...Michelle Griffith Mary Cole Lifespan 232 February 27, 2013 Couples Should Live Together before Marriage I have heard that one of two marriages end in divorce. Although I believe that this is just merely a word of mouth or this estimate is to high, there is no question that divorce has become a more common occurrence in the society we live in today. I think that the biggest cause for divorce is people getting married to young and too soon. I strongly believe that couples should live together before they marry due to the fact that you learn the habits, both good and bad, of the other person before you make the marriage commitment. “Cohabitation by definition in our text book refers to the lifestyle of unmarried couples who have a sexually intimate relationship and who share a residence. In many cases this prepares couples for marriage – a time to test the relationship and get use to living together.” (textbook book pg. 487) People become engulfed in a sort of euphoric haze when a relationship first begins to take a serious turn. The entity of your affection seems to be perfect in every way and can do no wrong. You want to spend all of you available time with that person; often neglecting anything you enjoyed doing prior to your relationship. In effect, you lose your individual identities and become more like Siamese twins (individuals that are “joined-at-the-hip”). This stage in a relationship is only a temporary period. However, many couples mistake this hormonal...
Words: 804 - Pages: 4
...Cohabitation in the United States in recent years has become the normative path to marriage for adults in their twenties and thirties. The United States has seen an estimated 50 percent to over 60 percent of couples cohabitating before marriage (literature article). This paper examines an academic article and a mainstream media article, which discuss the topic cohabitation. The mainstream media article from The New York Times addresses the issues of cohabitating and gives advice on how protect one’s self from the cohabitating effect of distress and divorce. The academic article from the Family Relations Journal,explores Inertia and the premarital cohabitation effect through a commitment framework. By using both opinion and academic based research articles ,this paper will compare, contrast, and give advice to support a more complete mainstream media article. The main stream media article written by Meg Jay who is a therapist, shares a personal experience from one of her clients. Jay (2012) shares that her client who had lived with her boyfriend for fours years prior to having a lavish wedding, is now searching for a divorce lawyer. Jay explains reasons why her client is getting a divorce through past research and her opinion. Some of the topics Jay explains is cohabitation effect, how couples go from dating to cohabitating, the costs of cohabitation, and protective factors young adults can do to avoid the cohabitation effect. In this article Jay not only sites past...
Words: 577 - Pages: 3
...Introduction In recent years, there is an increasing rate of cohabitation in the society. Cohabitation by definition is two unmarried people living together. In moral values, this does not seem an appropriate situation because there is no marriage between the couples. However, cohabitation is a chance and requirement to establish strong bonds at the relationship. I became interested in the topic because of my own situation. I am a Christian, so according to the Bible, it is considered a sin to live together outside of marriage. However, I stand in grace. As a grace believer, I know that if I was going to live under law, breaking one “rule” means you break them all. What a frightening thought considering everyone falls short in some area or another. My thought on the subject is that I have seen both sides of the story, and having married young and watching the marriage fall apart, I am very content just living with my significant other. Marriage is a commitment, and before God we have said our vows to each other, but according to man we have not. I feel as though we are married, but I also do not feel as though signing legal documents will change anything accept gain the approval of the world. It is not my intentions to live in sin, but I also do not feel as though it is necessary to sign a bunch of papers just to gain the approval of man. I suppose I feel so strongly because I have seen how devastating marriage can be, and although any relationship can end, the repercussions...
Words: 2728 - Pages: 11
...rather than with married parents. Nearly 20 percent of births today are to cohabitating parents, according to Susan L. Brown at the Center for Family and Demographic Research.Almost 40 percent of children will spend time in a cohabiting household by age 16. Living together is now common, but it is not without consequence—particularly for children. The effects of this family structure on children are just beginning to be understood. However, initial research by Brown and others suggests cohabitation is generally a less stable family structure than married couple or single-mother households. While there is some evidence that children in cohabiting households fare worse than those in married or single-parent families on several key indicators (Manning & Lamb, 2003), what is less clear is why. Do these negative outcomes stem from something inherent in the family structure? Or are these effects due to the types of parents who choose to cohabit (rather than to the experience of cohabitation itself)? How does living in a cohabiting household affect both children and adults? Impact on Children Development Spending extended time in cohabiting households at an early age is linked to slowed cognitive growth and language acquisition in children. Brown notes that even in stablecohabiting households, children show smaller gains in mental development. The Urban Institute finds children in cohabiting homes are also less likely to be read to than other children. Poverty Poverty is...
