Free Essay

Cargills

In:

Submitted By sasli
Words 19574
Pages 79
Sri Lanka | Diversified Holdings Initiation of coverage

EQUITY RESEARCH 5 September 2013

CT Holdings PLC (CTHR)
Cashing in on consumption growth
CT Holdings (CTHR) is the fourth-largest Sri Lankan diversified company by market capitalization. The company holds controlling interests in Cargills (CSE ticker: CARG, CTHR’s 70%-owned food retail company), the country’s largest chain of supermarkets, as well as in several companies in the food processing, restaurant, real estate, entertainment and financial services sectors. We expect CTHR’s revenues from continuing operations to post an 11.1% CAGR over FY14E-FY16E and net margin to expand 40bps to 2.3% by FY16E. Rising disposable income should continue to boost consumer demand and benefit Sri Lanka’s modern food retail market, driving CTHR’s retail and wholesale distribution segment (84% of revenue in FY13) at an 8.8% CAGR over FY14EFY16E. We expect margins to benefit from higher food sales and economies of scale in food processing. However, high finance costs resulting from CTHR’s recent spate of acquisitions may pressure earnings. We arrive at a valuation range of LKR126-153 for CTHR, compared with the current share price of LKR140, as at 4 September 2013. Sri Lanka’s organized food retail penetration grew to 15% in 2012 from 10% in 2004. This growth was supported by rising disposable income (12.6% CAGR over 2010-2012) and a slowly increasing preference for shopping at modern retail outlets. However, penetration remains lower than regional peers’, implying growth potential. We expect CTHR’s revenues to post an 11.1% CAGR over FY14E-FY16E. CTHR’s food retail and wholesale distribution segment will be the key driver of growth, with revenue rising at an 8.8% CAGR over the forecast period, driven mainly by macro-level growth and an aggressive store expansion strategy. Total store count is up 55% since 2009 and we forecast a 22% increase from FY13 to FY16E. We believe the food processing segment (12% of revenue), which produces a range of items such as ice cream, yoghurt and soft alcoholic beverages, will grow at a 22.6% CAGR. Net profit margin should widen 40bps to 2.3% in FY16E. Margin growth should be supported by a 47bps margin expansion in the retail and wholesale distribution segment to 1.6% in FY16E. Net margin in the food processing segment should expand by 127bps to 3.8% in FY16E, driven by the economies of scale gained from the recent capacity expansions in the segment. Margin expansion may be tempered by growing operating costs as a result of the rise in electricity and fuel expenses. Additionally, increased finance and depreciation expenses could also negatively impact the margin. High debt level may weigh on profitability due to higher finance costs. Over the past three years, management has carried out several acquisitions and other expansion activities, mostly funded by debt – which climbed to LKR15.8bn in 1QFY14, up 150% from FY10. Due to this increase in debt, CTHR’s gearing levels increased to 42% in 1QFY14 from 30% in FY10 and should drive the increase in its interest expense over FY14E-FY16E, and thereby possibly restrict any significant profit growth in the short term. However, we expect these investments to pay off starting from FY14E. We arrive at a valuation range of LKR126-153, compared with the current share price of LKR140. We have used DCF/SOTP valuation and P/E analyses to establish this valuation range. CTHR shares currently trade at an FY14E P/E of 23.9x, within its three-year historical forward P/E range of 17.3x-41.2x. Our bull-case scenario analysis assumes better-than-expected performances in the retail segment. Conversely, our bear-case scenario takes into account a possible slowdown in consumption due to sluggish consumer sentiment (see page 21 for risks to our valuation range). Key statistics
CSE/Bloomberg tickers Share price (4 Sept 2013) No. of issued shares (m) Market cap (USDm) Enterprise value (USDm) Free float (%) 52-week range (H/L) Avg. daily vol (shares,1yr) Avg. daily turnover (USD ‘000) CTHR.N0000/CTHR SL LKR140 183 193 338 39% LKR170/120 17,500 19

Source: CSE, Bloomberg Note: USD/LKR=128.6 (avg. for the 1 year ended 4 September 2013)

Share price movement
140%

120%

100%

80% Sep-12 Nov-12 Jan-13 Mar-13 May-13 Jul-13 CTHR Source: CSE, Bloomberg ASPI S&P SL 20

Share price performance
3m CTHR All Share Price Index S&P SL 20
Source: CSE, Bloomberg

6m 8% 2% 0%

12m 7% 7% 9%

-3% -11% -12%

Summary financials
LKR m (year end 31 March) Revenue EBITDA Net profit Recurrent EPS ROE (%) P/E (x) 2013 56,050 6,337 1,084 6.31 6.5 22.1 2014E 63,319 4,738 1,061 5.85 4.7 23.9 2015E 70,385 5,216 1,508 6.56 6.5 21.3

Source: CTHR, Amba estimates Note: Revenue and net profit figures exclude discontinued operations

1 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC

Table of Contents
Favorable consumer indicators to drive growth of food retail segments ............................................................................. 3
Disposable income and consumption rising steadily ............................................................................................................................ 3 Potential risks to the food retail sector .................................................................................................................................................. 7

We forecast CTHR’s revenue to post an 11.1% CAGR through FY16E ............................................................................. 9
Growth in the food retail market to drive retail and wholesale distribution, and food processing revenue ............................................ 9 Food processing revenue to grow at a 22.6% CAGR through FY16E .................................................................................................. 9 Restaurant revenues to rise at a CAGR of 22.6% through FY16E ..................................................................................................... 10

Net profit margin to improve 40bps to 2.3% in FY16E from 1.9% in FY13 ........................................................................ 12
Rise in finance costs may weigh on short-term profit potential ........................................................................................................... 12 Retail and wholesale distribution margins to widen 47bps supported by retail volume growth ........................................................... 12 Food processing margins to widen 127bps, driven by recent investments in capacity expansion and new products......................... 13 Restaurant margins to expand 49bps fuelled by growing consumer demand in the local restaurant sector ....................................... 13 Real estate margin to contract to 3.0% in FY16E, as new developments weigh on margin ............................................................... 13

High debt levels may lower earnings growth ..................................................................................................................... 14
Land bank may add to upside potential .............................................................................................................................................. 15 Trajectory of banking efforts evolving ................................................................................................................................................. 16

We establish a valuation range of LKR126-153 for CTHR ................................................................................................ 18
DCF/SOTP analysis returns a valuation range of LKR126-153 per share .......................................................................................... 18 P/E analysis yields a valuation range of LKR127-140 per share ........................................................................................................ 20 Sources for additional potential upside/downside ............................................................................................................................... 21 We have not factored in relative valuation in our price range ............................................................................................................. 21 Share price performance .................................................................................................................................................................... 22

Earnings release focus areas............................................................................................................................................. 24 Appendix 1: Company overview......................................................................................................................................... 25
CTHR’s key businesses ..................................................................................................................................................................... 26 Management strategy, transparency and governance ........................................................................................................................ 27 Shareholding structure ....................................................................................................................................................................... 28 Board of directors ............................................................................................................................................................................... 29

Appendix 2: Key financial data ........................................................................................................................................... 31
Summary group financials (LKRm) ..................................................................................................................................................... 31 Key ratios............................................................................................................................................................................................ 32 Segmental summary........................................................................................................................................................................... 33

Appendix 3: Industry analysis using Porter’s framework ................................................................................................... 35
Organized food retail .......................................................................................................................................................................... 35 Food and beverage manufacturing ..................................................................................................................................................... 36

Appendix 4: SWOT analysis .............................................................................................................................................. 39 Appendix 5: Diversified sector overview ............................................................................................................................ 40 Fact Sheet .......................................................................................................................................................................... 43
Sri Lanka investment environment overview ...................................................................................................................................... 43

2 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC

Favorable consumer indicators to drive growth of food retail segments
Supported by encouraging macro trends, the Sri Lankan food retail market is growing, mainly driven by the improving retail infrastructure and an expanding, increasingly selective consumer base looking for convenience. Growing macro trends should benefit the Sri Lankan food retail market

Disposable income and consumption rising steadily
We believe Sri Lanka’s favorable macroeconomic environment, in terms of continuing GDP growth and the consequent increase in disposable income, is driving growth in the food retail sector, as reflected in rising consumer demand. This bodes well for CTHR’s retail and wholesale distribution and food processing segments, which we expect to benefit from increased consumer appetite for food and beverage products. As illustrated in Figure 1, we expect revenue growth in these two segments to outperform both macroeconomic data points.

Figure 1:

Growth in CTHR’s food retail and processing segments to outpace macroeconomic growth

YoY growth 100%

50%

0%

2010

2011 2012 2013 2014E YoY GDP per capita growth rate YoY disposable income growth rate YoY revenue growth - retail and wholesale distribution (LHS) YoY revenue growth - food processing (LHS)

2015E

2016E

Source: World Bank, Central Bank of Sri Lanka (CBSL), Amba estimates

The food, beverages and tobacco industry’s contribution to GDP grew to 8.1% in 2012 from 7.9% in 2007. Further, expenditure on food, beverages and tobacco recorded a 16.6% CAGR over the period to LKR610.9bn in 2012. Both measures highlight the growth in local consumption in the recent past.

Figure 2:
LKRbn 8,000 6,000 4,000

Expenditure on food, beverages and tobacco posted a 16.6% CAGR over 2007-2012

25% 20% 15% 10%

2,000 0

5% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 0%

GDP (LHS) Expenditure on food, beverages and tobacco - YoY growth (RHS)
Source: Department of Census and Statistics

Expenditure on food, beverages and tobacco (LHS)

3 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC

Overall consumption levels in the country continued to rise in 2012, although at a slower rate than in 2011. Private consumption, in particular, grew 15.5% YoY in 2012, compared with 25.1% in 2011. Food, beverages and tobacco constitute the largest consumption expenditure sector, rising 27.7% YoY in 2011 and subsequently 7.7% in 2012. This sector contributed 37.6% of total private consumption expenditure (PCE) in 2012, down from 40.4% in 2011, as rising income levels reduced the share of spending on essential items such as food, while that on non-food items increased 20.7% YoY in 2012, compared with 23.4% in 2011. However, CARG’s most recent annual report cites research from the Nielsen Company which shows that the share of expenditure on food, while expenditure on beverages, laundry and household products, amongst others, has dropped.

Figure 3: Private consumption levels continued to rise in 2012; spending on food, beverages and tobacco increased 7.7% YoY
LKRm 6,000 4,000 2,000 0

Figure 4: Spending on food, beverages and tobacco as a percentage of household expenditure declined slightly in 2012 compared with that in 2010
Ratio

30% 20% 10% 0%

100% 80% 62.4% 60% 40% 20% 0% 37.6% 2007 Food ratio (%)
Source: Department of Census and Statistics

57.7%

62.4%

42.3% 2010

37.6% 2012

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Private consumption expenditure (LHS) Expenditure on food, beverages and tobacco (LHS) Expenditure on food, beverages and tobacco - YoY growth (RHS)
Source: CBSL

Non-food ratio (%)

Overall food retail market growing, along with the preference for modern food retail outlets
Traditional trade outlets, such as local grocers, outdoor markets and roadside stalls, continue to hold the majority share (85%) of the Sri Lankan food retail market, particularly in rural areas. However, CARG’s aggressive outlet expansion plan is targeting regional cities in an attempt to expose these areas to modern retail outlets. Organized retail (i.e., supermarkets) is accreting market share, albeit slowly, by operating a low-margin, high-volume model, and entices customers with a larger range of products (some at prices lower than what traditional stores can offer) and a more comfortable shopping environment. At a macro level, Sri Lanka’s modern food retailing sector is attractive, with only 15% of food sold through modern outlets in 2012, compared with 10% in 2004, according to data from Nielsen – the rest is bought through traditional grocery stores (which carry a limited range of staples and convenience goods) and outdoor markets (which offer fresh produce). This segment should, therefore, benefit from the growing propensity for shopping at modern trade outlets. The experience in other emerging markets suggests that increasing disposable income is positively correlated with modern food retail market share, as consumers demand greater choice and search for a more convenient grocery shopping experience. The current low level of penetration of modern retail outlets leaves room for upside in the sector

CARG is well positioned to capture the growing demand for organized food retail
CARG’s chain of supermarkets currently enjoys a market share of about 40-45% in the local organized food retail sector and slightly less than 7% of the estimated total grocery spend,

4 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC according to management. The rapid growth of its store network should help the retailer position itself to capture an increase in shopping at supermarkets, with the increasing presence of CARG’s own-brand goods strengthening its position further. CTHR’s retail and wholesale distribution activities account for approximately 84% of its total revenue from continuous operations (as of FY13), while retail operations alone contribute 79%. The company’s food retail operation is the largest amongst private supermarket retailers in Sri Lanka by both revenue and total store count, as shown in Figure 5. Here, we examine three main factors that contribute to CTHR’s competitive edge in the organized food retail space. Extensive retail network. Through CARG, CTHR’s main retail strategy is to reach as many regional areas in the country as possible, where no private supermarket chains have ventured yet. Just over 50% of Sri Lanka’s total fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) market is in rural areas, according to a Nielsen report, and these regions are generally underserved by modern-format retailers. CARG launched an ambitious expansion program in December 2009 to open 100 new outlets by FY14, a 74% increase in its store count, which stood at 136 as of March 2009. The company remains on track to achieve this target – net additions were 75 new outlets between March 2009 and March 2013, including 29 in FY13 alone. As of June 2013, the company had 219 outlets in all 25 districts of the island. CARG is far more aggressive in its expansion plans than its competitors Keells Super and Arpico, which had net openings of only four and minus one stores, respectively, in FY13 and seven and six over FY09-FY13. This allows CARG to enjoy the first-mover advantage and establish a strong local market position before its competitors enter a particular region. Keells Super and Arpico focus more on opening larger stores in cities with higher levels of disposable income. CARG is the leader in the local modern food retail market due to its wide-reaching outlet network, a well-organized supply chain and its growing presence in the private-label space

Figure 5:

CARG leads Keells Super and Arpico in total store count

No. of stores 250 200 150 100 50 0 44 38 46 38 45 42 47 45 136 142 151 182

211

51

44

FY09 Cargills

FY10

FY11 Keells Super

FY12 Arpico

FY13

Source: CTHR, Ceylon Cold Stores PLC, Richard Pieris and Company PLC

Efficient supply chain. CARG has built direct relationships with farmers from whom the supermarket retailer buys agricultural and dairy produce, which it distributes to its retail outlets. By directly sourcing from the farmers in a typical produce supply chain, the company is able to sell the products at highly competitive prices in its supermarkets, which is a key feature of its marketing strategy. As part of its strategy of buying produce directly from farmers, CARG ensures a price 20% above the farmers’ production cost, thereby firmly securing the supply of goods, according to the company’s management. Due to the efficiency of its supply chain and its efforts to minimize postharvest wastage, the supermarket chain is typically able to price its products lower than modern trade competitors. This has made CARG popular with price-conscious customers, who want to keep their food expenses low. Figure 6 compares the prices of a few common goods across supermarkets in Colombo. In this sample – which is admittedly limited – CARG offers the lowest prices for most of the goods, though not all, in our sample list.

