...growing popularity and strength of the Bolsheviks as they played on these mistakes. With the Bolshevik under the leadership of Lenin, they managed to create the October Revolution. Figures like Leon Trotsky and the weaknesses of Kerensky were both significant factors that led to the Bolshevik Revolution. Lenin’s role in the revolution was vital but he would have not taken power were it not for the failures of the Provisional Government, which was the most crucial factor that caused the revolution and led the Bolsheviks to power. Word count: 104 One of the key element to the success of the Bolshevik revolution was Lenin’s orating and leadership skills, personality and his determination to take power. Lenin’s April theses where he spoke of ‘Peace, Bread and Land’ increased the popularity of the Bolshevik as it reached out to the peasants who made up most of the population. The April theses was effective because it highlighted the feelings and aspiration of the workers and soldiers. The Bolsheviks pacifist stance from the very start of the war and Lenins’ promise of ‘peace’ proved a popular idea and this gained them thousands of followers. With inflation causing prices, of the food that was available, to increase Lenin’s offer of food was an immense attraction. Lenin realised the importance of the peasants for support so he promised them land to get their support. The April theses offered what the Provisional Government would not and so the Bolsheviks gained supporters, which is why the...
Words: 2082 - Pages: 9
...North that Russia had gained since 1618…all told 1.3 mill km2, 26% of her people and 75% of her iron and capacity…needless to say Lenin had hard time “selling” the Treaty - the October coup d’état = “beginning of the Revolution” not end….Bolsheviks in the provinces + the centre had to be decide how to handle local Soviets which asserted authority but happened to be dominated by Mensheviks. - long difficult struggles against anarchy, decentralization + separatist tendencies lay ahead – the future form of gov’t = an “open question” - for Lenin, “Dictatorship of proletariat” was what the revolution needed…now this was a slogan and principle that fit into the circumstances of the winter 1917–1918…but, what did it mean?...it meant: a) crushing counter revolution of the old ruling class – the dictatorship would have to have coercive organs like Tsarist police (i.e. the Bolsheviks would assemble the Cheka) b) that the dictatorship of Bolshevik Party and other political parties was incompatible…and would pose problems c) that giving broad powers to unions + factory committees could in itself be problematic… what if worker ideas differed from Bolsheviks? Problems for the Bolsheviks 1) one underlying problem came in that the Bolsheviks considered themselves to be a part of an international proletarian revolution….and they hoped their success in Russia could helped spark similar success in Germany for example…indeed, many believed they couldn’t survive without them. 2) another...
Words: 3349 - Pages: 14
...The Bolshevik Revolution At the turn of the 20th century, Russia was a vast empire. The country spanned across the entire northern half of Asia, from the Pacific coast in the east, and into Western Europe. Tsar Nicholas II ruled the country as it had been ruled by his family for centuries before. The strict feudal traditions were upheld with brutality; Tsarist policies prolonged the agony of the lower classes and supported the opulence of the royal family. In the early 1900s, the poor social and economic conditions coincided with the spread and increased study of Karl Marx’s communist philosophy. The Russian people, determined to establish a new government, initiated a chain of events that climaxed with the Bolshevik Revolution in October 1917. The Bolshevik Revolution transformed Eastern Europe and Asia and had a significant impact on the entire world throughout the twentieth century. The fallout of the Bolshevik Revolution still impacts Russia and the rest of the world today. There was no singular cause or event that sparked the Bolsheviks to take to arms in 1917, instead the action resulted from the culmination of a history of social, political, and economic issues. Prior to the Bolsheviks’ rise to power in October 1917, there were two Revolutions that set the stage for the Soviet takeover. The First was the revolution of 1905. This revolution resulted in Russia transitioning from a strict feudal system to a constitutional monarchy; the power of the Tsar was limited...
Words: 3331 - Pages: 14
...Why were the Bolsheviks able to seize power in 1917 and how did they consolidate their rule? The Bolsheviks mainly gained their power by using force and violence. During 1971 the Bolsheviks were quickly gaining popularity among the Russian people, they took control by attacking the unpopular, weak Provisional Government’s meeting place in the Winter Palace and then declared a new workers government, this was just one of the factors that led to the Bolsheviks success. A rise in popularity definitely led to the success of the Bolsheviks. One of the reasons why the Bolsheviks popularity was increasing was because they promised the people of Russia the things that they wanted most of all, which was to provide food for all families, end the war to reduce Russian deaths and bring in land reform in the countryside. This was all very well advertised with the slogan ‘Peace! Bread! Land!’ created by Lenin. It appealed to all people, the soldiers who were tired of war, to the hungry workers in the town and to the poverty-stricken peasants. The Germans financed the Bolsheviks because they knew that Lenin wanted to take Russia out of the war, this gave them the money to mount their publicity campaigns. In September 1917, the army commander in chief, general Kornilov, attempted to move troops back from the front to Petrograd in order to destroy the soviets and arrest leading Bolsheviks. Kerensky was afraid that Kornilov might be planning to take power for himself so he decided...
