...Chrysler & DaimlerAcquisition-Merger Case Study | | Situation faced by company After facing some hardships and bad acquisitions in the 80s and 90s, Daimler-Benz led by Jurgen Schrempp began to see the light in the mid-90s. By focusing on the most profitable businesses within Daimler and reducing the number of businesses at Daimler from 35 to 23, Shrempp was able to post high profits in 1996 and 1997 despite the poor looking financials in the previous years. In order to remain profitable in this highly competitive market, Shrempp knew that the company had to continue to grow. They needed to reach customers down market without compromising their high-quality brand. To do this, they began selling vehicles to the market’s premium niches and were quite successful. Along with broadening their product offering, they were becoming more and more international with their production because of the high amount of revenues being generated internationally. Schrempp knew that these steps would only keep them competitive for so long though. With the nature and frequency of alliances and mergers in the automotive industry becoming more and more frequent, he knew that to keep up with the changing industry and increased time and cost pressures, he had to take another step in order to not fall behind the competition. SWOT analysis Daimler-Benz | Strengths * Attention to detail * Brand image * Engineering * Global distribution network | Weaknesses * High-cost & inefficient...
Words: 5532 - Pages: 23
...CASE STUDY - “Daimler and Chrysler: lessons from a merger”. This case study is about the merger occurred in 1998 between two big companies in the auto industry: German company Daimler-Benz and American auto manufacturer Chrysler Group. At the end, this merger appeared to be a failure because of different types of problems. Chrysler benefited from Mercedes while benefits to Daimler were harder to find, so that Daimler decided to sell 80% of its stake in Chrysler for just 7.4 billion dollars. They were two companies from different countries with different languages and different styles that came together although there were no synergies. First of all, these firms operated in the same sector but they had different customers, goals and cultures so there was a lack of common vision and values. Daimler was a luxury brand based on excellence and superior engineering that wanted to enter new markets and develop new products, especially by raising its standing in the North American auto market. On the other hand, Chrysler addressed to “blue collars” purchasers and decided to look for a partner being aware of the overcapacity in the industry. Originally, the plan was for Chrysler to use Daimler parts, components and even vehicle architecture to sharply reduce the cost to produce future vehicles. The operation started with the intention to realize a “merger of equals” but it ended up being more like an acquisition as Daimler strove to impose its own position, even though Chrysler...
Words: 597 - Pages: 3
...- Lessons in Post-Merger Integration - Jan Daniel Laufhütte 2304958 Individual Written Case Study Report in Strategic Management IHS-3-422 London South Bank University 17/12/2003 Table of Contents List of Figures................................................................................. i Introduction ................................................................................... 1 1. The changing world automobile industry .............................. 1 2. Reasons for mergers and acquisitions .................................. 3 2.1. 2.2. Daimler-Benzs’ motives..................................................................... 3 Chryslers’ motives ............................................................................. 5 3. The Post-Merger Integration Structure................................... 7 3.1. 3.2. 3.3. Preparations for the merger .............................................................. 7 Integration Structure of DaimlerChrysler......................................... 7 Expected Synergies ........................................................................... 8 4. Cultural Issues ......................................................................... 9 4.1. 4.2. 4.3. Daimler-Benz’s Culture...................................................................... 9 Chrysler’s Culture ............................................................................ 10 Key Integration Problems and Post-Merger Business Culture ....
Words: 3210 - Pages: 13
...Strategic Management- DaimlerChysler Assignment WordCount: 2413 Taking into account the changing strategic and competitive environment of the automobile industry in the 1990s, identify and evaluate Daimler-Benz and Chrysler’s objectives in the merger. How well was the pre-acquisition planning handled? Daimler-Benz was a German car corporation founded by Gottlieb Daimler and Carl Benz, when both engaged in a merger in 1926. Daimler-Benz started off manufacturing automobiles, motor vehicles and internal combustion engines, agreeing that all factories would use the brand name ‘Mercedes Benz’. Daimler-Benz was later recognised for producing luxury cars. Chrysler on the other hand was the third largest US based car maker and was founded by Walter Chrysler in 1925. Chrysler manufactured cars, minivans, sport-utility vehicles and trucks. Daimler-Benz and Chrysler merged in 1998 forming DaimlerChrysler. This was the biggest merger in history. The Strategic environment is referred to the direction and scope of an organisation over the long-term: which achieves advantage for the organisation through its configuration of resources within a challenging environment, to meet the needs of markets and to fulfil stakeholder expectations (Johnson and Scholes). Competitive environment is the immediate competitive context in which an organisation or enterprise operates in (www.palgrave.com). The automobile industry in the 1990’s had accelerated during the last half of the decade due to the...
