...To Baghdad 1917 to 2003 – Why is knowledge of the British Empire particularly relevant to the study of US relations and American Imperialism especially in the last twenty years? Emy Ibrahim Washington D.C. Public Policy Seminar-Research Paper April 17th, 2007 Our armies do not come into your cities and lands as conquerors or enemies, but as liberators. ... It is [not] the wish of [our] government to impose upon you alien institutions. ... [It is our wish] that you should prosper even as in the past, when your lands were fertile, when your ancestors gave to the world literature, science, and art, and when Baghdad city was one of the wonders of the world. ... It is [our] hope that the aspirations of your philosophers and writers shall be realized and that once again the people of Baghdad shall flourish, enjoying their wealth and substance under institutions which are in consonance with their sacred laws and their racial ideals.[1] The government of Iraq, and the future of your country, will soon belong to you. ... We will end a brutal regime ... so that Iraqis can live in security. We will respect your great religious traditions, whose principles of equality and compassion are essential to Iraq's future. We will help you build a peaceful and representative government that protects the rights of all citizens. And then our military forces will leave. Iraq will go forward as a unified, independent, and sovereign nation that has regained a respected place in the world. You...
Words: 8099 - Pages: 33
...Assess the significance of the role of individuals in bringing about the expansion and dismantling of the British Empire in Africa in the period 1870-1981 It seems rather farfetched at first glance that individuals have enough influence in events such as the expansion of the British Empire in Africa or on the other hand the dismantling of it. However once we look into the effect individuals such as Cecil Rhodes, who was one of the main figures in the expansion of the British Empire to southern Africa or Harold Macmillan who with one speech “the winds of change” could cause so much revolt in British colonies. Although there is definitely evidence that individuals did have an effect in bringing about the expansion and dismantling of the British Empire in Africa in the period 1870-1981 we must not discard other reasons, such as how in the beginning expansion was financially great and after the second world war it was no longer profitable and instead a liability or how events such as the Suez canal crisis were able to lead to revolt of British colonies and how that may have caused the dismantling of the British empire in Africa. One key individual in the expansion of the British Empire in Africa was Cecil Rhodes. His arrival to South Africa in 1871 was fuelled by the hunger for financial gain, more specifically through the diamond industry. Rhodes had a rather complex personality. He was the first to think of turning "riches into a political instrument"1...
Words: 975 - Pages: 4
...Economics throughout the British Empire has always had to be focused on maintenance, especially in Africa. But as we will establish, Geo-strategic and Political factors, put strain on the Empire’s ability to preserve its economy, and caused dismantlement in Africa between the years of 1870 - 1980. Though the factors of the latter, outweigh that of economics, as they all relied on perfect economics in order to be maintained or in order for the Empire to expand. As a result of two World Wars, the British where wasting resources annually trying to uphold its colonies, and as a result, simply ran out of finance and began relying on its allies, such as the USA, for support. In addition, the looming Cold War priorities meant that Britain could no longer provide for her colonies in Africa, eventually leading to dismantlement. The first issues to consider are the financial and economical impact that Africa had on the Empire, pre-world war and during the African Scramble, which contributed to the expansion of the Empire in Africa. The diamond industry became the key to the economic fortunes of the Empire in Southern Africa in the late 1800s. Though intrinsically worthless, Cecil Rhodes, who had succeeded in monopolising the diamond industry in Southern Africa, allowed the value to increase, by restricting its sales. Diamonds, which were mined from the Transvaal region, accounted for (1) “£4,000,000 (£181,600,000 today), of a £15,000,000 (£618,000,000 today)” economy. South Africa was...
Words: 2031 - Pages: 9
...Indian-Pakistani confrontation from the partition of the British Indian Empire to these days. Over the Kashmir issue DATE: 06/JAN/2013 Introduction to the Indian-Pakistan conflict: Since 1946 the British began dynamically to negotiate a shift of authority, but this did not prove to be an easy affair, for as independence was established in August 1947 it was not to a single unitary state, but to two- India and Pakistan. The detachment of India occurred as Congress and the Muslim League had principally incompatible thoughts about how to represent a single successor state to British rule. Put plainly, The Muslim League preferred a weak political centre and the devolution of power to groups of provinces, which would permit the Muslim-majority areas a superior deal of self-government, while Congress sought the construction of a sturdy centralized state in order to become conscious on its social and economic goal. With neither side enthusiastic to compromise at the country on the brink of chaos. The easiest resolution was partition. The outcome was that the Muslim-majority areas of Baluchistan, Sind, the North-West Frontier, the western half of the Punjab and Eastern half of Bengal were amalgamated into the state of Pakistan underneath the premiership of the leader of the Muslim League. Muhammad Ali Jinnah. In the meantime India gained its independence under the leadership of Jawaharlal Nehru, the leader of the Congress party. In addition, it hastily added to its territorial...