5 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC

Figure 6:

Price comparison of key food items across supermarket retailers
Cargills 60 45 124 216 155 139 98 45 640 1,079 Keells 70 60 127 197 123 149 103 45 857 1,005 Arpico 70 60 125 165 165 141 97 42 678 881

Item (in LKR) Rice (samba) Rice (red) Wheat flour Big onions Potatoes Lentils Sugar (white) Coconuts Chicken breast Fish
Source: Amba, based on prices gathered from all three retailers

Note: Prices are as of 26 August 2013 per kg of each item, except coconut prices which are per nut

Growth of private-label goods. Demand for private-label products is rising due to improved quality and expanded product variety, and these products are popular with both retailers and customers, who are looking to save money. A Nielsen report showed that sales of private-label goods, on average, grew 16% YoY in eight Asian countries in 2011. Customers benefit from the generally lower prices of these products, while retailers such as CARG enjoy higher margins, often as much as 25% more than those on comparable branded goods. Since private-label goods often have lower marketing costs, supermarket retailers are able to offer such items at a lower price than similar branded products. Management stated that CARG typically prices its private-label products lower than the category leader. For CARG, private-label goods constitute 3-4% of revenue, compared with 4% for Keells and 2% for Arpico. A brief comparison of certain key ratios across the top three retailers in the country is shown in Figure 7. CARG’s lower revenue per store can be attributed to the fact that most of its newer stores are being opened in less populated, lower income towns, whilst Arpico and Keells continue to focus on higher income areas. Further, Keells and Arpico tend to have stores that are larger in size, contributing to higher revenue per store figures. Keells supermarkets are currently focusing on opening stores of 7,000 sq. ft. and Arpico’s stores are 10,000-60,000 sq. ft. in size. CARG’s stores, on the other hand, are in the 2,000-5,000 sq. ft. range, with expansion plans now focusing on the smaller-sized Cargills Express stores, particularly in sub-urban towns. CARG’s absolute revenue is far higher than peers’, but revenue per store trails the peer group due to smaller store sizes

Figure 7:

CARG’s FY13 revenue is 2.8x higher than its closest local peer Arpico, but revenue per store is the lowest in the group
Revenue (LKRm) Revenue growth (YoY) FY13 44,258 15,703 14,025 FY11 3.1% 20.8% 12.7% FY12 24.5% 28.4% 16.2% FY13 12.9% 12.0% 17.7% Revenue/store (LKRm) FY11 193 260 228 FY12 202 312 254 FY13 210 357 275

Retailer Cargills Arpico Supercentres Keells Super

FY11 31,493 10,926 10,258

FY12 39,205 14,027 11,918

Source: CTHR, Ceylon Cold Stores PLC and Richard Pieris and Company PLC

Figure 8:

CARG’s margins are lower than Arpico’s, ROA is higher compared to Keells
Operating margin ROA FY13 3.8% 6.1% -1.3% FY11 4.5% NA -2.5% FY12 4.6% NA 0.4% FY13 6.8% NA -5.0%

Retailer Cargills Arpico Supercentres Keells Super

FY11 3.5% 7.6% 0.2%

FY12 4.3% 10.6% 0.7%

Source: CTHR, Ceylon Cold Stores PLC and Richard Pieris and Company PLC

6 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC

Low penetration of modern food retail highlights growth potential
An analysis of the sales contribution from modern store formats to total grocery sales across several regional peers reveals that penetration levels in a country generally go hand in hand with per capita GDP levels. This trend suggests that as Sri Lanka’s GDP per capita rises, supermarket retailers have an opportunity to increase their presence and share of total food retail sales.

Figure 9: market
USD 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0

Regional comparison of modern food retail penetration levels and GDP per capita show room for growth in the local

60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% India Indonesia GDP per capita (LHS) Sri Lanka Philippines Thailand Malaysia 0%

Modern food retail penetration level (RHS)

Source: World Bank, JP Morgan, PricewaterhouseCoopers

Potential risks to the food retail sector
While the local organized food retail industry is enjoying a period of revenue growth, the following factors highlight potential downside risks that may affect this momentum.  Regulatory changes could affect supermarket operators’ revenue and profitability levels. The 12% value-added tax (VAT) imposed in January 2013 on all retail and wholesale operators with quarterly revenues of more than LKR500m is likely to moderate revenue and, therefore, margin growth, as not all of the extra cost can be passed on to consumers. Supermarket chains’ margins are typically thin, with their main focus being on high sales volumes over high margins. There is, therefore, constant pressure on operating costs, which is compounded by the recent hikes in fuel and electricity costs. The table below compares CARG’s operating and net margins with those of a sample of its global peers, and shows that while CARG’s operating margin has historically been in line or slightly below the peer average, its net margin trails that of the peer group, possibly highlighting the negative margin impact of its increased debt level. Risks to the local food retail sector include regulation changes, continued pressure on margins and a lack of qualified personnel



7 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC
Figure 10: Comparison of global peers highlights low margin levels in the food retail sector
Operating margin Retailer Cargills Tesco Walmart Carrefour Metro Aeon Co Al-Meera Consumer Goods Dairy Farm Sumber Alfaria Trijaya Midi Utama Indonesia Philippine Seven Corp. Mean Median High Low
Source: CARG, Bloomberg

Net margin 2013 3.7% 3.9% 5.9% 2.9% 2.1% 3.8% NA 5.1% 2.4% NA NA 3.7% 3.8% 5.9% 2.1% 2011 1.8% 4.4% 3.9% 0.5% 1.0% 6.7% 6.6% 5.3% 2.0% 1.2% 3.5% 3.5% 3.7% 6.7% 0.5% 2012 1.8% 4.4% 3.5% 1.6% 0.0% 6.5% 7.0% 4.6% 2.1% 1.2% 3.6% 3.4% 3.6% 7.0% 0.0% 2013 0.8% 0.2% 3.6% 1.3% 0.1% 6.9% NA 4.8% 1.9% NA NA 2.7% 1.9% 6.9% 0.1%

Country Sri Lanka UK USA France Germany Japan Qatar Singapore Indonesia Indonesia Philippines

2011 3.5% 5.8% 6.1% 2.9% 3.6% 3.8% 3.0% 5.6% 2.3% 2.9% 5.1% 4.1% 3.7% 6.1% 2.3%

2012 4.4% 5.9% 5.9% 2.8% 2.5% 4.2% 3.8% 4.7% 2.2% 2.6% 5.3% 4.0% 4.0% 5.9% 2.2%



Several Sri Lankan industries, from tourism to plantations, are experiencing a severe dearth of qualified personnel, and the food retail sector is no exception. The lack of suitable personnel, especially managers and other higher-level executives, together with high employee turnover, makes managing and training human resources crucial for CARG’s expansion plans.

8 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC

We forecast CTHR’s revenue to post an 11.1% CAGR through FY16E
We expect CTHR’s revenue growth to be fuelled primarily by its retail and wholesale distribution segment, supported by the food processing segment. The restaurants segment should also continue to contribute positively to group revenue, as will the real estate and entertainment segments, albeit to a much lesser extent. We expect CTHR’s revenue to benefit from growing food retail sales in Sri Lanka

Growth in the food retail market to drive retail and wholesale distribution, and food processing revenue
We forecast retail and wholesale distribution revenue to grow at a CAGR of 8.8% over FY14E-FY16E to reach approximately LKR60.5bn. This segment is CTHR’s largest top-line contributor and consists largely (94%) of CARG’s food retail operations. The food processing segment, which produces FMCG items such as ice creams and yoghurt as well as beer, and accounted for 12% of CTHR’s continuing revenues in FY13, is forecast to grow at a 22.6% CAGR through FY16E to reach LKR11.9bn. Growth in both segments should come mainly from the positive macroeconomic factors discussed above, in addition to CARG’s continually expanding retail and distribution footprint.

Figure 11: Revenue growth in the retail and food processing segments
LKRm 60,000 40,000 20,000 15% 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014E 2015E 2016E -5% 95% 75% 55% 35%

Revenues of retail and wholesale distribution segment (RHS) Revenues of food processing segment (RHS) YoY revenue growth - retail and wholesale distribution (LHS) YoY revenue growth - food processing (LHS)
Source: CTHR, Amba estimates

Food processing revenue to grow at a 22.6% CAGR through FY16E
The local food retail sector has seen a marked increase in lifestyle and impulse purchases over the past few years, spurred by a corresponding rise in disposable income. Through its food processing segment, and its sizeable portfolio of own brands of popular consumer goods, CTHR is in a prime position to take advantage of this trend. We expect the following factors to further support CTHR’s revenue growth in this segment. New product launches. In FY13, CTHR’s 59.5%-owned listed subsidiary Kotmale (CSE ticker: LAMB) expanded its line of cheese products by introducing cheese wedges and launched a new range of yoghurts in 1QFY14. A new range of one liter UHT milk cartons and a chocolate malt food drink were also launched in the year. CTHR is also capitalizing on the growing demand for more healthy and natural products with a new line of natural juices. Further, CARG signed a deal with Carlton & United Brewers (CUB) to brew and distribute its Foster’s brand of beer in Sri Lanka, which is scheduled to enter the local market in 3QFY14E. Capacity expansion. Over the past three years, CTHR has invested significantly in expanding capacity in its food processing operations, anticipating a rise in demand for these products. The

9 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC company is bolstering its top selling item by adding production and storage capacity to its dairy ice cream operations, in addition to its pasteurized milk and yoghurt plants, which should be commissioned by 3QFY14E. Sri Lanka’s per capita consumption of ice cream, at 1.7 liters/year, is well above the levels in China and the Philippines. However, consumption levels – reflecting both purchasing power and consumer appetite – in nearby Malaysia and Singapore are substantially higher. In the brewery segment, CTHR plans a substantial capacity increase to 600,000 hectoliters (htl) per annum from 50,000 htl at the time of the acquisition of the business in FY12; capacity is presently at 300,000htl. Demand for alcohol is poised to benefit from growth in disposable income and the rise in tourist arrivals to the country, evidenced by the 22.5% YoY growth in the malt liquor production industry in FY12, as per the CARG 2012 annual report. Geographical expansion. Processed meat revenue continued to increase in FY13, although the product line experienced some margin pressure as well, and CTHR is keen to explore new markets for export. Additionally, the company should also see further growth in this product category coming from the pickup in the local and Maldivian hospitality sectors.

Restaurant revenues to rise at a CAGR of 22.6% through FY16E
We expect revenue in the restaurant segment, which accounted for 3% of CTHR’s continuing revenues in FY13, to grow at a 22.6% CAGR over FY14E-FY16E. This is as a result of more people eating out – the CBSL reports a 50% YoY growth in PCE in the hotel, cafe and restaurant segment in 2012. In addition, CTHR’s revenue in the segment has been recently boosted by higher prices points at KFC. The local restaurant industry is likely to benefit from growing tourist arrivals, with the government forecasting a 28.0% CAGR in tourist arrivals over 2014E-2016E.

Figure 12: Private consumption expenditure (PCE) on restaurant visits posted an 18.0% CAGR over 2009-2012
LKRm 100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 Expenditure on hotels, cafes and restaurants
Source: CBSL

2.0% 1.8% 1.6% 1.4% 1.2% 2010 2011 2012 1.0%

Expenditure on restaurants - % of PCE

CTHR, through its 70%-owned subsidiary Cargills Food Processors (Private) Limited operates the franchise for the KFC chain of fast-food restaurants. The company has already opened 23 KFC outlets, including 5 in FY13, mainly in Colombo and its suburbs. The recently launched outlets in regional cities have performed above the company’s expectations, with consumers in these areas showing a higher propensity to dine out than in the past. CTHR has plans to add two or three more outlets in FY14, with several more in the pipeline, according to the company. KFC’s strength in the local quick-service sector is its ability to innovate and “localize” its food menus to make them more appealing to the local palette. The launch of KFC’s home delivery service in FY12 should also help boost revenue in the segment, as increasingly busy households opt to bring home the dining out experience. Through CARG, the company has also signed a deal to become the exclusive franchise in Sri Lanka for global restaurant chain TGI Friday’s. The first restaurant is scheduled to open at the end

The restaurant segment will be driven by the growing KFC chain and the opening of the first TGI Friday’s restaurant in 2013

10 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC of 2013 in Fort, the heart of Sri Lanka’s business district, but no further expansion plans beyond the opening of the first restaurant are currently available. We forecast that CTHR will open one new TGI Friday’s restaurant a year through FY16E. KFC faces competition in the local market from other international fast food chains such as McDonalds, Pizza Hut and Dominoes, as well as competitors like stand-alone restaurants and smaller, informal wayside food stalls. While it still enjoys a considerable level of popularity amongst diners, KFC’s high price point relative to some of these smaller establishments, may negatively affect diner footfall.

Real estate and entertainment segments to make modest revenue contributions
Real estate We expect CTHR’s real estate segment to post low growth – with a CAGR of 3.8% over FY14E-FY16E. The segment makes up 1% of total revenue and consists primarily of CTHR’s listed subsidiary, CT Land Development PLC (CSE ticker: CTLD), and CT Properties, among other smaller companies. CTLD’s business activities comprise mainly the ownership and operation of Majestic City, one of the more popular shopping malls in the country. CT Properties is the property development arm of the segment and was responsible for the construction of the 100-unit Empire apartment complex, a leading residential condominium project completed in 2009. The company is now nearing the completion of its CT Gardens project, a residential township with 180 building plots, and has recently signed a preliminary JV agreement for the construction of GS Towers, a 260-unit luxury condominium project in Kotahena, a busy business and residential area 3km from the center of Colombo, at a reported cost of USD52m. We believe CTHR is likely to use its considerable land bank for future development projects and have factored in the value of such investment properties in arriving at our valuation range (refer page 16 for further details). The increasing level of economic activity in Sri Lanka and the inflow of expatriates into the country should also present CTHR with more opportunities to cater to the resultant growth in demand for premium office space and high-end apartments. However, several other property development companies are also competing for a share of this expected demand hike – an estimated 3,000 new high-end apartments and condominiums should enter the real estate market by 2018, possibly resulting in a supply glut, although the development of these projects will be phased out over the period. Entertainment We forecast entertainment revenues to grow at a CAGR of 6.4% through FY16E to reach LKR189m, although it will still account for only less than 1% of FY16E group revenues. We believe that this segment will benefit from the rising demand for leisure and entertainment activities from increasingly affluent middle-class consumers with growing disposable incomes. The segment operates several cinemas in Colombo and other main cities. Sri Lanka’s Central Bank Annual Report for 2012 stated that there was a 13% growth in leisure and entertainment spending over 2010-2012, further supporting the company’s decision to invest and overhaul its existing cinemas in FY11. The real estate segment should benefit from CTHR’s extensive land bank; the entertainment segment stands to gain from the growing expenditure on leisure activities

11 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC

Net profit margin to improve 40bps to 2.3% in FY16E from 1.9% in FY13
We expect CTHR’s net profit margin from continuing operations to improve 40bps over the forecast period, as volume growth in key segments should offset losses in the real estate segment. Three key factors affecting CTHR’s margin are set out below. Operating costs. This mainly consists of electricity and fuel expenses. Management stated that electricity costs constitute 2-3% of CTHR’s revenue and the company is a large consumer of electricity, due mainly to CARG’s high electricity requirements for its supermarket chain and its capital-intensive food processing factories. Finance costs. CTHR’s recent significant capex spend has led to a spike in its finance costs, as detailed further below. Depreciation. Higher depreciation charges are also the result of CTHR’s investment activities over the past three years. CTHR’s margin should be driven by its retail and food processing segments, although margin growth may be tempered by rising operating costs

Rise in finance costs may weigh on short-term profit potential
As a result of CTHR taking on additional debt to finance its recent expansion plans, finance costs rose 113% YoY in FY13 and are likely to remain high until the company pays down its debt. CTHR’s management is reported to have said that the company will reduce its debt over the next two years. This rise in the company’s finance expenses, which accounts for 46% of EBIT in FY13, could weight down on CTHR’s profitability levels until debt levels are reduced.

