...uring the scientific process, deductive reasoning is used to reach a logical true conclusion. Another type of reasoning, inductive, is also used. Often, deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning are confused. It is important to learn the meaning of each type of reasoning so that proper logic can be identified. Deductive reasoning Deductive reasoning is a basic form of valid reasoning. Deductive reasoning, or deduction, starts out with a general statement, or hypothesis, and examines the possibilities to reach a specific, logical conclusion, according to the University of California. The scientific method uses deduction to test hypotheses and theories. "In deductive inference, we hold a theory and based on it we make a prediction of its consequences. That is, we predict what the observations should be if the theory were correct. We go from the general — the theory — to the specific — the observations," said Dr. Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller, a researcher and professor emerita at Albert Einstein College of Medicine. uring the scientific process, deductive reasoning is used to reach a logical true conclusion. Another type of reasoning, inductive, is also used. Often, deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning are confused. It is important to learn the meaning of each type of reasoning so that proper logic can be identified. Deductive reasoning Deductive reasoning is a basic form of valid reasoning. Deductive reasoning, or deduction, starts out with a general statement, or hypothesis...
Words: 1107 - Pages: 5
...different modes of enquiry (for example; analytic-deductive, systems thinking; and inductive-consensual). b) Using ONE of the methods of enquiry develop a plan to show how you will carry out the research for Tasks 2 and 3. c) Provide a short summary justifying method of enquiry and identifying the strengths and weaknesses of your approach. (Approximately 1200 words) WORD COUNT: 1245 words An Enquiry System is a system of interconnected components for stimulating knowledge on a problem or issue of importance . An enquiry system is composed of inputs, processes and outputs, which can be further defined by two categories; Simple/Old Thinking and Complex thinking. Simple/old thinking is broken down into inductive-consensual and analytic-deductive, whereas Complex thinking consists of dialect thinking and multiple realities. Inductive-consensual is the classic way of knowing. This enquiry involves limited observation on any situation, but is capable of observing its own process by means of reflection. “Inductive – Consensual enquiry derives a conclusion from a limited set of observations which may be: Analogous (for e.g. ‘the situation was a bit simpler than this one but a little more complicated than that one’) Historical (for e.g. ‘in the past the answer has always been such-and- such within those tolerances’) Multiple independently sourced (for e.g. An average derived from a group of experts .” Inductive-consensual enquiry works with agreements among decision...
Words: 1328 - Pages: 6
...Deductive and Inductive Criminal Profiling In when interpreting the personal and behavioral characteristic to identify a suspect of a crime, two primary forms of logic can be using in conducting an investigation: inductive and deductive. Inductions consists of generalizations or assumptions that are formed based on what has been observed. Inductions, like predictions, may not always be accurate. Profilers who develop their logic base off of experience or observation without any provable or verifiable science based theories, ultimately allow bias conclusions to form. On the contrary, deductive profiling is an evidence-based, process-oriented method of investigative reasoning based off of the behavioral patterns of a particular offender...
Words: 482 - Pages: 2
...which conclusions are drawn from premises. The logician is concerned primarily with the correctness of the completed process of reasoning. Nature of Reasoning Typically, a piece of reasoning moves from one or more statements which are, at least provisionally, taken for granted to some other statement. A statement means what is typically asserted using a declarative sentence, and hence always either true or false – although its truth or falsity may be unknown. The starting points of reasoning are called the premises, the end-point the conclusion. A set of statements consisting of some premises and a conclusion is called an argument. Examples of arguments: First: All rich people are happy and Hitesh is rich, therefore, Hitesh is happy. Second: The potatoes have been boiling for twenty minutes, therefore, they are cooked! A logical perspective begins in response to questions such as the following: Is this argument based on reason or experience? Is this argument correct (rationally defensible)? Does this argument preserve or lead to truth? Arguments are traditionally divided into two different types, deductive and inductive. Deductive Argument A deductive argument is valid when its premises, if true, do provide conclusive grounds for the truth of its conclusion. In the realm of deductive logic, the central task is to clarify the relation between premises and conclusion in valid...
