Premium Essay

Bigtime Toymaker

In:

Submitted By seymourjunior
Words 680
Pages 3
Kudler Fine Foods | To: | Kathy Kudler, CEO | From: | | Date: | June 10, 2013 | Re: | Ratio Analysis Memo |

Kudler Fine Foods have traveled across the world to bring people upscale foods and wines carrying a wide variety of products that is affordable to all. In order to meet the organization business demands sales, company’s goods, and depreciation are must guarantee maintain stability. Kudler Fine Foods has programs in three stores in Southern California selling the best merchandise and discounts regarding cooking and wine classes to measure the balance sheet, income statement, using horizontal and vertical analysis revealing profits, solvency, and liquidity to show how well the company has progressed over the years. Kathy, analyzing the company’s financial performance is an important tool. You will find the following data useful for understanding how well the company has been performing. Different users such as investors, management, bankers, and creditors will appreciate the knowledge of the financial situation of Kudler Fine Foods in the past year when making their decision to use the services and products. The liquidity ratio reveals current ratio (16:94:1), acid-test ratio (13:03:1), receivable turnover (no receivables), and inventory turnover (19.8 times). It is vital that Kudler Fine Foods has maintained obligations increasing acid-test ratio experiencing top line growth. Faster inventory turnover proved good sales and measures the level of cash flows. Kudler generated 4.21 (asset turnover), 0.06 (profit margin), .26 (return assets), and 0.5 (return common stock). Kudler Fine Foods have many possibilities having to borrow from savings or

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Bigtime Toymaker Law/421

...Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker LAW/421 Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker In this scenario, Big Time Toymaker had entered into an option contract with Chou whereby they paid him $25,000 for exclusive negotiation rights for distribution of his strategy game for 90 days. This negotiation agreement stated that no contract existed unless it was in writing. Three days before the 90-day period was over, BTT and Chou reached a verbal agreement at a meeting. Chou was to draft the agreement, but a BTT manager sent an e-mail to him entitled “Strat Deal” that included all aspects of the agreed-upon contract. Chou believed this e-mail was to negate his drafting of the contract. A month passed before Chou was asked by BTT to fax a draft of the contract, which he immediately did. Several more months passed before BTT contacted him again to revoke the contract. This paper will attempt to point out why Chou has a case against BTT for contract enforcement. This type of contract is governed by state statutory law based on the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), Article 2, as it is a contract for the sale of goods. Generally, the contract would be considered unenforceable as it was stipulated by both parties in the original negotiation agreement that no contract existed unless it were in written form. The manager of BTT made a unilateral mistake according to the Doctrine of Mistake. He sent an e-mail outlining the terms of the contract and though it did not specifically contain the word “contract”...

Words: 1358 - Pages: 6