Figure 13: Net profit margins from the retail, food processing and restaurant segments to drive CTHR margin growth
Margin 40% 20% 0% -20% -40% Retail & wholesale distribution
Source: CTHR

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014E

2015E

2016E

Real estate

Food processing

Restaurants

Entertainment

CTHR

Retail and wholesale distribution margins to widen 47bps supported by retail volume growth
We expect the retail and wholesale distribution segment’s net profit margin to expand 47bps in FY16E to 1.6% from 1.1% in FY13. This growth is likely to result from CTHR’s aggressive outlet expansion strategy driving retail revenue growth. Although this margin expansion appears modest, we believe it is noteworthy, as margins in the food retail sector are typically low (refer to Figure 10 for a peer comparison of margins), with the focus being on selling high volumes. In addition, the segment contributes 49% of the group’s net income, and, as such, even a slight expansion in the segment’s margin would boost overall net income. Two factors tempering the segment’s margin expansion are rising electricity and fuel costs and, to a lesser extent, the imposition of the VAT from January 2013. Although CTHR does not disclose

12 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC the exact breakdown between its fixed and variable operating costs, we expect the recent fuel and electricity price hikes to drive up the cost of logistics and the operating cost of supermarkets, especially larger outlets, thereby restricting significant margin growth in the upcoming quarters. We believe the introduction of the VAT will also weigh on profitability of the segment, although CARG states that the impact from the tax has been mitigated to some extent.

Food processing margins to widen 127bps, driven by recent investments in capacity expansion and new products
We forecast an expansion in CTHR’s food processing margins to 3.8% in FY16E from 2.5% in FY13, as investments in soft alcohol and the underperforming confectionary businesses weigh down on margin expansion in the short term. CTHR has invested LKR1.5bn to expand the capacity for dairy goods and LKR2-2.5bn to increase the production capacity for its soft alcohol range. Although such significant capex may limit margin expansion in the short term, we expect the dairy business to remain profitable and the brewery to turn around from FY15E. Furthermore, the launch of the Kist biscuits line in FY12 in an already competitive market is still below the company’s expected level of performance. We expect this product line to break even in FY15E, as improved distribution and marketing strategies raise the level of consumer awareness of the biscuit range. The increase in electricity costs and VAT impact may temper margin growth in this capital-intensive segment, although CTHR does not disclose to what extent. There could, however, be some scope for upside margin surprise from potential price increases, particularly for ice creams, CTHR’s bestselling product. The relatively low competition in the market – ice cream is a de facto oligopoly – means that CTHR faces little resistance to increasing prices. If demand remains robust, CTHR could push through higher price hikes to bolster margins. With regard to the soft alcohol business, further rises in excise duties on alcohol would pressure margins in the segment; excise duties were increased twice during FY13 and most recently in August 2013. The food processing segment should see its margin rise by 127bps due to its recent capacity expansions coming online and the growth in consumption levels

Restaurant margins to expand 49bps fuelled by growing consumer demand in the local restaurant sector
We forecast the restaurant segment’s net profit margin to expand to 9.5% in FY16E from 9.0% in FY13, driven by the increasing consumer expenditure on dining out in hotels, cafes and restaurants, as well as increasing prices. In addition, the opening of the first TGI Friday’s restaurant should also boost margins slightly as we expect the restaurant to return higher margins compared with KFC. However, rising operating costs and input prices will continue to pressure margins in the segment. Relief in the form of increasing prices is also limited if the restaurants are to remain competitively priced and due to the already high price points charged.

Real estate margin to contract to 3.0% in FY16E, as new developments weigh on margin
Margins in the real estate segment tend to be very volatile, and are affected by construction costs and the timing of apartment sales, which command significantly higher margins than rentals. We forecast a contraction in the segment’s net margin to 3.0% in FY16E from 43.8% in FY13, mainly affected by the construction costs of the GS Towers project. The development is slated for completion in 2018; however, we currently have no visibility on the projected revenue inflows and the timings of such.

13 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC

High debt levels may lower earnings growth
High level of gearing and lack of cash generation could restrict investment opportunities in the near term
Over the past three years, following the end of the 30-year civil war in Sri Lanka, CTHR has invested significantly in new business ventures, such as in the real estate segment, and in capacity enhancement of existing product lines. CARG alone is reported to have made more than LKR12bn in post-war investments, about 7.4x its FY13 net profit. Most of these investments have been funded through debt and, as a result, CTHR’s net debt increased to LKR14.6bn in 1QFY14 from LKR5.8bn in FY10. The company’s gearing level came in at 42% as at 1QFY14, compared with 30% in FY10. In addition, CTHR’s free cash flow (FCF) generation has not been encouraging, with negative FCF reported every year since 2008, with the exception of 2010, resulting in a group FCF yield of negative 10% on average for the past three years. We believe that CTHR’s divestment of its holding in Lanka Ceramic PLC for LKR2.9bn in May 2013 may provide a source of funds for debt repayment. CTHR has paid an interim dividend of LKR5 per share in June 2013 using part of the proceeds from the divestment. Short term investment opportunities may be curbed by current debt position

Figure 14: CTHR’s net debt position is higher compared with peers’
LKRm 0

(10,000)

(20,000) CT Holdings PLC Ceylon Cold Stores PLC Richard Pieris & Co. PLC Hemas Holdings PLC Nestle Lanka PLC

Source: CTHR, respective company financial reports Note: Figures are as of June 2013

Figure 15: CTHR’s net debt progression (FY10-1QFY14)
LKRm 20,000 16,000 12,000 8,000 4,000 0 FY10 FY11 Net debt
Source: CTHR

60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% FY12 Gearing FY13 1QFY14 0%

14 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC
High debt levels could restrict CTHR’s ability to make further acquisitions or additional large investments until some part of this is paid down and the liquidity position improves. In Figure 16, we have highlighted a few of the larger acquisitions CTHR has been involved in over the past three years. Management noted that these transactions were carried out mainly to benefit from the economies of scale and compete more closely with multinational food retailers, which account for around 70% of all branded food sales in supermarkets in Sri Lanka. CTHR’s investment activities include enhancing its ice cream factory, improving the Kist jam and cordial plant and expanding its meat processing plant. Further, as mentioned previously, CTHR also expanded its dairy, brewery and confectionery businesses, including the acquisitions of Kotmale Holdings, McCallum Breweries and Diana Biscuits, detailed in Figure 16.

Figure 16: CTHR has expanded its business lines through acquisitions in the past few years
Year 2010 Target Kotmale Holdings PLC Description Produces dairy products Transaction amount LKR922m Comment Acquired a stake of 74%. This has now increased to 90.65 Acquired the company's production plant Acquired a 62% stake. Renamed as Swisstek Aluminium Limited in 2011

2010 2010

Diana Biscuits Manufacturers (Private) Limited Ceykor Aluminium Industries Limited

Manufactures and distributes biscuits Manufactures aluminum extrusions for the local market Produces the Three Coins brand of beer

LKR350m LKR105m

2011

McCallum Breweries (Ceylon) Limited, McCallum Brewing Company (Private) Limited and Three Coins Company (Private) Limited

LKR1,425m

Source: CTHR, ft.lk, island.lk

During FY13, CARG has also finalized an agreement to establish a dairy hub in the northern part of Sri Lanka in order to further consolidate its dairy operations. Financial details for the project have not yet been disclosed.

Land bank may add to upside potential
CTHR’s entire real estate portfolio consists of about 130 acres of land in and out of Colombo as of March 2012; the two properties listed under Cargills (Ceylon) PLC in Figure 17 were detailed in CARG’s FY13 annual report. We believe that some of these properties could be used for future development projects and be a sizeable source of further value. In Figure 17, we have highlighted these specific sites and arrived at a valuation based on current market prices. We believe that CTHR’s valuable land bank could be a noteworthy source of upside potential

15 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC
Figure 17: We estimate CTHR’s investment property land bank at LKR8.0bn
Value per acre (LKRm) 185 235 192 172 1,447 690 290 1,271 1,047 52 400 1,115 Current value (LKRm) 197 88 109 240 638 177 725 1,906 511 2,236 490 655 7,971

Land area (Acres) C T Holdings PLC Kandy Nuwara Eliya Negombo Bandarawela Cargills (Ceylon) PLC Colombo 1 Colombo 2 Boralesgamuwa Vauxhall Street - Colombo 2 Braybrooke Place - Colombo 2 C T Properties Lakeside (Private) Limited Boralesgamuwa C T Properties G S (Private) Limited Kotahena - Colombo 13 Dawason Office Complex (Private) Limited Colombo 2 Total
Source: CTHR, Amba estimates

1.06 0.38 0.57 2.80 0.88 0.51 2.50 1.50 0.49 43.00 1.23 0.59

In our sum-of-the-parts (SOTP) valuation of CTHR, the land bank accounts for 32% of our estimated equity value for the company.

Trajectory of banking efforts evolving
CTHR and CARG are the joint sponsors of Cargills Agriculture and Commercial Bank (CACB), which will have a capital base of LKR5bn and is awaiting final approval from the CBSL to commence operations. CACB will operate as a commercial bank and offer a full range of conventional services such as corporate and project finance. We believe that the bank may have a particular focus on the microfinance space and cater to micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs), especially in the agricultural and agro-based sectors. CACB was granted provisional approval by the CBSL in September 2011 and was originally scheduled to commence operations in July 2012, but this was pushed back several times due to delays in obtaining final approval. The bank has a perceptible advantage in building out its branch network, as it will be able to use CARG’s extensive store footprint and set up small branches within these supermarkets. This should allow CACB to benefit from the low cost of setting up new branches and establish a presence in regional cities, where most farmers and other agricultural workers, the bank’s apparent target market, live. CTHR and CARG each hold a 15% stake in CACB, each acquired for LKR660m, while two foreign investors – the International Finance Corporation (IFC) and DEG (a subsidiary of German state development bank KfW) – own 10% each. The IFC, the private sector investment arm of the World Bank, is expected to provide a USD7.0m senior loan to support CACB’s debt funding requirements, in addition to making a USD3.8m equity investment (equivalent to 44m shares of CACB’s initial share capital). In July 2013, the Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF), Sri Lanka’s state-controlled pension fund, invested a reported LKR550m to acquire a 10% holding in CACB, including a director board seat, according to the local Daily Mirror journal. As more detailed and confirmed plans for the bank have not yet been formally announced, we have taken a conservative view and not factored this in our estimates. Furthermore, since CTHR’s Visibility on the impact of new banking venture currently limited; CACB awaiting final approval from CBSL the is is the

16 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC holding in CACB is only 15%, the bank would be accounted for only as an associate and, as such, its impact on CTHR’s operations may be limited.

17 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC

We establish a valuation range of LKR126-153 for CTHR
We arrive at a valuation range of LKR126-153 for CTHR, compared with the current share price of LKR140 as of 4 September 2013. We have arrived at this valuation range using scenario analysis with the discounted cash flow (DCF)/SOTP valuation technique and a P/E-based valuation approach. For comparison, we have also assessed CTHR’s valuation levels relative to a group of peers.

Figure 18: Valuation range analysis provides a range of LKR126-153 per share (current share price: LKR140)

140 126 DCF 127 P/E analysis 120 52-Week Range 170 140 153

1

0 50
Source: Amba estimates, CTHR, Bloomberg

100

150

200

DCF/SOTP analysis returns a valuation range of LKR126-153 per share
We have used a combined DCF/SOTP method to arrive at our valuation range for CTHR. We used base-case assumptions of a risk-free rate of 9.5% and a market risk premium of 5.0%, yielding a value of LKR135 per share. The assumptions we have made for each segment are presented below. Other elements of our valuation approach include the following:   We conducted a DCF analysis for all five segments, with explicit forecasts over FY14E-FY16E, followed by a fade period up to FY22E. We value CTHR's investment property portfolio (see Figure 17) based on our assumption that these properties may be used for future development projects and provide future upside to CTHR's valuation. We have valued these properties based on average market land prices for the areas they are located in. We assume a target capital structure of 50/50 for all segments, compared with CTHR's current capital structure of 62% equity and 38% debt. Our base case assumes a riskfree rate of 9.5% and a market risk premium of 5.0%



The following tables reflect our DCF/SOTP assumptions for the company’s key segments. For each segment, we have estimated:   EBIT and FCF throughout the explicit and fade periods. Terminal value at FY22E, calculated by applying a terminal growth rate to unleveraged FCF as of FY22E.

We arrive at our segmental enterprise value (EV) by discounting the unleveraged FCF values over the explicit and fade periods at the segmental WACC.

