Premium Essay

Commercial Speech Court Case: Valentine V. Chrestensen

Submitted By
Words 902
Pages 4
Commercial Speech is a type of legal term that a company or individual is intended to make a profit from the audience. It is usually to convince the audience to take a certain action or buy a particular product. The first commercial speech court case was in 1942 called the Valentine v. Chrestensen and it provided the foundation of the commercial speech doctrine. Chrestensen was an owner of world war one submarine and it was located on the state pier on East River in NYC. He created pamphlets to advertise his exhibit and charged an admission fee. The Police warned him that it was violating the Sanitary Code and he could only use handbills for only information or public protest use only. Chrestensen protested against the City Dock by going around …show more content…
citizens are treated equally and have the same protection under the law and be given due process. Every person is to be treated the same, dispute race, wealth, sex, religion, etc. Also, every individual should be protected by the same law and deserves to receive the same due process of law. For example the four part Hudson Test would also be considered protection under the 14th amendment.

2) Not many cases for Commercial speech was denied, but there was a case called Members of City Council V. Taxpayers for Vincent. The city of L.A. had a municipal code that helped with the ongoing issue of visual clutter. The code stated to not post any signs or any sort of material on the utility poles. The taxpayers known as the people who were trying to advertise Vincent for election kept posting signs on the utility poles because the police removed them. The taxpayers filed them to court, but the court agreed with the City Council because the code did not violate any rights. The code was narrowly tailored and L.A. had a reasonable objection because of asetheitc values. Also stating the first amendment does not automatically guranteed government property because the Government owns or controls the

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Commerical Speech

...Evolution of Advertising (Commercial Speech) Law For many years the U.S. Supreme Court defined commercial speech as speech that proposes nothing more than an economic transaction. At first this particular type of speech did not receive protection under the First Amendment, and many problems arose over the years from the narrow definition of commercial speech, which the U.S. Supreme Court found it necessary to address and change over time. Such issues that arose are: does the State have the authority to regulate commercial speech? A more fundamental issue, is the intention of profit alone what makes some speech, commercial speech? Lastly, should commercial speech be protected under the First Amendment, and if so, should the protection be conditional? The Supreme Court’s current view on the matter may be traced historically through the evolution of four key cases. Although prior to 1976 the U.S. Supreme Court’s view was that commercial speech was not protected under the First Amendment, nevertheless, the Supreme Court’s view was altered, after the Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council in 1976, to hold that commercial speech does not sit completely outside of First Amendment protection. Mainly due to the evolution of the interpretation of commercial speech that is derived from the Supreme Court’s ruling over the cases: Valentine v. Chrestensen, New York Times v. Sullivan, Bigelow v. Virginia, and Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer...

Words: 2212 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Bar V. Went For It Case Study

...the people. However, there have been cases in the past where professionals abuse the freedoms that are given to them, and limitations are then set in place. The Florida Bar v. Went For It, Inc exemplifies a case where the Supreme Court decided that individuals deserve to have the right to privacy. 1 The Supreme Court took notice of the First Amendment implications to limitations of personal injury lawyers from sending targeted direct-mail solicitations to victims and their relatives for 30 days following an accident or disaster. 2 The Court established used a the Central Hudson test, which was a four –part test, which engages in “intermediate” scrutiny of restrictions in commercial speech, analyzing them under the framework set forth in Central Hudson Gas and Electric Corp v. Public Service Commission of N.Y. The test, predicated on a making sure that three prongs are being proven: first the government must assert a substantial interest in support of its...

Words: 1203 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Bigelow vs Virginia

...U.S. 809 Bigelow v. Virginia Facts: Jeffrey C. Bigelow was the managing editor for The Virginia Weekly, a newspaper which was published in Charlottesville, Virginia. He was charged with violating Virginia law on May 13, 1971, after printing an advertisement for a New York City agency that helped women arrange for, finance and obtain abortions. The ad print was as follows: UNWANTED PREGNANCY LET US HELP YOU Abortions are now legal in New York. There are no residency requirements. FOR IMMEDIATE PLACEMENT IN ACCREDITED HOSPITALS AND CLINICS AT LOW COST Contact WOMEN's PAVILION 515 Madison Avenue New York, N.Y. 10022 or call any time (212) 371-6670 or (212) 371-6650 AVAILABLE 7 DAYS A WEEK STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL. We will make all arrangements for you and help you with information and counseling. 1 Specifically, Mr. Bigelow was charged with violating Va. Code Ann. § 18.1-63 (1960). The statute made it a misdemeanor to encourage or prompt the processing of an abortion "by publication, lecture, advertisement, or by the sale or circulation of any publication, or in any other manner, encourage or prompt the procuring of abortion or miscarriage". Mr. Bigelow was tried and convicted in Albemarle County Court. He appealed to the Albemarle County Circuit Court, where he was granted a de novo trial. De Novo is Latin for ‘new beginning’, so a de novo trial is a completely new trial. Typically, a trial de novo is ordered by an appellate court when the original...

Words: 15430 - Pages: 62