Words: 2551 - Pages: 11
...1.0 CASE BACKGROUND DaimlerChrysler AG was two huge automotive companies that were merged together and become fifth largest automaker and the third largest in sales. These two different companies come with a lot of differences such as countries, the cultural issues, the creative styling and product development and more. After the merger, appeared some major problem that hardly fixed by both of the company and yet there were some issues that occur after the integration until Tom Stallkamp wonder if the merger should be continue. 2.0 ISSUES The merger between the companies faced problems that mostly related to the cultural differences, the management of the companies, communications and misunderstanding in a lot of aspects. Besides that, is the merger between these two massive companies is the best strategies? 3.0 TOOL USED CAGE analysis is used in this problem solving. CULTURE Different personalities appeared because basically, after the recent aggressive change The Board of Management, Daimler can be said as a assertive and committed company where totally unlike Chrysler that tend to be little less rigid and sometimes can be flexible and go off on tangents. Their working lifestyle also showed obviously different for Daimler which they embraced formality and hierarchy while Chrysler favored open collars, and free-form discussion. There were also language barriers that happened between the affiliations when practically all the German executives spoke English while...
Words: 1687 - Pages: 7
...DaimlerChrysler: The Quest to Create “One Company” Case Analysis AMBA 650 Professor Bensimon February 12, 2013 In 1998, the Daimler Benz and Chrysler companies decided to merge together in an effort to capitalize on each other positioning in their respective markets. This merger would join together Germans and American to create synergy to dominate the world automotive market. In theory, this was a brilliant idea to bring together the best engineers and auto stylists in the world. However, differences in culture which was thought to be a minor barrier turned out to be a major underlying factor behind the failure of DaimlerChrysler. Separate cultural ideals on business practices, communications and management destroyed this endeavor. In this case analysis, we will evaluate and understand how cultural differences, organizational structure, management styles, integration strategy and stakeholders played a role in this failure. The cultures of these two companies were totally different; Daimler Benz was aggressive and believed in gaining every advantage possible to be the top automotive company in the world. Chrysler was a firm that was non-aggressive and progressed slowly. They believed that they gained most of their success from production and operations flexibility. In addition to this, the procedures for compensation and decision-making cause severe friction between top level managers of the newly merged DaimlerChrysler. At lower levels, employees bickered...
Words: 1306 - Pages: 6
...Case of DaimlerChrysler merger Introduction The case is about merger and demerger of the two automotive companies which have dedicated and skilled workforces and successful products, but in different markets and in different regions of the world, i.e. Daimler Benz of Germany and other company is Chrysler Corporation of US which take place merger in 1998 and demerged in year of 2007. This study analyses the potential sources of value creation and destruction, and evidence on how this process has affected the valuation of the Daimler Chrysler merger. We also discuss some of the important issues that must be taken into account in cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Differences in corporate culture, compensation policies, ownership structure, and the legal environment may pose significant challenges to international business combinations. This is the historic merger that will change the face of the automotive industry. Context In a Modigliani-Miller framework, if mergers do create value, they do so by changing tax liabilities, changing contracting costs, or changing investment incentives. If the size, timing, and riskiness of the combined future cash flows of the merged firms exceed the cash flows of the separate firms (“synergy”), the merger will be a positive net present-value project. They include:- Tax motivation Mispricing inspiration Market power high price hypothesis motivation Earning diversification stimulation In the case of Daimler Chrysler merger...
