Currently, the topic of birth control and other forms of contraception used by women is a hot topic among the common people and politicians alike. Its use and coverage for women by insurance and employers has been an immensely controversial point of interest for many people. More than 99% of women aged 15–44 who have ever had sexual intercourse have used at least one contraceptive method, making it something that affects almost all women ("Contraceptive Use in the United States"). Like with any tendentious issue, there are two, or sometimes even more, opposing sides all fighting for their opinion to be the one that wins; however, most people choose the side that birth control and contraceptives should not be covered by employers and insurance companies simply because they are greatly misinformed on the subject. Due to the many beneficial effects that they offer their users, all forms of contraceptives should be covered by all employers and insurance companies. One of the most recent issues involving employers denying their female employees the coverage of contraceptives is the case of Burwell vs. Hobby Lobby. The Affordable Care Act requires that employer health plans include coverage for preventive services and the federal government has issued regulations defining contraceptive care as one of the services that must be covered. The plaintiffs in these consolidated cases are two for-profit business corporations that sought, and were awarded, an exemption from that general rule under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act ("Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores & Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. Burwell") . However, this decision made by the Supreme Court is completely ludicrous and unlawful. The five male justices who sided with Hobby Lobby essentially said that a boss’s opinion about birth control overrides a woman’s personal choices, and women are incapable of