Free Essay

Russia

In:

Submitted By Joseph123456
Words 2082
Pages 9
The Provisional Government was reluctant to act effectively of the problems of Russia in 1917, allowing the growing popularity and strength of the Bolsheviks as they played on these mistakes. With the Bolshevik under the leadership of Lenin, they managed to create the October Revolution. Figures like Leon Trotsky and the weaknesses of Kerensky were both significant factors that led to the Bolshevik Revolution. Lenin’s role in the revolution was vital but he would have not taken power were it not for the failures of the Provisional Government, which was the most crucial factor that caused the revolution and led the Bolsheviks to power.
Word count: 104
One of the key element to the success of the Bolshevik revolution was Lenin’s orating and leadership skills, personality and his determination to take power. Lenin’s April theses where he spoke of ‘Peace, Bread and Land’ increased the popularity of the Bolshevik as it reached out to the peasants who made up most of the population. The April theses was effective because it highlighted the feelings and aspiration of the workers and soldiers. The Bolsheviks pacifist stance from the very start of the war and Lenins’ promise of ‘peace’ proved a popular idea and this gained them thousands of followers. With inflation causing prices, of the food that was available, to increase Lenin’s offer of food was an immense attraction. Lenin realised the importance of the peasants for support so he promised them land to get their support. The April theses offered what the Provisional Government would not and so the Bolsheviks gained supporters, which is why the April theses was effective. His April theses was also popular with influential figures such as Trotsky who said “nothing can separate me from his April theses”. His political beliefs gained support from people of Petrograd but most importantly gained support from soldiers and the Kronstadt sailors who latter become an essential factor of the Bolsheviks rise to power. In 1917, Lenin persuaded his Bolshevik supporters that revolution should happen now, his firmness to start the revolution in October was his greatest accomplishment with some saying he was “the greatest figure of the Russian revolution”. Lenin ensured that his party was a united and dedicating fighting force by using their hate for the Provisional Government to fuel them. He also called revolutionary groups not to collaborate with the Provisional Government and demanded “All power to the Soviets”. Unlike other groups like the Mensheviks who supported the war Lenin kept his party purely anti-war which further increased the already popular Bolshevik party. His, Treat of Brest-Litovsk, peace agreement with Germany, in which he had a leading role, to safeguard the survival of Russia satisfied the people while in turn influenced them to believe in him. With these leadership abilities Lenin was “well-equipped” in leading the Bolshevik to power in 1917. Lenin was so important for the Bolsheviks that Arthur Ransome goes as far as saying that without Lenin the Bolshevik party would have “not existed” and if we look at how Lenin was still writing revolutionary newspaper and the main person pulling all the strings in the Bolshevik party while at exile it clearly shows his dedication. However, Lenin was absent for the most part of 1917 and only returned to Russia after the February Revolution. His April theses and ideas were “the ravings of a madman” as one said and was opposed by some members of the Bolshevik Central Committee. Some wanted Trotsky as the leader due to him being involved since the very start unlike Lenin which shows Lenin did not have the full support of the Bolsheviks or the Russian people. When Lenin arrived in Petrograd, Chkheidze who was the chairman of the Soviet, told him “they did not need him” which shows how insignificant Lenin was in reality. The July Days were blamed on the Bolsheviks and the Bolsheviks only became a real threat due to the failure of a young Kerensky with the Kornilov affair with Orlando Figes, a historian, calling Kerensky “foolish”. The Bolshevik seized on the mistake made by the Provisional Government who had a lack of understanding of the event which eventually led to the Kerensky blunder. The failure of Kerensky to deal with this affair consequently left the Bolshevik armed. Which goes to shows how lucky the Bolshevik was to have such a “foolish” and “inexperienced man” protecting the Provisional Government as without Kerensky the Bolshevik would most likely not have come to power the way they did. Also, the role that Trotsky played in co-ordinating the October revolution in 1917 with the sailor cannot be forgotten as without Trotsky the October revolution would have failed. Therefore, Lenins’ role was more of a reactionary factor and thus was not the most important reason why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power in October 1917.
Word count: 699

