Free Essay

Cardinalist and Ordinalist Approach of Utility

In:

Submitted By torsaadonatus
Words 1425
Pages 6
-------------------------------------------------
“KWAGH KUHWAN MAN ATSAM AWAN SHA CHIU ICHIVIR I TER”
-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------
KA MCHIVIR AONDO UHEMBAN CHII, MAN MLU U HEMBAN SHA TARTOR JE KPAA.(NGEREN NE KA UTAVER ONOV MBA AONDO MBA VE EREN TOM NE KEN IYOU ITER SHIMA SHA U ZAN HEMEN UEREN TOM NE ZAZAN SHA TARTOR) I OR NGEREN NE KEN MKOHOL UMBUR KU U TER SHA 13TH-15TH DECEMBER, 2013 HEN NKST CHURCH ZAKI BIAM EAST.
-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------
ORNGEREN:
-------------------------------------------------
TORSAA DONATUS
-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

1.HOMON MKAAN
Se umache sha won chii ka awuese se idoo se kpishi, shin ka sea aer kwagh uvihin je kpaa, awuese se yo idoo se je i zua ga. Hen ter wase Aondo je yo, se mba ma kwagh unan un ga saa uwuese man uchivir un tsegher. Nahan aluer onov mba Aondo zua mba wan astam, kuhwan kwagh sha chiu ichivir ina yo, ka ihom shi isaan iyor kpaa. Ichan or ka ahungur a ichan itserun yo, oruange akera fa angev ken akuhwe na ga, ornyar adugh pe ate ki kor la man mbatyomov mba shaa ve gbidye iwer sha akenge ataver, nahan, Ter wase asagh ikyangenev mbi hanema mlu ken uma wase chii.
Nahan wea fa er idoo ueren nahan yo taver ase shima ueren tom u kwagh kuhwan man atsam awan ne. Mlu u ka inengen er orkuhwan kwagh ka or u ihembaun la, ka ishor ibo ivesen. Ken tar usha je kpaa mbatyomov mba eren tom ne zanzan (Mpase 14:2-3, 15:3)
2.0 MDOOM MA KWAGH KUHWAN MAN ATSAM AWAN
2.1 KA VE NASE AGEE Yiase u atsam man tyoulogh ken Bibilo tese wanger wanger nahan er, kwagh kuhwan man atsam awan, alu a tahav yo. Ashie kpishi kwagh kuhwan man atsam awan ka ve yange ishor ibo ieren, ka ve gema ve hingir kwagh u yangen imeen ii ve hen avese la. Er kwagh ne alu iyua i Aondo ka ana or umache nahan kpaa, ka kwagh u hembe nan mlu wase uken jijingi agee jela.
Er onov mba Israel lu zenden ken taakongo yo, ve waan atsam atseghan shi ve kuhwan kwagh, nahan Ter Aondo hemen ve gbenda, tyav kpaa ve lu hemban mbaihomon vev zan zan ve kar nyoron ken tar u tyendezwa. Atsam man kwagh kuhwan ka ve dugh mlu udang, shima nyoon man ityough ki taver ken onov mba dondon kera, mhoonom man shima ilegh legh ve tema tor ken ve, nahan ve hemba lun a mlu uchivir Aondo u dedoo u sha jijigh unan u taveragh. Ka mlu unan ishima i mba dondon lun per man umbur atindi akaa man akaa awan aken luamabera u uma, mlu u chan iyan isha ayange a ken jime la ve hungur amin man mlu uhe anyor ken mbera mba ve ungwa kwagh kuhwan man atsam hen shie la yo.
Inja I kwagh ne yo, man ilu kwaghfan usaan she hen mba nan jijigh ga, man ilu kwagh u ken uyaav asev man ken imakeranta yase kpaa, man ilu zan hemen ueren nahan sha u van a mbayev asev ikua ikua a Aondo, aticha ve man mba genev kpaa.
Kwagh kuhwan man atsam awan ken iyou I Ter ka mchivir Aondo u mimi man ka msen utaveraa kpaa.
2.2 KA TUMUGH KU IVYORON
Iyor kpe wee? Wa icham tsue amar wuese Aondo sha mdoom nav hen awe (or nan tenge imar la or la wuam tata guda me gba heen tso). Uvor a angevee? Wa cham nahan tsa uzua a mndohor ken akuhwe aou. Orihom mough num awee? Yo tindi icham man kwagh kuhwan ve hemen gbenda tsa uzua a mhembe (II Kroniku 20). Yehoyafati er kwagh ne nahan ken tarikongo u Tekoa, tso Ter Aondo sen hemen ve ityav tso ve hemba mbi.
Ken ityav mbi ken jijingi kpaa shie u satan ka une mough num avese yo, ihemba doon use wa icham se kuhwa kwagh nahan Aondo ana se mhembe. Ahemba lun a inja use nyor ken iyou iter atsam awan man kwagh kuhwan sha er se hemba boor satan tahav yo.
