...FINANCIAL COMPARISON BETWEEN THE BOEING COMPANY AND LOCKHEED MARTIN Keith L. Hohl EMGT 452 Semester Project 14 December 1999 Table of Contents 1. Introduction/Study Objective 2. Boeing Financial Statement and Analysis 2.1. Background and Product Lines 2.2. Consolidated Balance and Income Statements 2.3. Divisional Financial Statements 2.4. Ratio and Trend Analysis 3. Lockheed Martin Financial Statement and Analysis 3.1. Background and Product Lines 3.2. Consolidated Balance and Income Statements 3.3. Divisional Financial Statements 3.4. Ratio and Trend Analysis 4. Financial Comparison between the Two Companies 4.1. Consolidated Comparisons 4.2. Military Aircraft and Space Divisions Comparisons 5. Summary/Conclusions 6. Bibliography 7. List of Tables 8. List of Figures List of Tables T-1: Consolidated Financial Balance Sheet-The Boeing Company T-2: Consolidated Income Statement-The Boeing Company T-3: Divisional Financial Summary-The Boeing Company T-4: Consolidated Financial Ratio Analysis-The Boeing Company T-5: Consolidated Financial Balance Sheet-Lockheed Martin T-6: Consolidated Income Statement- Lockheed Martin T-7: Divisional Financial Summary- Lockheed Martin T-8: Consolidated Financial Ratio Analysis- Lockheed Martin List of Figures F-1: Total Assets Divisional Trend Analysis-The Boeing Company F-2: Sales Divisional Trend Analysis-The Boeing Company F-3: Net Earnings...
Words: 4739 - Pages: 19
...Financial Management Case - Boeing 7E7 1. Background 1.1 General introduction of Boeing Boeing is the world's largest aerospace company and leading manufacturer of commercial jetliners and defense, space and security systems. Boeing is organized into two business units: Boeing Commercial Airplanes and Boeing Defense, Space & Security. According to Boeing’s 2002 Annual Report, the revenues split between its commercial airplanes division and its integrated defense systems division is about 50/50. Boeing has been the premier manufacturer of commercial jetliners for more than 40 years. Today, the main commercial products are the 737, 747, 767 and 777 families of airplanes and the Boeing Business Jet. New product development efforts are focused on the Boeing 7E7. 1.2 Basic information of Boeing 7E7 Boeing 7E7 was expected to enter service in 2008 with three versions: a baseline model with 200 seats and a range of 7,800 nautical miles; a lighter version with a 3,500 nautical-mile range; and a stretch version with 250 seats and a 8,300 nautical-mile range. The 7E7 is intended to replace the 757, 767 and A300 and even the successful A330. This is why Boeing has a lot of opportunities in this market segment. With almost every U.S. major airline operating a large fleet of 757/767 aircraft, this will be the main target market for Boeing's 7E7. American Airlines, Delta Airlines and United Airlines may all be the customers we want to pay attention to. American Airlines also operates...
Words: 2793 - Pages: 12
...Capstone Lockheed Martin Strayer University Maitland campus Business Administration Capstone BUS 499 Prof. David Repp March 11, 2014 Lockheed Martin is an American global security defense, aerospace and advance information Technology Company that was establish in 1912 by Glenn Luther Martin. Martin believed that the future would be in technology and the harvesting of that technology. Lockheed approximately operates 572 facilities nationally and 75 facilities internationally employing about 115,000 people worldwide. Lockheed employees are constantly engaging in research, design, development, manufacture, integration and sustainment of advanced technology systems, products and services. It is apparent that their employees all share the same enthusiasm about the company and the impact that the company has on mankind’s need to explore the technological possibilities in a whole. It’s abundantly clear that Lockheed is focused on the betterment of mankind and securing the information gained from those who which to use it offensively. It almost sounds as if Lockheed could be a character in a superhero comic book. Conversely, they are much more than a character in a superhero comic book and they are much more than just a global security or aerospace company. Lockheed has dedicated their company to helping design the future through technology. They have crossed over from the science fictional realm otherwise known as the realm of impossibilities into the virtual world with...