Kerensky played a huge role in the Bolsheviks gaining power as he was making mistakes that gave opportunities for the Bolshevik to exploit him. His unwise military decisions strengthened the Bolsheviks into putting them into a situation where they could act against the Provisional Government. This gave Lenin the opportunity to exploit him and in return gain more supporters. This was made worse by the fact Kerensky was ambiguous in which side to pick with him supporting both the right and left in the political spectrum. Kerensky wanted Russia to continue the war and launched a new offensive against Germany in June which resulted in an extra 40,000 soldiers dying adding to the death toll, this didn’t sit well with many people especially the Bolsheviks. Kerensky’s decision to appoint General Kornilov was a “fatal blunder” as this spectacularly backfired when Kornilov sent troops to seize power of the government. The Kornilov affair left him humiliated. Officers would not fight for him or the Provisional government because they felt he had betrayed Kornilov and might betray them. Kerensky unthoughtfully armed and allowed the Bolsheviks to set a defence force. They came out of this as heroes for stopping Kornilovs’ troops; they had saved the Provisional Government thus acquiring “great support all over the country” which was very significant. Kerensky then tried to close Bolshevik newspapers and limit the control and this was exploited giving the Bolsheviks an excuse for action against the Provisional Government and blamed Kerensky of attacking the Bolsheviks. This led to very little or “no supporters” for the Provisional Government and Kerensky, with the latter being “powerless” to stop the Bolsheviks and eventually fleeing. The poor leadership of Kerensky had not only deteriorated the popularity of the Provisional Government but it helped the Bolsheviks gain “great support all over the country” enabling them to seize power and “remove an unpopular government”, under Lenins’ leadership. “Kerensky had been weakened by the double failure of military and diplomatic” support thus enabling the Bolsheviks to authority. However, although Kerensky’s failures catalysed the rise of the Bolsheviks some people such as Alfred Knox believed that “the Provisional Government could not have existed in Petrograd if it were not for Kerensky” in the first place. Furthermore, the fact that Kerensky was a member of both the Provisional Government and Petrograd Soviet meant he was the line of communication between the two showing his popularity with both the Soviets and Provisional Government. Nevertheless, Lenin was instrumental in uniting and leading the Bolshevik into power due to the incompetence of the Provisional Government. Without the “military genius” Trotsky, then the Bolshevik would have failed to stage a coherent October Revolution in the first place. But the success of the Bolshevik comes back to the weakness and uselessness of the Provisional Government to deal with the coalition facing Russia which is why the failure of the Provisional Government was the biggest reason why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power.
Word count: 494

The Provisional Government was the main factor in the rise of Lenin and his Bolshevik party. The Government was a coalition between the Liberals, Mensheviks and Social Revolutionaries. Divisions between socialists and liberals led to a lack of clear policies as the two groups often blocked each other. Thus, there was no unity unlike the Bolsheviks who were united. The illegitimacy and internal discord in the Provisional Government painted a picture that the “government was weak” to rule Russia. The Provisional Government saw itself as a temporary body, which meant either big issues were unresolved or they passed “ineffective reforms” and both caused friction with the Russian people especially the peasants. The government did not resolve the land issue with the peasants, allowing Lenin to take advantage and reach out to the peasants which boosted the popularity of the Bolsheviks. The Provisional Government believed that “the war should be brought to a victorious conclusion whatever the cost” which was detrimental as this crippled the economy and caused high inflations and this decision was against developed consensus to end the war. This resulted in the Provisional Government, as historian Christopher Lazarski says of “losing power” and being “doomed”. Soldiers, who were mostly made up peasants, did not want to continue with the war as casualties were high and millions were dead. The promise of only fighting a “defensive war” was contradictory and damaged the integrity of the Provisional Government and all the other parties that agreed with this. This left the Bolsheviks, who were “anti-war”, as the only party opposed to the war which increased their support. This increased the membership of the Bolshevik party was 390,000 and also other factors played into this such as Lenins return which was crucial for their popularity. Clearly, without the Provisional Government making these mistakes then Lenin would have not been able to gain support from the people. The mistakes were capitalised by the Bolsheviks by promising to improve the lives of the Russian people which increased the popularity. Thus, the Provisional Government is the most significant factor that led to the Bolsheviks rise to power in 1917 not the leadership of Lenin.
Word count: 359