Mbadondon kpishi atsam ka hemba nyoron ve ken uma ve u ken jijingi la a loho sha zwa o or u pasen, u afe upasen ga, ahembe tan kwaghhir yo. Ka atsam man kwagh kuhwan ka ve na nongu ior u Aondo Ter, ve bugh asema ve sha ungohor loho u dedoo ye.
2.3 KA MLU U ORKRISTU U SHA MIMI
Alu inyor adua man atsam man kwagh kuhwan mba ga yo, akaa er ior mban ve nyor ka mzough u mbaimev. Sha chiu mlu u ving la ka ana iwanger ior keng ga. Icham man kwagh kuhwan ka ve na ikav I mlu u orkristu sha mimi, alu nan ngu eren akaa ne ken mlu uyolugh gayo. Wa icham ter Aondo wase, man kuhwa kwagh tarchii ukav er se fe un, ua gbe sha man tar la ye. Pepe man aikighe kohor tsombor wou wa atsam kuhwa kwagh, gadia zua ken mkohol u nongo ior u Aondo, er nahan tso, iengem i kristu ia tese sha shir iyou. Aondo kaa er “tese onov ou akaa ne, oron ve a, shie u wea tema imongo shin wea zenden shin wea yaven nya shin wea mou sha”
Ka nahan idoo u se taver mbayev mba chuku mban (MIM) ueren tom ve er ahoor ve iyor u kuhwan kwagh man wan atsam yo. Ka er, i hoor se yor amin ga ve, ashie nkpishi ior mba genev ka ve fa iwasen i or u kuhwan kwagh ga ye.
2.4 YESU JE KPAA ZUA IWASEN HEN TER NA KEN ATSAM AWAN
Shie u Yesu lu yev yo(Manuscript 65, 1901-Evangelism, p. 498), imeen va hen ana kpa ahemba i. Er ava vese kpa shi ormee va hen ana, nahan awa icham I yange ngo na tese un yo nahan, awa I, a wuese Aondo nahan ahemba ormee, man, mba ve lu vea na chii, ve gba wuese Aondo sha atsam. Wea fatyo yo,er gbayor a hanema kwagh kuhwan chii sha uwan atsam man wuese Aondo sha er u hemba ormee yo.
Alu ken nongo u kristu, oru lun anyaregh kpishi kaa tema sha gbande, gba dorugh u kuhwan yo, amagh iyor shi ,adoo unengen kpaa. Kpa ken nongu wase ne yo, or ka alu a iyua i atsam awan man nan fa hanema ityolugh chii ki kuhwan, kpa nan gema anenge inja er nan gande agande u eren gbaiyor a iyua ne je yo. Ka ambaakaa ne kpaa, ior kpishi mba ve fe gayo ka ve nenge injaer, mbakuhwan kwagh ken nongo ne yo ka mba ve yen je yo.
3.0 KWAGH WAN
Er se chii se kav er i doo ka nyoron iyor ken gbaa tom ne yo, akera lu a inja u se gbihi nongo u kristu nahan ga, kpa se gema se houmn iyor ken ueren tom ne sha gba shima. Hanema or u Aondo ane nan iyua ne yo nana er tom amin sha gbashima sha er se kav awashuima u Ter wase Yesu ken kwagh ngeren ne yo. Mbera mba ve ngohol mlumun u sha mhoon u Aondo man ve fe takerada shin ve lu anyaregh yo, ve wa iyor ve ken ueren tom ne, nahan mba ve yen mbera vea hemba zuan ashima taver ueren tom u kuhwan kwagh ken iyor i Ter, wan atsam man wuese chian iti na sha ayange a uma ve chii.
4.0 ISHUUN I SHA MKUR
Kam a inja kpishi unan ishuun hen Aondo Ter wase man hen Pastor u alu kuran Nongu u Kristu u Zaki Biam East kpishi, sha zege ian man mhen udedoo u a lu amin sha utan iwanger sha itine kwagh ne sha uwasen umaan mba mlu asev ken gbaa tom u kwagh kuhwan, man atsam awan ken iyor i Ter yo. Me wundu mba tamen man u diakon ke nya ga, alegh man mbela mba ve kohol avese heen chii, ve ngohol ishuun yam ne, hemban chii je yo mbera mba ve vande tsuan ayor ave ueren tom atsam man kwagh kuhwan yo, man mba ve lu a awashima u nyoron nongo ave kpaa, ken iti Ter Yesu Kristu Amen. Hanema or unan zua a kwaghngeren ne shin nan ongo yo, nana er fefa sha unyoron iyor ken gbaa tom ne.
Aondo ana or ugen ian izan hemen u ngeren kwagh sha tine kwagh ne er iwanger ihemban ngin ia seer aseer sha u maan u jijigh asev, u eren tom u Ter wase Yesu Kristu, awe se ne yo.