Words: 2564 - Pages: 11
...Case Study of Boeing's Decision to Develop the 777 1. What is an appropriate required rate of return against which to evaluate the prospective IRRs from the Boeing 777? 1a. which beta did you use? Why? 1b. if you used the CAPM, which risk premium and risk free rate did you use? Why? 1c. which capital-structure weights did you use? Why? Answer: i. Key Assumptions for the Calculation: In order to calculate the appropriate rate of return against which to evaluate the prospective cash flows from the Boeing 777 project, several assumptions had to be made. First, in order to facilitate the calculations, I referred to betas from Exhibit 9 and selected the value for Boeing calculated in comparison to the S&P 500 Index for the previous 58 months (β= 0.81). The reason is that the project is a 35-year project. As a result, I think a long-term data may be more accurate. With Exhibit 10 as a complement, the beta calculated against the S&P 500 Index could be a better choice than that calculated against the NYSE Composite Index. Second, according to the text, the yield on long-term U.S. Treasury bonds was 8.82% and the 64-year geometric average equity-market risk premium was 5.4% in October 1990. Since the yield of long-term U.S. Treasury bonds is always used as the risk free rate, we can assume that the risk free rate was 8.82% and market risk premium was 5.4%. Third, according to Exhibit 9, the capital structure weights used were 26 percent for the defense division and...
Words: 1288 - Pages: 6
...Executive Summary Airbus and Boeing have constituted a duopoly in the large jet airliner market since the 1990s, leading to fierce competition. Boeing is an American company while Airbus began as a consortium of European aviation. The two are presently facing issue that tarnish their political, legal, and ethical reputations. Airbus argues that Boeing has received over $16 billion from the US government in addition to help from countries like Japan. The U.S. fires back arguing that since 1992, Airbus has been receiving EU government loans. Boeing’s scandal with Lockheed and the discovery of wing cracks in the Airbus A380s have damaged both companies’ ethical reputations. The following recommendations will ensure that, while Boeing and Airbus compete in the commercial airline industry, their actions will be ethical and legal, while adapting within the current cultural and political bounds of the global market. Introduction Boeing: the world’s largest aerospace company Since its foundation in 1916 in the Puget Sound region of Washington State, Boeing has become the largest aerospace company and a leading producer of military and commercial aircraft. Boeing’s military aircraft come equipped with satellite, missiles, launch vehicles and advanced information, and communication systems. The number one U.S. exporter have about 160,000 employees across the United States and in 70 countries, making it one of the most diverse and talented companies that thrive through their innovative...
Words: 4499 - Pages: 18
...Introduction The goal of the study is to provide overall financial statement overview of The Boeing Company using the knowledge obtained during the Financial Management course. The main question of the study is how financially well the company is at the moment and what investment expectation it generates on the market nowdays. The Boeing Company background The company was originally founded by William Boeing on July 15, 1916, as "The Pacific Aero Products Company". Two years later it was renamed into “The Boeing Company”, on May 9, 1917. Since that date the company grew and acquired a lot of its competitors, including the McDonnell Douglas in 1997. [pic] The Boeing’s structure consists of two main divisions and two supporting divisions: - Boeing’s Commercial Airlines (BCA) - Boeing Defense Space & Security (BDS), which in turn consists of: o Boeing Military Aircraft o Network & Space Systems o Global Services & Support - Boeing Capital Corporation (BCC) - Other segments (including own Fire department and other non-profile activities) [pic] The Boeing Company’s Commercial Airliners division took the leading market positions up to 2003. Financial Ratios Analysis Liquidity Boeing’s liquidity ratios increased in 2010 and 2009 in comparison to 2008 values, but current and acid-test ratios are still below the industry average. Reasons: - the amount of money and short-term investments...