In conclusion there were many factors that led the Bolsheviks seizing power in 1917. One of the factors that led to this was the leadership of Lenin. Lenin was able to unify the Bolsheviks and use popular slogans such as “Peace, Bread and Land” to gain massive support from the peasants, who made up the majority of the populations. Lenins’ compatriot Trotsky was also another factor as he co-ordinated the October revolution and stopped Lenin from starting a revolution early in order to gain a majority Soviet representation in the assembly. Lenin’s ideas attracted groups like the sailors and the army who became the spine of the Bolshevik party and essential in the October revolution and in protecting it from the white army. However, the Bolsheviks would never have started the October revolution were it not for Kerensky’s military blunder of providing the Bolsheviks with weapons to fight Kornilov’s men. This showed how weak minded he was in contrast with Lenin who was a strong leader which is what the Russian people wanted. The issue of Kerensky played into the Bolsheviks hand as he was two minded in his beliefs and this weakened the protection of the Provisional Government. He lost popularity with the Soviets due to his belief and decision in carrying on the war which led to the June offensive which claimed the lives of hundreds of thousands of soldiers. The Provisional Governments unwillingness to solve the problems of Russia further weakened its authority and Lenin capitalised on this which increased the influence and popularity of the Bolsheviks. The all for the war to be carried on was the final nail in the coffin for the Provisional Government. This decision led to many soldiers deserting and created low morale for the soldiers that came back from the war. This played right into the hands of the Bolshevik as they, from the start, were anti-war. With Lenin preaching to end war, it’s easy to see why many soldiers, who were peasant conscripts, joined the Bolsheviks cause. Thus, I believe, with the help of the primary sources, that the weakness of the Provisional Government was most important factor in the Bolshevik revolution and their seizing of power. The leadership of Lenin was not the reason why the Bolshevik seized power in October but rather the weakness of the Provisional Government led to the Bolshevik seizure of power.
Word count: 397
Overall word count: 2,072

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Russia

...Within the context of the period 1801-1917, to what extent was the fall of Tsarism a consequence of significant social development in Russian society? Tsar Nicholas II’s abdication on 2nd March 1917 marked the end of Tsarism’s iron grip on Russia and the subsequent revolution was the clearest possible sign of political and social upheaval. Finally, its people had tired of their nation’s own backwardness and were looking for improvements to an archaic system which they had endured for hundreds of years. Seldom does a revolution succeed without violence being an integral part of its development, and the Russian revolution was no exception. However, there are economic and political factors that helped contribute to the outbreak of this civil disobedience, which must be considered. Underpinning these issues is the stark difference in the social dynamics of Russia between the early 19th century and the early 20th century. The social dichotomy that had presented itself was one that no other European power had experienced. Russia was the only European super-power to still employ serfdom by the time of its termination, for its roots had been deeply embedded in Russian culture. Historian Jonathon Bromley believes the longevity of serfdom was because it “served the economic interests of the nobility and the political interests of the Tsarist state.” This implies that the economic policy and political foundations of the country were predicated on its social structure; therefore social stability...

