Premium Essay

Criminal Law Outline

In:

Submitted By Sindhiking
Words 9944
Pages 40
ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF CRIME

Elements:
Actus Reus – physical act or unlawful omission by the D
Mens rea – state of mind or intent of D at the time of act
Concurrence – actus reus and mens rea exist at same time
Harmful result and causation – a harmful result caused both factually and proximately by D’s act
Attendant circumstances –
ACTUS REUS:
Definition: physical/external, or objective, part of the crime
Eser = Actus Reus is the comprehensive notion of the act, harm and its connecting link, causation, w/ actus [expressing the voluntary physical movement in conduct] and reus [this conduct results in a certain proscribed harm (e.g. causes injury to the legal interest protected in that crime)]
Conduct crimes: punished for illegal act [e.g. driving while intoxicated]
Result crimes: punished for result [e.g. murder]

VOLUNTARY ACTS:
Definition: The D’s act must be voluntary in the sense that it must be a conscious exercise of the will.
Rationale: An involuntary act will not be deterred by punishment.
Not voluntary // not liable:
Conduct that is not the product of the actor’s determination.
E.g. A shoves B into C w/ result that C falls to death.
Reflexive or convulsive acts
Acts performed while the D was either unconscious or asleep UNLESS the D knew that he might fall asleep or become unconscious and engaged in the dangerous behavior.
MARTIN V. STATE:
Police arrested drunk Martin at home and brought him to highway – convicted of being drunk on highway
Criminal liability must be based on conduct which includes a voluntary act or omission to act which was physically possible to be performed.
Rationale: Law rests on premise that wrongful act must be chosen
Volition separates an act from a bodily movement.
My arm went up v. I raised my arm – you will your body to move
PEOPLE V. DECINA:
Epileptic suffered a seizure while driving;

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Alternative Solution Proposal

... February 11, 2016 Jill Spriggs Alternative Solution Proposal There are hundreds of criminal justice policies floating around. There are even policies covering policies. Policies could be covering laws that are in place or rules and regulations of the criminal justice agency. Some policies are put into place after too many incidents have occurred. Some policies protect victims, witnesses, subjects, and the officers that enforce them. Not every criminal justice policy becomes a strong policy out of the gate. A lot of them were created as some alternative solution and then gradually made its way to becoming a policy. This paper will take a peek at the California’s three-strike law. In 1993, the first three-strikes policy was adopted through a ballot initiative, and it was until 1997 that the policy was enacted. Since then approximately half of the country and the federal court system have adopted this policy. Since a lot of offenders are repeat offenders, the three-strikes law is based on an increase in sentencing severity as to reduce recidivism through incapacitation and deterrence. The idea is that the most unreformed criminals deserve the most punishing of sentences. Each of state that practices the three-strike laws only shares it in name as the laws vary from state to state. Some of the differences that are present are what each state defines as the number and types of offenses (Mallicoat & Gardiner...

Words: 880 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

The Criminal Justice Process

...The Criminal Justice Process Edith Lewis Criminal Law & Procedure (BLJ1442A) Agustin Pena November 15, 2014 The Criminal Justice Process Even though the defendant can be found guilty at his trial he, has the right to to file an appeal to see if legal errors occurred which could possibly affect the outcome of the verdict or the trial. The first step in the criminal justice process is the investigation and plea negotiations begin after the defendant is charged and a trial is set when the plea negotiations fail. The defendant has an arraignment hearing where he is allowed to enter a plea of guilty, not guilty, or no contest. In this step probable cause is established with the evidence that is gathered so that an arrest can be made. Each state has their own way of processing felony criminal charges in a state court. They have their own procedures and rules that describe the criminal justice process for their states. The first step in the criminal justice process is the investigation. Before an arrest can be made in a crime, a crime must be committed and reported so that an investigation can be initiated. The Criminal Justice Process, 2014 noted that, “During the investigation the investigating officer seeks to obtain a search warrant if there is enough evidence in a particular location” (The Criminal Justice Process, 2014). When the investigators submit the information to the judge, the judge decides if there is “probable cause” to issue a search warrant for...