18 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC
Figure 19: Amba DCF/SOTP assumptions schedule
Retail and wholesale distribution and food processing WACC assumptions Target capital structure Cost of equity Cost of debt Terminal growth rate Effective tax rate WACC Restaurants WACC assumptions Target capital structure Cost of equity Cost of debt Terminal growth rate Effective tax rate WACC Real estate WACC assumptions Target capital structure Cost of equity Cost of debt Terminal growth rate Effective tax rate WACC Entertainment WACC assumptions Target capital structure Cost of equity Cost of debt Terminal growth rate Effective tax rate WACC
Source: Amba estimates

50/50 14.5% 13.0% 3.0% 28.0% 11.4%

EBIT total FCF Terminal value (undiscounted) EV

FY14E 2,408 831 49,855 32,688

50/50 14.5% 13.0% 3.0% 28.0% 12.1%

EBIT total FCF Terminal value (undiscounted) EV

FY14E 295 34 2,566 1,633

50/50 14.5% 13.0% 3.0% 28.0% 12.2%

EBIT total FCF Terminal value (undiscounted) EV

FY14E 201 145 2,079 1,679

50/50 14.5% 13.0% 3.0% 28.0% 12.1%

EBIT total FCF Terminal value (undiscounted) EV

FY14E 13 6 161 116

Figure 20 lists the segmental and other contributions to our base-case value per share. Figure 20: Segmental and land bank contribution to CTHR’s value per share
Equity value (LKRm) 34,413 1,679 1,633 116 850 343 (15,806) (4,715) 7,971 24,759 LKR per share 178.5 9.2 8.9 0.6 4.6 1.9 -86.3 -25.8 43.5 135.2 Contribution mix 132% 7% 7% 0% 3% 1% -64% -19% 32% 100%

Retail and wholesale distribution, and FMCG Real estate Restaurants Entertainment Cash and cash equivalents Short-term investments Debt Minority interests Dormant land bank Total
Source: Amba estimates

19 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC
We have also constructed bull- and bear-case scenarios to supplement our base-case DCF valuation, mainly based on our projections for CARG’s store openings and performance, since this is CTHR’s largest top-line contributor. The key distinguishing factors of these are as follows:  Bull case: Here we assume that CARG will open 27, 20 and 13 stores annually over FY14E FY16E. This is in comparison to 22, 14 and 10 openings for the period in our base case. In this scenario, we assume that the retail segment will perform above our expectations, supporting the accelerated pace of store openings. This scenario would yield a share price of LKR153. Bear case: Conversely, if the retail segment does not meet expectations due to sluggish consumption levels, CARG may decide to slow down its store network expansion plans and open only 19, 10 and 9 stores annually over the explicit forecast period, resulting in a share price of LKR126.



P/E analysis yields a valuation range of LKR127-140 per share
CTHR’s 12-month forward P/E has ranged between 17.3x and 41.2x since September 2010, and the share has traded at a 12-month average forward P/E of 22.8x. The share currently trades at 23.9x its 12-month forward EPS (based on Amba forecasts), 10% below its historical average. In determining a P/E valuation range, and a share price range, we have applied two scenarios:  Optimistic scenario: In this scenario, we expect shares to trade at a 24.0x forward multiple, based on our FY14E EPS estimate, implying a 5% premium to the share's historical average. This valuation outlook may arise from several favorable factors, such as better-than-expected growth in the food retail business driven by improving consumer demand and an increase in the proportion of shopping done at supermarkets. We applied the 24.0x forward P/E to our FY14E EPS estimate of LKR5.85 to arrive at a value of LKR140 per share. Conservative scenario: Here, investors may place a discount on the CTHR share due to sluggish consumption levels affecting the performance of the retail and food processing segments. By assigning a 5% discount to its 12-month forward P/E, implying a 21.7x multiple applied to FY14E EPS, we arrive at a share price of LKR127. Our optimistic scenario assumes a 5% premium to account for a higher-thanexpected rise in consumer demand, while we apply a 5% discount in our conservative scenario to adjust for low growth in consumption levels



Figure 21: CTHR forward P/E band chart
LKR 300 250 200 150 100 50 Sep-10

Mar-11
15x

Sep-11
21x

Mar-12
28x 34x

Sep-12
40x MPS

Mar-13

Source: CTHR, Bloomberg

20 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC

Sources for additional potential upside/downside
Listed below are some possible sources of valuation upside that we have not factored into our modeling of CTHR's financial performance:  Retail and food processing: As the food retail segment continues to grow, revenues (and possibly margins) could grow faster than our forecasts. Since CTHR's retail and wholesale distribution and food processing segments account for 95% of revenue and 64% of net profit attributable to the equity owners of the company, a better-than-expected performance could have a disproportionately large impact on overall margins. Investments: CTHR plans to launch Cargills Agriculture and Commercial Bank (CACB) and is currently awaiting final approval from the CBSL. While details of the bank's start-up and operation plans are limited, CTHR is likely to take advantage of CARG’s extensive outlet network to expand its own network by setting up bank branches inside each retail store at low cost. This new venture could very well be a source of upside potential for the CTHR share. Real estate: CTHR has signed a preliminary JV agreement for the construction of a luxury condominium complex in the heart of Colombo. The project should be completed in 2018, and should bring in additional revenue and profit for CTHR. Additionally, the company may also start new development projects using some of its potential investment property land bank in Colombo and regional cities (refer to Figure 17 for more details on CTHR’s dormant land). Restaurants: The company plans to open its first TGI Friday’s restaurant in 3QFY14E, which should add to top-line growth in the segment, although we do not have any indication as to what sort of revenue inflow is expected from the restaurant annually. We have accounted for the opening of one new TGI Friday’s restaurant per year in our explicit forecast period until FY16E. We have made this conservative assumption as there is no visibility on its potential expansion plans yet, leaving room for potential upside for this segment. Entertainment: CTHR plans to open a new shopping mall in Jaffna in 3QFY14E, including three new cinema screens, which should add to top-line growth in the entertainment segment.









However, there are risks to our valuation that could result in some downside to our estimates for CTHR. Retail operations may post only sluggish growth, which could impact our forecasts considerably, since this is by far the largest segmental component of revenue. The food processing segment may remain affected by the currently loss-making brewery and biscuit businesses for longer than we expect. In addition, ongoing increases in electricity and fuel costs may affect both these segments more than expected, with the retail operations additionally hit by the VAT, although CARG states that the impact from the tax on its operations are minimal. The real estate segment may also underperform as a result of delays or weak demand for current development projects brought on by stiff competition from new condominiums and other high-end residential schemes.

We have not factored in relative valuation in our price range
Figure 22 compares CTHR’s valuation metrics relative to its peers’. The share is trading at an FY14E P/E of 23.9x, at a premium to its peer average of 19.5x. Owing diversified companies’ range of activities, choosing an appropriate group of peers is challenging. Therefore, we have included a list of companies that, though imperfect, provides some measure of comparison for CTHR with other regional conglomerates.

21 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC
Figure 22: CTHR trades at a discount to its peer group on most measures
P/E Company name CT Holdings PLC Domestic peers Ceylon Cold Stores PLC Richard Pieris & Co. PLC Hemas Holdings PLC Nestle Lanka PLC International peers Sumber Alfaria Trijaya Tbk PT Midi Utama Indonesia Tbk PT Philippine Seven Corp. Mean Median High Low 37.6x 38.7x 25.2x 35.1x 28.5x 81.2x 15.4x 40.5x 50.6x 78.6x 23.5x 20.2x 50.6x 3.8x 37.5x 45.9x 91.8x 23.9x 22.9x 45.9x 6.7x 29.4x NA NA 19.5x 18.9x 33.2x 6.9x 22.8x NA NA 12.1x 7.1x 22.8x 6.3x 29.0% NA NA 19.0% 20.4% 29.0% 7.6% -0.2% -2.1% 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% 4.6% -2.1% NA NA NA 4.3% 4.2% 5.6% 3.2% 81.2x 15.4x 19.5x 17.9x 3.8x 5.6x 11.6x 28.8x 6.7x 6.7x 8.4x 38.4x NA 6.9x 8.5x 33.2x NA 6.3x 7.1x NA NA 7.6% 20.4% NA 3.0% 4.6% -0.6% 2.7% 3.2% 4.2% 5.6% NA 2011 29.3x 2012 28.3x 2013 22.2x 2014E 23.9x 2015E 21.3x EPS CAGR FY14E-FY15E 2.0% FCF yield 2012 12.7% 2013 -15.9%

Source: CTHR, Bloomberg, Amba estimates Note: CTHR multiples are based on Amba estimates. Peer multiples are Bloomberg estimates. FY13 P/E multiples for Nestle Lanka PLC and all international peers are Bloomberg estimates and not actuals

Share price performance
CTHR shares closed at LKR140 on 4 September 2013, having appreciated by 7% YoY (LKR10) from the same time last year, compared with a 9% increase in the S&P SL 20 and a 7% jump in the All Share Price Index (ASPI) over the period.

Figure 23: Share price performance graph
Share price (LKR) 250 200 6,000 150 4,000 100 50 Sep-10 2,000 Index values 8,000

Jan-11

May-11 CTHR

Sep-11

Jan-12 ASPI

May-12

Sep-12

Jan-13 S&P SL 20

May-13

Source: CSE, Bloomberg

Figure 24 shows that CTHR has outperformed the local indices within the last year, while only underperforming the S&P SL20 index in the one year period comparison.

22 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC
Figure 24: CTHR vs key indices
3 months CTHR ASPI S&P SL 20
Source: CSE, Bloomberg

6 months 8% 2% 0%

1 year 7% 7% 9%

2 years 0% -18% -10%

3 years -16% -2% -1%

-3% -11% -12%

23 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC

Earnings release focus areas
What follows is a checklist of items that investors should track in the next – and subsequent – quarterly earnings release. We will closely track CTHR’s performance across these key areas and revise our forecasts and update our valuation range in earnings update notes.

For the group as a whole:
1. 2. Have debt levels further increased to fund expansion-related activities? Such an increase could weigh down on profitability due to the associated rise in finance costs. Have any additional details on CACB emerged, specifically with regard to the opening date?

Retail and wholesale distribution segment
1. 2. How many Cargills stores were opened during the period? How have margins in the segment performed? What effect has VAT had on these margins?

Food processing segment
1. 2. 3. Has there been any indication on how ice creams sales have progressed in the period, since this is its highest-selling product group in the segment. Have further capacity expansion plans been made for any product group? Focus on the performance of beer and biscuits – have they started generating profits?

Restaurants segment
1. 2. How many KFC outlets have been opened in the period? Has the TGI Friday’s restaurant commenced operations? Have any expansion plans for the restaurant been detailed?

Entertainment segment
1. Have the cinemas in the Jaffna mall been opened and how have they performed in the period?

24 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC

Appendix 1: Company overview
CT Holdings PLC (CTHR) is the fourth-largest conglomerate listed on the Colombo Stock Exchange (CSE) by market cap – which stood at LKR26bn (USD193m) as at 4 September 2013 with a free float of 38.7%. CTHR began operations as Ceylon Theatres Limited in 1928, with an initial focus on the Sri Lankan entertainment industry. The company grew and changed through numerous acquisitions and strategy evolutions. Today, its business activities are divided into five main segments: retail and wholesale distribution, food processing, restaurants, real estate and entertainment. The retail and wholesale distribution and food processing segments are the most significant contributors to CTHR’s top line and profit, bringing in 95% of revenue and 64% of net profit from continuing operations in FY13 (these two segments record lower margins than the company’s other segments). This discrepancy between contribution to revenue and net profit arises due to the retail and wholesale distribution segment’s lower net profit contribution – 58% in FY13 compared with 84% of revenue. The restaurants segment is the third-largest contributor to revenue (3% in FY13), but accounts for 16% of net profit. In May 2013, CTHR sold off its 80.4% stake in Lanka Ceramic PLC for LKR2.9bn. Lanka Ceramic and its listed subsidiaries, Lanka Walltiles PLC and Lanka Floortiles PLC, previously made up CTHR’s ceramics and tiles segment, which was the second-largest contributor to the company’s top-line (12% in FY13) and net profit (21%) after the retail and wholesale distribution segment. As a result of this transaction, CTHR also disposed of its interests in its plantations and packaging segments, which together contributed 6% to group revenues and 6% to net profit in FY13.

Figure 25: Retail and wholesale distribution and food processing contribute 95% of FY13 revenue
LKRm 60,000 40,000 20,000 0

Figure 26: Retail and wholesale distribution and food processing segments account for 64% of net profit
LKRm 1,400 800 200 (400)

FY09 FY10 Entertainment Food processing Retail & wholesale distribution
Source: CTHR

FY11 FY12 Restaurants Real estate

FY13

FY08

FY09

FY10

FY11 Restaurants Real estate

FY12

FY13

Entertainment Food processing Retail & wholesale distribution
Source: CTHR

CTHR posted revenue from continuing operations of LKR56.1bn for FY13, at a CAGR of 15.2% over FY10-FY13. The company generated net profit at a 27.5% CAGR over FY10-FY13 to reach LKR1.1bn in FY13.

25 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC
Figure 27: Revenue grew at a 15.2% CAGR over FY10-FY13
LKRm 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 YoY growth 30% 25% 1,050 20% 15% 10% 350 5% 0% 0 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 700

Figure 28: Net profit grew at a 27.5% CAGR over FY10-FY13
LKRm 1,400 YoY growth 300% 250% 200% 150% 100% 50% 0% -50%

Revenues (LHS)
Source: CTHR

YoY growth (RHS)
Source: CTHR

Net profit (LHS)

YoY growth (RHS)

CTHR’s key businesses
The group’s retail and wholesale distribution segment is the largest contributor to revenue (84% of revenue and 49% of net profit in FY13) and mainly consists of the activities of subsidiary Cargills, in which CTHR holds a 70.0% stake. Retail – CTHR subsidiary Cargills (CSE ticker: CARG) operates the largest private supermarket chain in Sri Lanka. As at end-March 2013, the company operated 211 stores across all 25 districts of the country, far ahead of its rivals Keells Super (51 outlets) and Arpico (44 outlets). In terms of revenue, its LKR44.3bn is 3.2x larger than Keells Super and 2.8x larger than Arpico. The company states that it holds about 45% of the modern food trade market. The chain’s outlets have two formats: Cargills Food City supermarkets, which have a floor space of 3,000-5,000 sq. ft and therefore carry a wider range of stock keeping units (SKUs), and Cargills Food City Express outlets, which are convenience stores with an average floor space of 2,000 sq. ft. In August 2013, CARG submitted a proposed restructuring of its retail operations that would see its entire retail business carried out by a wholly-owned subsidiary, Cargills Food Company (Private) Limited. CARG would then function only as an investment holding company for the other segments within the group. Wholesale distribution – Cargills’ distribution and marketing company Millers Limited holds the agency rights for a variety of international brands, including Kodak, Kraft and Cadbury. Additionally, the company has an extensive distribution and logistics network, and distributes these brands as well as the company’s own brands to CARG outlets and other supermarkets and food retail stores. The food processing segment (12% of revenue and 15% of net profit in FY13) manufactures a range of FMCG products, under a number of popular household brand names. The segment’s portfolio of product offerings has expanded significantly in recent years and competes with international competitors such as Nestle. The main brands under this segment are as follows: Magic/Heavenly ice cream – Cargills stated that it is the largest dairy ice cream player in the country and through its 70.0% owned subsidiary Cargills Quality Dairies produces a range of ice creams, milk and milk shakes. Kotmale – Kotmale Holdings PLC (CSE ticker: LAMB) is a local manufacturer and distributor of dairy products. CTHR holds a 59.5% stake in the company. The brand has been in the market for about 30 years. It produces a variety of dairy products including cheeses, ice creams, ultra-high temperature (UHT) milk, yoghurt, fresh cream and ghee. Kist – This brand’s product portfolio includes a range of jams, sauces, cordials, fruit-based nectars and, more recently, and juices. Kist Biscuits – Following the acquisition of Diana Biscuits Manufactures (Private) Limited in 2010, Cargills Quality Confectioneries manufactures, distributes and markets biscuits and