Words: 663 - Pages: 3
...individuals’ skills that enable them to process information and solve problems they face throughout their life. However, every day we face a different kind of problems that we are required to solve to survive, but solving these problems requires developing some kind of skills and abilities. Recently, at an age of 26, I was preparing for the medical school’s placement exam (MCAT). However, after covering and studying all the material required for the exam, I thought I was ready to ace my practice exams. After I was done with my first practice exam, I was surprised with my low score. At that moment, I realized that memorizing the material was not enough to pass my MCAT exam. Thus, I knew I had to develop some type of strategy that will increase my chances of guessing correctly the multiple-choice problems on the MCAT exam....
Words: 544 - Pages: 3
...a consultant by the local police commissioner to lend my expertise on criminal justice research. On the other hand this is for educational resources for the police captains who will be developing a new citywide crime prevention strategy. In addition to the resources that will be discussed are the key differences between deductive, inductive, grounded, and axiomatic research theories. However, there are differences and similarities between the theories and hypothesis that will also be discussed. Defining the theory is more valid then the other and what are variables will also be included in this assignment. Lastly, they have important components of theoretical schemes and that is vital to demonstrate the key points in the scenario of a consultant and an educational consultant. Introduction In a research process there are many factors to consider in educating individuals on criminal justice research. However, to understand the strategy in constructing new citywide crime prevention strategy there are key points that needs to be discussed. They key points that will be demonstrated for educational resources will include defining theories of deductive, inductive, grounded, and axiomatic research theories. Furthermore, with one of these theories one can be considered more valid then the other. There are many theories introduced in the criminal justice system but they all have similarities and differences that make them so unique in the world of criminal justice. Understanding the...
Words: 643 - Pages: 3
...Globalization Argumentative Paper Jamie Mallard PHL/320 January 18, 2016 Lisa Siegal Globalization Argumentative Paper Globalization is a process of interaction and integration among the people, companies, and governments of different nations, a process driven by international trade and investment and aided by information technology. This process has effects on the environment, on culture, on political systems, on economic development and prosperity, and on human physical well-being in societies around the world. (The Levin Institute: Globalization101, para. 1) According to Merriam-Webster (2015), a definition of good is “a favorable character or tendency, or profitable or advantageous.” In using the definition profitable or advantageous, (1, Conclusion) globalization is good for business. (1, Premise) Globalization allows for companies to have their products made for a much lower cost and in turn pass those savings on to consumers. (1, Premise) Globalization also allows for foreign aid and has moved many countries out of abject poverty and into a middle class standard of living, according to Meredith and Hoppough (2007). (2, Conclusion) Globalization is also good for international relations and trade. (2, Premise) Globalization can bring different cultures to different nations. Thankfully, through the developments and technology, borders have been erased and products and services can now move globally more easily. (2, Premise) Different regions of the world...
Words: 716 - Pages: 3
...Journal of Operations Management, Management Science, and Production and Operations Management. The qualitative case studies chosen were published between 1992 and 2007. With an increasing trend toward using more qualitative case studies, there have been meaningful and significant contributions to the field of operations management, especially in the area of theory building. However, in many of the qualitative case studies we reviewed, sufficient details in research design, data collection, and data analysis were missing. For instance, there are studies that do not offer sampling logic or a description of the analysis through which research outcomes are drawn. Further, research protocols for doing inductive case studies are much better developed compared to the research protocols for doing deductive case studies. Consequently, there is a lack of consistency in the way the case method has been applied. As qualitative researchers, we offer suggestions on how we can improve on what we have done and elevate the level of rigor and consistency. Published by Elsevier B.V. Article history:...