MSUGH NE CHII

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Discuss Utility from a Cardinalist and Ordinalist Approach and Discuss the Economies of Scale

...Utility means satisfaction which consumers derive from commodities and services by purchasing different units of money. “Ineconomics, utility is a measure of satisfaction;it refers to the total satisfaction received by a consumer from consuming a good or service. Utility is often affected by consumption of various goods and services, possession of wealth and spending of leisure time.s CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR • It is the study of how people buy, what they buy, when they buy and why they buy. • It attempts to understand the buyer decision processes/buyer decision making process, both individually and in groups. • It also tries to assess influences on the consumer from groups such as family, friends, reference groups, and society in general. • The theory of consumer behavior in managerial economics depends on a) Budget • constrained by income and the price of the goods, • The budget constraint specifies the combination of goods the consumer can afford to buy. b) Preferences • Economists use the concept of utility to describe preferences. • There are some assumptions of consumer behavior theory like :- a) rational behavior b) clear cut preferences • Consumer behaviour can be explained using two main approaches: 1. Marginal Utility Theory (The Cardinalist Approach); and 2. Indifference curve Analysis (The Ordinalist Approach) 1. MARGINAL UTILITY THEORY (THE CARDINALIST APPROACH) • developed by Alfred Marshall who introduced an imaginary unit called the...

Words: 357 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Consumer

...The cardinalist and ordinalist approach to consumer behaviour discuss? Economics Questions Answers.com > Wiki Answers > Categories > Business & Finance > Economics View Slide Show Best Answer Consumer Behavior from a Cardinalist and Ordinalist Approach Utility means satisfaction which consumers derive from commodities and services by purchasing different units of money.From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia "Ineconomics, utility is a measure of satisfaction;it refers to the total satisfaction received by a consumer from consuming a good or service. "Given this measure, one may speak meaningfully of increasing or decreasing utility, and thereby explain economic behavior in terms of attempts to increase one's utility. Utility is often affected by consumption of various goods and services, possession of wealth and spending of leisure time. According to Utilitarian's, such as Jeremy Bentham (1748- 1832) and John Stuart Mill (1806-1873), theory "Society should aim to maximize the total utility of individuals, aiming for "the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people". Another theory forwarded by John Rawls (1921-2002) would have society maximize the utility of those with the lowest utility, raising them up to create a more equitable distribution across society. Utility is usually applied by economists in such constructs as the indifference curve, which plot the combination of commodities that an individual or a society would accept to maintain...