Words: 884 - Pages: 4
...Leadership DaimlerChrysler Merger: The Quest to Create “One Company” Tom Stallkamp, Chrysler president and executive in charge of accelerating integration of the recently merged Daimler and Chrysler companies, was feeling great frustration. Why couldn’t he move the integration process along more rapidly? He could see clearly the amazing potential for payoffs, but it just wasn’t happening. He wasn’t used to being unable to move the organization, and he hated the feeling of being able to visualize great things without being able to mobilize people to action. What else could he do? Maybe it was time to let the two cultures duke it out, and allow the stronger one to win. That would be one kind of integration, though not quite what he had been working for. Background At 4:00pm on November 12, 1998 as the final bell rang on the New York Stock Exchange, U.S. automaker Chrysler Corporation and German automaker Daimler-Benz ceased to exist. They emerged the next day as a new global conglomerate named DaimlerChrysler AG. With combined revenues of $130 billion and a market capitalization of $92 billion, DaimlerChrysler became the fifth largest automaker in the world in number of vehicles sold and third largest in sales. The $40 billion stock deal was the largest ever in the industrial world. Upon completion of the transaction Daimler stockholders owned 57 percent of the new DaimlerChrysler and Chrysler stockholders the remaining 43 percent. After ten months of discussions and negotiations...
Words: 10521 - Pages: 43
...Term project Operation Management CHRYSLER: [pic] Total Quality Management Submitted to Dr. Chafik Abid CONTENTS -Introduction…………………………………………………. -Chrysler Total Quality management………………………. -Chrysler SWOT Analysis…………………………………… -Chrysler service Quality…………………………………….. -Chrysler service and dealership Problems (Middle East)… -Chrysler Service solution……………………………………. -Conclusion……………………………………………………. -Work Cited…………………………………………………… INTRODUCTION: DaimlerChrysler AG with its businesses Mercedes-Benz Cars, Daimler Trucks, Daimler Financial Services, Mercedes-Benz Vans and Daimler Buses, is a globally leading producer of premium passenger cars and the largest manufacturer of commercial vehicles in the world. As it can be seen above that the integration of the two different companies with similar line of production makes the company stronger, reliable, and caters the best for its customer needs and satisfactions. As a result, we chose this company to discuss further on its Total Quality Management and other related issues. Total Quality Management is a set of management practices throughout the organization, geared to ensure the organization consistently meets or exceeds customer requirements. TQM places strong focus on process measurement and controls as means of continuous improvement. TQM views an organization as a collection of processes. It maintains that organizations must strive to continuously improve these processes by incorporating the knowledge...
Words: 2668 - Pages: 11
...order to understand and be critical on Daimler’s choice of partner, apart from the motives presented in the case, one also needs to consider the enterprise environment trends during the time. 90’s was a wave of mergers and acquisitions characterized by Cross-border ventures (Lipton M., 2006). According to Lipton it was an era where size mattered and mergers were considered the one-way to internationalization and market expansion. Furthermore, nine of the ten largest deals in history all took place in the three-year period 1998-2000. Having established that, one can understand that Daimler was under market and investor pressure to go large. In such an environment, a European company would think of an integrative expansion to the vast US market as the best strategy (Japanese market too cultural different). So, from the choices of either founding a new subsidiary (high risk) or seeking for a JV, or an acquisition or a merger Daimler went for the merger. It was an effort to meet the environmental trend by increasing market share and to make a big impact to the larger competitors. Comparing the three great American car companies, GM was too large (in 1997 GM had $178b revenues compared to Daimler’s $71b) and difficult to control, Ford had investor issues (Ford family), but Chrysler, a similar size company, would seem the best partner. Chrysler was also ideal partner for Daimler because it had a good knowledge of the local market, which lowers the venture risk (Bartlett & Beamish, 2011)...
Words: 358 - Pages: 2
...manufacturing, such discovery has inspired daimler over the past years and has also led to its success. modern manufacturing technology practiced by Daimler include the used of production plan of a prototype technology which is approved by a function of the group and later processed for inspection then improvement are subsequently implicated for the MSD (Mercedes Benz Development System) phase. All vehicle manufacturing plant are equipped with automated robotic systems which is used in the lean production of all its automobiles. the production method utilizes CIM (computer integrated manufacturing) this system exploits all computer related information by the means of IDS ( integrated database systems) and combines its into a single database thereafter the computer controls the reboots for some part of the machining processes and paint job, thus saving cost on health related circumstances of physical labour. other systems used include the CAD computer aided design which assist engineers in the design aspect of manufacturing. MPM (management process manufacturing) is popular at Daimler, is gathers the methods and technologies used in the manufacturing thus assisting the management accounting department with reducing work in progress. _ EXPLAIN WHAT IS MEANT BY STRATEGIC POSITIONING AND IDENTIFY THE STRATEGIES USED BY THE COMPANY TO ACHIEVE ITS POSITION the modern management strategies used include the merger between Daimler-Benz and Chrysler an equal competitor in 1998 the merger...
