ntroduction
The process describe about does make some sense, nonetheless, there also possibilities that could come up, wherein abuse of power becomes an issue. “Power is defined as the ability to control or significantly influence others” (Brusseau, 2012). Consistently, there could be many cases that people would be stopped, even if not committing any infractions, just so these traffic cops could maybe extra money. Therein, the whole idea of fairness, where citizens pay taxes directly to cops, becomes an extortion. This question and answers paper below should helps us analyze all the ethics involving these briberies, so called Mordidas in Mexico City.

What is cultural relativism, and how does the vision of ethics associated with it diverge from the traditional ethical theories?

Answer:
Cultural Relativism is the idea that “values and morality are culture specific” (Brusseau, 2012). Therefore, taking the case study Mordidas as an example, it is common for traffic cops to receive money from driving …show more content…
There different point of views here, which makes traditional ethics much more complex. It emcompasses: Teleogogy, by Aristotles - “first, determine the proper end and then decide the means for achieving it” (Hub, 2013). Deontology, by philosopher Immanuel Kant - “decisions or choices should be based on moral principles that can be applied universally”(Hub, 2013). Utilitarianism - “argued that the correctness of actions should be judged by their consequences” (Hub, 2013). In the end, when associated with cultural relativism, all of these traditional theories are rejected and lost, because the idea of it is to analyze and find the best course of action that people will morally be able to follow at any time or any place. Cultural relativism simple ignore that idea, and is sole based on a right and wrong of a specific