Words: 7560 - Pages: 31
...SHOULD COHABITATION BE ENCOURAGED? Cohabitation has become very popular and common among teenagers these days. As stated in the Oxford Dictionary, cohabitation is the act of living in the same house together and having a sexual relationship without any commitments and marriage. In the last several decades, families have changed. Instead of getting married, many people are cohabitating or in simple words prefer living together. Some of these cohabitating couples finally get married. Most of them don’t last as they break up. Eventually very few couples stay together as cohabitants for long. Most couples cohabitates rather than getting married for many reasons. According to Linda J. Waite and Maggie Gallagher (2000), cohabitation’s biggest attraction is the relatively easy exit with few responsibilities. Before cohabitating couples get married and get into a legal union, they may want to test their compatibility. They may also want to maintain their status as single for financial purposes whereas some may also feel that marriage is unnecessary. Although cohabitation is very popular among teenagers these days, it should be discouraged. Opponents claim that living together or cohabitating will automatically lead or increase the chances for the couple to get married. However living together will not necessarily lead to marriage because many cohabitating couples often break up. Every person has a different view on cohabitation. Rather than a preparation, cohabitation is often viewed...
Words: 894 - Pages: 4
...Examine the reasons for and patterns for changes in the patterns of marriage and cohabitation There have been many changes in the pattern of marriage and cohabitation. For example there are now fewer marriages taken place and remarriages now include divorcees rather than widows and widowers. Many people are also remarrying later in life. This essay will examine the reasons for these changes. Firstly, there are fewer stigmas attached to marriage. There is now less pressure to marry and people are free to choose the type of relationship they want. The widespread believe that the quality of the couple’s relationship is more important than the status of their marriage has greatly weakened the norm that everyone ought to get married. People are also less likely to get married in a church. Churches influence on society is decreasing because they hold strong views on matters such as having children outside marriage and cohabitating in which more and more people are disagreeing on. Churches are also less likely to marry divorcees, who make up the greatest proportion of people in society, which deters people from marry in church Changes to the position of women have also led to the changes in the patterns of marriage. Women now have higher status jobs and earn a lot more than they used to. There is a shift from the view that the women’s role is to care for the children and look after the home. This is because women are becoming more successful in education and are able to pursue...
Words: 539 - Pages: 3
...Cohabitation versus Quality The Reasons of its Popularity Word Count Cohabitation versus Quality Sociology is an attempt to understand and explain the way that individuals and groups interact within a society. Considering the new age perspective, the purpose of my paper is to explain the newest trend in marriage and family, known as, cohabitation. I will define cohabitation, explain its sociological acceptance as a new norm, and the sociological effects on a quality relationship; these ideas will help to explain some of the reasons for its new found popularity as the new form of un-marriage. Cohabitation versus Quality Cohabitation is a very complex family structure. For about half of cohabiters, it is a relationship that lasts about 2 years and then ends, either through marriage or just termination. For others, it is a predecessor to marriage. Except for one tenth of these cohabiters, it is just a long-term relationship. Even though the majority of these relationships share many of the qualities of marriage, like sharing a residence and personal resources, monogamy, and, in a substantial number of cases, procreation; we know very little about the quality of cohabiting relationships compared with what we know about the quality of marital relations (Brown and Booth 1996). One of the most fascinating perspectives of relationships today is the new standard by which people relate. Traditionally, there was dating or courtship and then marriage. No exceptions. Marriage is...