Words: 4587 - Pages: 19
...Industry 7 4. Customers 8 5. Ease of Entry/Exit 8 6. Technology/Innovation 9 7. Product Characteristics 10 A. Government 10 B. Commercial Aircraft 10 8. Scale Economies 11 A. Internal 11 B. External 12 9. Experience Curve Effects 12 10. Capacity Utilization 13 11. Industry Profitability 13 SIX FORCES OF COMPETITION 14 1. Threat of New Entrants 14 2. Bargaining Power of Suppliers 16 3. Bargaining Power of Buyers 16 4. Threat of Substitute Products/Services 17 5. Intensity of Rivalry among Competitors 17 6. Relative Power of other Stakeholders-Unions 18 COMPETITIVE POSITION OF MAJOR AEROSPACE COMPANIES 18 COMPETITOR ANALYSIS OF MAJOR AEROSPACE COMPANIES 20 Boeing Co. 20 Lockheed Martin Corporation 21 Northrop Grumman Corporation 23 Raytheon Co. 24 Other Manufacturers 25 Airbus 25 United Technologies 26 KEY SUCCESS FACTORS 26 Reducing Costs 26 Maintaining Access to Foreign Markets 27 INDUSTRY PROSPECTS AND OVERALL ATTRACTIVENESS 29 Factors Making the Industry Attractive 29 Factors Making the Industry Unattractive 31 Special Industry Problems and Issues 32 Profit Outlook 33 “Micro Jet” Airplanes 33 CONCLUSION 35 Works Cited 37 Appendix A. Aircraft Information Fixed-Wing Aircraft 38 INTRODUCTION The accomplishments and advancements in the aerospace manufacturing industry over the last century since the Wright Brothers made their first...
Words: 11504 - Pages: 47
...Running head: A FINANCIAL ANALYSIS FOR THE BOEING COMPANY 1 An Overview of Financial Statement Analysis for The Boeing Company. Kathleen Kelly Capella University A Financial Analysis of The Boeing Company EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Boeing Company is a leader in manufacturing aircraft in both commercial and military sales. The Boeing Company is the world’s largest within its industry of aerospace/defense products and services with over $90 billion in revenue at the end of 2014 (Boeing, 2015). Boeing is a top US exporter of goods and has customers in 150 countries (Boeing, 2015). Boeing is listed on the NYSE and compared to their top two competitors, Lockheed Martin and Northrup Grumman, Boeing has an operating cash flow of 7.83B while both competitors total 5.31B (Yahoo Finance, 2015). This is more than double the amount of their competitors. While Boeing clearly has a higher cash flow their profit margins are not as high as both competitors (Yahoo Finance, 2015). However, Boeing has been extremely profitable but not as profitable as recorded in 2012 (Yahoo Finance, 2015). Boeing also appears to be losing market share at the present time. A 52 week range has been 116.32-158.83 and the last day’s range has been 146.01-148.37 (Yahoo Financials, 2015). A thorough analysis will follow to compare Boeing with its major competitors as well as review Boeing’s financial data for the last 3 years to identify any noteworthy changes and...
Words: 7887 - Pages: 32
...Situational Analysis: According to the United States Air Force Capital Flyer, in 1997, the Office of management and budget requested a cost comparison or A-76 study, over a three-year period that would affect 700 military and civilian positions within the Federal Government and military entities. The A-76 study reviewed the supply and maintenance operations to determine the effectiveness of maintaining these positions as military and Department of Defense (DOD) civilian entities or privatizing the positions through outsourcing. Contrary to popular belief an A-76 study is not contracting. Its purpose is to create cost savings for the DOD through a competitive sourcing program. “The A-76 circular mandates that the government procure commercially available goods and services from the private sector when it makes economic sense to do so”. (A-76 Cost Comparison Overview, p.1, 2002). The cultural makeup of the organization is active duty and federal employees. The A-76 was implemented before our retirement, we would like to revisit the process and research the outcome and its affect on the organization and its members. This research will uncover some of the problems associated with A-76 studies/processes outside of cost effectiveness. This study will provide the effects outside of cost savings, it will demonstrate the negative affects it has on federal/military personnel jobs, civilian pay, training and the morale of the organization. Premise: The outsourcing/A-76 study...