Words: 527 - Pages: 3
...The collapse of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and the disintegration of the USSR is undoubtedly the most significant development in world politics since the Second World War. In immediate terms, it has provoked widespread ideological confusion and demoralisation within the international workers' movement, and on the other side, gloating by the capitalist rulers and their apologists. The latter have used this event to step up their efforts to discredit socialism by identifying it with the bureaucratic dictatorship that has ruled over the Soviet Union since Stalin's rise to power in the 1920s. This, of course, is not something new. The capitalist rulers in the West have always argued that the totalitarian regime created by Stalin and maintained by his heirs was the inevitable consequence of the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917. The capitalists were greatly assisted in this task by the Stalinists' claim to represent the tradition of Marx and Lenin. The capitalists cynically accepted the Stalinists' description of their hideous police regimes as representing "socialism" in order to prejudice the workers of the West against socialism by identifying it with the denial of democratic freedoms, and to promote the idea that bourgeois parliamentary democracy is the highest embodiment of human freedom. While this bourgeois propaganda campaign certainly succeeded in discrediting Marxism and Leninism among large sections of working people in the imperialist democracies during...
Words: 657 - Pages: 3
...1914, Germany had been fighting a two-front war. The eastern front was the war between Germany and Russia. By 1917, Tsar Nicholas II was in personal command of the army, since all his officers had deserted him. Russia’s involvement in World War I result in many causalities. Russia suffered heavy losses against Germany, offset partially by consistent victories against Austria-Hungary. The defeats on the battlefield led to growing dissatisfaction with the war. The people began to feel hostility towards the ineffectual Tsar Nicholas II. The dissatisfaction of the war and imperial regime helped to strengthen the cause of the Bolsheviks, a radical socialist group that was working oppose the tsar and begin a socialist revolution. The Bolsheviks advocated the overthrowing of the Romanov Dynasty and the establishment of a Marxist government...
Words: 1238 - Pages: 5
...being involved in wars such as the Bolshevik Revolution (History.com Staff). Russia was disunified and looked into the idea of Communism after past wars (The Bolshevik Revolution). Russia rose to Communism because of past Russian warfare, an immense backlash of laborers, and its unstable society. Past Russian warfare hurt the country economically and politically. The Bolshevik Revolution was initiated from a revolt against the Tsar Nicholas II government (The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica). Tsar Nicholas II sent 11 million peasants...
Words: 957 - Pages: 4
...for the Bolsheviks’ success in the revolution of October 1917? (20 Mark) It is accurate to say that Lenin’s leadership was one of the most important reasons for the Bolsheviks’ success in the revolution of October 1917, due to Lenin taking control over the Bolsheviks and beginning to make preparations for seizing power. The whole idea of the revolution only came about because of Lenin returning to the Bolsheviks. However, it cannot be ignored that there were other factors that contributed to the success of the October revolution such as the failings of the Bolsheviks political opponents. Lenin contributed to the Bolsheviks’ success in October 1917 mainly in three different ways. The first contribution Lenin had made in the success of the October Revolution was on the return from exile in April 1917 where he persuaded and took control over the Bolshevik party and made them adopt the idea of seizing power. This was a difficult task as many of the members of the Bolshevik party shared the Menshevik view which predicted that the overthrow of capitalism was far off. Lenin had to work hard to persuade the Bolshevik party to understand his interpretation. Lenin’s success was largely based on his force of personality, but it also owed something to the support he received from new entrants in the Bolshevik party. Secondly, Lenin raised the Bolsheviks’ political profile as he recognised that the Bolsheviks were too weak to mount a serious challenge for power. The Bolsheviks had around...
Words: 988 - Pages: 4
...History Unit 2 Test 5. Hitler and the National Socialist Party gained power because of Germany’s economic depression and the people’s lack of faith in the Weimar Republic. Germany was a country where millions of people did not have jobs and the country was still being suppressed from the effects of World War 1. When the German referendum took place and ultimately failed in 1929, the party gained more publicity through propaganda. Hitler’s rise to become a chancellor was due to Hitler’s supporters demanding Hindenburg give Hitler power due to the inevitable anarchy. The downfall of the communist party was Hitler’s true rise to absolute power and took place due to the burning of the Reichstag. It was blamed on the communist party and in 1934,...