Words: 5215 - Pages: 21

Premium Essay

Russia

...will emerge from it. Russia’s chaos was caused by economic turmoil and political upheaval. Economic slump on the stock market, devaluation of the ruble, a default on foreign debt by banks and government are parts of a climax and the general instability of Russia is worsen by them. These things sometimes happen in the process of transforming a country from a command into a market economy.www.russiatoday.com; Fr. Aug. 21 1998. There was a sharp increase in the inflation level after it has been brought down to as little as 5.6% a year in July. The prices began to rise fast and a lot of people were thrown far beyond the poverty level. The anatomy of the financial crisis consists of several causes. The first cause is the so-called “Asian factor”. There was economic turmoil in Thailand first and then it spread all over Asia: South Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia in 1996- 1997. "All these countries and more have seen their economies wrecked over the last couple of years. Now Russia has its currency heading for the basement and is basically defaulting on its national debt". http://www.islamic.org.uk Aug. 39 1998.It has scared foreign investors. “This cooled their enthusiasm for investment in riskier economies” (Russia today) and they start taking their money out of its stocks and converting their rubles into dollars. It will take a lot of time for them to gain confidence in Russian “emerging” market again--.www.russiatoday.com; Fr. Aug. 21 1998. Although the Russian...

Words: 1292 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Russia

...Background. After years, even decades of growing disenchantment of the Russian people with their government leadership and inability to provide a stable economy, Russia of the 1990’s was about to experience even more turbulence in an attempt to provide stability, economic growth and become a superpower on the world stage once again. As the end of the Cold War drew to a close, Russians demanded more freedom and independence from the old Soviet-style ways of operating their country and thus led to a break from the Soviet Union in 1991. While Gorbachev attempted to maintain his power and keep the Soviet Union united, the fate of Russia had already been decided and a new leader emerged by the name of Boris Yeltsin. However, unbeknownst to the Russian citizenry, their country was about to experience greater instability and deterioration in their economy by way of ill-advised reforms, more specifically poorly planned tax policies, inexperienced leadership, lack of and disrespect for rule of law, continuous changing of laws and their Constitution, inefficient and upside-down government infrastructure, absent institutionalization, increased foreign government debt (see Exhibit 12), hyper-inflation (see Exhibit 7D), devaluation of their currency and finally a contraction of their national GDP. These serious issues, or flawed attempts to make Russians lives better, resulted instead in corruption, violence, poor national health, distrust of government leadership, and a bankrupt...

Words: 1815 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Russia

...1881-1914. Firstly we can look at the repression form of Russification. This was a policy that ensured that the language of Russian was spoken throughout all of Russia and was enforced onto all ethnicities and people of Russia. This would be sure to repress all the cultural differences between people and help to give the Tsar more control over the vast population of Russia. This reform was introduced by Alexander II but reached new heights under Alexander III. This policy ensure that all legal documents were to be written in Russian, and all other languages were forbidden from schools meaning that this plan would affect the future of the Russian population ensuring the children would all talk the chosen language. This policy also led to attacks on the Russian Jews which suffered greatly under Alexander III, many attacks were organised and supported by the government which involved beating, robbing, raping and even killing Jews, and eventually this led to many Jews fleeing Russia for new lives. This policy showed the weakness of the Tsars opponents as he could simply affect the people in their everyday lives and affect the future of the population easily with no real opposition or backlash from it. Also the fact that the Jewish people fled means that he identified a huge weakness in them and by them moving out of Russia it made his job easier with less cultural diversity. Next we look at the press restriction by the Tsar and how that explained the weakness of his opponents. During...

Words: 1458 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Russia

...A2 Russia and its Rulers 1855–1964 Past Questions workbook How to use this booklet Your Russia and Cold War teachers will discuss what they want you to do in each Cold War lesson (now that your coursework is finished). This booklet has a page for each examination question that has been asked about our course since the change of course in 2010. For each question there is a section from the guidance given to examiners for marking it, and a section from the examiner’s report on each question. Each page also contains a section where you can record what you have learned about answering each question. Tackling past questions is an excellent way of revising. You could be doing several things in any order: * Reading the examiner’s remarks; * Planning an answer to the question; * Using your notes to find the evidence you’ll need to answer each question; * Sending a plan to a friend for constructive criticism. Before you get going – please note the advice that the Chief Examiner has given to his exam markers for the last year: ------------------------------------------------- “Candidates are expected to demonstrate understanding of the issues in each of their selected questions over a period of at least a hundred years (unless an individual question specifies a slightly shorter period.) Candidates are reminded of the synoptic nature of the Unit. Answers are required to demonstrate understanding of the processes of historical continuity, development...

