Greed is reaching new levels in college athletics. Universities make huge profits from their athletics and now many people want players getting paid as well. The idea that college athletes should be paid during their years in college is something that has been suggested for years, but paying athletes will only lead to further decline in collegiate sports. College athletes in most sports, both major and minor, receive a full scholarship that provides them with a top-notch college education. This scholarship provides the athlete with everything they need to have a successful four to five years in college. There is no reason for them to receive more. Giving college athletes additional spending money can also lead to other problems. Colleges profit millions of dollars from TV deals, merchandise and ticket sales and appearances in important games like the Bowl Championship Series or the Final Four and the athletes don't see a penny of it. Even though it all may seem unfair, as long as one remembers that an education is being received for free while all this money is going around, it is easier to see how terming these athletes as exploited may seem harsh. By paying college athletes, learning in the classroom would take a back seat to learning the ways of the team plays. It’s likely that more collegiate athletes would stay in school and develop their game a little further rather than making a premature leap into the professional ranks, yet therein lies the problem. College athletics are not professional athletics. Players in the NBA and NFL get paid because playing basketball and football is their job. Student-athletes are supposed to worry about just what their title suggests: their studies and then their game. One of the biggest arguments of those in favor of paying NCAA athletes is that the schools exploit their athletes and reap all the benefits, comparing the