Words: 2668 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

A Case Analysis

...(a) In this case, the action for John’s culpable driving relates to the civil law and private law. The behaviour of speeding and drunk-driving which were accused by Mick Jones relates to criminal law and public law. The action that Jones ask for monetary compensation $15000 is related to the private law and civil law. (b) The possible wrongs that John Smith,may have committed are drunk-driving, speeding, culpable driving resulting in death and badly injured. Identify the branch of law involved. Criminal law is involved in drunk-driving, speeding. Civil law is involved in culpable driving and the monetary compensation for $150000. Outline how each matter could be resolved. The drunk-driving, speeding, culpable driving resulting in death should be heard in the Magistrates’ court and the judge trail system should be adopted. Because the amount of compensation exceeds the maximum limit in Magistrate’s court, the case should be heard in the upper court which is county court. Discuss what type of penalty John may face. John Smith may face both criminal punishment and civil punishment. His driving license must be revoked,and he should be sentenced for 8 years. The damage he should pay Mick is $100000. (c) Civil law is concerned with relations and dealing between individuals, organizations and governments. Criminal law is concerned with laws that aim to protect individuals and the community. In the civil case, the plaintiff would be said to ‘sue’ the defendant, the plaintiff...

Words: 261 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Criminal Justice System

...The Criminal Justice System in Modern Day Society According to Schmalleger (2015) the American experience with crime during the last half century has been especially influential in shaping the criminal justice system of today. Crime is defined as “conduct in violation of the criminal laws of the state, the federal government, or a local jurisdiction, for which there is no legally acceptable justification or excuse,” (Schmalleger, 2015). Therefore, what constitutes a crime is regulated by local, state and federal laws. Moreover, what is deemed a crime in one state may not be a crime in another state; this is because each unit of government is charged with defining what is classified as a crime within that particular jurisdiction. Likewise, each governmental agency is responsible for the detection and subsequent prosecution of crimes that are committed. Society determines which acts are criminal by using two models known respectively as the consensus model and the conflict model. Schmalleger (2015) suggest that the consensus model is based on majority of the people within a society sharing the same values and beliefs. This group of people determined what is considered right and what is considered wrong. If a member of the groups acts in opposition of the agreed upon norms, and the act threatens the safety of well being of the group, the act is considered illegal and therefore is subject to reprimand. The conflict model seems to suggest that criminal acts are...

Words: 894 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Criminal Logistics

...Questions   1.  Should morality, in and of itself, be considered a sufficient basis for dening particular conduct as criminal? I think by itself morality should not be used as a basis because the definition of morality varies greatly by person and location. What is moral behavior to one person, could also be non-moral behavior for another.   2.  What are the chief distinctions between the civil law and the criminal law? Why Do criminal and civil law sometimes overlap? Whether a tort or a crime was committed. One could punch another in the face and commit the crime of battery, thus being criminally prosecuted and or fined or jailed. At the same time the victim can sue for medical bills, and pain and suffering as compensation.   3.  To what extent is the English common law significant in contemporary American criminal law? English common law is the basis for American criminal law, it was built off of it. It’s a statutory system.   4.  What is the essential difference between substantive criminal law and procedural criminal law? Give examples of each. Substantive laws define crimes and outline their penalties. An example would be possession of heroin. Procedural laws deal with enforcement of substantive law, determination of guilt, and punishment of the guilty. An example is search and seizure to obtain that evidence.   5.  What means of punishment for criminal offenses exist in your state? Is capital punishment available for persons convicted of first-degree murder? Which punishments...

Words: 783 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Jurors Duty

...Assignment 5 A- The Juries act of 1974 (amended by the criminal justice and courts act 2015) lays down the following rules in order for a candidate to qualify to become a juror; the candidate must be aged between 18-75, be on the electoral roll and must have lived in the UK for at least 5 years from age 13. The criminal justice act of 2003 broadened the boundaries of who can become a juror, since this act was initiated police, judges, doctors are now also expected to sit as a juror even though they were once excused from the service. However, you can still be excused from jury duty for exceptional purposes, e.g. if you have an exam, if you are pregnant, if you are ill or on holiday. If you are excused, your date will postponed to another time. There are some people that are completely excluded from jury duty, for example; the mentally ill, people in active service (Soldiers in Afghanistan etc.), if you served longer than 5 years in prison or if you are serving a community order most of these exceptions are highly understandable- for example; the mentally ill. This isn’t a completely limiting factor I.e. if the juror had depression and is being treated with medication and is perfectly able to think straight then there is no reason that they cannot be discriminated against. However, if the mental illness is more extreme such as bipolar or Schizophrenia the court will not accept them to sit on the jury. This would only be fair as the juror would not have a clear mental understanding...