Words: 10577 - Pages: 43

Free Essay

Russia

...Situation in Russia * Russian politics gained considerable stability after Vladimir Putin became president in 1999. * Country managed to maintain 5.2% growth in 2008, the Russian economy contracted by 7.9% in 2009. The Russian economy recovered in 2010, however, registering a growth rate of 3.9%. * Key Factors * But despite its established and seemingly stable political structure, Russia is considered to be one of the most corrupt nations in the world. * Russia scored 2.1 out of 10 in the 2010 Corruption * Country’s current account surplus reached $72.6bn in 2010, which is an increase of around 47% compared to the previous year. * The new liberal immigration laws brought in many foreign workers, especially from the EU region; indeed, it was reported that the total number of foreign-born individuals who had entered Russia had risen to 14.5 million as of the end of 2008. Immigration laws play a vital role in attracting foreign direct investment (FDI) and, in Russia's case, they are presently adding to its strengths. * GDP Contribution by sector: Agriculture | 4.2% | Industry | 33.8% | Services | 62.0% | Russia has maintained a surplus position since 2000. Improved competitiveness and higher oil prices facilitated a dramatic turnaround in terms of current account, from a deficit of around 0.5% of GDP in 1998 to a surplus of 12% of GDP in 1999. This surplus increased further during 2000 to 18% of GDP. This marked improvement in...

Words: 1371 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Russia

...Napoleon at Waterloo in 1815. However this threat came to nothing. Despite the efforts of successive Tsars, the country remained backward and bureaucratic. When change at last occurred, it was through the work of the revolutionaries during the 1917 Revolution. Imperial Russia following the Decembrist Revolt of 1825 , the entire Russia population was plagued with fear, trapped in a country dominated by ruthless totalitarian leaders. and served as an effective way to ultimately control the entire population. Due to many of the despotic policies imposed upon Russian citizens, widespread discontent arose and revolutionary groups began to form. Although terrorism remained relatively quiet during most of the 19th century, tension began to build and by the early 20th century revolutionary movements were in full force, as a “new type of terrorist emerged”(cite). Russia from 1825 until the mid-20th century was, for the most part, a totalitarian state, dominated by tyrannical ruler who used methods of terror to achieve and later consolidate their power. A common strategy used throughout this century in suppressing opposition was the exploitation of a certain group, dubbing all members “enemies of the people.” Russia also experienced a century of economic instability as a result of the implementation of different reforms that at times succeeded, but mostly failed. The general feeling of discontent and resentment toward the government thus became obvious as people began to form revolutionary...

Words: 338 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Russia

...By the twentieth century, over three-quarters of the Russian population were unhappy with their position in the Empire. By 1905, rebellion was inevitable Russia like many of the great super powers had been trying to expand its empire and in doing so Russia came into direct conflict with Japan who also wanted to expand throughout the Far East. Although Russians saw themselves as a far superior military power, they suffered a huge defeat; this led to many Russians questioning the Tsar’s leadership because Nicholas II was advised by Plevhe (Minister of interior) to go to war with Japan in order to heighten patriotic favour and national pride suggesting that Tsar Nicholas was uninterested and unprepared during his reign. Additionally, the defeat made the Tsar look even weaker and therefore encouraged the revolutionaries to act out due to the fact that resources diverted to the war lessened the already limited supply of grain and fuel leading to rising inflation which affected many Russians citizens. However, it could be argued the defeat to Japan worked in the Tsar’s favour because the Russo-Japanese war prolonged the revolution as many of the events of the war took place after the revolution had began. During Nicholas II reign, Russians saw industrialisation and urbanisation occur; nonetheless peasants and workers alike still suffered horrendous living and working conditions which was made worse by the economic downturn in the early 1900’s leading to a lack of jobs and regular...

