdinand who was the heir to the throne of Austria. He was assassinated by a Serbian terrorist that triggered the countries of Austria, France, Germany, Russia, and Serbia to declare war between each other. France was soon invaded by the Germans who were trying to capture the city of Paris, and eventually were pushed back by the resilient forces of the French Armies. With the fierce fighting between the two countries and numerous other battles that has taken place, the United States eventually entered the war in 1917 due to the “Zimmerman note” and several sinking of U.S. cargo ships. Was the battle of the Meuse-Argonne necessary for the stability of the European nation? What was the American’s role in accomplishing peace in the region? The American allies, both the French and British, presumed that the U.S. was not able to muster, train, and equip a large force to effectively fight the enemy. The French’s plan was to try and bolster their sagging morale from all the fighting that they requested an American Division be sent to show their support in the war. The French offered to help train but were cautious because they wanted the Americans to eventually have their own army. The British on the other hand wanted the Americans to be trained, equipped and integrated with the British...

Words: 1963 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

World War 1 Summary

...French soldiers got a quick win and that messed up German plans. February-December 1916 at the Battle of Verdun about 1 million troops died. The Russians invaded German soil at East Prussia and Poland but Austria and German soldiers stopped the invasion at the Battle of Tannenburg. Although Germans won the Battle of Tannenburg Russia moved Germany to Eastern Fronts. That resulted in Russia winning the First Battle of Marne. Germans believed that would use the Schlieffen Plan to win quickly but France and its allies made it a long battle. In two years Russians produced and organized a lot of offenses at the Eastern Fronts of WW1. At that time it was extremely difficult for Russian troops to get through Germany’s defense. Russian’s were already dealing with a lot with WW1 then came the Russian Revolution. The Russian Revolution was when a new form of government was installed. The leader of this process was Vladimir Lenin. Soon after the Russian Revolution Lenin stopped Russian from being or helping in World War 1. Europe’s allies tried to win a battle against the Ottoman Empire but ended up starting problems with the central...

Words: 597 - Pages: 3