Words: 316 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Consumer Behaviour

...price of the goods, • The budget constraint specifies the combination of goods the consumer can afford to buy. b) Preferences • Economists use the concept of utility to describe preferences. • There are some assumptions of consumer behavior theory like :- a) rational behavior b) clear cut preferences • Consumer behaviour can be explained using two main approaches: 1. Marginal Utility Theory (The Cardinalist Approach); and 2. Indifference curve Analysis (The Ordinalist Approach) 1. MARGINAL UTILITY THEORY (THE CARDINALIST APPROACH) • developed by Alfred Marshall who introduced an imaginary unit called the util as a means of measuring utility. • 1 util = 1 unit of money. • Utility is additive. • This approach was termed cardinal since cardinal numbers could be used to measure utility. • Each consumer chooses quantity demanded of all goods and services in order to maximize his/her utility or want satisfying power, given the limits imposed by available income. • The concept of utility is ethically neutral. Total utility • Total utility is the total benefit/satisfaction obtained from all the units of a particular product consumed • Total utility depends on the person's level of consumption - more consumption generally gives more total utility. Marginal Utility • Marginal utility is the additional utility derived from the consumption of one more...

Words: 306 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Uyility Theories

...Contents Utility before 1920’s 2 Utility measurements 2 CARDINALIST AND ORDINALIST UTILITY APPROACH OF CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR 3 CARDINALIST UTILITY APPROACH 3 Marginal utility 4 Assumptions of Cardinal Utility Analysis: 5 Cardinal Measurement of Utility 5 Rationality 6 Diminishing marginal utility 6 ORDINALIST UTILITY APPROACH 7 Rational behavior of the consumer 8 Ordinal Utility 8 Diminishing marginal rate of substitution 8 Consistency selection 8 Transitivity/Consumer’s preference is not self-contradictory 8 Goods consumed are substitutable 9 ECONOMIES AND DISECONOMIES OF SCALE 16 ECONOMIES OF SCALE 16 Definition: 16 Internal economies of scale 16 External economies of scale 18 DISECONOMIES OF SCALE 20 Internal diseconomies of scale 20 External diseconomies of scale 21 CONCLUSION 22 INTRODUCTION Utility before 1920’s: One reason why utility theory was not of great significance is explained by the “ Paradox Value” by economist/philosopher Adam Smith in 1800’s. Also known as Diamond-Water Paradox, it addressed why absolute necessities such as water are valued (priced) so cheaply, while frivolities like diamonds are highly valued and command outrageous prices. Many economists then thought utility was not the cause of price and therefore concentrated on cost of production as the explanation of price.It was until economist Jevons (1871), established how the paradox value could be resolved by associating price with degree of utility, that is marginal...

Words: 4743 - Pages: 19

Premium Essay

Cardinalist and Ordinalist Approach of Consumer Behavior

...Consumer Behavior from a Cardinalist and Ordinalist Approach Utility means satisfaction which consumers derive from commodities and services by purchasing different units of money.From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia “Ineconomics, utility is a measure of satisfaction;it refers to the total satisfaction received by a consumer from consuming a good or service. “Given this measure, one may speak meaningfully of increasing or decreasing utility, and thereby explain economic behavior in terms of attempts to increase one's utility. Utility is often affected by consumption of various goods and services, possession of wealth and spending of leisure time. According to Utilitarian’s, such as Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832) and John Stuart Mill (1806–1873), theory “Society should aim to maximize the total utility of individuals, aiming for "the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people". Another theory forwarded by John Rawls (1921–2002) would have society maximize the utility of those with the lowest utility, raising them up to create a more equitable distribution across society. Utility is usually applied by economists in such constructs as the indifference curve, which plot the combination of commodities that an individual or a society would accept to maintain at given level of satisfaction. Individual utility and social utility can be construed as the value of a utility function and a social welfare function respectively. When coupled with production or commodity constraints...

Words: 313 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Theory of Consumer Choice

...branch that tries to relate preferences to both consumer demand curves and consumer expenditures. The theory analyses the way consumers maximize their need to consume which is measured by their preferences against the limited ways on their expenditure. Consumers do this by utility maximization subject to a constraint on their budget. Other times it gets referred to as the theory of consumer behavior. Through the study of this theory, researchers can explain why the consumers would buy more of the product when its price is less as compared to when its price is high. Another elaboration of the theory is that it shows the reason why the households spend their income as they always do (Haugtvedt, Herr, & Kardes, 2008). The greater assumption is that every consumer is rational and aims at maximizing their satisfaction. Some major theories explain the consumer behavior. First is the Cardinalist approach or the marginal utility theory and the second is the ordinalist approach or the analysis of the indifference curves. The former describes extra satisfaction a consumer derives after consuming an extra unit of a commodity while consumption of all other products remains unchanged. The law of diminishing marginal utility gives a thorough elaboration on why the demand curves always have a downward sloping nature. The latter shows the line of combinations (indifference curves) of the quantity of two products say A and B such that the individual is indifferent between all combinations on...