26 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC confectionaries. The segment has yet to perform up to management expectations amid a highly competitive local biscuit market. Supremo/Finest/Goldi/Sams – CARG manufactures several types of processed meats under these brand names, ranging from mass-market products to a premium deli range. The company also exports processed foods and meats to India, the Middle East and the Maldives. Three Coins/Sando/Irish Dark/Grand Blonde – The acquisition of McCallum Brewery Limited in 2011 signaled Cargills’ entry into the local beer market. The company’s brewery operations produce a range of premium as well as mass-market beers. CTHR’s restaurants segment (3% of revenue and 16% of net profit in FY13) consists of the Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC) chain of restaurants. The company has indicated that it is looking to expand its operations in this segment and, to that end, in September 2012 signed a development agreement to open the first TGI Friday’s restaurant in the country. The first outlet of this international restaurant chain is scheduled to open at the end of 2013. KFC – Cargills holds the franchise for KFC, the largest international fast food chain in Sri Lanka, which currently has 23 outlets, mostly in Colombo and its suburbs. The restaurant is one of the most popular chains in the country and the company plans to continue to open new outlets in regional cities in response to initial encouraging demand in these areas, as well as expanding in Colombo and its suburbs. The group’s real estate segment (1% of FY13 revenue and 19% of net profit) comprises CTHR’s listed subsidiary, CT Land Development PLC (CSE ticker: CTLD), in which CTHR holds 51.9%, as well as several other smaller property companies. The main activities in the segment are the management of a shopping mall and property development projects. CT Land Development (CTLD) – The company owns and is responsible for the management of the Majestic City shopping mall in Colombo. Revenue from CTLD made up 81% of total segment revenue in FY13. Property development – CTHR’s real estate projects are carried out by its property arm CT Properties Limited, an unquoted subsidiary in which CTHR holds an 86.1% stake.   Empire – This is a 100-unit residential apartment complex in central Colombo that was completed in 2009. All units of the complex have been sold. CT Gardens – This is a township development project developed in Piliyandala, a populated suburb around 20km south of Colombo, and this consists of 180 building plots with 12 different house designs. The plots can also be sold off only as land. GS Towers – This 240-unit apartment complex is currently being developed by CT Properties on a 1.25-acre site in Kotahena, 3km from the commercial center of Colombo. In FY13, the company signed a JV agreement with Edmonton Private Limited, based in Singapore, for the construction of the complex. Currently, the project is in the design stage, and the company estimates it to cost USD52m.



Through its private subsidiary Ceylon Theatres (Private) Limited – in which CTHR holds a 76.0% stake – the entertainment segment (less than 1% of FY13 revenue and net profit) manages CTHR’s cinemas, which includes four screens at the Majestic City shopping mall in Colombo, including the first 3D screen in the country. The segment also includes its other movie theatres – Regal Colombo, Regal Negombo and Regal Kandy. The company plans to develop three new screens at an upcoming shopping mall in Jaffna, in the northern part of Sri Lanka.

Management strategy, transparency and governance
Over the past three years, CTHR has made numerous acquisitions and investments into new sectors, frequently expanding its range of business lines and expanding its product portfolios within segments. The group has sold some businesses in order to fund what it believes are higher-return investment opportunities. Management notes that, broadly speaking, the company’s strategy is to invest in sectors that will grow with the economy as a whole, with the current focus being on the food retail and processing, restaurants, real estate, entertainment and financial segments. This is highlighted by the May 2013 divestment of its listed company Lanka Ceramics PLC (CSE ticker: CERA) and its subsidiaries, which contributed 18% of group revenue and 29% of net profit in FY13.

27 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC
However, CTHR typically does not release many details on its business strategy and investment plans. We believe improved articulation regarding the company’s business strategy and a higher level of segmental financial disclosure could help investors better understand the company. We believe CTHR’s disclosure can be improved in the following areas.  The company does not disclose EBITDA/EBIT composition and working capital details on a segment basis. Investors could better understand the company's profitability of the company if this information was available. There is very little, if any, performance-related information disclosed on a group or segment basis. For example, the Cargills store count is not disclosed on a quarterly basis, while store sales space data are not published at all. As a result, forecasting segmental and quarterly results is particularly challenging, and requires analysts to make a number of sweeping assumptions to do so. Annual reports could be published in a more timely manner. It would be more relevant and helpful to investors and analysts if the company’s annual reports are released sooner after the end of its financial year.





Shareholding structure
Sri Lanka-based investors hold the majority (86%) of CTHR’s shares, while institutional investors (both domestic and international) hold 59% overall as of March 2012 (the complete shareholder breakdown was most recently disclosed only in the company’s FY12 annual report). CTHR’s directors hold a 20% stake in the company. We estimate that individual members of the Page family, who founded and own a majority stake in the company through various holdings, hold personal stakes in CTHR amounting to almost 30% of the company, based on the top 20 shareholder list disclosed by the company. The Page family also holds a controlling interest in Odeon Holdings – the largest shareholder – bringing the family’s total holding in CTHR to around 71% as at June 2013.

Figure 29: 86% of CTHR’s investor base is domestic
CTHR directors 20%

Figure 30: Individual investors, including directors, account for 41% of total shareholding
Individual investors 21% CTHR directors 20%

International investors 14%

Domestic investors 66%

Institutional investors 59%

Source: CTHR, as of March 2012

Source: CTHR, as of March 2012

Top shareholders
The following table shows CTHR’s top five shareholders as of June 2013. The top 20 shareholders hold about 88% of the group.

28 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC
Name of shareholder Odeon Holdings (Ceylon) (Pvt) Ltd Mr. Anthony A. Page Mr. Ranjit Page Sir Chittampalam A Gardiner Trust Ms. M.M. Page
Source: CTHR, as of June 2013

Description An investment company controlled by the Page family Chairman of CTHR Managing director of CTHR A private family trust fund Director at Asiabox Consultancy Services, based in Singapore

Stake 41.6% 8.7% 6.0% 5.0% 4.3%

Board of directors
As of June 2013, CTHR’s board comprised nine directors. Five directors, including the chairman and deputy chairman, are members of the Page family. The details of the board of directors are provided below.
Name of Director Mr. Anthony A Page Mr. Louis Page Mr. Ranjit Page Mr. Jebba De Silva Mr. Sunil Mendis Mr. Joseph Page Mr. Priya Edirisinghe Mrs. Cecilia Muttukumaru Mr. R Selvaskandan Description Non-executive chairman. He has been the chairman since April 2003. He has previously served on the board of the CSE and was a council member of the Employers Federation of Ceylon. Non-executive deputy chairman. He has been engaged in determining policy framework for CTHR in a nonexecutive capacity. He is also the chairman of Cargills (Ceylon) PLC. Managing director. He is also the deputy chairman and CEO of Cargills (Ceylon) PLC. He has over 29 years of experience in the food retailing, food service and manufacturing sectors. Independent non-executive director. He is an attorney-at-law and a past chairman of the Colombo Rubber Traders’ Association. Independent non-executive director. He is a former governor of the CBSL and was previously the chairman of Hayleys PLC, a large Sri Lankan conglomerate. Non-executive director. He is also the deputy chairman/managing director of CT Land Development PLC and a director of CT Properties Limited. He was formerly an executive director at Millers Limited. Independent non-executive director. He is a Consultant at HLB Edirisinghe & Co., Chartered Accountants and is also the chairman of CTHR’s executive and audit committees. Non-executive director. She also serves as the chairperson of CT Smith Stockbrokers (Private) Limited, CT Capital (Private) Limited and Comtrust Asset Management (Private) Limited. Independent non-executive director. He is an attorney-at-law (Sri Lanka) and a solicitor (England and Wales and Hong Kong). He also holds the position of chairman at CT Land Development PLC, deputy chairman at CT Properties and is a partner at Varners, a Sri Lanka-based law firm.

Source: CTHR

29 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC
Figure 31: CTHR Corporate Holding Structure

Retail and wholesale distribution

Cargills (Ceylon) PLC (70.0%) - Cargills Food City supemarkets

Millers Limited (70.0%) - distribution

Cargills Quality Foods Limited (70.0%)
Kotmale Holdings PLC (59.5%)

Food processing

Cargills Quality Confectionery (Pvt) Limited (70.0%) - Kist Biscuits Millers Brewery Limited (70.0%) - Three Coins/Sando/Irish Dark/Grand Blonde beer

CT Holdings PLC

Cargills Quality Dairies (Pvt) Limited (70.0%) - Magic/Heavenly ice cream Cargills Agrifoods Limited (70.0%) - Kist products

Restaurants

Cargills Food Processors (Pvt) Limited (70.0%) - KFC

CT Land Development PLC (51.9%)

Real estate

CT Properties Limited (86.1%) CT Real Estate (Pvt) Limited (86.1%)

Entertainment
Source: CTHR

Ceylon Theatres (Pvt) Limited (76.0%)

CTHR holds stakes in three listed companies, namely Cargills (70.0%), CT Land Development (51.9%) and Kotmale Holdings (59.5%).

30 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC

Appendix 2: Key financial data
Summary group financials (LKRm)
INCOME STATEMENT (For the year ended 31 March) Revenue Revenue - Continuing operations Interest expense Earnings before Tax (EBT) Net profit Net profit - Continuing operations 47,045 38,455 (806) 2,894 2,295 1,118 59,283 48,848 (965) 3,160 2,357 1,248 68,236 56,050 (2,060) 2,961 2,158 1,084 63,319 63,319 (2,588) 1,633 1,061 1,061 70,385 70,385 (2,743) 2,094 1,508 1,508 76,774 76,774 (2,811) 2,494 1,795 1,795 2011 2012 2013 2014E 2015E 2016E

BALANCE SHEET (As at 31 March) Current assets Cash and cash equivalents Short-term investments Accounts receivable Inventories Total current assets Non-current assets Property, plant and equipment Leasehold property Investments in associates/JVs Total non-current assets Total assets Current liabilities Short-term debt Accounts payable Income tax payable Total current liabilities Non-current liabilities Long-term debt Post-retirement benefit obligation Total non-current liabilities Equity Common share capital Retained profit Minority interest Total equity Total liabilities and equity

2011 842 47 4,159 5,487 11,139 842

2012 872 34 4,951 7,612 13,987 872

2013 1,181 2,424 4,891 8,834 18,457 1,181

2014E 1,293 343 3,527 4,301 11,161 1,293

2015E 1,634 343 4,538 5,023 13,235 1,634

2016E 1,878 343 5,758 6,278 15,954 1,878

19,014 1,730 52 23,824 34,963

23,542 2,407 75 29,326 43,313

28,745 2,068 148 41,868 60,326

22,290 1,981 156 37,413 48,574

23,291 1,981 165 38,423 51,659

24,255 1,981 178 39,400 55,355

7,796 6,443 472 14,751

9,624 8,704 426 18,806

15,783 9,543 362 25,743

12,817 7,591 452 20,904

12,817 8,371 452 21,685

12,817 9,582 452 22,896

2,193 702 3,958

2,453 806 4,556

4,538 1,004 7,204

3,815 351 5,189

4,837 351 6,211

5,795 351 7,169

517 3,638 7,334 16,254 34,963

3,194 4,272 7,680 19,951 43,313

3,194 10,628 9,924 27,379 60,326

3,194 10,900 4,904 22,481 48,574

3,194 11,875 5,210 23,763 51,659

3,194 13,035 5,576 25,289 55,355

31 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC
CASH FLOW STATEMENT (For the year ended 31 March) Operating activities Net cash flow from operating activities Investing activities Purchase of PPE and intangible assets Net cash flow from investing activities Financing activities Debt issuance/(repayment) Common share issuance/(repurchase) Interest paid Dividends paid to common shareholders Net cash flow from financing activities Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (1,231) (806) (204) 1,286 (1,057) (598) 2,677 (965) (287) 1,715 (2,326) (1,063) (2,060) (375) 6,926 2,205 178 (2,191) (1,035) (360) 550 1,022 (2,743) (226) (1,947) 342 958 (2,811) (269) (2,122) 244 (3,264) (4,844) (5,617) (6,166) (6,487) (7,541) (3,117) (2,841) (2,815) (2,715) (2,687) (2,562) 2,501 2,125 2,820 3,751 5,003 4,927 2011 2012 2013 2014E 2015E 2016E

Key ratios
2011 Growth Revenue growth (%) EBITDA growth (%) EBT growth (%) Net profit growth (%) Margins EBITDA margin (%) EBT margin (%) Net profit margin (%) ROCE (%) ROE (%) Liquidity and efficiency Current ratio (x) Total asset turnover (x) Gearing and cash Flow Debt/Capital (%) Interest cover (x) Free cash flow (FCF) yield (%) Net debt/FCF (x) Valuation P/E (x) P/BV (x) EV/Sales (x) EV/EBITDA (x) EV/EBIT (x) EV/FCF (x) Dividend yield (%) Dividend cover (x)
Note: Revenue and net profit growth are for continuing operations

2012 24.6% 16.1% 9.2% 11.6% 9.7% 5.3% 2.6% 9.6% 9.7% 0.7 1.4 37.7% 4.2 -12.7% (3.2) 28.2 2.2 0.8 8.1 11.4 (13.3) 1.1% 6.3

2013 11.4% 10.7% -6.3% -13.2% 9.3% 4.3% 1.9% 6.5% 9.3% 0.7 1.1 42.6% 2.2 -15.9% (4.6) 22.1 1.3 0.7 7.6 10.9 (13.2) 0.0% NA

2014E 10.5% -25.2% -44.9% -2.1% 7.5% 2.6% 1.7% 4.7% 7.5% 0.5 1.3 42.5% 1.0 2.5% 23.7 23.9 1.5 0.6 8.6 15.1 64.0 0.6% 6.7

2015E 9.0% 10.1% 28.3% 42.1% 7.4% 3.0% 2.1% 6.5% 7.4% 0.6 1.4 42.6% 1.2 8.6% 7.2 21.3 1.4 0.6 7.9 12.1 18.8 0.9% 6.7

2016E 6.9% 9.1% 19.1% 19.1% 7.4% 3.2% 2.3% 7.5% 7.4% 0.7 1.4 42.4% 1.4 8.8% 7.3 17.9 1.3 0.5 7.4 10.6 18.7 1.1% 6.7

19.5% 32.6% 90.4% 246.4% 10.5% 6.2% 2.9% 13.6% 10.5% 0.8 1.3 38.1% 4.5 -2.2% (11.9) 25.4 3.8 1.1 10.2 13.8 (66.2) 1.0% 9.0

32 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC
PER SHARE DATA Recurrent diluted EPS (LKR) Common dividend per share (LKR) Book value per share (BVPS) Net operating cash flow per share Net cash flow per share
Source: CTHR, Amba estimates

2011 5.9 1.5 52.4 14.7 (6.2)