Words: 1243 - Pages: 5
...The American Revolution occurred due to many factors from 1763 to 1775 that caused American Colonists to develop a stronger sense of autonomy and self-government from the British Empire. After the French and Indian War in 1763, the British Empire had imposed higher and more strict mercantilist imperial controls and taxes on the American Colonists. The American Colonists, however, heavily resisted the imperialistic control from the British and soon saw British troops march in Lexington and Concord in 1775. The American Colonists' resistance to British control was a major factor that caused the heavy tension between American and British political officials before the Revolution. For example, American Colonists forced the abolition of the Stamp...
Words: 303 - Pages: 2
...The significance of Cecil Rhodes on the British Empire It is true, Cecil Rhodes had an unquestionable impact on the British Empire and has become one of the most important figures in British Imperial history. The rapidity of his progress in South Africa is quite phenomenal; from the age of 37 he had become the Prime Minister of Cape Colony, and was part head of De Beers Consolidated, a diamond mining company which possessed a near monopoly of the global diamond market. However, this essay will claim that Rhodes as a businessman was not the main element in his imperial notoriety, prioritising NM Rothschild & Sons finance and subsequent corporate decisions over those made specifically by Rhodes. I will argue that Rhodes’ significance was mainly to the detriment of the British Empire, as his political blunders and capitalistic short-sightedness greatly tarnished public opinion towards Empire - nationally and internationally - and facilitated Britains losing independence in the Boer war of 1899. Rhodes’ methods were questionable to say the least, and his ability to strengthen Britain, whilst at the same time tarnish her long standing reputation as justified sovereign of her colonies was, impressive, to say the most. It has been said that Rhodes’ impeccable success as an imperialist can be greatly accredited to his success as a businessman. For it was his speculation in diamond and gold mining proper which facilitated his amass of wealth. Needless to say, the role of international...
Words: 2677 - Pages: 11
...The Aims and Consequences of the Great Exhibition During the summer of 1851, the Great Exhibition served as a stage to showcase British prowess in a variety of fields. This greatness contrasted with the dark shadow of anarchy and the gutted remains of old regimes on the continent. While strife consumed the rest of Europe, the UK continued to thrive as the “top dog” in world politics and economics. This most clearly manifested itself in the Empire it had crafted through the centuries. Rather than just endure, Britain and the Empire continued to thrive and grow, with the later entity reaping enormous profits and influence for Britain. In both industry and science, Britain led the charge throughout the 19th century, revolutionizing the way in...
Words: 1451 - Pages: 6
...early colonists as violators that insulted British rule by taking independence into their own hands. Because the British government wanted it both ways, reaping unforeseen benefits from increased economic trade while not wanting to represent their own, who migrated to the New World, they were devaluing and doing their best to eliminate the liberties of these American colonists. Many...
Words: 863 - Pages: 4
...decisions that we would not have made on our own if we would not of had influence by someone else. In both “Shooting an Elephant,” by George Orwell and “Decolonising the Mind,” by Ngugi Wa Thiong’o both Orwell and Thiong’o received the British colonial education. As humans, others' opinions mean a great deal to us, and in "Shooting an Elephant", and “Decolonising the Mind,” they both have one thing in common: English. "Shooting an Elephant" is the story of a British policeman in Moulmein, a city in Burma, that is torn between shooting or not shooting an elephant that has gone ramped. Many people may misinterpret George Orwell's tone in the essay "Shooting an Elephant." People often construe that the story is about Orwell's decision to either shoot the elephant, or to just peacefully observe it until the mahout came to tame the animal. The story is actually about the struggles Orwell faces because of his position "in between" the Burmese and the imperialistic system. Orwell portrays a distinctive amount of irony in this piece of writing because after he reviewed the situation and started this essay, he spotted a lot of irony in the actions between himself, the people of Burma, and the British Empire. Thiong’o gives a powerful image of how British government tries to control the culture of Kenya. In “Decolonising the Mind”, Thiong’o illustrates his childhood: “All the paper were written in English. Nobody could pass the exam who failed the English language paper no matter how brilliantly...
Words: 1135 - Pages: 5
...“Never, before had a trade in slaves been denounced and then abolished by the governments of the same peoples who had created it”. In 1834, Great Britain abolished slavery in all of its colonies. The British Campaign against slavery was surrounded by the circumstances of British industrialisation and the American Revolutionary War, which were the prime stimuli in the emergence and triumph of British abolition. The main arguments employed by British abolitionists were on religious and humanitarian grounds. These arguments were central to the campaign employed by British abolitionists. Although, their campaign’s success was reliant on the circumstances that surrounded Great Britain. As following their dismal and disgraceful defeat, by their own...