Words: 347 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Russia

...country. Up until the 1990’s it was the only surviving superpower in the globe after World War II along with the United States. The Russian Federation is located east of Europe and north of Asia. Russia has boundaries with fourteen other countries, like China in Asia, Kazakhstan in the Middle East, and Finland in Europe. In this country there are only two distinct seasons winter and summer. Spring and autumn are brief periods of change between extremely low and extremely high temperatures. The coldest month is usually in January. The warmest month is usually in July. Russia has a pretty broad population but mostly by Russians and the main language there is Russian. Russia is the ninth most populous nation in the world with 139 million people. The currency is the Ruble. One dollar is equivalent to 30 rubles. The capital city of Russia is Moscow. Russia is home to the famous St Basil’s Cathedral in Moscow which looks like a castle with onion shaped domes. The Kremlin is also located in Russia which is where government business is conducted. Some famous Russian ornament is the Fabergé Egg. Made by Peter Carl Fabergé o nly 65 eggs were ever made and they are worth millions. Russia is also famous or infamous for its assault rifle the AK-47. This is just a brief overview of Russia. We are covering many different facets about this magnificent country. We will cover mostly its government, military, education, employment, economy, and sports. Government Frank ...

Words: 4276 - Pages: 18

Premium Essay

Russia

...Russia and its Rulers
1855-1964 An overview This overview The Nature of Russian Government Ideology Structures and Institutions Opposition The nature of opposition and how it changed Repression as a way of controlling opposition Reform as a way of controlling opposition Social and Economic Change In the countryside In the towns and cities War and Revolution and the development of Government Government - Ideology Strong continuity in autocratic Tsarist rule 1832 Fundamental Laws (Nicholas I) “The emperor of all Russians is an autocratic and unlimited monarch: God himself ordains that all must bow to his supreme power, not only out of fear but also out of conscience” 1906 Fundamental Laws (Nicholas II) “The All-Russian Emperor possess the supreme autocratic power. Not only fear and conscience but God himself commands obedience to his authority” Government - Ideology Subtle changes in the extent to which different Tsars were autocratic. 1861 Emancipation Edit (Alexander II) Though Alexander II used his autocratic powers to enact the edict, this was only after a long period of discussion and consultation with his nobles, which started in 1856. 1881 “The Reaction” of Alexander III to his father’s assassination. Under the influence of Pobodonostev, who believed that most Russians were incapable of understanding the complexity of the world, and therefore could not be given freedom, or the vote...

Words: 2462 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Russia

...The Russian Revolution altered the lives of the Russians by overpowering the Tsar, because of the hardships they experienced under his rule. They believed that with this they could have more freedom of speech in which they could have a say on how their nation would be governed and also a fairer share in the wealth of their sovereign state. The revolution in Russia was then led by Lenin who had modified their lives. This included women being given the same rights as men, because women under the Tsar's rule, were considered second class citizens. Which meant that they can't get jobs, every signing of documents and procuring of properties would need to be approved by the husband or the father. Other modifications brought about by the Russian revolution were; workers having power in the factories, banks taken over by the state, debts to foreign governments remained unpaid, rich people gave up their money to help the less fortunate, people had to have the same amount of wage regardless of what position they hold in the workplace, divorce was made easier in which all that couples had to do was to ask for it, the calendar were made the same as the rest of Western Europe, the use of courtesies such as "Sir", and "Count", were abolished. Lastly procedures in the court of law were made simpler in the hope that justice would more likely prevail. In addition to this Lenin put his own managers in factories to impose strict discipline to the...

Words: 254 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Russia

...Alekhina had already taken the child’s existence into account. Reaction: The crime that the two women had committed was very disrespectful, and definitely deserved harsh prosecution. They interrupted a church service and subjected people to whatever point they were trying to make. They covered their faces in church, a big disrespect in the Orthodox religion, stormed the Altar, forcing the church service to stop. Also, women are not allowed in Orthodox Altars, sang a prayer to the Virgin Mary which included swearing. Sinning there. and had their backs to the Altar, another disrespect. Imagine this happening in a Catholic church or a Muslim mosque. No one would be defending these girls if that was the case. But it was an Orthodox church in Russia, which is why people find this anti-Putin-ism related. They interfered with the Orthodox religion, showing disrespect and I support the court ruling. However, the issue that one of the woman brings up...