2012 6.4 2.1 67.7 11.7 (12.8)

2013 6.3 95.3 15.4 12.0

2014E 5.8 0.9 96.0 20.5 3.0

2015E 6.6 1.2 101.3 27.3 1.9

2016E 7.8 1.5 107.7 26.9 1.3

Segmental summary
(For the year ended 31 March)
Retail and wholesale distribution Revenue PAT YoY growth Revenue PAT Margins PAT Food processing Revenue PAT YoY growth Revenue PAT Margins PAT Restaurants Revenue PAT YoY growth Revenue PAT Margins PAT 11.2% 14.0% 9.0% 8.7% 9.2% 9.5% 32.4% 185.3% 23.6% 54.5% 41.3% -9.1% 25.7% 20.9% 22.8% 30.4% 19.4% 23.3% 17.0% 2011 1,119 125 4.2% 2012 1,383 194 2.5% 2013 1,955 176 1.2% 2014E 2,457 213 3.5% 2015E 3,017 278 3.8% 2016E 3,602 342 43.9% 4.7% 95.5% -51.8% 38.6% -16.3% 27.6% -38.0% 22.0% 247.5% 18.5% 28.7% 1.9% 2011 2,387 405 2.2% 2012 4,666 195 1.1% 2013 6,468 164 1.4% 2014E 8,255 101 1.5% 2015E 10,071 352 1.6% 2016E 11,934 453 19.5% 120.8% 24.6% 47.0% 11.4% -42.5% 10.5% 37.2% 9.0% 16.7% 6.9% 13.5% 2011 33,880 630 2012 42,205 926 2013 46,998 533 2014E 51,938 731 2015E 56,603 853 2016E 60,521 968

33 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC
Real estate Revenue PAT YoY growth Revenue PAT Margins PAT Entertainment Revenue PAT YoY growth Revenue PAT Margins PAT
Source: CTHR, Amba estimates Note: PAT refers to proft after taxation from continuing operations FX rates (LKR/USD): Y/E 31 March 2013 = 129.59 Y/E 31 March 2012 = 112.64 Y/E 31 March 2011 = 112.12

2011 1,001 (38) 125.8% -90.4% -3.8% 2011 69 (4) -2.0% 568.6% -6.1%

2012 489 (68) -51.2% 78.5% -13.8% 2012 105 1 53.0% -124.8% 1.0%

2013 472 207 -3.4% -406.2% 43.8% 2013 157 5 49.8% 346.4% 2.9%

2014E 503 1 6.6% -99.3% 0.3% 2014E 165 11 5.3% 134.7% 8.6%

2015E 517 10 2.6% 595.5% 2.0% 2015E 177 8 7.0% -0.6% 8.0%

2016E 528 16 2.1% 53.2% 3.0% 2016E 189 16 7.0% 9.7% 8.2%

34 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC

Appendix 3: Industry analysis using Porter’s framework
Porter’s analysis – named after its creator, Harvard Business School professor, Michael Porter – is an analytical tool used for industry and competitive analysis. To assess overall industry attractiveness, the tool uses seven elements: barriers to entry, barriers to exit, rivalry among competitors, power of buyers, power of suppliers, availability of substitutes and government action. Based on a range of specific analytical points for each element, the industry and/or company subject to analysis are rated on a spectrum of highly unattractive to highly attractive. Each rating is then used to arrive at an overall industry rating. Below, we briefly present some key points of the seven elements for the two key industries in which CTHR operates.

Organized food retail
Conclusion: The industry should remain neutral through 2016 The organized food retail sector in Sri Lanka is dominated by a few large firms. The industry is highly competitive and still in its growth phase, with opportunities for revenue growth resulting from rising disposable income in Sri Lanka. Customers can choose whether or not to go to a retail store, as most products sold are day-to-day FMCG items, for which substitutes are freely available in open-air markets or other small grocery stores. Moreover, consumers have very little brand loyalty. However, if large retail chains expand their distribution networks, manage the impact of new regulations and retain their customer base, they can generate margin growth.

Threat of new entrants – low
Potential new entrants to Sri Lanka’s food retail industry may be attracted by low product differentiation, low customer brand loyalty, high price elasticity and, therefore, low switching costs, which make it easier to penetrate the industry and attract new customers through lower prices. However, the threat of new entrants is reduced by the economies of scale enjoyed by larger, wellestablished retail chains that already have extensive distribution networks. High initial capital expenditure is also required (approximately LKR100m for a saleable area of 7,000 sq. ft.) to set up operations and find a suitable prime location. Further, recent regulations imposing a 12% VAT on retailers with a turnover of more than LKR500m (approximately USD4m) per quarter could also discourage new entrants, as retail sector net margins are already low at 2-3%.

Barriers to exit – moderate
The one-time exit cost may be considered moderate. Retail outlets in Sri Lanka are either owned by a company or obtained on a long-term lease. Therefore, disposing of these outlets may not be a major problem, as company-owned properties are in prime locations, which are largely sought after, and any lease agreements may be terminated/revised.

Rivalry among competitors – high
Although there are several smaller private retailers across the island, the organized retail industry consists of three main private sector FMCG retail chains – Cargills, Keells and Arpico (accounting for approximately 15% of modern retail trade in Sri Lanka). The industry is in its growth stage and is likely to be driven by an expected 7.2% CAGR in per capita income over FY14E-FY16E, according to World Bank estimates. If economic growth trends as projected, existing firms can benefit from the incremental growth in market share through market development (opening more stores in new locations) over the medium term, as rising GDP could see more customers visiting larger retail outlets regularly. However, significantly low levels of differentiation could increase price competition and yield low margins.

Bargaining power of buyers – high
The industry is home to a large number of consumers who remain extremely price conscious, despite rising GDP and the desire for a more comfortable lifestyle. They are not willing to pay significantly higher prices for products that are readily available at a considerably lower price elsewhere. The generic nature of FMCG products and the highly elastic nature of demand mean there are several substitutes available and customer switching cost is extremely low, as they can easily opt not to visit a large retailer for weekly FMCG requirements. Further, based on statistics from the CBSL, at the end of 2011, more than 40% of the average monthly household spend was

35 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC on key FMCG products. This is a significant proportion of the buyer’s income, which should increase price sensitivity further.

Bargaining power of suppliers – low
Large retailers manufacture some of their own products. Other products come from small fragmented suppliers or larger established manufacturers. However, regardless of the size or scale of the external supplier, extensive distribution networks established by organized retailers make external suppliers fully dependent on organized retailers for business. Switching costs of large retailers are low due to the generic nature of the products, which makes them easily available. Even with branded products, suppliers are largely dependent on retailers for business, and even if large retailers choose not to stock particular brands, it would not have a significant impact on top lines, since customers are flexible and can easily choose another brand to meet their immediate needs. Cost of sales is the highest contributor to a retailer’s cost structure and since retailers face increasing margin pressure from high direct and fixed costs, and their inability to increase prices, there is a constant need for cost control. Further, retailers purchase in bulk from external suppliers, accounting for a large proportion of suppliers’ revenues, which again lowers the bargaining power of supplier firms.

Threat of substitutes – high
The substitute to retail supermarket shopping is purchasing provisions from small local grocery stores or open-air markets. Customer switching costs are extremely low, as small local vendors are widespread across Sri Lanka. Further, these small retailers maintain close relationships with customers; therefore, organized retailers are unable to command strong brand loyalty.

Government action – moderate
Most large retailers have been able to absorb the 12% VAT together with their suppliers, which means customers will not face any significant price increases. There is also a recent proposal to ban foreign investments in retail trade to protect domestic investors, although further details on this regulation are not yet available. The government reserves the right to make any tax and policy amendments in most areas, without having to give any prior notice to businesses. This creates uncertainty for the industry and the impact depends on how quick the businesses are in responding to such changes.

Food and beverage manufacturing
Conclusion: The industry should remain attractive through 2016. Sri Lanka’s food and beverage manufacturing industry comprises branded F&B manufacturers such as Cargills, Keells, Nestle and Unilever. The customer base includes distributors, comprising large organized retailers, small local grocery stores/retailers and markets across Sri Lanka. The sector should hold substantial opportunities for firms to increase volumes and revenues. The industry is likely to remain competitive, with key players constantly focusing on maintaining brand equity through innovation and product differentiation. Positive industry dynamics such as rising per capita GDP, a growing middle-class population, strong brand awareness and the government’s efforts to promote the domestic F&B sector are expected to stimulate industry demand. The industry’s attractiveness also means that there is a threat of new entrants. The strong market positions of incumbent producers in the sector, and the economies of scale and low costs of production they enjoy relative to both smaller local competitors and international F&B companies contemplating entering the Sri Lankan market, somewhat diminish this risk, however.

Threat of new entrants – moderate
There are a few large established F&B manufacturers in Sri Lanka that mostly produce their own label/branded products in large quantities, and enjoy economies of scale and other cost advantages. Differentiation occurs through product variations (flavors, package sizes, etc.) and branding. Customer (retailer) brand loyalty is high – in the case of smaller retail customers, they may be compelled to stock these large local brands to attract customers, and in the case of larger organized retail customers such as Cargills and Keells, they may give preference to their own manufactured brands within the product ranges that they offer (e.g., ice-creams and soft drinks). Even though raw materials are easily available, a new entrant would have to incur high initial

36 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC capital expenditure to set up a manufacturing facility, or else import goods for sale, which would force it to sell at higher prices. Furthermore, establishing a distribution network would be difficult, as the majority of the large locally established F&B manufacturers have their own retail distribution networks or have tied up with other large organized and smaller local retailers to sell their products.

Barriers to exit – moderate
Although firms in the industry use specialized processes to automate their manufacturing, potential buyers are ready to take over should they choose to exit. However, a large F&B manufacturing firm should consider the impact to its business before making such a decision, as there is a high level of strategic interrelationship with its retail lines of business, and an exit could have a significant oneoff impact on the organization.

Rivalry among competitors – moderate
A few large firms (Cargills, Keells and Nestle) dominate the F&B manufacturing industry in Sri Lanka. With anticipated increases in per capita GDP and consumer demands for a more convenient lifestyle, the demand for branded, high-quality F&B products should increase. High levels of product and brand differentiation enable existing players to compete on a distinct basis effectively and seek opportunities to increase volumes and market share. Innovation is critical in this industry to maintain brand equity and keep customers engaged. Existing firms may also have the option of enhancing capacity easily without the need for additional fixed costs (by simply adding on another shift at an existing factory).

Bargaining power of buyers – high
This analysis has been broken down to include both types of buyers:  Large organized retail buyers: high bargaining power – There are a few large organized retailers (including the manufacturers’ own distribution networks) in Sri Lanka that account for 15% of retail trade in the country. These include Cargills, Keells, Arpico, Laugfs and Sathosa. Although they account for a smaller proportion of the customer base, they can be considered more important than the smaller retail buyers, as they have more extensive distribution networks and will therefore account for a large volume of sales to the F&B manufacturer. Buyer switching cost is low (with the exception of retailers stocking own-branded products), as these organized retailers are aware of their importance to the manufacturers. As retail margins are generally low (2-3%) and since they purchase in bulk, these buyers should be able to squeeze the manufacturers’ margins, indicating higher bargaining power. Small local retail buyers: low bargaining power – Small local retailers (buyers) account for 85% of the customer base for the large F&B manufacturers. However, they have lower bargaining power, because they buy in small quantities from the few large firms producing these locally branded, high-quality products (that are trusted and preferred by the local end-consumer). Brand differentiation is high, which makes switching costs high, as these small local retailers may be required to stock certain brands to meet demands from their customer base. Further, these small retailers do not have much room for margin improvement, as the large F&B manufacturers are in a more dominant position and will try to squeeze the smaller retailers’ margins.



Bargaining power of suppliers – low
There are a large number of small local suppliers and a few international suppliers providing basic commodity ingredients (such as sugar and meat) to F&B manufacturers. Even though raw materials constitute more than 80% of the manufacturers’ total production costs, which implies that the suppliers are a critical contributor to the F&B manufacturing industry, bargaining power of the suppliers is low, as they provide undifferentiated products. This makes customer switching costs low, as these items can be obtained easily from anywhere. Suppliers are also much smaller in size and scale than the large F&B manufacturers, which places them in a weaker bargaining position.

Threat of substitutes – moderate
Substitutes are available in the form of other local brands and some internationally branded items as well. However, customer switching costs may be high – smaller local substitute brands may not be well recognized and international brands may be too expensive for the end consumer, which would result in unsold inventories for retail distributors (who would consequently opt not to stock

37 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC such brands). Therefore, existing branded F&B manufacturers would only be exposed to substitute brands from their direct local competitors.

Government action – favorable
The strategic plan of the Export Development Board (a state organization dealing with the promotion and development of exports) for 2011-2015 has identified the F&B industry as one of the seven key priority sectors, with plans to grow export earnings from this sector to USD1bn by 2015 (from approximately USD284m in 2012, including tobacco exports). Therefore, there are several incentives provided to firms operating in the industry, such as VAT exemptions on machinery and equipment, and zero tax concessions on processed foods; making the industry more attractive.

38 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC

Appendix 4: SWOT analysis
Strengths     Cargills is one of the most valuable and recognized brands in the country First-mover advantage with most of its new outlet openings More comprehensive distribution network – more extensive than competitors Holds a large and valuable land bank Weaknesses   Higher finance costs may temper profitability in the short term Volatility in the real estate segment, particularly in terms of profitability

Opportunities   Uptake in consumption appetite supported by rising disposable income in Sri Lanka Further potential acquisitions to drive future growth

Threats   Any new taxes on supermarkets may further pressure margins Risk of further pressure on operating costs such as electricity and fuel expenses through price hikes

39 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC

Appendix 5: Diversified sector overview
As of 4 September 2013, the diversified sector represented 19% of the CSE’s total market capitalization of USD17.9bn. It is the third-largest sector on the stock market, behind beverage, food and tobacco and financial services.