Words: 13548 - Pages: 55
...Thinking and Decision Making MGT/350 September 25, 2011 Dr. Valerie E. Davis Introduction Thinking is a process in which situations are analyzed and acceptable conclusions are developed. Critical thinking is a process in which information is gathered and topics or situations are researched to develop more than one conclusion so that one can consider the alternative. There are different styles of thinking and people process information in different ways. Many people use different styles of styles of thinking to solve problems and to assist with making any projects or program a success. Some different forms of thinking will be compared and contrasted so that there is a clear understanding of how people use different styles of thinking. Persuasive Thinking Persuasion is the art of influencing others to believe what the speaker is saying. The art that lies behind the persuader is the ability to speak in a way that is believable to any audience. As we analyze the persuasive thinker we will cover such topics as ethics of persuasion, think about what persuades us, and learn ways to analyze audiences to find how they differ from the persuasive thinker (Kirby & Goder, 2007). The main point of the ethics of persuasion that must be identified is the difference between manipulating and persuading. When one is trying to persuade people to do anything for self-gain it is manipulation, and when the persuader is trying to persuade others that would be...
Words: 1699 - Pages: 7
...1 The Induction-Deduction Opposition: Ambiguities and Complexities of the Didactic Reality Wilfried Decoo Published in IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics, vol. 34, n° 2 (May 1996), 95-118. ("didactic" = pertaining to teaching and learning in a school context) Abstract An analysis of some of the scientific literature reveals that the terms "induction" and "deduction" often point to various concepts. A number of modalities need to be discerned, especially in the realm of "induction". Experimental comparisons of different methodological approaches may also neglect, to some extent, the complexities of what is really taking place in the classroom setting. The purpose of this article is not to take sides in the methodological controversy, but to contribute to a greater awareness of terminology identification and of the tangents, plural forms and crossings between didactic strategies that draw on "induction" or "deduction". Les termes "induction" et "déduction", tels qu'une analyse de la littérature scientifique nous les révèle, renvoient souvent à des concepts différents. Il semble utile de discerner les différentes modalités, en particulier dans le domaine de "l'induction". Les comparaisons expérimentales de différentes approches méthodologiques semblent négliger, du moins en partie, les aspects complexes de la réalité en classe. Cet article ne prend pas position dans la controverse méthodologique, mais désire contribuer à une plus grande prise de conscience d'une part...
Words: 8498 - Pages: 34
...Understanding the Doctoral Research Process Julia Coy-Ybarra Northcentral University November 24, 2013 Understanding the Doctoral Research Process An obvious factor in understanding the doctoral research process is having chosen the right academy to pursue the doctorate. Other deciding factor are the reference resources that are easily accessible to the student—a Writing Center and a Library database. The ultimate decision is choosing the right specialization program. Once these are done, what follows are organization, commitment, and dedication to the doctoral process. Introduction Following university standards is the threshold to acquiring a doctorate. Hence, these standards are the Academic Integrity Guidelines, APA writing standards, understanding the function of the School of Education, and the online function of your Academic Advisor. An online commitment to pursue a Doctorate is a very solitary commitment. The process will fail to provide any personal face-to-face interaction between student and mentor, between student and advisor, bantering with colleagues, or befriending the Dean of the School in any way but grades. Consequently, the student must make a commitment and prepare for this singular or introverted activity. The Research Process Nevertheless, in order to fully understanding the research process of the doctoral process, one needs to select a topic that...
Words: 979 - Pages: 4
...Chapter 1 – Introduction and Ethical Concepts 2. Compare and contrast inductive and deductive reasoning in a business ethics context. Provide examples. Inductive reasoning moves from specific details and observations (typically of nature) to the more general underlying principles or process that explains them (e.g., Newton's Law of Gravity). It is open-ended and exploratory, especially at the beginning. In the business ethics context, inductive reasoning is adjusting a course of action based upon a limited amount of information gathered. It is a process where one starts from a specific experience and draws inferences (generalizations) from it. For example, a salesperson, by observing a potential customer's reaction to the sales presentation, may induce what the customer's needs and personality are and what should be said to obtain the sale. In contrast, deductive reasoning typically moves from general truths to specific conclusions. It opens with an expansive explanation (statements known or believed to be true) and continues with predictions for specific observations supporting it. Deductive reasoning is narrow in nature and is concerned with testing or confirming a hypothesis. Deductive ethical reasoning provides a framework for the resolution of moral problems in business today. However, it is supported by very little experience and does not create a practical scheme, thus incapable of providing answers to specific moral problems. For example, Chapter 2 – Plato ...