Words: 1179 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Consumer Behavior from a Cardinalist and Ordinalist Approach

...Utility means satisfaction which consumers derive from commodities and services by purchasing different units of money.From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia “Ineconomics, utility is a measure of satisfaction;it refers to the total satisfaction received by a consumer from consuming a good or service. “Given this measure, one may speak meaningfully of increasing or decreasing utility, and thereby explain economic behavior in terms of attempts to increase one's utility. Utility is often affected by consumption of various goods and services, possession of wealth and spending of leisure time. According to Utilitarian’s, such as Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832) and John Stuart Mill (1806–1873), theory “Society should aim to maximize the total utility of individuals, aiming for "the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people". Another theory forwarded by John Rawls (1921–2002) would have society maximize the utility of those with the lowest utility, raising them up to create a more equitable distribution across society. Utility is usually applied by economists in such constructs as the indifference curve, which plot the combination of commodities that an individual or a society would accept to maintain at given level of satisfaction. Individual utility and social utility can be construed as the value of a utility function and a social welfare function respectively. When coupled with production or commodity constraints, under some assumptions, these functions can be used to analyze...

Words: 3826 - Pages: 16

Free Essay

Cardinal Utility

...Ivan Moscati How cardinal utility entered economic analysis during the Ordinal Revolution 2012/5 UNIVERSITÀ DELL'INSUBRIA FACOLTÀ DI ECONOMIA http://eco.uninsubria.it In questi quaderni vengono pubblicati i lavori dei docenti della Facoltà di Economia dell’Università dell’Insubria. La pubblicazione di contributi di altri studiosi, che abbiano un rapporto didattico o scientifico stabile con la Facoltà, può essere proposta da un professore della Facoltà, dopo che il contributo sia stato discusso pubblicamente. Il nome del proponente è riportato in nota all'articolo. I punti di vista espressi nei quaderni della Facoltà di Economia riflettono unicamente le opinioni degli autori, e non rispecchiano necessariamente quelli della Facoltà di Economia dell'Università dell'Insubria. These Working papers collect the work of the Faculty of Economics of the University of Insubria. The publication of work by other Authors can be proposed by a member of the Faculty, provided that the paper has been presented in public. The name of the proposer is reported in a footnote. The views expressed in the Working papers reflect the opinions of the Authors only, and not necessarily the ones of the Economics Faculty of the University of Insubria. © Copyright Ivan Moscati Printed in Italy in december 2012 Università degli Studi dell'Insubria Via Monte Generoso, 71, 21100 Varese, Italy All rights reserved. No part of this paper may be reproduced in any form without permission of the Author...

Words: 11439 - Pages: 46

Premium Essay

Clive M

...The Central Problem of Economics Needs and Wants Needs are the things we can’t survive without. They are necessities of life e.g. food, clothing, shelter, water, basic wealth and basic education. Wants are the things we desire to have or own but we can survive without them e.g. cell phones, TVs, oars, radios, entertainment etc. Our want are unlimited and we never seem to be satisfied with what we have. It is people’s wants rather than their needs we provide the motive for economic activity. The economic resources that are available to satisfy our wants are limited. These resources are called factors of production which are : Land (Natural Resources) Land refer to natural resources over which people have power of disposal and of which may be used to yield income/money e.g. farming and building land, forests, mineral deposits, air, seas, oceans, vegetation, fisheries. The reward for land is rent. Labour Labour is human effort – physical or mental which is directed to the product of goods and services. Reward for labour is wages/salary. Capital Is money and all man-made assets used in the production of goods and services e.g. money, machinery, factories, delivery vans etc. Reward for capital is interest. Enterprise Land, labour and capital on their own will not produce anything. There must be a person or people who will organise the 3 factors of production so that production can take place. Whoever takes these decisions and consequent risks is known as the entrepreneur...

Words: 18355 - Pages: 74