Figure 32: Top five sectors on the Colombo Stock Exchange by market capitalization
Market cap (USDbn) 3.8 3.7 3.3 2.3 1.0 % of total CSE market cap 21% 21% 19% 13% 6%

Sector name Beverage, food & tobacco Banks, finance & insurance Diversified Hotels and travels Telecommunication
Source: CSE Note: Data as of 4 September 2013

Two largest companies Ceylon Tobacco Company PLC Nestle Lanka PLC Commercial Bank of Ceylon PLC Hatton National Bank PLC John Keells Holdings PLC Carsons Cumberbatch PLC Asian Hotels & Properties PLC Aitken Spence Hotel Holdings PLC Sri Lanka Telecom PLC Dialog Axiata PLC

40 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC
There are 18 listed diversified companies trading on the CSE, 13 of which are listed on the main board, while 5 are listed on the Diri Savi Board. We have listed the top 10 companies in the Diversified sector based on market capitalization as of 4 September 2013, along with a brief description of their main businesses. Figure 33: Details of conglomerates listed on the main board of the CSE
Market cap (USDm) 1,373 Free float (%) Top 3 businesses by revenue contribution 88.4% Consumer food (manufacturing) & retail Tourism (hotels, destination management) Transportation (oil bunkering, container handling) 23.8% Oil palm plantations (palm oil, palm kernel, fresh fruit) Oils and fats (refined oils, cooking oil, specialty fats) Beverages (breweries) 40.1% Power generation Tourism (hotels, destination management) Logistics (freight forwarding, courier services, integrated logistics, maritime transport) 38.7% Retail and wholesale Distribution (FMCG) Food processing (consumer foods) Restaurants 40.0% Hand protection (rubber gloves) Transportation & logistics (warehousing & distribution, freight, chartering and port operations) Purification products (carbon granular, fines, powders and pellets) 19.4% Finance (banking) Apparel Tiles 28.3% Healthcare (pharmaceuticals, diagnostic and surgical services, hospitals) FMCG Power generation 26.9% Freight & logistics (air and sea freight, logistics, warehousing) International trading and manufacturing (agricultural, paper, plastic, metal pharmaceutical products) Investments & services (airline general sales agent, business process outsourcing, education, investments, corporate services) 45.6% Retail Plantations (tea, rubber, palm oil) Plastics (water tanks and pumps, foam mattresses, bulbs, molded plastics) 2.9% Tea exports Services (environmental services, insurance brokering, marine cargo surveying, airline general sales agent) Logistics (tea warehousing, temperature controlled logistics, air freight)

Company name John Keells Holdings PLC

Bloomberg/CSE tickers JKH SL/ JKH.N0000

Carsons Cumberbatch PLC

CARS SL/ CARS.N0000

530

Aitken Spence PLC

SPEN SL/ SPEN.N0000

350

CT Holdings PLC

CTHR SL/ CTHR.N0000

193

Hayleys PLC

HAYL SL/ HAYL.N0000

163

Vallibel One PLC

VONE SL/ VONE.N0000

122

Hemas Holdings PLC

HEMS SL/ HHL.N0000

112

Expolanka Holdings PLC

EXPO SL/ EXPO.N0000

101

Richard Pieris & Co. PLC

RICH SL/ RICH.N0000

91

Finlays Colombo PLC

JFIN SL/ JFIN.N0000

74

Source: CSE, Bloomberg, Company annual reports Note: Market capitalization data as of 4 September 2013. Revenue contribution and free float is based on FY13 data.

41 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC
The shareholding structures of these listed conglomerates are shown in the table below. Four companies have significant international shareholding, and management hold large stakes in four issuers.

Figure 34: Shareholding structures by investor type and geographical location
Investor type Management John Keells Holdings PLC Carson Cumberbatch PLC Aitken Spence PLC CT Holdings PLC* Hayleys PLC Vallibel One PLC Hemas Holdings PLC Expolanka Holdings PLC Richard Pieris & Company PLC Finlays Colombo PLC* 5.0% 0.3% 1.9% 19.5% 48.5% 63.7% 4.0% 72.8% 0.4% 0.0% Other retail 23.3% 3.9% 7.5% 21.2% 36.0% 8.2% 6.1% 10.7% 15.9% 1.6% Institutional 71.7% 95.9% 90.7% 59.3% 15.6% 28.1% 89.9% 16.6% 83.8% 98.4% Geographical location Management 5.0% 0.3% 1.9% 19.5% 48.5% 63.7% 4.0% 72.8% 0.4% 0.0% Other domestic 28.4% 81.7% 52.8% 66.5% 48.0% 35.4% 89.2% 23.2% 40.1% 2.5% International 66.6% 18.0% 45.3% 14.0% 3.5% 0.9% 6.8% 4.1% 59.5% 97.5%

Source: Company annual reports *Note: Data as of FY12 (31st March 2012). For Finlays PLC, the FY12 data is as of 31st December 2012

Below are key financial statistics for these conglomerates. Figure 35: Key financial data
Company Name John Keells Holdings PLC Carson Cumberbatch PLC Aitken Spence PLC CT Holdings PLC Hayleys PLC Vallibel One PLC Hemas Holdings PLC Expolanka Holdings PLC Richard Pieris & Co. PLC Finlays Colombo PLC Revenue 661 588 283 527 572 254 202 387 268 40 EBIT 55 84 43 34 51 33 19 15 29 2 Net income 94 35 25 9 14 17 13 8 15 3 EBIT margin (%) 8.3% 14.2% 15.0% 6.5% 9.0% 12.9% 9.3% 3.8% 10.7% 6.1% Net income margin (%) 14.3% 6.0% 8.9% 1.7% 2.5% 6.6% 6.4% 2.1% 5.5% 7.2%

Source: Bloomberg Note: All data as of FY13, except for Finlays Colombo PLC (data as of December 2012). All figures are in USDm, unless stated otherwise

42 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC

Fact Sheet
Sri Lanka investment environment overview
Sri Lanka’s economy has been on an upward trajectory since the end of the three-decade civil war in May 2009. Sri Lanka currently boasts South Asia’s highest GDP growth, conducive fiscal and monetary policy, and favorable socio-economic conditions, which together create an attractive investment destination. Figure 1: Sri Lanka's GDP projected to increase at a 7% CAGR 2012-2016E
% 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 8.0 6.8 6.0 3.5 8.2 6.4 8.0 8.3 8.5

Figure 2:
USD 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0

GDP per capita to increase 33% by 2016E

7.5

2013E

2014E

2015E

Source: CBSL, Department of Census and Statistics

2016E

Source: Central Bank of Economic and Social Statistics of Sri Lanka 2012, Road Map 2013 - CBSL

Figure 3: Annual core inflation post-war has averaged 6.7%, government targeting mid-single digit levels in the medium term
% 16 14 12 10 8.5 8 6 4 2 0 2006

Figure 4: CBSL expects the rupee to stabilize in the medium term despite recent volatility
250

13.6 200 7.0 7.7 7.0 6.9 5.8 150

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

100 Jan-07

Apr-08 LKR/USD

Aug-09

Dec-10 LKR/EUR

Apr-12

Jul-13

LKR/GBP

Source: Department of Census and Statistics, CBSL

Source: Bloomberg

Figure 5:
LKRbn 600 400 200 0

Fiscal deficit target of 5.2% of GDP for 2014E
12% 8% 4% 0%

Figure 6:
% 120 100 80 60 40 20

Debt-to-GDP to fall to 71% by 2015E

102 102 91 88 85 81 86 82 79 79 78 75 71

2013E

2012

2014E

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2003

2012

2013E

2014E

Fiscal Deficit LKR bn
Source: CBSL

As a % of GDP
Source: CBSL

43 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

2015E

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

0

2016E

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2012

CT Holdings PLC
The Sri Lankan equity market offers a rare and attractive alternative to investors in an investment era impacted by economic growth worries. Backed by the country’s robust economic growth, the Sri Lankan capital market is well set to offer attractive returns to investors who are keen to be a part of this emerging market success story. There are several strong incentives for entering the Sri Lankan capital market. Figure 7: Post war, the ASPI has significantly outperformed global and developed market indices
400 320 240 160 80 0 Jul-09 ASPI MSCI World

Figure 8: Post war, the ASPI has also outperformed some of the best-performing regional indices
400 300 200 100 0 Jul-09

Mar-10

Nov-10

Jul-11

Mar-12

Dec-12

Aug-13

Apr-10

Feb-11 DAX

Dec-11

Oct-12

Aug-13 FTSE 100

Dow Jones

ASPI Jakarta (JCI) Thailand (SET) MSCI Emerging Market Index
Source: Bloomberg *Note: All figures re-based to 1 July 2009

Bombay (BSE 500) Philippines (PASHR) Hanoi (VNINDEX)

Source: Bloomberg *Note: All figures re-based to 1 July 2009

Figure 9: 2009
LKRbn 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0

The CSE’s market capitalization has doubled since

Figure 10: The government anticipates FDI inflows to reach USD2bn in 2013, a 19% CAGR 2009-2013E
USDm 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 827 601 516 1,338 1,066

2,211 1,092

2,214

2,168

2,351

2,000

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013 (August)

0 2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013E

Source: Bloomberg, CBSL

Source: Ministry of Finance and Planning, Board of Investment of Sri Lanka

Figure 11: Most sector P/Es are below market average and historical valuations

Figure 12: Trend is similar on a P/BV value

120 90 60

6

4

2 30 Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals Construction & Engineering Diversified Services Telecommunication Beverage, Food & Tobacco Hotels & travels Manufacturing Banks, Finance & Insurance Investment Trusts Power & Energy Land & Property Plantations Trading Construction & Engineering Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals Diversified Services Telecommunication Beverage, Food & Tobacco Hotels & travels Manufacturing Investment Trusts Banks, Finance & Insurance Power & Energy Land & Property Plantations Trading 0 0

2011

2012

2013

Average market P/E 2010-2013

2011

2012

2013

Average market P/BV 2010-2013

Source: Colombo Stock Exchange

Source: Colombo Stock Exchange

44 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Research

CT Holdings PLC

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
This document has been prepared on behalf of the Colombo Stock Exchange (“CSE”) by Amba Research Lanka Private Limited (“Amba”) and is sponsored by the CSE. The views expressed in this document are those of the authors based on available and accessible information from the public domain and do not represent those of the CSE. Please note, inter alia, that with the publication of this document on the CSE website, www.cse.lk, neither Amba , as author, nor CSE (as sponsor) intend to assume and are not assuming any responsibility or liability (including under contract, common law or tort) to any party arising out of or with respect to this document. This document is not intended to, and does not form part of any contract with anyone (including a contract between author and reader/recipient) and no one shall have any right (contractual or otherwise) to enforce any claim in relation to the document either directly or indirectly. Except as otherwise indicated, you may only view and print one copy of the document for your own personal, non-commercial use. You may not copy, store [either in hardcopy or in an electronic retrieval system] transmit, transfer, broadcast, publish, reproduce, create a derivative work from, display, distribute, sell, license, rent, lease or otherwise transfer any of the contents to any third person (including, without limitation, to others in your company or organization) whether for direct or indirect commercial or monetary gain or otherwise without the prior written permission of Amba and CSE. This document does not contain any investment advice nor does it constitute an offer to buy, sell or hold any of the investment product(s)/asset class (es) mentioned herein. Prospective investors are required to possess sufficient knowledge when evaluating the advantages and risks inherent to such investment product(s)/asset class(es) mentioned herein and to take into consideration their circumstances and financial position when assessing the suitability of such investments.. Prior to making an investment decision, prospective investors are strongly advised to obtain independent advice from competent legal, financial, tax, accounting and other professionals. Amba and CSE shall not be held liable in any manner for any direct, indirect or consequential loss that may arise as a result of investing in the investment product(s)/asset class (es) mentioned herein. Amba and CSE expressly disclaim any fiduciary responsibility or liability for any consequences, financial or otherwise from any reliance placed on the information in this document. The investment product(s)/asset class (es) described in this document may not be eligible for sale or subscription within a particular jurisdiction or to particular categories of investors. This document is not intended for distribution to a person or, within a jurisdiction where such distribution would be restricted or illegal. It is the responsibility of any person reading this document to observe all applicable laws and regulation of the relevant jurisdiction. Neither Amba, nor CSE, shall be responsible for any error which may have occurred at the time of printing of this document. The information set out in this document is subject to change without notice. The information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable and Amba and CSE make no warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, timeliness, completeness or correct sequencing of the information. This document does not purport to list all of the terms and conditions, nor to identify or define all or any of the risks that would be associated with the purchase or sale of the investment product(s)/asset class (es) described herein. Please note that any price levels, rates, simulations, illustrations, terms or conditions contained herein are indicative only, and may vary in accordance with changes in market conditions. All the information included in this document is current at the time of preparing this document and subject to change at any time. Any forecast, projection or forward looking statement made in this document embodies assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. They are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance, of investment product(s)/asset class (es), countries, markets or companies. Any past market conditions or product performances may not be representative of future market conditions or product performances.

45 A capital market development initiative by the Colombo Stock Exchange in association with Amba Resear

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Cargills

...Sri Lanka | Beverage, Food & Tobacco Initiation of coverage EQUITY RESEARCH 19 December 2013 Cargills (Ceylon) PLC (CARG.N0000) A consumption play Cargills (Ceylon) PLC (CARG) is the largest organized food retailer by market capitalization listed on the Colombo Stock Exchange (CSE), and also manufactures a range of fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) and operates a fast-food chain. The company is majority owned by its parent company CT Holdings PLC (CTHR), itself one of the largest traded conglomerates on the CSE. We expect the typical signs of consumption growth, such as rising GDP and private consumption expenditure, to support CARG’s revenue growth, at an 11.3% CAGR over FY14E-FY16E. We also forecast CARG’s EBIT margin to expand to 4.3% in FY16E from 4.1% in FY13. Margin development across all segments is likely to be tempered by persisting high operating costs, particularly electricity and fuel expenses, as well as currently underwhelming results from the brewery and biscuits businesses. CARG’s debt and gearing levels in the past three years have risen due to a string of acquisitions and investments to expand capacity of several product lines. Our SOTP and P/E analyses yield a valuation range of LKR110-149, compared with the share price of LKR149 as of 18 December 2013. We forecast revenue to post an 11.3% CAGR over FY14E-FY16E as consumption levels are set to improve. CARG’s revenue is likely to be driven by its retail segment, which we forecast to also grow at an 11.2% CAGR...

Words: 13320 - Pages: 54

Premium Essay

Cargill

...Cargill, Incorporated is a privately held, multinational corporation, and is based in the state of Minnesota in the United States. It was founded in 1865, and has grown into the world's second largest privately held corporation (in terms of revenue).[1] Were it a publicly held company, it would rank in the top 20 companies in the Fortune 500. Cargill's business activities include purchasing, processing, and distributing grain and other agricultural commodities, and the manufacture and sale of livestock feed and ingredients for processed foods and pharmaceuticals. It also operates a large financial services arm, which manages financial risks in the commodity markets for the company. In 2003 it split out a portion of its financial operations into a hedge fund called Black River Asset Management, with about $10 billion of assets and liabilities[1]. It owns 2/3 of the shares of The Mosaic Company, one of the world's leading producers and marketers of concentrated phosphate and potash crop nutrients. Cargill also owns a Canadian division, Cargill Ltd.. Despite its size, the corporation is still a family owned business; descendants of the founders (from the Cargill and MacMillan families) own about 85% of the company. This means that most of its growth has been due to reinvestment of the company's own earnings, rather than public financing. Cargill's long-term business strategy is to shift its business from trading and processing large volumes of agricultural commodities, to higher...