Words: 362 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Russia

...TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 CULTURAL HISTORY OF EUROPE 3 CHAPTER 2 CONSUMERS. 5 TRENDS 7 CHAPTER 3 LUXURY INDUSTRY 8 MAJOR PLAYERS 9 BIBLIOGRAPHY 12   CULTURAL HISTORY OF LUXURY Russia has a longstanding history of luxury with a large emphasis on furs, gold, diamonds and the booming caviar industry. It has some of the most grandiose palaces in the whole world. We can consider Russian culture closely linked to term of luxury, because of the rich history and long tradition of impressive achievement in arts. We can say that Russian literature; ballet, classical music, architecture and paintings are part of there, as well as worldwide heritage in cultural and luxury world. SOME CHRONOLOGICAL FACTS EARLY 18TH CENTURY After the decree of Peter The Great, Russia became more opened for European way of life and traditional Russian appearances and fashionable Western clothes replaced dresses. MID 18TH CENTURY One of the most interesting facts regarding luxury has been related to Catherine the Great coronation gown. It was one of the most prestigious and glamorous dresses of that time in world of aristocracy. It was made out of luxuriant silver silk, with glamorous sleeves, lace bertha, blue sash, etc. Her crown was a byzantine throwback, joined by two rows of pearls. It contained a 4,936 diamonds and a giant 415-carat ruby perched on top of it. 1911 French master of haute couture Paul Poiret was amazed by Russian culture and he created the first European fashion...

Words: 2329 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Russia

...was then elected to help with a turn-around. He proclaimed his intention to restore Russia to superpower status and to recapture much of the global that the Soviet Union once possessed. President Vladimir Putin of Russia began Russia’s turn-around in 2000. Putin got Russia to join the G-7, making it the Group of Eight (G-8), which was a part of the world’s leading economies, yet they were not qualified to join. The new Putin administration diminished the influence of Regions by making a new geographic layout, which was combined of the 83 Regions, Republics, and others into eight new administrative units. The Internal Periphery remains unstable, even after Vladimir Putin promised victory. In order for the Internal Periphery to reach levels of wealth that Russia carries, they have a way to go in regards to health, income, opportunity, and education. Russia is already a country that is rich in oil and natural gas. The natural resources are vast and varied, including diamonds, gold, platinum, lead, etc. Across the country, you can find iron ore, coal fields, and also a variety of available raw materials. The BRICs is the world’s largest emerging markets. It consists of Brazil, Russia, India, and China. Russia is now part of the BRIC. Russia is continually trying to recover. Private property, upstart companies, trade, foreign investment, and stock exchanges, all have found their way into Russia. Russia’s leaders are hoping that improvements in the social circumstances of the average...

Words: 530 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Russia and Wto

...Russia and World Trade Organization Subject: International Business Professor: 梁学宏 Student: Kirilenko Viktoriia, vikir27@mail.ru Class: IB2013 Date: 13 December 2015 Table of Content Introduction…………………………………………………………………….3 Goals and Objectives of the Accession to the WTO……………………4 Advantages and Disadvantages of the Accession to the WTO………5 Conditions of Accession to the WTO……………………………………...6 * Terms and Conditions of Russia’s Accession to the WTO * Unfavorable Institutional Environment * Russia Does Not Have Effective Mechanism to Support Domestic Business * Phytosanitary Standards: Good Conditions and Poor Implementation * Sources of Growth of Exports to Russia Are Limited Overall Assessment of Impact of Accession to the WTO…………….10 * Missed Opportunities for Growth * The Overall Picture Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………13 References.……………………………………………………………………15 Introduction Russian economy can effectively develop only in close cooperation with international market of goods and services, in spite of huge potential and resources. It also required by the state reforms inside the country. However, World Trade Organization (WTO) states the rules of game on the international market, on time of international globalization. WTO unify about 160 countries and covers more than 95% of turnover of international trade. Russia should enter to WTO considering strategic...

Words: 3710 - Pages: 15