Words: 5159 - Pages: 21
...Background Boeing, a well-known aerospace company, has been facing a large decision regarding investing money in to producing a new aircraft. Boeing is split into two different primary segments: commercial airplanes and integrated defense systems or in other words, government contracts. Boeing makes commercial airplanes that can be used for both short and long-range flights, while also accepting government defense contracts. Boeing produces and sells six different airplanes to meet the needs of short- to long-range markets. Some of these aircrafts include the 717, 737, 747, 757, 767, and 777. For 2003, Boeing expects to deliver 280 aircraft and expects between 275 and 300 the following year. The expected revenues for 2003 are at $22 billion, which are down from $28 billion the previous year. B. History of the Industry Fundamentally, Boeing is a commercial-aircraft company. Unfortunately, as a part of this industry, they have started to see a significant downfall. They have lost the number one position to Airbus, their largest commercial competitors. Not only this, but also the current economic conditions look less than desirable for the commercial aircraft industry at the moment due to several reasons: • The SARS outbreak • Terrorist risks • Post 9-11 flying fears • War With all of this in mind, the decision to produce a new aircraft becomes even more questionable when analyzing how this company is to remain a dominant player in the future. C. Boeing and the...
Words: 1383 - Pages: 6
...By: Asana Kusnadi Mid Semester Examination Table of Content 1. Background 2. Vision Statement 3. SWOT Analysis of SpaceX 4. Porter’s Five Forces Model 5. SpaceX TOWS Matrix 6. SpaceX Business Model 7. SpaceX Business Level Strategy 8. Conclusions I. Background SpaceX or Space Exploration Technologies Corporation is a space transport services company headquartered in Hawthorne, California. It was founded in 2002 by former PayPal entrepreneur and Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk. SpaceX was founded with the goal of reducing space transportation costs and enabling the colonization of Mars. It has developed the Falcon 1 and Falcon 9 launch vehicles, both of which were designed from conception to eventually become reusable. SpaceX also developed the Dragon spacecraft, which are flown into orbit by the Falcon 9 launch vehicle, initially transporting cargo and later planned to carry humans to the International Space Station and other destinations.[1] By 2012, SpaceX had over 40 launches on its manifest representing about $4 billion in contract revenue—with many of those contracts already making progress payments to SpaceX—with both commercial and government (NASA/DOD) customers. As of December 2013, SpaceX has a total of 50 future launches under contract, two-thirds of them are for commercial customers. SpaceX's low launch prices, especially for communication satellites flying to geostationary orbit, have resulted in market pressure on...
Words: 8295 - Pages: 34
...Course Project Part II Busn379 AirJet Best Parts Financial Analysis A financial decision for the purchase of new equipment will be based on the projects IRR and NVP. Below I have included the IRR and NPV to help assist in the financial decisions for the project. Capital budgeting for a new machine 1.) The IRR is 22.38% 2.) The NVP is $450,867.00 NVP formula is as followed: Year 1 = 1100000/(1+0.15)^1 = 1100000/1.15 = 956521.74 Year 2 = 1450000/(1+0.15)^2 = 1450000/1.3225 = 1096408.32 Year 3 = 1300000/(1+0.15)^3 = 1300000/1.52087 = 854771.1 Year 4 = 950000/(1+0.15)^4 = 950000/1.74901 = 543165.58 Year Cash flow x15% Present Value 1 1,100,000 0.8696 $956,522 2 1,450,000 0.7561 $1,096,408 3 1,300,000 0.6575 $854,771 4 950,000 0.5718 $543,166 Total (3,000,000) NVP $450,867.00 3.) In my opinion the company should accept the project based on the financial gain of the project. 4.) Depreciation can have varying affects on different projects. In the case of this project depreciation would actually be a positive thing. Deprecation in an accounting income typically does not reduce cash flows. In fact, they can have a significant positive impact on cash flows, if they affect the tax liability of the firm. In this case it would be positive for the company because it would save on taxes while increasing present value. 5.) Examples as related to the project: a. Sunk cost- A cost that cannot be recovered because the funds are...