Words: 1345 - Pages: 6
...choices to pick from how to tell if a source is even worth to look at without having to expend a great amount of time looking at each one through. Even though non-credible sources are easier to find, credible sources are more reliable because they are usually written by experts and have more substantial information in them. If we take a credible source like “Rising prevalence of cohabitation in United States may have partially offset decline in marriage rates” from the Family Planning Perspectives and compared against a non-credible sources like “Cohabitation in the United States” from Wikipedia, we can see that the article from the credible source has the components that help sort out a credible source from a non-credible. The article “Rising prevalence of cohabitation in United States may have partially offset decline in marriage rates” from the Family Planning Perspectives has the main things that you should look in a credible source. First of all I found the article in the CINAHL with Full Text database from the library most popular database list. I made sure I used the Boolean word Cohabitation in USA and I limit the results to only show full text and peer-review articles. The article is written in a very professional manner, also even though the article was written 1990; it has fairly recent review date of 2009. The information that the...
Words: 825 - Pages: 4
...COHABITATION I - What is Cohabitation Cohabitation is a sexual relationship between a man and a woman prior to marriage. It is an agreement between two individuals, who live together like wedded individuals however without performing any matrimonial ceremony or tying a knot. Cohabitation may be heterosexual or between same genders. Those people who share space or a room are not considered cohabitants. Just those persons, who have taken a vow, either verbally or through mutual understanding to live together and gratify each other’s passionate and sexual yearnings, might be recognized cohabiters. On the other hand, marriage is a legitimate, religious and written agreement between a man and a woman to live together for the rest of their life. Cohabitation and marriage are having their own pros and cons. The modern world, especially, the Western countries are at the top of the list in cohabitation. Some people consider cohabitation superior to marriage, while some individuals hold marriage in extraordinary regard and deem it better than cohabitation. Which is better? Let’s play the devil’s advocate! II - PROS Cohabitation has transformed into a questionable subject nowadays. There are a lot of people who consider cohabitation as their favourite alternative to marriage, while those individuals who have got religious bent of mind consider cohabitation as a sin and act, which may provoke the wrath of God. Nowadays, the majority of individuals favour cohabitation instead of marriage...
Words: 1165 - Pages: 5
...Examine the reasons for changes in the patterns of marriage and co-habitation in the last 40 years. [24] Marriage is traditionally conceived to be a legally recognized relationship between two consenting adults that carries certain rights and obligations. Cohabitation is an arrangement whereby couples who are not legally married live together in partnership within the common law. Cohabitation has now become a very common way of living. The patterns of marriage have varied quite significantly. Statistics show that in 1972, the number of couples (480,000) near the Second World War got married. The reason for this was because of the baby boom generated in 1950s reaching the marriageable age and these people choosing to marry at a younger age. Women were getting married at the age of 22 and men at the age of 24. Recently, the trend of getting married went into decline, in 2005, only 284,000 couples got married. Also, in comparison to 1972, men were getting married at the age of 31 and women at the age of 29 in 2004, showing that the trend was decreasing and the age of marriage was slowly increasing. Wilkinson (1994) suggests reasons as to why the trend in marriage has dropped so significantly. He notes that women are going through a ‘genderquake’ suggesting a radical change to the female attitude towards marriage and family life. She argues that young females no longer prioritize marriage and children; this could be due to there being more opportunities for women within education...
Words: 1058 - Pages: 5
...Co-habitation Cohabitation is when two people who are romantically involved choose to live together without making the commitment of marriage. Cohabiting couples are typically emotionally and sexually intimate. Cohabitation can refer to either heterosexual or same sex couples. The number of couples cohabiting is increasing and is the fastest growing family type in in the UK. There are over 2 million cohabiting couples in Britain. About a quarter of all unmarried adults under 60 are now cohabiting which is double the number in 1986. The number of cohabiting couples is expected to double again by 2021. Why is cohabitation increasing? Many people want to live in a companionship without marriage. Half of all marriages end in divorce which scares many people out of getting married. By cohabiting it feels like marriage, without the risks. Increased cohabitation rates reflect the decline in stigma attached to sex outside of marriage. 1989 only 44% of people agreed that premarital sex is not wrong at all but by 2000 62% took this view. Many couples state the primary reason for living together is to...