Words: 319 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Slavery

...slavery? I think the answer varies in culture to culture. But in my opinion, there is no way to acceptchild slavery. Children are kidnapped, sold and forced into harvesting. Farmers are beatingthem. From may point of view, children should not be used for labor. They should have aright to choose their lifestyle. They should have education and then contribute the country’seconomy and welfare. Regardless of the society one may live in, I think child labor isabsolutely wrong. 3. Who shares in the moral responsibility for the slavery occurring in the chocolateindustry: African farmers? African governments? American chocolate companies likeHershey, Mars, Nestle and Kraft foods? Distributors like Archer Daniels Midland Co.,Barry Callebaut, and Cargill Inc? Consumers like you and I who know about thesituation but continue to purchase tainted chocolate? I believe, African Farmers, African governments, American chocolate companies,distributors, consumers and people who know the situation, shares in the moral responsibilityfor the slavery occurring in the chocolate industry. African farmers use child slavery labor.African government do not control over the rules. Middlemen buys cocoa beans from farmerswho use slavery labor. American chocolate companies know farmers use slavery labor andthey continue to work them. If we know the company names and continue to buy chocolatefrom them, we are also morally responsible for the child slavery labor. As a result, all actorsin the industry are...

Words: 264 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Cargill Rm

.................................................................................................................... 3 Riscurilor Operaționale cu care se Confrunta Compania (Anca Voinea)............................. 5 A. Riscurile Operaționale Cargill Agricultura ............................................................................... 6 B. Riscurile Operaționale Cargill Industrie .................................................................................10 C. Riscurile Operaționale Cargill Management Financiar și de Risc: ........................................13 D. Riscurile Operaționale Cargill Pharma & Îngrijire Personală ................................................13 E. Riscurile Operaționale Cargill Cercetare și Dezvoltare..........................................................14 3. Matricea Riscurilor Companiei Cargill Inc. (Claudia Ioana Toma) ...................................15 A. Terminologia de Risc Utilizată ...............................................................................................15 B. Matricea Riscurilor .................................................................................................................16 C. Tabelul ce stă la baza matricei riscurilor pentru compania Cargill ........................................17 4. 5. Harta de interconectare a riscurilor (Andreea Voicu) .........................................................22 Măsuri de Acoperire a Riscurilor (Titavu Alexandra Ioana Olimpia Diana Tufeanu)...

Words: 13707 - Pages: 55

Free Essay

Cargills Report

...Analysis Of Jaykay Marketing Services Marketing Essay The supermarket industry in Sri Lanka is set out for an explosive growth in the recent years this is with the western lifestyle of modern Sri Lankans where convenience is a key benefit sought after.(Perera 2006) The traditional grocery store concept has been evolving in to a ‘’Mega Stores’’ and the heavy discounter concept which carry all the goods shoppers want (Stanton 2007). If we look at the drivers for the evolution of modern supply chains, or ‘’Modern Trade’’ they have been persistent in increase demand for value added consumer products, convenience food, beverage, and frozen confectioneries. ‘’The emergence of supermarkets, urbanization, income increase, high quality retail export markets, high quality bulk procurement, trade agreements, with other countries, increased migration of Sri Lankan citizens and increased female participation in labor force have created a new demand pattern, shifting the focus towards continuous supply of high quality, value added products with improved processing, packaging and labeling’’ (Samarthuga A 2006 15). Sri Lanka is an agriculture base country primarily it has 2 million hectares or 30% agricultural land, and almost 75% of the agricultural land is under small holdings and the balance is under estates. Sri Lanka Imports 65000 MT of diary commodities mainly FCMP and diary therefore seen and instrument to replace, and about 70% of the contribution to the livestock subsector comes from...

Words: 4225 - Pages: 17

Free Essay

Business Policy

...Group Assignment Cargills Super Market Group Members Name : K. K. R. A. Prematilake (09148205) : D. M. Warnasooriya (09148159) : P.M. Alagiyawadu (09152130) : P. D. Priyadarshika (09148221) : T.R. Thotamune (09148175) : S.N. Fernando (09151168) : H.L. Liyanage (09151150) : S.K. Wirthamulla(09153551) Subject Name : Business Policy Batch Number : 13 BSc in M I S Executive Summary Cargills (Ceylon) PLC is one of the foremost and the largest retail chain in Sri Lanka with having over 150 outlets widen transversely the island covering 20 districts, counting Cargills Big City hypermarkets, Cargills Food City supermarkets and Cargills Express convenience stores. Today Cargills is the leader in the food and beverages sector and is ranked among the top 10 companies in Sri Lanka with over 4,600 employees. Supermarket industry is one of the high competitive industries in Sri Lanka. Within this assignment we analyzed the internal and external factors that affected to Cargills and generate strategies which help to gain competitive advantage among competitors. In this Assignment we concern about SWOT analysis and TOWS matrix. According to those analyses we develop corporate, business and functional strategies to Cargills which help to achieve its vision Contents Executive Summary 2 Our Business 4 Overview of the Industry 5 Organization Vision, Mission and Objectives 7 Vision 7 Mission 7 Objectives 7 SWOT Analysis 8 Strengths 8 Weaknesses...

Words: 3073 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Passion Fruit Industry in Sri Lanka

...Case study 2 Sri Lanka Cargills Ceylon Ltd Total cost: Financier Year of initiation: NA Private company 2001 2010-2015, Possible partner under the IFAD-supported National Agribusiness Development Programme (NADeP) Relational chain, buyer-driven Value chain approach: Background. Cargills Ceylon Ltd (Cargills) is a supermarket chain called Food City in Sri Lanka. It has improved the efficiency of its operations by purchasing directly from producers, increasing the efficiency in the chain, thereby increasing its own income as well as the price paid to smallholders. Its intervention in the passion fruit chain provides an example of how Cargills improved the efficiency of the chain resulting in considerable benefits to the producers and increased sales of passion fruit through its retail outlets. In a normal fruit and vegetable chain in Sri Lanka (see Figure 11) there are many actors who usually tend to act in their best interests rather than operating as a coordinated chain, resulting in high operating costs. Some 30% of the market value accrues to the middlemen, post-harvest losses amount to about 40% and only around 30% of the final value accrues to the producer. Figure 1: Conventional supply chain for fruits and vegetables (SL/kg) In the generic chain there are many problems. Usually low quality planting material is used. In addition, premature harvesting and poor post-harvest practices contribute to inferior product quality entering the markets. Fresh produce is traditionally...

Words: 1253 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Financial Statement Analysis of Biofuel Energy Corp. (2010)

... Also, the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) mandates that renewable biofuels comprise a certain minimum amount of the U.S. fuel supply. Fuel blended with up to 10% ethanol is approved for use by major motor vehicle manufacturers and is often recommended as a result of ethanol’s clean burning characteristics (BioFuel Energy Corp. 10-K, pg. 5). BioFuel has various unique accounting methods such as revenue recognition and inventory valuation, due to changes in commodity prices and BioFuel’s exclusive buyer-seller relationship with Cargill. One of BioFuel’s unique accounting methods is revenue recognition. Revenue is recognized by BioFuel when the risk of loss and title transfers upon the delivery of the ethanol and distillers grain to Cargill, BioFuel’s sole purchaser of its ethanol and distillers grain products. BioFuel’s revenue is recorded based on the amounts payable from Cargill to BioFuel at the time of sale. The amount payable from Cargill for ethanol is equal to the average delivered price per gallon received by the marketing pool from Cargill’s customers, less the...

Words: 1147 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

America's Most Successful Family Businesses

...misconception that family firms are simply "mom and pop shops." Although it is clear that family businesses are capable of incredible widespread success, exactly why this is the case is far less obvious. One way to gain some valuable insight into how and why so many effective family businesses exist is to closely examine the three in our nation that have had the most success: Cargill, Ford Motors, and Wal-Mart. In many ways, these businesses could not be more different; for instance, they operate in separate industries, and the levels and types of family involvement in the firms vary. Extensive analysis of these three corporations did, however, reveal that while no family, business, or family business is perfect, each company's achievements are directly attributable to its commitment to the common vision and identity instilled in the firm by the family. Cargill Cargill is a private corporation that works with "farmers, customers, governments and communities" to provide "food, agriculture, financial and industrial products and services to the world ("Cargill: Provider of Food…"). Believe it or not, Cargill is as broad of a company as it makes itself sound. Founded in 1865 as a grain storage facility, the company no longer specializes in delivering any one specific product or service. Instead, through elements such as massive economies of scale and efficient and far-reaching distribution networks, this family firm is able to provide high...

Words: 3063 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Stock Analysis

...Finance Associate: Full Time 2015-UNI03409 Working at Cargill is an opportunity to thrive—a place to develop your career to the fullest while engaging in meaningful work that makes a positive impact around the globe. You will be proud to work for a company with a strong history of ethics and a purpose of nourishing people. We offer a diverse, supportive environment where you will grow personally and professionally as you learn from some of the most talented people in your field. With nearly 150 years of experience Cargill provides food, agriculture, financial and industrial products and services to the world. We have 143,000 employees in 67 countries who are committed to feeding the world in a responsible way, reducing environmental impact and improving the communities where we live and work. Learn more at www.cargill.com.Description Position Objective: Think about a career where you get to be a key player in safeguarding Cargill's assets and contributing to the company's profitability. Your career path could take you to a special project on the implementation of a new technology or working on cross-functional international teams. A career in accounting at Cargill means you get to be a business partner to help Cargill reach its strategic initiatives.  Choosing a career at Cargill means you are on the fast-track to success!  Principal Accountabilities: * Apply finance and accounting skills by participating in cross-functional teams within your department. * Provide analysis...

Words: 646 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

International Markeeting

...Management Functions in Application Amy Wilson Denise Harrison Ashford University MGT 330 4/26/2015 Introduction Management practices are those methods which provide an effective way of achieving the organizational goals. This is coupled with the maximum utilization of the available resources, as well as the minimization of the costs as much as possible. In every organization, there are those costs which are extremely important, and this may not be avoided. The cuts are implementented on the aspects which would not have a significant effect on the organization. The main reason why organizations get into business is to make profits. This is the reason why costs are kept as low as possible since in that case, the profit margin is increased (Baack, Reilly & Minnick, 2014). The Functions of Management There are several managerial functions. Nonetheless, most of them can be categorized into five. These include the planning, organization of resources and related aspects, staffing, coordination, as well as control. The whole essence is to create a framework where the employees find it easy to exploit the resources. The arrangement has to be in such a manner than the employees are motivated. This makes it easy for the organization to achieve its goals Effective leadership and management involves finding solutions to the emergent problems and challenges, motivating the employees, as well as ensuring the goals and objectives of the organization are achieved as much...

Words: 1510 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Salmonella

...Humans usually contract salmonella from contaminated food; it is most common among poultry but can taint almost any food type. Some outbreaks have included the bacteria found in raw eggs, raw meat (ground beef and other poorly cooked meats), egg products, fresh vegetables, nuts, and contaminated water. Salmonella can enter water in a bowel movement of an infected human or animal through sewage overflows, sewage systems that are not working properly, or wells after severe flooding. Infected milk is another possibility of infection, but pasteurization usually destroys the germ. A recent major outbreak in July of 2012 by Cargill meat solutions Corporation was found in over 29,000 pounds of fresh ground beef products. A total of 46 people in 9 states were reported to have contracted the virus, thankfully no deaths were reported. Although the recall is over Cargill encourages consumers who purchased these products with sell by dates of May 29 to June 16th of this year to dispose of their purchases. Symptoms can begin about eight to 48 hours after consumption of the bacteria and can last anywhere between 4 and 7 days. Salmonellosis (gastroenteritis) is a common source of bacterial food poisoning that can be described by nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. It is the most common disease triggered by the organisms. In some cases blood may be present in the...

Words: 564 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Term Paper on Bonds

...Strategic Objective being met Alternate Options Considered Advantages and Disadvantages |Tax Rate | |WACC (Weighted Average Cost of Capital) | |Forex (INR to USD) | |Standard Hurdle Rate (Must exceed this rate) | |Strategic Initiative Hurdle Rate (Must exceed this rate) | |High Risk Hurdle Rate (Risk Score b/t 4 -5) | |The expected life of the initiative or project | |The initiative or project independent of other projects/initiatives or is it dependent? | |Cost level for flagging high risk/high return project as candidates for pilots | |Does the initiative or project involve new and technology (candidate for a pilot)? | |Window of opportunity | |Implementation time | Financial Benefits Originating Cost Ongoing Costs Depreciation ...

Words: 274 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Biz Tort

...Law 252 Business Torts — Week One Course Reading Assignment 1 Part One: The "borderland" between tort and contract. Sommer v, Federal Signal Corp., 79 N.Y.2d 540 (1992); IKEA North American Services, Inc. v. Northeast Graphics, Inc., 56 F.Supp.2d 340 (S.D.N.Y. 1999). Part Two: Introduction to the economic loss doctrine. Grams v. Milk Products, Inc., 283 Wis.2d 511 (2005). ' I have edited the cases in this attachment. Le • ' 593 N.E.2d 1365 79 N.Y.2d 540, 593 N.E.2d 1365, 583 N.Y.S2d 957 • (Cite as: 79 N.Y.2d 540, 593 N.E.2d 1365, 583 N.Y.S.2d 957) Page I .'Sommer v. Federal Signal Corp. N.Y.,1992. Court of Appeals of New York. Beverly SOMMER et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION et Respondents-Appellants, andHohnes Protection, Inc., Appellant-Respondent, et al, Defendant (And a Third-Party Action and All Related Consolidated Actions.) May 12,1992. OPINION OF THE COURT KAYE, Judge. substitute-initially understood that 810 wanted normal service restored. But as the brief conversation proceeded, the dispatcher became confused by the caller's repeated insistence that he would "activate" the system and the dispatcher concluded-without attempting to elicit greater clarification from the caller, or any other confirmation-that 810 wanted its system taken out ofservice. Seven to nine minutes later, Holmes began receiving fire signals from the building. However, consistent with his mistaken impression that the system was to be taken out...

Words: 9531 - Pages: 39

Free Essay

Gm520: Legal, Political, and Ethical Dimensions

...controls the regulation. Explain why this agency and your proposed regulation interest you (briefly). How will this proposed regulation affect you or the business in which you are working? Provide the URL to the website where the regulation change proposal is located. (Check your URL to be sure it takes the reader to the actual regulation). (10 points) The FDA or also known as the Food and Drug Administration are agencies that control the rules and regulations. I decided to used this agency as my reference because the FDA is one the most popular and important agency. This proposed regulation change who filed this petition with the FDA to amend their rule is Cargill. Scientist and researchers in Cargill research and development laboratories and engineering departments have worked on this project for a number of years. If Cargill plant expansion to produce their product on that specific location, this would bring a positive economic impact to that location, only if the rules by the FDA become permanent. 2. Describe the proposal/change. (10 points) According to the FDA Summary, “amending the health claim regulation entitled ‘Soluble fiber from certain foods and risk of coronary heart disease (CHD)’ to add barley beta fiber as an additional eligible source of beta-glucan soluble fiber.” The FDA has come to the agreement that there is an important scientific agreement in the public domain to support this claim. At the present time, certain whole oat and whole grain barley products...

Words: 752 - Pages: 4