Words: 936 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Justice System

...Criminal Justice System Paper Introduction In the field of Criminal Justice in America it is important to explore the parts of the criminal justice systems and the processes that occur. Many of the parts and processes in the Criminal Justice System shall be discussed in this work. Crime will be defined in relation to the law. Models of how society views acts as criminals will be reviewed. Choice theories will also be revealed in this work. The Instruments and government structure in relation to criminal justice shall be reviewed as well in this paper Criminal justice is exciting to review. Crime What is crime? Crime has an important definition with an important relation to the law. Crime is not defined by any one individual. It is important to explore what crime is defined as in society. Crime is, conduct in violation of the criminal laws of a state, the federal government, or a local jurisdiction, for which there is no legally acceptable justification or excuse. There is no justifying or excusing these acts (Schmalleger, 2009, p. 7). Crimes definition plays a major role in determining which acts are criminal as well as the models that are presented. Government Structure The government is structured in such a way as to support the Criminal Justice System in America. The first part of that structure is the Constitution. The Constitution outlines laws, freedoms and power to several governmental agencies. Government first plays a role in making laws. Then insure enforcement...

Words: 1027 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Outline the Criminal Courts and Appeal System.

...Outline the criminal courts and appeal system. (10 marks) The courts of first instance in the criminal court hierarchy are the Magistrates’ Court and the Crown Court. The Magistrates’ Court conducts trials of both summary and either-way offences that are to be tried summarily, such as theft, while the Crown Court deals exclusively with serious criminal cases, trying indictable offences such as murder, or either-way offences which are to be tried on indictment, such as theft. In the event that a party to a case wishes to appeal against the conviction or sentence awarded by the Magistrates’ Court, the case is then heard on appeal by the Crown Court. Cases can also be heard on appeal from the Magistrates’ Court by the High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) by way of case stated on point of law. Cases heard in either the High Court or Crown Court are all heard on appeal at first by the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) and then to the Supreme Court, which is the final court of appeal available. Appeals from the Crown Court, which are heard by the Court of Appeal, can be due to several grounds, including misdirection of law or facts and jury irregularity. The Court of Appeal has the power to quash convictions or even order a new trial. Each criminal case is sent to the Magistrates’ Court at first, for either bail hearings to be conducted or plea entry hearings. Where the offence charged is an indictable offence, a Magistrates’ Court will conduct sending for trial hearings...

Words: 303 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

American Criminal Justice System Research Paper

...American Criminal Justice System? The criminal justice system I mainly know is the Korean system, which I’m quite sure it would be different from the American system. However, I’m assuming the fundamental principle or structure would be similar; therefore, I will explain what I know. In my opinion, the criminal justice system is a system that is established to control crime and rehabilitate or impose penalties on those who violate the law in order to maintain communal order. Because of the United States’ distinct characteristics in history of forming the nation on the basis of independence of the states, American criminal justice system differs from other nation’s criminal justice system by having different regulations in each state. Most of the criminals are tried in local courts, rather than the federal courts since individual states have police powers and responsibility to...

Words: 612 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Cjs 220

...|[pic] |Syllabus | | |College of Criminal Justice SSecurity Security | | |CJS/220 Version 4 | | |The Court System | Copyright © 2011, 2009, 2007 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved. Course Description This course is an introduction and overview of the legal system, the participants, the courtroom process, and post-conviction process of the court system. It demonstrates the connections among participants and how they relate to each other. Additionally, the course covers the history of the court system and the different types of court at the state and federal levels. Policies Faculty and students/learners will be held responsible for understanding and adhering to all policies contained within the following two documents: • University policies: You must be logged into the student website to view this document. • Instructor policies: This document is posted in the Course Materials forum. University policies are subject to change. Be sure to read the policies at the beginning of each class. Policies may be slightly different depending on the...

Words: 2497 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Law1000 Review

...|Carleton University |Department of Law and Legal Studies | Course Outline | | | | |Course: | |LAWS 2301T | | | | | |Term: | |Summer 2016 | | | | | |Prerequisites: | |LAWS 1000 | |Class: |Day & Time: |online | | |Room: |N/A - there is no classroom; lectures will be viewable online | | | | ...