Words: 448 - Pages: 2
...Outline reasons for the decline in first time marriages (10 marks) There are numerous reasons for a decline in first time marriages; these could be a simple change in the attitude toward marriage, secularisation, a change in the position of women, a fear of divorce and a decline in the stigma attached to alternatives to marriages. A change in the attitudes toward marriage, there is less pressure to marry and there is more freedom for individuals to choose the type of relationship they long to be in, this could be cohabitation or just a relationship without living together. In today’s society, there is a widespread belief that the quality of a relationship has higher importance over the legal status. The norm that everyone ought to marry has been greatly weakened and the level of stigma toward those who hadn’t married no longer was as strong as it used to be. In previous years, men who were single didn’t need to marry but women who were single needed to marry as they were not financially independent; people now choose to live as creative singledom, which means anyone, any gender, can live financially independent and not have the need to get married. Secularisation means that society has moved from religion to a nonreligious society. This influences first time marriage as churches influences on marriage is declining so that people have the right to choose not to marry. According to the 2001 consensus, 3% of nonreligious people were married in comparison to 17% of people with...
Words: 617 - Pages: 3
...E harmony, the match making company was founded by Dr. Neil Clark Warren and Greg Forgatch in 1998. The company business is to provide right partners to their customers. Now the company is struggling to overcome their competitors. This summary discusses about that how they are going to address the recent competitor actions. To start with modern marriage markets, the marriage rate had reached its lowest point. Earlier the marriage age for men and women is 26 and 22 respectively. Now that has been changed to 27 for men and 26 for women. People started following cohabitation before marriage. Also, 60% of those who married in early 2000s had lived with their future spouse for two years before getting married. EHarmony followed the concept of filling personal information and questions for selecting the right partner to their customers. The problem is that they need to fill 436 questions including basic information; it takes around 1.5 to hours. Customer feels too lengthy for filling that information but later it was reduced to 250 questions which take only 45 minutes. Also company faced issues of getting only 20% of potential customers. After filling all the questions, the company’s next step is matching algorithm. It means they will match the information given and they will find a selection. Also they did a matching algorithm validation scale on 4000 couples. Although critics believed that patent amounted to little more than a marketing gimmick, further company research revealed...
Words: 444 - Pages: 2
...or choose to move on. Some couples still wait until they get married to move in together. Different studies show that cohabitation and divorce rates vary due to ethnicity, different living situations, education, women with children and also has to do with the use of drugs. In this paper I will focus on what is the relationship between premarital cohabitation and divorce rates. One main reason for divorce is attributed to uncertainty about the quality of the current match and other characteristics that are important for a partnership. When beginning a partnership two partners have only limited information on each other. As time passes, the couple learns new information on the quality of the match and on the outside options of each partner and the couple decides whether to break up or continue the partnership. The longer a relationship has lasted, the lower the risk of break up. Couples who start out as cohabitants have the advantage of gathering information about their partner before marrying. Therefore only good matches evolve into marriage, and marriages preceded by cohabitation should have a lower risk of divorce (Svarer 2006). Married couples who begin their relationship by cohabiting appear to face an increased risk of marital dissolution, which may be due to self- selection or more dissolution-prone individuals into cohabitation before marriage (Lillard et al. 1995). Using nationally representative data from the 1995 National Survey of Family...
Words: 1066 - Pages: 5
...is to inform the reader of the challenges that face marriages in today’s society. It researches the issue of cohabitation before marriage and how people view it whether it is harmful to the marriage or how it can help the marriage be more successful. Another issue that is reviewed is the issue of infidelity. It discusses the problems that arise from infidelity and touches on the reconciliation process that couples have to go through if they have a desire to stay in their marriage. Communication and forgiveness within the marriage is also discussed. Challenging Issues that Face Marriages Today Introduction In the world today, there are a lot of marriages going through some trying times. Parents have put their children first instead of their spouse which have created a barrier between the couple. Some families are dealing with extra effort children that require more time with them and put their spouse on the back burner. Financial burdens have been over whelming for some marriages causing stress, anger and even resentment. The issues that this research paper is going to explore are the challenges of cohabitation, infidelity, communication, and forgiveness. These issues seem to be an important part of marriages that are continually brought forth in many therapy, counseling, and laypersons offices. Premarital Cohabitation Couples will move in together before marriage for many reasons. These reasons include financial situations (fewer...
Words: 2264 - Pages: 10