Words: 1168 - Pages: 5
...The Joint Strike Fighter has to be affordable. Currently, it is not. Make or Break for the F-35 The sun rises on six Air Force F-35As awaiting flight testing at Edwards AFB, Calif., in June. After lackluster testing progress in 2010, test sorties are mounting rapidly in 2011 as the test fleet grows. A 22 s the Pentagon’s biggest and most expensive program, the F-35 is getting intense scrutiny, both from Pentagon managers and Congress. Now that tight fiscal limits put every defense dollar under threat, the F-35 needs to prove itself—and fast. There’s been a whirlwind of action on the F-35 over the last 18 months. The program has been shaken up and restructured—twice—prompted by severe cost and schedule overruns. The Nunn-McCurdy law requires the Defense Secretary to scrutinize such programs and decide whether the requirement can be met some other way. Ashton B. Carter, the Pentagon’s acquisition, technology, and logistics chief, told the Senate Armed Services Committee in May that after this analysis: “We didn’t come up with any better alternatives to the Joint Strike Fighter. We want it.” However, Carter immediately added, “At the same time, it has to be affordable; and at the moment, … it’s not.” Carter said that during the last decade, the F-35’s per-aircraft cost “has doubled in real terms.” That has happened, in part, because as the nation was fighting two wars at once, money was flowing to the Pentagon, and there was “an erosion of focus on affordability,” he...
Words: 4285 - Pages: 18
...THE BOEING 7E7 Teaching Note Synopsis and Objectives In 2003, the Boeing Company announced plans to build a new “super-efficient” commercial jet called the “7E7” or “Dreamliner.” This was a “bet the farm” gamble by Boeing, similar in magnitude to its earlier introductions of the 747 and 777 airliners. The technological superiority of the new airframe, as well as the fact that it would penetrate a rapidly growing market segment, were arguments for approval of the project. On the other hand, the current market for commercial airplanes was depressed because of terrorism risks, war, and SARS, a contagious illness that resulted in global travel warnings. Boeing’s board of directors would need to weigh those considerations before granting final approval to proceed with the project. The task for students is to evaluate the 7E7 project against a financial standard, the investors’ required returns. The case gives internal rates of return (IRR) for the 7E7 project under base-case and alternative forecasts. The students must estimate a weighted-average cost of capital (WACC) for Boeing’s commercial-aircraft business segment in order to evaluate the IRRs. As a result of that analysis, the students identify the key value drivers and distinguish, on a qualitative basis, the key gambles that Boeing is making. The general objective of this case is to exercise students’ skills in estimating a weighted-average cost of capital and cost of equity. The need for students...
Words: 7346 - Pages: 30
...THE BOEING 7E7 Teaching Note Synopsis and Objectives In 2003, the Boeing Company announced plans to build a new “super-efficient” commercial jet called the “7E7” or “Dreamliner.” This was a “bet the farm” gamble by Boeing, similar in magnitude to its earlier introductions of the 747 and 777 airliners. The technological superiority of the new airframe, as well as the fact that it would penetrate a rapidly growing market segment, were arguments for approval of the project. On the other hand, the current market for commercial airplanes was depressed because of terrorism risks, war, and SARS, a contagious illness that resulted in global travel warnings. Boeing’s board of directors would need to weigh those considerations before granting final approval to proceed with the project. The task for students is to evaluate the 7E7 project against a financial standard, the investors’ required returns. The case gives internal rates of return (IRR) for the 7E7 project under base-case and alternative forecasts. The students must estimate a weighted-average cost of capital (WACC) for Boeing’s commercial-aircraft business segment in order to evaluate the IRRs. As a result of that analysis, the students identify the key value drivers and distinguish, on a qualitative basis, the key gambles that Boeing is making. The general objective of this case is to exercise students’ skills in estimating a weighted-average cost of capital and cost of equity. The need...
Words: 7290 - Pages: 30