Words: 487 - Pages: 2
...category. Include the characteristics of the original eight elements in your descriptions. The four real distinct categories are deductive, inductive, abductive or inference, and analogical. Deductive Reasoning: Consist of Implication and Consequences, and Interpretation and Inference. Deductive reasoning is one of the two basic forms of valid reasoning. It starts with an assumed hypothesis or theory, which is why it has been called 'hypothetical-deduction; this assumption may be well-accepted or it may be rather precarious - nevertheless, for the argument it is not questioned. This is the opposite of inductive reasoning, which involves creating broad generalizations from specific observations. The basic idea of deductive reasoning is that if something is true of a class of things in general, this truth applies to all members of that class. One of the keys for sound deductive reasoning, then, is to be able to properly identify members of the class, because incorrect categorizations will result in unsound conclusions. Inferences are interpretations or conclusions you come to. Inferring is what the mind does in figuring something out. Implications are claims or truths that logically follow from other claims or truths. Implications follow from thoughts. Consequences follow from actions. Inductive Reasoning: Entails Concepts and Information. It is the process of reasoning in which the premises of an argument are believed to support the conclusion but do not ensure it. Induction is...
Words: 452 - Pages: 2
...example of a statement is saying, “All cats are vicious animals.” The next topic that is brought up in part one of the video is the subject of inference. Inference is the reasoning process of an argument. Inference can be explicit (using premise and/or conclusion indicator words) and implicit (the reader has to catch the inference). Finally the video concludes with the point that there are four non-inferences commonly mistaken for arguments these are: advice, assertion, reports, and explanations. Part two of the formal logic video is the topic of inference. As stated in the early video inference is the reasoning process of an argument. Viewers are now introduced with the topic of deductive and inductive arguments. A deductive argument means that there is no possibility of the conclusion being false when the premises are true. Inductive arguments mean that the premises merely make the conclusion likely (conclusion “goes beyond” the premises). Lastly inductive forms are arguments based on signs, prediction, and generalization just to name a few. Part three of the video talks about validity, strength, soundness, and cogency. Validity is either valid or invalid. Valid deductive arguments means that it is impossible for conclusion to be false given that the premises are true, and an invalid deductive arguments means that it is possible for the conclusion to be false given that the premises are true. The next topic viewers are presented with is strength of an argument. The strength...
Words: 423 - Pages: 2
...this assignment to expound on four real distinct categories of reasoning which consist of deductive, inductive, adductive or inference, and analogical. The first category of reasoning involves deductive reasoning which consist of consist of implication and consequences, and interpretation and inference. Deductive reasoning is one of the two basic forms of valid reasoning; it commences with an assumed hypothesis or theory, which is why it has been called 'hypothetical-deduction; this assumption may be well-accepted or it may be rather precarious - nevertheless, for the argument it is not questioned. The basic idea of deductive reasoning is that if something is true of a class of things in general, this truth applies to all members of that class. One of the keys for sound deductive reasoning, then, is to be able to properly identify members of the class, because incorrect categorizations will result in unsound conclusions. Moreover, inferences are interpretations or conclusions that you come to. Inferring is what the intellect does in attempting to figure something out. Implications are claims or truths that reasonably follow from other claims or truths. On the other hand, implications follow from ideas, and consequences follow from actions. The second category of reasoning is inductive Reasoning, which is composed of constructs and data. What is more, inductive reasoning is the process of cognitive in which the principles of an argument are believed to support the disagreement...
Words: 479 - Pages: 2