Words: 777 - Pages: 4
... |8 | | TYPES OF MERGERS |9 | |WHY MERGERS |12 | |STATUTORY REGULATIONS |13 | |COMPARISON OF MERGERS IN INDIA AND CHINA |16 | |ARCELLOR MITTAL DEAL |17 | |DAIMLER CHRYSLER DEAL |19 | |REFERNCE |22 | ABSTRACT Mergers and acquisitions are on the rise today. It is used as a strategy for diversifying risk by some companies, and to combat competition or gain market share and the like by the others. In this paper, an insight has been given...
Words: 4859 - Pages: 20
...automobile industry. In recent years, 2008-2010, Ford, GM, and Chrysler had to be saved from self-destruction and bankruptcy through government incentives, loans, and emergency funding. In December of 2008 these 3 automakers asked the government for monetary assistance that totaled approximately 34 billion dollars (About, 2013). Ford, GM, and Chrysler asked for these funds to avoid impending job layoffs in the millions and also to avoid further financial trouble for the economy during the recession (About, 2013). All three of the car companies that had to be bailed out were American based and had for years been facing stiff competition from foreign car makers especially Honda, Hyundai, and Toyota. During this time there was quite a bit of finger pointing and blame being placed surrounding the reason for the failure of the American car industry. Was the failure based on external factors such technology, political/legal parties and organizations, or economic issues (Hitt, Ireland, Hoskisson, 2013)? Or was the failure of this industry based on internal factors such as marketing, physical facilities, and organization capabilities (Hitt, Ireland, and Hoskisson, 2013)? This paper will focus on Chrysler before the bailout and the reasons why the bailout was necessary for this corporation. Again, please remember that this paper is based on Chrysler pre-bailout and pre-merger. Founded in 1925, Chrysler began as a company known for...
Words: 3134 - Pages: 13
...Dysfunctions of a Team- Patrick Lencioni Bhavya Seth - 0568958 Trang Nguyen - 0567279 Kevin Baker - 0568890 MGT 210 Professor: Shane McQuade Golden Gate University 1 I. Introduction Team work has become a core competence in many organizations such as Whole Food, IDEO, or Cisco. A team is defined as “a group whose members work intensely with one another to achieve a specific common goal or objective” (Jones and George, 2011, p.495). One of the main reasons why team work is more preferable nowadays is that the organization wants to take advantage of synergies. For example, many teams lack cohesion in which team members do not consider themselves as part of a team. Some teams have to suffer from social loafing which means that team members do not contribute or get involved in the project as they do when working independently. Other teams are face with the problems of shared goals as team members pursue their individual goals rather than trying to achieve the team’s goal. Groupthink is another concern of team leaders because the team consider consensus as a primary goal. Consequently, they do not want to get involved into the debate and this may undermine team performance. All of these above problems are characteristic of a dysfunctional team. In fact, teams are made up of imperfect human beings which means teams are inherently dysfunctional and that decreases team performance. Organizations fail to achieve teamwork because they unknowingly fall prey to five natural but dangerous...
Words: 5084 - Pages: 21
...& McKersie, 1965; Zartman, 1977).Over the years, these studies have contributed to the construction of the so-called negotiation theory, which has assumed the development of techniques and models designed to solve political problems as the primary target of investigation. Management studies relating to negotiations have mainly focused on negotiation processes between companies, customers, suppliers, and industrial relations. The negotiations involving two companies that design strategic paths of cooperation – or have to implement a designed one – are less investigated, especially those concerning the effect of the intervention of outside (third) parties. I intend to focus on the latter. Through the analysis of the case studies relating to the negotiation between Fiat and Chrysler to establish a strategic alliance in the automobile sector, the article would like to investigate how the entry of interested third parties can influence the dynamics of a negotiation process. In particular, this work shows how this input has allowed the management of a critical deadlock. The adopted analytical approach has been drawn from the deliberations of James K. Sebenius (1983, 1992). 167 The Special Issue on Contemporary Research in Arts and Social Science © Centre for Promoting Ideas, USA In terms of theory...
Words: 1633 - Pages: 7