Words: 1901 - Pages: 8
...Asses the significance of economic reasons influencing Britain’s relationship with its empire in Africa in the period 1870-1981? Britain’s relationship with Africa was a very volatile one. By 1914 Britain was able to took control over nearly 30% of Africa’s population and most of African territory (5 million square miles) where under British control. By doing this Britain was able to gain the ‘Lion’s share’ over the other European powers which were competing for control in Africa. On the other hand by the end of the 20th century Britain’s influence in its African empire had shrinked dramatically. The process of colonization which mainly took part between 1870-1914 and decolonisation which started from the end of the Second World War until 1981 took place due to many and various reasons. Some of the reasons include Imperialistic and nationalistic feelings of the British people and of the Afrikaners , military conflicts, political actions and economic reasons. This essay will try to prove that the most important reason which influenced British relationship with its empire in Africa between 1870-1981 were economic reasons to a great extent as each and every action of the British leaders concerning Africa was either purely based on economic interest or had an indirect economic motive. To begin with before the 1870’s British policy towards its African empire was mainly focused on informal imperialism. This type of control was mainly focused on trading agreements as Britain...
Words: 2248 - Pages: 9
...Britain Between the late 16th and early 18th centuries Great Britain was the world's biggest empire to date, and controlled almost a fourth of the known world. This massive empire was achieved through bloody conquest and suppression of the native population in every country, which Great Britain got into contact with. In the time of the empire, artists created paintings of this great nation, they painted its great fights and conquests of the new worlds that were discovered. Britain was portrayed as a fair and just ruler of the savages, but this was far from the truth, because Britain just exploited the countries and brought along with its rule enslavement of entire populations, which was maintained by ruling with an iron fist. Many in Britain today still believe that imperial times were a glorious period that the inhabitants of the Britain should be admiring and looking up to. But imperial Britain wrought so much pain to the populations that was suppressed and forced into slave like conditions for the good of the empire, even though the British Empire helped create infrastructure in their occupied land and laid the foundation for new democracies. In the two following articles and the documentary “Seven Ages of Britain -Episode 6 Age of Empire” will the topic of whether or not Britons should be apologetic for their time as an empire be analysed and discussed. The article: “British Empire: Students should be taught colonialism ‘not all good’, say historians” by Jonathan Owen starts...
Words: 1131 - Pages: 5
...How far do you agree with the view that strategic factors were the main reason in expanding the British Empire? It could be rightfully said that strategic factors where one of the main reasons for the expansion of the British Empire. However it could as well be argued that Britain had other motives for expanding their empire, such as for their own economic gain or because of their belief of self-superiority. It could be argued that strategic factors were a reason in expanding the British Empire. Prior to 1869 there was no expansionist intent however in 1869 when the French had built the Suez Canal, the canal attracted Britain as it represented a vital trade route to India and was of extreme importance strategically. was a country of economic interest and they had to control the canal as a means of protecting India and all of its economic advantages Britain This gave Egypt economic importance and the government devolved into British hands Furthermore it following the nationalist riots led by colonel Arabi, Egyptian nationalism began to emerge. Egypt was part of the Turkish Empire and Egyptians began to want freedom from the Turkish. Britain feared if they were to free themselves from Turkish rule they would form alliances with other European countries, minimising Britain’s influence. Although this could be said that this was a political reason why they expanded into North Africa Additionally strategic factors were Britain’s main reason for expansion in the south Following...
Words: 1117 - Pages: 5
...audience. ‘We have before us’ indicates a situation, but that ‘we’ have not yet got there. The situation may be overpowering for any single man, but because of Churchill’s use of inclusive language it is a situation that can be handled together. The more people who join the war effort the lesser the burden has to be for each man, woman and child. ‘Our cause’, once again reiterates the feeling of an equally shared burden. Most noticeably in Churchill’s Finest Hour speech he uses an immense amount of inclusive language. The patriotism shown by Churchill in all of his speeches is strong and motivational and satisfying for his audience. ‘Superior quality of our ships’, additionally in most of his speeches he uses the great power of the British Empire as a compelling argument for both the World Wars. ‘Battle of Britain’, Churchill called part of the war which is another satisfying factor. This gives the...
Words: 859 - Pages: 4
...through non-violence. One of the ways Mahatma Gandhi was able to be such an effective leader was his ability and determination to stand against injustice and racial discrimination. Gandhi witnesses his first experience of racial discrimination while traveling by train to Johannesburg, South Africa. Though he carried a first class ticket, he was ordered to move to the “colored” cars in the back by the officers. He refused to accept their demands which resulted in him being thrown out of the train. As a result, he had to spend a long and freezing night at the train station. It was through witnessing firsthand the racism and injustice against Indian people in South Africa that Gandhi started to question his people's status within the British Empire, and his own place in the society. This gave him a cause to fight for in his quest to end discrimination and inequality, which would eventually lead to a free India. At age 45, he moved back to India and he dedicated himself to organizing peaceful rallies all over the country. He soon was a commanding figure and inspired Indians to join peace protest. Great Leaders 3 Another trait he possessed that displayed his effective leadership was his ability to run influential campaigns. He led three major campaigns to...
Words: 649 - Pages: 3