Words: 755 - Pages: 4
...Lenin’s leadership was the main reason for why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power in 1917. Lenin was a very significant figure during the Russian revolution, under his strong leadership and the advice of some of his advisors, Lenin helped the Bolsheviks come to power. However I would not agree that his leadership was the main reason to why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power as factors such as the weakness of the provisional government, the home front and most importantly Trotsky role all played a significant role to why the Bolsheviks were successful. Lenin’s leadership played a significant role to why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power in 1917 due to his clear and persuading aims. Lenin was an influential figure in the eyes of the proletariat. Due to the April thesis clear aims resulted in that he was able to gain greater support and he succeeded in having 200,000 members. The vast amount of members meant that the Bolsheviks had greater support when it came to seizing power. The main aims of the April theses were, Peace, Land and Bread and power to the soviets. Many supported the idea of Peace, Land and bread as they were fed up with the affect the war was having on them and wanted to bring it to an end, people were also starving due to the war and therefore welcomed the idea of Peace, Land and bread. Lenin also promised the confiscation of landed estates from landowners and the aristocracy. The slogan all power to the soviets played on the feelings of the proletariat...
Words: 1325 - Pages: 6
...Why were stalin’s opponents unable to prevent him from becoming the leader of the USSR by 1929? For five years following the death of Lenin, a power struggle took place in the USSR. The struggle was not just abut which person should become leader, it was also about the policies that party should follow and keeping some people out of power. Joseph Stalin emerged in 1929 as the victor of this struggle with the due to his ability to manipulate the party machine, his devious tactics to undermine his opponents and his popular policies and ideologies which appealed to the average Bolshevik member which made it nearly unpreventable for his opponents to stop him. Due to Stalins ability to manipulate the party machine,. Stalin used his position as general secretary, a job that few wanted due to seeming lack of importance with this job however, Stalin was able to increase his hold over the Bolshevik Party. In the 12th Congress, 1923, Stalin by using his position as General Secretary was able to influence who attended the Party Congress leading to a 30% of the members there being under Stalin’s influence. This was very significant because for someone who aimed to lead and control the party and government needed to have the support of majority in Congress and Politburo. Furthermore Stalin also increased his power of the government by being head of the Central Control Commission. Through this job Stalin was able to discipline any supporters of his rivals: For example, in the 15th Congress...
Words: 1001 - Pages: 5
...The October Revolution The Great October Socialist Revolution, known more commonly as the October Revolution or the Bolshevik Revolution, occurred in 1917 in Russia, and the revolt resulted in a leftist government coming to power. The uprising started in the then-capital city of St. Petrograd, now St. Petersburg, and spread nationwide. Headed by Vladimir Lenin of the Bolshevik party, the October Revolution was the first communist rebellion of the 20th century and was founded on the beliefs of Karl Marx. The events of the October Revolution helped lay the groundwork for Stalinism and the Cold War. The Stage Is Set The Bolshevik Revolution in Russia in 1917 was initiated by millions of people who would change the history of the world as we know it. When Czar Nicholas II dragged 11 million peasants into World War I, the Russian people became discouraged with their injuries and the loss of life they sustained. The country of Russia was in ruins, ripe for revolution. Provisional Government Established During a mass demonstration of women workers in February of 1917, the czar's officials called out the army to squelch the protesters. The women convinced the soldiers to put their guns away and help them in their cause. Czar Nicholas II was dethroned in Russia during this, the "February Revolution." The Provisional Government was formed to replace the void left by the deposed czar. This provisional government was made up of bankers, lawyers, industrialists, and capitalists. The...
Words: 1320 - Pages: 6
...fundamental differences between how each country wished to rule/provide is the foundation of this conflict. I think that it was a mixture of the Russian Revolution, the ongoing “war” between the Bolsheviks and Germany which opened the doors to the communist form of government that Russia adopted following the Bolshevik revolution of 1917, and the economic conditions of the years following World War I that planted the seeds for the Cold War. I believe that the collapse of Russia had the largest impact on World War I and lead to the animosity that sparked World War II and the Cold War as well. The first incident took place in March 1917 when the Russian government was originally overthrown and fell into the hands of “members of the Duma, who formed a provisional government composed chiefly of Constitutional Democrats with Western sympathies”...
Words: 696 - Pages: 3
...The peace process went wrong in several aspects, The League Of Nations contributing most to the problem. By having so much outside influence in the newly formed and developing countries led to deplorable conditions, economic depression, and a rise in European Nationalism. The Versailles Treaty failed by placing too much blame on certain countries, causing them to feel guilt and embarassment, adding to the fact that there was a War Guilt clause in the Treaty itself. Germany especially felt the pressure of this, both by being delt the majority of the blame, and by being handed the majority of the financial liability, si ce they were the only coubtry to emerge from the conflict with an intact financial system. This lead to growing resentments, growing distrust, and led rise to nazism in Germany. According to Heinrich von Treitschke, what factors produced the idea of the greatness of war? What role did rising militarism play especially in Germany in bringing on World War I? How did radicals like the German Social Democrat Karl Liebknecht react to such glorification of war and militarism?...
Words: 951 - Pages: 4
...wanted their allies to adopt an economic system that they thought was superior to the other in terms of capitalism and socialism. The Bolshevik party which was made up of revolutionary leaders where Lenin came to amass the political clout which he enjoyed through his rule was the ruling party that gained victory after the revolution. However before the Bolshevik party came to be a part of the...
Words: 843 - Pages: 4