Words: 1393 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Parole and Truth in Sentencing

...University of Phoenix | Parole and Truth in Sentencing | CJS/200-Foundations of the Criminal Justice System | | Roy Burgess II | 3/30/2014 | The parole system is an integral part of the U.S. criminal justice system. The functions of parole are closely tied to the laws regarding truth in sentencing. The focus of this paper is to outline the concepts related to the parole system and the intent of the truth in sentencing laws. | The early release of an inmate from a correctional facility is defined as parole. The goal of parole is to provide a means for an inmate to gradually reenter society and lead a productive life. There are two types of parole, discretionary parole and mandatory parole. An inmate that is eligible for discretionary parole must go before a parole board to show that they are no longer a threat to society and that they are capable of beginning to rebuild their lives and becoming a productive member of society. Mandatory parole is determined by the sentencing guidelines and is not under the control of the parole board. After an inmate has served a predetermined amount of time according to sentencing, they are automatically released from custody. Both forms of parole have specific conditions that must be followed and failing to do so could result in the individual returning to prison. The conditions of parole vary according to the jurisdiction, but they also share some of the same restrictions and requirements. One condition that is common...

Words: 492 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Anguilla Cuisine

...Bibi Suffiya Allie February 4, 2013 Professor Grant Criminal Law Chaney vs. State Brief Fact Summary: The Appellee, Donald Scott Chaney (Appellee), was convicted of two counts of forcible rape and one count of robbery. The trial court imposed a concurrent one-year sentence and provided for parole in the discretion of the parole board. Even though the law prohibits an increase in the sentence upon appeal, the State of Alaska filed this appeal in order to express its disapproval of the judgment of the trial court. Synopsis of Rule of LaW: The principles and objectives of criminal reformation are rehabilitation of the offender, isolation of the offender, deterrence of the offender, deterrence of other potentially similarly situated individuals in society and community condemnation of the offender in order to reaffirm societal norms. Facts: The Appellee, a member of the United States Armed Forces and another individual picked up the victim at a downtown location in Anchorage. After driving around with the victim in their car, they beat her and forcibly raped her four times. Money was also removed from the victim’s purse. After the incident was over, the Appellee and his companion threatened the victim in order to make sure she did not tell anyone what had occurred. The Appellee claimed it was not forcible rape and that he did not direct any violence toward the victim. The Appellee also stated that he found some money on the floor of the car and was...

Words: 544 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Criminal Justce Questions

...Describe the American experience with crime during the last half century. What noteworthy criminal incidents or activities occurred during that time, and what social and economic conditions might have produced them? a. The American experience with crime during the last half century has been the main reason for the way our courts, law enforcement, and the criminal justice system operates the way that it does today. There have been many crime waves and other events that have played a key role in shaping the system as it is today. Some of these things include: the huge spike in organized crime activity during the prohibition years and its evolution into gangs and the laws concerning them today, the increase in reported crimes and enforced laws through the 50’s, 60’s and 70’s as well as the change/increase in the types and availability of illegal drugs today. For example: prohibition effectively created a black market for alcohol, a sub cultural of illegal gambling, and other organized crime like protection rackets, to name a few. That paved the way for gangs and the way we handle them today. 2. What is the theme of this book? According to that theme, what are the differences between the individual-rights perspective and the public-order perspective? a. The theme of this book is individual-rights verses public-order, specifically; the rights guaranteed by the constitution to criminal suspects and law abiding citizens need to be upheld and defended. On the public-order side of things...

Words: 1198 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Canadian Criminal Law Inchoate Offences

...Inchoate Offences in Canadian Criminal Law: Conspiracy and Counselling November 9, 2014 The Criminal Code of Canada is a systematically arranged body of law that defines various acts as crimes in Canadian society. It also serves as the legal doctrine that describes the assorted criminal behaviours specific to each criminal offence, as well as the correlating sentence to be administered upon an individual found to be in violation of the law. While some provisions under the Code address crimes that are ultimately perpetrated, such as the offence of robbery found under s.343 (1985), the Code also outlines offences in which a criminal act has yet to be physically carried out, or is “incomplete” (Verdun-Jones, 2011, p.180). These crimes are defined as inchoate offences, and represent a distinctive class of criminal offences in which the actions that precede detrimental conduct but “do not necessarily inflict harmful consequences in and of themselves” are deemed unlawful (Verdun-Jones, 2011, p.180). Consider a case involving the inchoate offence of conspiracy, or specifically, to commit a robbery. Two individuals (for this example named Slammer and Provis) agree to carry out an armed robbery, contrary to the provisions of s.343 of Criminal Code (1985). However, prior to attempting to commit the robbery, both Slammer and Provis are arrested due to the effective surveillance...

Words: 1288 - Pages: 6